Session 3
Session 3
Some of the changes that occur in business firms because of new information technology (IT) investments cannot be
foreseen and have results that may or may not meet your expectations. Who would have imagined fifteen years ago, for
instance, that e-mail and instant messaging would become a dominant form of business communication and that many
managers would be inundated with more than 200 e-mail messages each day?
ORGANIZATIONS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
How do these definitions of organizations relate to information systems technology?
• A technical view of organizations encourages us to focus on how inputs are combined to create outputs when technology changes
are introduced into the company.
• The firm is seen as infinitely malleable, with capital and labor substituting for each other quite easily.
• But the more realistic behavioral definition of an organization suggests that building new information systems, or rebuilding old ones,
involves much more than a technical rearrangement of machines or workers—that some information systems change the
organizational balance of rights, privileges, obligations, responsibilities, and feelings that have been established over a long period of
time.
• Changing these elements can take a long time, be very disruptive, and requires more resources to support training and learning.
• Technological change requires changes in who owns and controls information, who has the right to access and update that
information, and who makes decisions about whom, when, and how. This more complex view forces us to look at the way work is
designed and the procedures used to achieve outputs.
• The technical and behavioral definitions of organizations are not contradictory. Indeed, they complement each other:
The technical definition tells us how thousands of firms in competitive markets combine capital, labor, and information technology,
whereas the behavioral model takes us inside the individual firm to see how that technology affects the organization’s inner
workings.
HOW INFORMATION SYSTEMS IMPACT ORGANIZATIONS AND BUSINESS FIRMS
Information systems have become integral, online, interactive tools deeply involved in the minute-to-minute operations and decision
making of large organizations.
Economic Impacts
• From the point of view of economics, IT changes both the relative costs of capital and the costs of information.
Information systems technology can be viewed as a factor of production that can be substituted for traditional capital and labor. As the
cost of information technology decreases, it is substituted for labor, which historically has been a rising cost. Additionally, as the cost of
information technology decreases, it also substitutes for other forms of capital such as buildings and machinery, which remain relatively
expensive. Hence, over time we should expect managers to increase their investments in IT because of its declining cost relative to other
capital investments.
• IT also affects the cost and quality of information and changes the economics of information. (Transaction-cost theory)
Information technology helps firms contract in size because it can reduce transaction costs—the costs incurred when a firm buys on the
marketplace what it cannot make itself. Information technology, especially the use of networks, can help firms lower the cost of market
participation (transaction costs), making it worthwhile for firms to contract with external suppliers instead of using internal sources. As a
result, firms can shrink in size (numbers of employees) because it is far less expensive to outsource work to a competitive marketplace
rather than hire employees.
• Information technology also can reduce internal management costs. (Agency Theory)
Information technology, by reducing the costs of acquiring and analyzing information, permits organizations to reduce agency costs
because it becomes easier for managers to oversee a greater number of employees.
Transaction Cost Theory
Transaction cost theory states firms and individuals seek to economize on transaction costs, much as they do on production costs.
Using markets is expensive because of costs such as locating and communicating with distant suppliers, monitoring contract
compliance, buying insurance, obtaining information on products, and so forth (Coase, 1937; Williamson, 1985).
Traditionally, firms have tried to reduce transaction costs through vertical integration, by getting bigger, hiring more employees,
and buying their own suppliers and distributors, as both General Motors and Ford used to do.
Source:
Source: https://online.visual-paradigm.com/repository/images/5a9829a9-2ee5-4726-b0e1-e032a700fbc3/five-forces-analysis-des
USING INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO ACHIEVE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
INFORMATION SYSTEM STRATEGIES FOR DEALING WITH COMPETITIVE FORCES (PORTER’s Generic Strategies)
What is a firm to do when it is faced with all these competitive forces? And how can the firm use information systems to counteract
some of these forces? How do you prevent substitutes and inhibit new market entrants?
Low-Cost Leadership: Use information systems to achieve the lowest operational costs and the lowest prices.
Example: Walmart → use of inventory replenishment system. Walmart pays only 16.6 percent of sales revenue for overhead.
(Operating costs average 20.7 percent of sales in the retail industry).
Product Differentiation: Use information systems to enable new products and services, or greatly change the customer
convenience in using your existing products and services. For instance, Google services, Apple iPod. The ability to offer individually
tailored products or services using the same production resources as mass production is called mass customization. E.g., Nike
Focus on Market Niche: Use information systems to enable a specific market focus, and serve this narrow target market better
than competitors. Information systems support this strategy by producing and analyzing data for finely tuned sales and marketing
techniques. For example, Hilton Hotels’ OnQ system
Strengthen Customer and Supplier Intimacy: Use information systems to tighten linkages with suppliers and develop intimacy with
customers. E.g., Supplier Side Intimacy → Chrysler Corporation. Customer Side Intimacy→ Amazon.com
Strong linkages to customers and suppliers increase switching costs (the cost of switching from one product to a competing
product), and loyalty to your firm.
USING INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO ACHIEVE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
THE BUSINESS VALUE CHAIN MODEL
The value chain model highlights specific activities in the business where competitive strategies can best be applied (Porter, 1985)
and where information systems are most likely to have a strategic impact. This model identifies specific, critical leverage points where
a firm can use information technology most effectively to enhance its competitive position. The value chain model views the firm as a
series or chain of basic activities that add a margin of value to a firm’s products or services. These activities can be categorized as:
1. Primary activities are most directly related to the production and distribution of the firm’s products and services, which create
value for the customer.
2. Support activities make the delivery of the primary activities possible and consist of organization infrastructure (administration
and management), human resources (employee recruiting, hiring, and training), technology (improving products and the
production process), and procurement (purchasing input).
USING INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO ACHIEVE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
THE BUSINESS VALUE CHAIN MODEL
Using the business value chain model will also
cause you to consider benchmarking your
business processes against your competitors
or others in related industries, and identifying
industry best practices.
• A value web is a collection of independent firms that use information technology to coordinate their value chains to produce a product or
service for a market collectively. It is more customer driven and operates in a less linear fashion than the traditional value chain.
• Internet technology has made it possible to create highly synchronized industry value chains called value webs.
• Looking at the industry value chain encourages you to think about how to use information systems to link up more efficiently with your
suppliers, strategic partners, and customers. Strategic advantage derives from your ability to relate your value chain to the value chains
of other partners in the process.
• By working with other firms, industry participants can use information technology to develop industry-wide standards for exchanging
information or business transactions electronically, which force all market participants to subscribe to similar standards. Such efforts
increase efficiency, making product substitution less likely and perhaps raising entry costs—thus discouraging new entrants. Also, industry
members can build industry-wide, IT-supported consortia, symposia, and communications networks to coordinate activities concerning
government agencies, foreign competition, and competing industries. E.g., Amazon.com
• Value web synchronizes the business processes of customers, suppliers, and trading partners among different companies in an industry or
in related industries. These value webs are flexible and adaptive to changes in supply and demand. Relationships can be bundled or
unbundled in response to changing market conditions.
• Firms will accelerate time to market and to customers by optimizing their value web relationships to make quick decisions on who can
deliver the required products or services at the right price and location.
USING INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO ACHIEVE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
SYNERGIES, CORE COMPETENCIES, AND NETWORKBASED STRATEGIES
• A large corporation is typically a collection of businesses. Often, the firm is organized financially as a collection of strategic
business units and the returns to the firm are directly tied to the performance of all the strategic business units. Information
systems can improve the overall performance of these business units by promoting synergies and core competencies.
• Synergies: The idea of synergies is that when the output of some units can be used as inputs to other units, or two organizations
pool markets and expertise, these relationships lower costs and generate profits. One use of information technology in these
synergy situations is to tie together the operations of disparate business units so that they can act as a whole. For example,
acquiring Countrywide Financial enabled Bank of America to extend its mortgage lending business and to tap into a large pool of
new customers who might be interested in its credit card, consumer banking, and other financial products.
• Enhancing Core Competencies: A core competency is an activity for which a firm is a world-class leader. Any information system
that encourages the sharing of knowledge across business units enhances competency. Such systems might encourage or
enhance existing competencies and help employees become aware of new external knowledge; such systems might also help a
business leverage existing competencies to related markets. For example, Procter & Gamble, a world leader in brand management
and consumer product innovation, uses a series of systems to enhance its core competencies. An intranet called InnovationNet
SYNERGIES, CORE COMPETENCIES, AND NETWORKBASED STRATEGIES
• Network-Based Strategies: The availability of Internet and networking technology have inspired strategies that take advantage of firms’
abilities to create networks or network with each other. Network-based strategies include:
➢ Network Economics: Business models based on a network may help firms strategically by taking advantage of network economics. From
this network economics perspective, information technology can be strategically useful. Internet sites can be used by firms to build
communities of users—like-minded customers who want to share their experiences. This builds customer loyalty and enjoyment, and
builds unique ties to customers. EBay, the giant online auction site, and iVillage, an online community for women, are examples.
➢ Virtual Company Model: Another network-based strategy uses the model of a virtual company to create a competitive business. A virtual
company, also known as a virtual organization, uses networks to link people, assets, and ideas, enabling it to ally with other companies to
create and distribute products and services without being limited by traditional organizational boundaries or physical locations. One
company can use the capabilities of another company without being physically tied to that company. The virtual company model is useful
when a company finds it cheaper to acquire products, services, or capabilities from an external vendor or when it needs to move quickly to
exploit new market opportunities and lacks the time and resources to respond on its own. Fashion companies, such as GUESS, Ann Taylor,
Levi Strauss, and Reebok, enlist Hong Kong-based Li & Fung to manage production and shipment of their garments.
➢ Business Ecosystems: The concept of a business ecosystem builds on the idea of the value web described earlier, the main difference
being that cooperation takes place across many industries rather than many firms. E.g., Is the mobile Internet platform. In this ecosystem
there are four industries: device makers (Apple iPhone, RIM BlackBerry, Motorola, LG, and others), wireless telecommunication firms
(AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint, and others), independent software applications providers (generally small firms selling games,
applications, and ring tones), and Internet service providers (who participate as providers of Internet service to the mobile platform).
Source: https://image.slidesharecdn.com/ccd1-130901032949-phpapp02/95/cafe-coffee-day-14-638.jpg?cb=1378006272
Source:
https://image.slidesharecdn.com/ccd-ppt1-151015091331-lva1-app6891/95/cafe-coffee-day-22-638.jpg?cb=1444900770
https://slideplayer.com/slide/9324090/28/images/7/Porter%E2%80%99s+5+Forces+Analysis.jpg
Source: https://image.slidesharecdn.com/ccd1-130901032949-phpapp02/95/cafe-coffee-day-12-638.jpg?cb=1378006272
Source: https://image.slidesharecdn.com/ccd1-130901032949-phpapp02/95/cafe-coffee-day-13-638.jpg?cb=1378006272
Paper Discussion: New approach in mobile telecom operators analysis “Analysis of Eight Key Fields”
Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308611478_New_approach_in_mobile_telecom_operators_analysis_-_Analysis_of_Eig
SWOT analysis should give following answers:
• Company positions against competitors,
• The best future opportunities,
• Current and future threats.
The main SWOT disadvantage is huge subjectivity.
Ansoff matrix is the solution for strategic analysis which was
devolped by Russian economist Igor Ansoff.
The resulting matrix offers structured way to assess
potential strategies for growth.
The main sequences of this strategy are:
• Market penetration – focus on selling existing products
and services on existing market,
• Market development – focus on developing new markets
or market segments for existing products and services,
• Product development – focus on developing new
products or services for existing markets .
• Diversification – focus on the development of new
products and services to sell into new market.
PESTEL analysis is one of the most popular analysis for considering six important external factors those could have an impact
for any company or organizations:
• Political: stability of government, potential changes to legislation, global influences, etc.
• Economic: economic growth, employment rates, inflation rates, monetary policy, consumer confidence, etc.
• Social: income distribution, demographic influences, lifestyle factors, etc.
• Technological: international influences, changes in ICT technology, take up rates, etc.
• Legal: taxation policies, employment laws, industry regulations, health and safety, etc.
• Environmental: regulation and restrictions, attitudes of customers, etc.
The main disadvantage of this analysis is quite big analysis subjectivity.