1640118840
1640118840
1640118840
Abstract
Keywords
Bernoulli differential equation , Ricatti equation ,
Alsultani differential equation 2 , Alsultani differential
equation [3] .
1. Introduction
First I will explain the old way to solve Ricatti
equation
1
y ' = A(x ) y 2+ B ( x ) y +C ( x)
du ∫ P ( x ) dx
dx e +( p(x)e∫ P ( x ) dx
u=Q(x)e ∫ P ( x ) dx
D(u e∫ ( ) )=Q(x)e∫
P x dx P ( x ) dx
P x dx
∫ Q( x) e∫ ( ) dx
.u= ∫ ( ) P x dx
e
1
As it is seen that because we choose the variable ( u )
so we must do this substitution and the procedure of
the derivation through the solution of any problem of
ricatti equation which leads to more time and may be
more mistakes and more paper ,
I find by my new way that C ( x ) which is a function
of ( x ) only is a part of the direvative of the
2
can concider that : Riccatti equationis
a first order linear D.E.
consists of three terms [3].
Then to solve it by using Alsultani D.E. which denotes:
dy P ( x )
+ y=Q ( x ) y k where k=1−n
dx n
¿ Ay2 we find that k=2 = 1-n then n= -1
i. e .( y ¿¿−1)is the primary solution∈addition ¿
y ₁=f ( x)as a particular solution
1 dy
y ₂' = y ₁' − =A¿
y 2 dx
−1 dy 1 B
. y ₁' =A ¿+ 2 ¿+ By ₁+ +C(x )
y dx y
2
y
but y ₁' = Ay ₁2+ By ₁+C( x)
−1 dy A 2 Ay ₁+B
.i.e. = +
y dx y2
y 2
dy
=−( 2 Ay ₁+ B ) y− A (anyone can solve ricatti equation
dx
problem directly at once he knows A , B and the
particular solution to save the time , papers and less
mistakes )
dy
+ ( 2 Ay ₁+ B ) y =− AI called this equation as :
dx
Alsultani D . E .2 so P(x)¿ ( 2 Ay ₁+ B )
3
First find a particular solution y ₁then it is easy to transform it to
a first order linear ODE
Notes :
1. if we use the solution (y₁+u ¿ then Bernoulli D . E . will apear and
we
must use another substitution with it’s complications
2. it is clear that we need the particular solution ( y₁)
three times the first in the question , second in the
differential equation and in ( y₂ ) and this proofs that
any problem hasn’t ( y₁ ) is not Ricatti equation but
similar to it and we can solve it by another procedure
like the separation for example .
Main results
I will solve some problems to proof the exactness of
the new way .
Example 1
Solve y =¿ '
Solution
y ' =( y−x)2 = y 2−2 xy+ x 2
−1 2 x
e +c
So 2 −e2 x +2 c −1+ N
y= = = where
e3 x 2 e2 x 2
N=2c
1 2
=
y −1+ N e−2 x
2
Then y₂= x+1+ −1+ N e −2 x solution
Example 2
2 ' 2
Solve y + y = x 2
solution
2
y ' =− y 2 +
x2
2
A=-1 B=0 C= x2
c −c
Let the particular solution is so y ' = 2
x x
−c
Then x +¿ so c −c−2=0
2
2
5
dy 4
− y=1
dx x
∫ −4xdx 1
Then Iₓ =e =e−4 lnx =
x4
y dx y −1
So 4 ∫ 4
= +c then 4 = 3 +c
x x x 3x
−x 4 x (3 c x 3−1)
.y= 3 +c x = 3
1 3
=
y x (3 c x3 −1)
1 2 3 6 cx+ 1
y ₂= y ₁+ = + = let 3 c =N
y x x (3 c x −1)3 3
x(3 c x −1)
2 Nx +1
.y= x ( N x 3−1 )
2
1 x ( N x −1)
=
y 2 Nx +1
2
−2 x ( N x −1)
y₂= x 2 Nx+1
+ solution
Example 3
1' 2
Solve y +6 y = x 2
Solution
here since B=0 so it not Riccati equation and there is
no particular solution
1
y ' =−6 y 2 +
so k=2=1−n thenn=−1
x2
−1 ' −1 dy −2 1
.y₂= y ∧ y ₂ = y2 dx =−6 y + x2 eq .(1)
now multiply eq, (1) by ( y )2
−dy y 2 y
dx
=−6+ () x
∧let =v
x
dy −vdx−xdv xdv xdv
so− = =−v − =−6 +v 2 then− =v 2+ v−6
dx dx dx dx
xdv
= ( v +3 ) ( v−2 )∧¿
dx
dx dv
- x = ( v+ 3 ) ( v−2 )
1 a b
let = +
( v+ 3 ) ( v−2 ) v +3 v−2
6
−1
then a=−b=
5
−dx −dv dv
∫ x
=∫
5(v +3)
+∫
5(v−2)
1 1
ln|v +3|− ln |v −2|=ln| x|+lnc (c >0)
5 5
v+3
ln | |
v −2
5
=ln(c 5|x| )
v +3
=± c 5 x5
v−2
N = ±c 5
v +3 1 1
=N x 5 then let =vx so v =
v−2 y xy
1
+3
xy 1+3 xy 1 ' −1
= =N x 5 when N=0 then y= 3 x so y = 3 x2
1 1−2 xy
−2
xy
−1 −1 2 1
3 x2
+ 6 ( )
3x
= 2
X
1 1 1 1 2 1
2
+ 6 . 2 = 2 so 2 +¿ 2
= 2
3x 9x x 3x 3x x
1 1
=
x2 x 2
Please compare the above solution with the old way
and see the differences
Example 4
Solve y =x ¿ ' 3
Solution
1. by the new way
' 3 2 y 2 3 y
y =x ( y −2 xy + x ) + = x y 2 −2 x 4 y + x 5+
x x
7
3 1 4
A= x ; B= x −2 x ; C=x 5 ; y ₁=x
dy
+ ( 2 Ay+ B ) y=− A
dx
dy 1
dx [ ]
+ 2 x 3 ( x ) + −2 x 4 y = - x 3
x
dy 1
+ y
dx x = -
x3
∫ dx
Iₓ=e x
=elnx =x
5
3 −x
xy=∫ − ( x ) x dx= +c
5
5 c−x 5
∧1
.y= 5 x =
5x
then
y 5 c−x 5
1 5x Nx−x 6 +5 x 5 x ( c +1 )−x 6
y ₂= y ₁+ =x + = =
y N −x 5 N −x5 N−x 5
Where N=5c
Example 5
Solve
1
x 2 y ' =x 2 y 2+ xy −3 eq ,(1)
and y₁ = x
divide eq.(1) by ( x ¿ we get 2
y 3
y'= y2 + − 2
x x
1 −3
A=1 , B= x
∧C= 2
x
dy
+ ( 2 Ay ₁+ B ) y =− A
dx
dy 2 1 3
( )
+ + y=−1 ,
dx x x p(x) = x
∫ 3 dx
I(x) = e=e 3 lnx=x 3
x
3 3 −x 4
,y ∫
x = −x dx+ c=
4
+c
4 c−x 4
∧1
.y= −x34 + c x−3= −x + c3 = 4 x 3 =
4 x3
4x 4 x y 4 c−x 4
8
1 4 x3 4 c−x 4 + 4 x 4 3 x 4 + N
.y₂= +
x 4 c −x 4
= 4
x ( 4 c−x )
=
Nx−x
5
where N=4 c END
Example 6
Solve x ( 1−x ) y =x + y−2 x y
3 ' 2 2
Solution
Divide by x ( 1−x ) 3
x2 y 2 x y2
y'= + - 3
x ( 1−x3 ) x ( 1−x 3 ) x(1−x )
x y 2 y2
= 1−x 3 x−x 4 1−x 3
+ −
−2 1 x
A= 1−x 3 , B= x−x 4 and C= 1−x 3
dy
+ ( 2 Ay ₁+ B ) y =− A
dx
dy −2
+¿ )y= -
dx 1−x 3
dy 1−4 x 3 2
+ y=¿
dx x−x 4
1−x 3
Let u=x – x thendu=1−4 x
4 3
du
Ix= e∫ =e =u= x – x
u lnu 4
3
dy ( 4 1−4 x x−x 4
( x−x ¿¿ 4 ) + x−x ) y= ¿=x
dx x−x 4 1−x 3
2
9
Conclusions
References
[1] Ricatti Jacopo (1724) ‘Animadversiones in
aequationes differentials secunde
Gradus ‘ (Observations regarding differential
equations of the second order),
Actorum Eruditorum,quae Lipsiae publicantur,
Supplementa, 8 : 66-73. Translation
Of the original Latin into English by Ian Bruce .
[2] Ince. E. L. (1956) [1926], Ordinary Differential
Equations, New York: Dover
Publications, pp. 23-25
[3] https://ijisrt.com/new-way-to-solve-the-first-
order-linear-de-which-consist-of-three-terms
10