Creating A Talent Management Philosophy: To Care?
Creating A Talent Management Philosophy: To Care?
At present, organizations strive to sustain their presence in the global marketplace, due to related
challenges such as globalization, stiff competition, and technological improvements. Organizations have
shifted their patterns from only focusing on increasing their productivity and differentiating their
products and services to focusing on their inimitable resources; namely, their human capital, as
employees are the most important resource and asset in any organization . Organizations that manage
their human capital more effectively and efficiently are more likely to attain their organizational goals
and objectives, and are more likely to have a sustainable organizational performance.
According to Rop , the growth and success of any organization relies on positioning the right employees
who possess the right skills in the right place at the right time, where talented employees are viewed as
the main resources that lead to sustainable competitive advantages and prominent performance.
Organizations face challenges regarding talent limitations more than capital limitations . In reference to
the literature, talented employees form only 3–5% of all employees in an organization . Talent is a key
success factor for increasing and sustaining organizational performance, where talent consists of an
individual’s capabilities, experience, knowledge, intelligence, and qualifications, as well as their ability to
learn and grow.
Talent Management
• Performance Management • Learning and Development • Skill Building and Career Development
Opportunities • Succession Management • Talent Mobility • Compensation Planning • Salary
Benchmarking • Job Descriptions • Job Mapping • Talent Acquisition • Ongoing Coaching and Feedback
• Assessments and Measurement Tools
Talent management suites include capabilities for learning management, performance management,
succession planning, compensation management and recruiting management. (Gartner)
2 Behaviors: How much do behaviors matter and at what threshold do we start to care?
3 Differentiation: How should we allocate our company’s resources and rewards across varying levels of
performance and potential? Transparency: How open should we be, and with whom, about our talent
processes and their outcomes?
4 Accountability: To what extent should managers be responsible for the execution of talent building
processes?
Present the data to the team and facilitate them to agreement on each talent philosophy area. It’s not
critical to have perfect alignment, as long as each executive agrees to manage his or her group
consistent with the team’s decisions. Conduct a reality check. It’s easy to give socially desirable
responses when asked talent philosophy questions, so it’s important to confront executives with the
philosophy’s real-world implications. Build HR processes and communicate to employees. Once you’ve
agreed on the rules, modify your HR processes to enable them. Talent review, succession, development
and compensation processes all likely require adjustments to consistently support your new philosophy.
Suggestions for Effective Talent Management in the organization
Following are some Suggestions to improve talent management and HR function of the organization.
Measure the business impact on workforce effectiveness before and after implementation.
Figure 2 Mapping the talent management territory (Blass, 2009, p. 22) Lewis & Heckman (2006) look
back to the early proponents of talent management and state that they believe that the best analogy for
talent management is that of an architecture. This architecture offers a systems-level, strategic
perspective, and could open up to new research possibilities according to them. However, they note
that other authors have failed in describing how talent management could be made into architecture
A research project based on a series of case studies made by the Chartered Management Institute in
conjunction with Ashridge Consulting, generated six different strategic perspectives on talent
management, which all influence how companies choose to approach talent management (Blass, 2009).
These perspectives are the process perspective, the cultural perspective, the competitive perspective,
the developmental perspective, the HR planning perspective and the change management perspective
described below in Table 1 (Strategic perspectives on TM) (Blass, 2009, p. 3ff).
According to Hay (2002) that employees are most likely to leave an organization when they feel that
their skills/talent is not properly developed by the employer, when their manager does not take an
interest in their career development, when they are dissatisfied with their boss, and when they perceive
that the company management does not have a clear direction for the organization.
Wikström (Talent management IFL Executive Seminar, 2013) presents ten reasons for why people
choose to leave an organization even though they may have been considered as talents:
• Lack of serious development discussions and lack of plans for the talents
• Poor managers