4
4
4
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently guidance of public health and regulatory authorities. The risk
issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for 2 highly stratification schema guide care for (1) individuals with different
effective coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines from allergy histories to safely receive their first mRNA COVID-19
Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna. This has brought hope to vaccine and (2) individuals who develop a reaction to their first
millions of Americans in the midst of an ongoing global dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Ó 2020 American Academy
pandemic. The FDA EUA guidance for both vaccines is to not of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (J Allergy Clin Immunol
administer the vaccine to individuals with a known history of a Pract 2021;9:1423-37)
severe allergic reaction (eg, anaphylaxis) to any component of the
COVID-19 vaccine. The Centers for Disease Control and Key words: mRNA; COVID-19; Vaccine; Allergy; Allergic re-
Prevention (CDC) additionally advises individuals with a history actions; Anaphylaxis; Guidelines; Risk stratification; Poly-
of an immediate allergic reaction to a vaccine or injectable or any ethylene glycol; Polysorbate
history of anaphylaxis be observed for 30 minutes after COVID-
19 vaccination. All other individuals should be observed for 15
minutes after COVID-19 vaccination. Staff at vaccine clinics INTRODUCTION
must be able to identify and manage anaphylaxis. PosteFDA Vaccination, one of the most effective public health in-
EUA, despite very strong safety signals in both phase 3 trials, terventions modern medicine can offer, has become increasingly
reports of possible allergic reactions have raised public concern. relevant as the global pandemic from coronavirus disease 2019
To provide reassurance and support during widespread global (COVID-19) continues to worsen throughout the world. In the
vaccination, allergists must offer clear guidance to individuals United States, the pandemic has risen to crisis levels in every
based on the best information available, but also in accordance state, setting records with tens of thousands of new cases reported
with the broader recommendations of regulatory agencies. This daily and deaths mounting. As of January 9, 2021, more than 89
review summarizes vaccine allergy epidemiology and proposes million people globally have had confirmed infections and almost
drug and vaccine allergy expert opinion informed risk 2 million have died of COVID-19.1 Medical necessities are often
stratification for Allergy specialist use in conjunction with in short supply, hospitals are overwhelmed, and health care
a
Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Vertex, Regeneron, and Biocryst; is codirector of IIID Pty Ltd, which holds a
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass patent for HLA-B*57:01 testing for abacavir hypersensitivity, and has a patent
b
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass pending for Detection of Human Leukocyte Antigen-A*32:01 in connection with
c
Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Diagnosing Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms without
Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass any financial remuneration and not directly related to the submitted work. Funders
d
Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn played no role in any aspect of this review. The rest of the authors declare that they
e
Allergy Division, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash have no relevant conflicts of interest.
f
Division of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Received for publication December 28, 2020; accepted for publication December 28,
Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 2020.
g
Edward P. Lawrence Center for Quality and Safety, Massachusetts General Hos- Available online December 31, 2020.
pital, Boston, Mass Corresponding author: Aleena Banerji, MD, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and
* Co-senior authors. Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Cox 201,
No funding was received for this work. 100 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114. E-mail: [email protected].
Conflicts of interest: E. Phillips reports grants from the National Institutes of Health 2213-2198
(grant nos. P50GM115305, R01HG010863, R01AI152183, R21AI139021, and Ó 2020 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
U01AI154659) and from the National Health and Medical Research Council of https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2020.12.047
Australia; receives Royalties from Uptodate and consulting fees from Janssen,
1423
1424 BANERJI ET AL J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL PRACT
APRIL 2021
FIGURE 1. Chemical structure and similarities between PEG and polysorbate 80.
BioNTech were identified, upon further review, only 21 were rare, vaccine reactions can cause substantial fear and anxiety in
consistent with anaphylaxis. This highlights the critically the general population and may contribute to decreased will-
important role for allergists in clinical phenotyping of these re- ingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Additionally, not all
actions with subsequent risk stratification rather than vaccine immediate reactions that occur in association with vaccines are
avoidance. The majority of CDC-confirmed anaphylactic re- true allergic reactions (eg, flushing, transient dyspnea) and careful
actions (86%, 18/21) occurred within a 30-minute observation clinical phenotyping is necessary to prevent large-scale COVID-
window, and patients were treated immediately with complete 19 vaccine avoidance. This is apparent in the recent CDC report
resolution of symptoms. While there are more epidemiologic demonstrating that of 175 possible severe allergic reactions, 86
data currently available for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, the (49%) were nonanaphylactic allergic reactions.2
authors have personal knowledge through clinical care of at least Confirmed allergic reactions to vaccines are not frequently
3 possible anaphylactic reactions to the Moderna COVID-19 attributed to the active ingredients, but rather to the inactive in-
vaccine. To date, there are no fatalities associated with reported gredients, or excipients, including egg protein, gelatin, formalde-
allergic reactions to any COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. hyde, thimerosal, or neomycin. Excipients are necessary and added
to a vaccine for specific purposes such as stimulating a stronger
immune response, preventing contamination by bacteria, or sta-
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND ETIOLOGY OF ALLERGIC bilizing the potency of the vaccine during transportation and
REACTIONS TO VACCINES storage. Excipients represent the major contributor to specific IgE-
Allergic reactions to vaccines are generally described as mediated and immediate reactions associated with vaccines.8 Ef-
occurring at a rate of 1.31 (95% CI, 0.90-1.84) cases per million forts to specifically decrease well-known excipients such as egg and
vaccine doses from a large population-based study, with no fa- gelatin in vaccines have been highly successful in reducing subse-
talities reported.7 Rates remain similar when stratified by age and quent allergic reactions.9,10 Other excipients, such as polyethylene
sex, although slightly higher frequencies have been observed in glycol (PEG) and polysorbate (Figure 1), are used to improve water
females.7 The incidence of allergic reaction by specific vaccine, solubility in drugs and vaccines. PEG itself has not previously been
however, is difficult to quantify in epidemiologic studies, because used in a vaccine, but polysorbate has been identified as a rare cause
often multiple vaccines are administered on the same day. The of allergic reactions to vaccines. First-dose reactions to vaccines
cases that followed the administration of a single vaccine involved containing polysorbates may have occurred because of previous
predominantly trivalent influenza vaccine, for which the rate of sensitization from polysorbate 80.11 The recently approved Pfizer-
reaction was estimated to be 1.35 (95% CI, 0.65-2.47) per BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are not
million vaccine doses.7 Of concern is that, although numerically formulated with any food, drugs, or latex, but both contain the
1426 BANERJI ET AL J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL PRACT
APRIL 2021
excipient PEG (Tables I and II) for the purpose of stabilizing the AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccines
lipid nanoparticle containing the mRNA. The specific PEG in currently under development do not contain PEG but instead
these vaccines is different from the PEG used most commonly in contain the excipient polysorbate 80 (Table II).
other health care products, both in molecular weight and due to its Numerous FDA-approved and over-the-counter products
coformulation as a stabilizing portion of a liposome.11,13 The contain PEG, including medications, skin creams, and personal
J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL PRACT BANERJI ET AL 1427
VOLUME 9, NUMBER 4
(continued)
J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL PRACT BANERJI ET AL 1429
VOLUME 9, NUMBER 4
lubricants, as well as foods using PEG as an antifoaming agent anaphylaxis to oral PEG has been postulated to be due to an
(Table III). In addition, PEG3350 is the active ingredient in impaired epithelial barrier, as PEG is normally used as an osmotic
several medications prescribed for treating constipation (eg, Mir- laxative due to its lack of absorption, anaphylaxis with serum IgE
alax) and in bowel preps used before colonoscopy (eg, GoLytely). detected to PEG has occurred in individuals without any apparent
Although considered to be safe and biologically inert, several re- defect.21
ports have shown that up to 70% of patients who have undergone Polysorbate, structurally similar to PEG with polyether do-
treatment with PEGylated therapeutics will develop anti-PEG IgG mains with observed clinical cross-reactivity (Figure 1), is also an
antibodies.15 A more recent study in the general population excipient in a multitude of medical preparations (eg, vitamin oils,
showed that 5% to 9% of 1721 serum samples tested were positive vaccines, and anticancer agents), creams, ointments, lotions, and
for anti-PEG IgG, 3% to 6% of 948 such samples tested were medication tablets (Table IV).22 For example, at least 70% of
positive for anti-PEG IgM, and 2 of 2091 (0.1%) samples tested injectable biological agents and mAb treatments contain a
were positive for anti-PEG IgE.16 Also, reactions to PEG- polysorbate, most typically polysorbate 80.23 Unfortunately,
containing products on the first exposure suggest previous sensi- polysorbate and its degradation products are known to be
tization to PEG. However, a review of FDA voluntary reporting intrinsically anaphylactogenic, leading to a plausible explanation
data from 2005 through 2017 identified an average of just 4 cases for multiple reports of anaphylaxis in patients receiving
(range, 2-8 cases) per year of PEG-associated anaphylaxis during polysorbate-containing biologics, vaccines, steroids, and chemo-
colonoscopy preparation or laxative use.11 Interestingly, more therapeutics, although there is limited in vivo and in vitro evi-
subtle PEG allergies are usually discovered during allergist evalu- dence to support this, and isolated sensitization through
ation of patients being evaluated for reactions to seemingly un- polysorbates appears rare and less common than through higher
related products, including injectable steroids, processed foods, molecular weight PEG.24-29 Attempts have been made to address
cosmetics, drugs, and other substances that contain PEG.17 Spe- these issues by using safer alternatives to polysorbate, but the
cific IgE directed against PEG, currently a research tool, has negative allergic outcomes are often outweighed by the clinical
recently been demonstrated in PEG-allergic patients who reacted benefit of improved drug performance. In the context of evolving
both to PEGs and, in 1 case, to a PEGylated liposomal product literature demonstrating PEG as an allergen, many allergists have
used as an echocardiogram contrast, by 2 independent hypothesized that any cases of anaphylaxis during the rollout of
methods.11,13,16 In the earliest of these 3 reports, the binding of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna severe acute respiratory
PEG-specific IgG from patients with PEG anaphylaxis showed syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines, which use
increased avidity as the molecular weight of the PEG assayed different liposomal delivery vehicles but contain PEG2000,
increased from 1000 and above, with clinical tolerance of PEG300 could potentially be due to preexisting PEG allergy.30
upon challenge, suggesting that not all PEGs are equally risky to The positive and negative predictive values of skin testing to
cause reactions.11 Although an exact threshold of reactivity based PEG in the evaluation of potential allergy to the mRNA
on the molecular weight of PEG is not known, tolerance of PEG COVID-19 vaccines are not clear but has shown utility in the
with molecular weight less than 400 has been described in those evaluation of individuals with a history of anaphylaxis to
who have documented anaphylaxis to PEG3350.11 It has been PEG.11,18 Allergists have significant experience with skin testing,
reported that those who lose reactivity to lower molecular weight however drug skin testing relies on the use of nonirritating skin
PEG over time may still remain sensitized to very high molecular testing concentrations which are helpful when positive, but do
weight PEG.18 Additionally, there appears to be an increased not rule out allergy when negative. With the currently available
incidence of allergic reactions in patients who receive intravenous mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, PEG is the only component that
PEG compared to the intramuscular route.19,20 Although can be tested using skin prick and intradermal testing techniques.
1430 BANERJI ET AL J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL PRACT
APRIL 2021
FIGURE 2. Risk stratification pathways with categories based on Mass General Brigham and Vanderbilt allergy expert consensus before
initial COVID-19 vaccination. *If “yes” for questions 1 or 2, specific investigation as to the specific injectable products and vaccines
should be pursued to determine whether these products could have contained high-molecular-weight PEG, polysorbate, or polyoxyl 35
castor oil (paclitaxel). See Tables II, III, and IV. {Current CDC guidance suggests 30 minutes of observation for patients with any history of
anaphylaxis. xSee Figures 3 and 4 for expanded skin testing procedures and non-irritating skin test concentrations. If skin testing to PEG is
positive, as of December 28, 2020, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are the only FDA approved vaccines and under EUA can not be given to
an individual with a history of anaphylaxis to a component of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Skin testing to polysorbate 20 and 80
become more important for patients with confirmed severe PEG allergy with regards to the safety of future vaccinations.
Thus, PEG skin testing could be considered in the evaluation of C3, C4, C5, and factor B).32 Depletion of complement levels
individuals with a history of IgE mediated allergy to a PEG and production of C3a and C5a have been seen in both mouse
containing injectable or a possible IgE mediated reaction to models of anaphylaxis and in clinical studies. C5a is the most
either of the currently available mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. We potent of the anaphylatoxins and can contribute to vascular
should remember, to date, that there is no confirmation IgE permeability as well as activation and chemotaxis of neutrophils,
mediated reactions to PEG are responsible for reported reactions basophils, and mast cells. Infection and tissue injury can lead to
to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Polysorbate, which is cross- activation of the complement system resulting in the generation
reactive with PEG, is the excipient in both the AstraZeneca and of C3a and C5a, and these mediators can lead to anaphylaxis.
Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccines (currently not FDA PEG IgM and IgG can cause complement-activationerelated
approved). Therefore, PEG and polysorbate skin testing may be pseudoallergy,33 a nonspecific immune response to PEGylated,
of value in shared decision making around future COVID-19 nanoparticle-based medicines.34 This pathway may be respon-
vaccination.31 sible for reactions to medications such as liposomal doxoru-
In addition to considering excipients as the cause of IgE- bicin35 and other drugs in clinical trials.34 Clearly, it is important
mediated allergic reactions to the currently approved COVID- to consider both IgE and alternative mechanisms for the current
19 vaccines, alternative non-IgE pathways for activating mast reactions. Measurement of serum tryptase and complement may
cells and other inflammatory cells must be considered, because help elucidate the mechanism of the drug-induced reactions in
they can lead to a similar clinical presentation. For example, patients following COVID-19 vaccination.
activation of the complement system leads to the generation of It is also important to note that other nonimmunologic re-
C3a, C4a, and C5a, which are potent activators of inflammation actions may masquerade as allergic reactions including anaphy-
and are called anaphylatoxins due to their ability to cause laxis. Vasovagal reactions are a well-known cause of hypotension
noneIgE-mediated mast cell degranulation. One of the first and syncopal reactions associated with injections including vac-
reports of acute anaphylaxis associated with serum complement cines. Panic or anxiety reactions can also present with symptoms
depletion was of a 45-year-old woman experiencing anaphylaxis masquerading as allergic reactions such as flushing, shortness of
after receiving lidocaine. She developed faintness, flushing, breath, tachycardia, and lightheadedness. Inducible laryngeal
pallor, dyspnea, and hypotension, but she did not have urticaria obstruction (ie, vocal cord dysfunction) may also masquerade as
or bronchospasm. Complement levels were markedly low (C1q, anaphylaxis, with prominent symptoms of shortness of breath
J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL PRACT BANERJI ET AL 1431
VOLUME 9, NUMBER 4
and throat tightness but may also include flushing. Indeed, the vaccine had a prior allergy history and 33% (7/21) had a prior
most recent CDC report demonstrated that of 175 potential history of anaphylaxis.2 The CDC provides guidance with use of
severe allergic reactions, 61 (35%) were determined to be a recently developed pre-screening tool.36 A similar approach,
nonallergic after case review.2 commonly used in the allergy field, is to risk stratify patients
based on a clinical assessment. The authors from Mass General
EVALUATION OF PATIENTS WITH SEVERE Brigham (formerly Partners HealthCare; comprising 16 health
ALLERGY HISTORIES AND GUIDANCE FOR INITIAL care institutions in the New England area and the largest
ADMINISTRATION OF COVID-19 VACCINE employer in Massachusetts with 80,000 employees) and Van-
Massive vaccination programs were initiated within a few days derbilt University Medical Center developed a plan of care to risk
after the FDA EUA of the COVID-19 vaccines. However, many stratify employees and guide safe COVID-19 vaccination
questions surrounded the safety of giving these vaccines to in- (Figure 2). To ensure vaccination in as many individuals as
dividuals with a previous allergy history and further supported by quickly as possible, our guidance, in line with FDA and CDC
recent data showing that the majority (81%, 17/21) of patients guidance, results in the rapid identification of high risk in-
with confirmed anaphylaxis to the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA dividuals needing Allergist assessment but does not preclude large
1432 BANERJI ET AL J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL PRACT
APRIL 2021
FIGURE 3. Expanded skin testing procedure. *Recommended skin testing to evaluate only known potential IgE mechanism (PEG allergy).
{Skin testing for consideration to evaluate PEG and polysorbate allergy. In patients with positive PEG skin testing, the result of poly-
sorbate 20 and 80 skin testing becomes important with regards to the safety of future SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development. Therefore,
based on clinical history, skin testing to both PEG and polysorbate during 1 clinic visit may be appropriate. xAnaphylaxis with intradermal
skin testing in PEG allergic patients has been described. We recommend staff have anaphylaxis training and anaphylaxis kit available in
close proximity. zTables II, III, and IV contain a list of PEG/polysorbate containing vaccines and injectables that can be shared with pa-
tients. **Recommended only after shared decision making between allergist and patient.
groups of individuals with lower risk allergy histories from paclitaxel). If the answer to question 4 is “yes,” the individual
receiving the COVID-19 vaccine per usual protocol with either would be deemed “higher risk,” prompting evaluation with an
15-minute or 30-minute observation periods. allergist for clinical phenotyping and consideration of
Four screening questions are presented to patients before the expanded skin testing if history is not consistent with
initial vaccination to assess risk: confirmed anaphylaxis using nonirritating skin test concen-
trations (Figures 3 and 4).11 If skin testing result to PEG is
1. Do you have a history of a severe allergic reaction to an positive, under EUA, the individual is not a candidate for the
injectable medication (intravenous, intramuscular, or Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, and the
subcutaneous)? skin test result to polysorbate 20 and 80 become important
2. Do you have a history of a severe allergic reaction to a previous with regard to the safety of future SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in
vaccine? development. If skin testing to PEG is negative, vaccination
3. Do you have a history of a severe allergic reaction to another with the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines
allergen (eg, food, venom, or latex)? could be considered in conjunction with shared decision
4. Do you have a history of an immediate or severe allergic re- making, informed consent, and would require 30 minutes of
action to PEG-, a polysorbate-, or polyoxyl 35 castor oil (eg, observation under Allergist supervision.
paclitaxel)-containing injectable or vaccine?
The screening questions address CDC guidelines and are EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS
accompanied by a “Frequently Asked Questions” document WITH POTENTIAL REACTIONS TO THE COVID-19
explaining medical terminology, including descriptions of VACCINES
PEG and polysorbates (Table V). For patients presenting to the allergist with a possible reac-
If the answer is “no” to all 4 questions, the individual would tion to the first dose of their COVID-19 vaccine, the primary
be deemed “lower risk” and receive the vaccine under usual concern is the ability to safely receive the second dose
protocol with a 15-minute observation period. If the answer to (Figure 5). Although the vaccines have some efficacy related to
question 1, 2, or 3 is “yes,” the individual would be deemed only 1 dose, both the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines
“medium risk” and require a 30-minute observation period. In received EUA approval for efficacy, which was evaluated with 2
addition, if “yes” for 1 and 2, specific investigation as to the doses. As such, a crucial determination will be establishing
specific injectable products and vaccines should be pursued to whether or not an allergic reaction occurred. Recent CDC data
determine whether these products could have contained high- demonstrate that the vast majority, 84% (147/175) of reported
molecular-weight PEG, polysorbate, or polyoxyl 35 (eg, severe “allergic” reactions, were unconfirmed after case review.2
J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL PRACT BANERJI ET AL 1433
VOLUME 9, NUMBER 4
FIGURE 4. Nonirritating skin testing concentrations for PEG3350 and polysorbate. *Methyl-prednisolone sodium succinate does not contain
PEG or polysorbate 80 and can be used as an additional control. {Refresh Optive Advanced Lubricant eye drops and Prevnar are an alternate
source for polysorbate 80 skin testing. xSome brands of methylprednisolone acetate contain polysorbate and PEG3350 while others only have
PEG3350; use methylprednisolone acetate containing PEG3350 only. zNonirritating skin testing concentrations for methyl-prednisolone so-
dium succinate and triamcinolone acetonide include a range of 10 to 40 mg/mL for initial skin prick testing with subsequent 10 dilutions.37
One author (E.P.) has extensive experience using 50 mg/mL as a non-irritating skin testing concentration for methyl-prednisolone sodium
succinate skin prick testing with subsequent 10 dilutions. **Dissolve 17 gram miralax packet in 100mL of sterile water for 1:1 solution (170
mg/mL).
Individuals with symptoms suggestive of a nonallergic reaction anaphylaxis to the first dose. For other vaccines for which there
(eg, transient dyspnea, tachycardia alone, metallic taste, flush- is much more allergy experience, split-dose challenges (eg, 10%-
ing, lip tingling) can proceed with a 15 or 30 minute obser- 25% of the dose followed 30 minutes later by the remaining
vation for the second dose. For patients with a potential allergic 75%-90% of the dose) have been used.38 Although some groups
reaction (eg, urticaria, angioedema) after their first dose that have indicated their intent to implement split dosing of the
does not meet criteria for anaphylaxis, vaccination programs mRNA vaccines, there are no supportive efficacy or safety data.
should prioritize follow-up with an allergist who can review the For both the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, neither
clinical history and consider PEG skin testing if an IgE-medi- the stability of the vaccine diluted nor the safety and immu-
ated reaction is suspected to risk stratify the patient prior to a nogenicity at altered doses or concentration have been studied.
second COVID-19 vaccine dose (Figure 5). Antihistamines do It should be remembered that these are not simple protein
not prevent anaphylaxis and could mask cutaneous symptoms, vaccines but instead are mRNA vaccines and subject to degra-
leading to a delay in treatment. However, pretreatment with dation. The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine indeed is only 0.3 mL and
fexofenadine 180-360 mg or cetirizine 10-20 mg 1-2 hours there are no data, to date, for either mRNA vaccine showing
prior to the second dose of COVID-19 vaccination can be split-dosing efficacy. We do not recommend vaccine skin testing
considered in individuals with mild allergic symptoms (ie, at this time because of limited vaccine supply, lack of infor-
pruritus or urticaria only), especially those that are delayed in mation on sensitivity or specificity, unclear safety of skin
onset. If a patient develops potential anaphylaxis to the first testing. At the time of publication, mRNA vaccines are under
vaccine dose, shared decision making with an allergist including EUA and remain unlicensed for skin testing.
risk stratification and expanded skin testing should occur before All patients with potential allergic reactions should be reported
any consideration of vaccine rechallenge (Figure 5). There are through formal processes, which include the Vaccine Adverse
no data on the safety of the second vaccine after confirmed Event Reporting System (VAERS; https://vaers.hhs.gov);
1434 BANERJI ET AL J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL PRACT
APRIL 2021
FIGURE 5. Risk stratification pathways with categories based on Mass General Brigham and Vanderbilt allergy expert consensus after
allergic reaction to first dose of COVID19 vaccine. *Ideal laboratory assessment includes reaction serum tryptase within 2 hours and
complement activation by ELISA (C3a, C3b, C5a, C5b-9 ideally within 1 hour; send to National Jewish); follow-up baseline serum
tryptase is also useful. {Follow CDC guidance.3 xSee Figures 3 and 4 for expanded skin testing algorithm and nonirritating skin test
concentrations. zShared decision making with allergist considering eligibility for second dose or future challenge with other SARS-CoV-2
vaccines. There are no data on the safety of administering the second vaccine dose after potential anaphylaxis to the first dose and
limited anecdotal evidence from the authors’ clinical experience suggesting that some patients can safely receive the second dose after
more mild allergic type reactions to the first dose. If the decision is made to proceed with vaccination, staff should have anaphylaxis
training and anaphylaxis kit needs to be available in close proximity. **84% (147/175) of potential anaphylaxis cases reported to the
CDC were unconfirmed after their case review.2 {{PEG skin testing can be considered to assist in the evaluation of a potential IgE
mechanism but data confirming this mechanism is responsible for reported reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are lacking.
xxConsider 15 or 30 minute observation based on clinical judgment.
Patients should be encouraged to use V-Safe (https://vsafe.cdc. clinical phenotyping, risk stratification, and reassurance to pa-
gov), a CDC application for second-dose reminders and to tients deemed at lower risk to safely receive the vaccine. For
enter reaction information.39,40 reactions that happen onsite, vaccination clinics are reliant on
staff that do not regularly diagnose and treat anaphylaxis, but
CDC guidance emphasized a minimum of 15 minutes of
SUPPORTING SAFE VACCINATION AND observation after all doses and ready access to appropriate med-
ADDRESSING PUBLIC CONCERN: A ROLE FOR THE ical treatment for allergic reactions. Those staffing the vaccina-
ALLERGIST tion clinic should have education around anaphylaxis treatment
Allergists’ expertise in the diagnosis and treatment of allergic guidelines. Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening hypersensitivity re-
reactions is invaluable for the screening of high-risk individuals, action where rapid, early administration of epinephrine is vital
the training of clinic staff conducting vaccinations, and the for recovery. Along with the CDC educational and training
management of patients who experience potentially allergic re- videos,41 allergists can help reassure patients and educate pro-
actions to a COVID-19 vaccine. To date, Mass General Brigham viders by addressing a few key issues:
and Vanderbilt have instituted screening methods before and
after vaccination which consist of self-reported answers to a 1. Education on the diagnosis of anaphylaxis.42 Allergists should
questionnaire followed by telemedicine visits with an allergy include differentiating vasovagal and anxiety reactions from
clinician for high-risk patients prior to the first vaccine dose or anaphylaxis and defining anaphylaxis with infographics
after potential allergic reactions to the first dose. This allows for (Table VI and Figure 6).
J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL PRACT BANERJI ET AL 1435
VOLUME 9, NUMBER 4
2. Education on the treatment of anaphylaxis. Allergists autoinjectors. A nonsedating antihistamine was added to
should review epinephrine use and anaphylaxis-kit con- the anaphylaxis kits. It is necessary to recognize that some
tents. For example, before the rollout of Mass General medications in anaphylaxis kits contain PEG, and as such
Brigham employee vaccination, allergists provided educa- it is important for clinics to use epinephrine for suspected
tion and replaced epinephrine vials with epinephrine anaphylaxis cases.
FIGURE 6. Graphic to assist in the recognition of anaphylaxis.44 BP, Blood pressure; GI, gastrointestinal.
1436 BANERJI ET AL J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL PRACT
APRIL 2021
3. Providing at-the-elbow support to vaccination programs. Al- decision models to achieve safe and effective outcomes. The
lergists may need to be on-site or on-call during higher risk potential life-saving benefit of vaccination in the setting of a
vaccination. This will ensure that vaccinated individuals with global pandemic makes it essential that we carefully evaluate
possible reactions receive the best diagnostic evaluation and every patient with a possible allergic reaction to prevent denying
treatment plan, while linking them to appropriate follow-up access to the vaccine unnecessarily. Our knowledge is rapidly
care before the second vaccine dose. evolving and future recommendations may change with addi-
4. Providing support to individuals with benign symptoms after tional data. Our intent is to provide updates on a regular basis as
discharge. Up to 80% of individuals in the vaccine clinical more information becomes available.
trials had local symptoms after vaccination. Large local re-
actions with symptoms of pain, itching, burning, or swelling
at the site of injection do not preclude an individual from
getting the vaccine again. Delayed local hypersensitivity re- Acknowledgments
actions, with onset after Day 8, have been observed specif- We thank the Mass General Brigham health system faculty
ically with Moderna's vaccine. Nonsteroidal anti- and staff, including Dean Hashimoto, MD, Tanya Laidlaw,
inflammatory drugs used to treat fever or myalgias may pre- MD, David Hong, MD, Anna Feldweg, MD, Karen Ferreira,
cipitate urticaria that could be misattributed to the vaccine. Kenisha Lewis, Barbara Schmidt, Nahal Beik, Adam Landman,
Allergists can provide assessments and reassurance and MD, Erica S. Shenoy, MD, PhD, and Rajesh Patel, MD, MPH.
encourage completion of vaccination. We thank Upeka Samarakoon, PhD, MPH, Allen Judd, Chris-
tian Mancini, Amelia Cogan, and Aubree McMahon for their
SUMMARY research assistance.
To date, allergic reactions to vaccines have been rare and often
attributed to various vaccine components. Current reports from REFERENCES
the CDC suggest that anaphylactic reactions to the Pfizer-Bio- 1. Adeline S, Jin CH, Hurt A, Wilburn T, Wood D, Talbot R. Coronavirus by the
NTech mRNA vaccine may occur more frequently than seen numbers: coronavirus is surging: how severe is your state’s outbreak? National
with other vaccines. Therefore, to support large-scale COVID-19 Public Radio. December 24, 2020. Available from: https://www.npr.org/
sections/health-shots/2020/09/01/816707182/map-tracking-the-spread-of-the-
vaccine rollout programs, allergists can offer clinical phenotyp-
coronavirus-in-the-u-s. Accessed December 24, 2020.
ing, risk stratification, and clear recommendations based on the 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team.
best available information to date. At this point in time, the Allergic Reactions Including Anaphylaxis After Receipt of the First Dose of
etiology of reactions to the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine — United States, December 14 e 23,
mRNA vaccines is not clear. Avoidance of both mRNA COVID- 2020. MMWR 2021;70:46-51.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim clinical considerations for
19 vaccines in individuals with a history of anaphylaxis to PEG, use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines currently authorized in the United States—
PEG derivatives or polysorbate is recommended by the CDC. Appendix B. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/info-by-
However, understanding the negative and positive predictive product/clinical-considerations.html#Appendix-B. Accessed December 24,
value of skin testing to PEG and polysorbate may play an 2020.
4. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al.
important role in future risk stratification as many vaccines
Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med
contain these excipients. Although these challenges require 2020;383:2603-15.
attention immediately during the current vaccination process, it 5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Moderna COVID-19 vaccine [FDA
is of equal importance that we must also design and conduct briefing document]. Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Food and Drug Administration,
adequately powered studies to investigate the potential mecha- Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee; 2020. Avail-
able from: https://www.fda.gov/media/144434/download. Accessed December
nistic etiology of these reactions. We need to understand the 24, 2020.
safety issues surrounding these vaccines, because the success of 6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine
this mRNA vaccine platform is foundational to the flexibility of (BNT162, PF-07302048) [FDA briefing document]. Silver Spring, MD: U.S.
the COVID-19 response and our response to other viruses with Food and Drug Administration, Vaccines and Related Biological Products
Advisory Committee; 2020. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/
similar vaccines in phase I and II trials. We must also remain
144246/download. Accessed December 24, 2020.
vigilant to the rare potential for PEG sensitization to occur as 7. McNeil MM, Weintraub ES, Duffy J, Sukumaran L, Jacobsen SJ, Klein NP,
individuals are receiving 2 doses of vaccine with PEG2000 in et al. Risk of anaphylaxis after vaccination in children and adults. J Allergy Clin
close succession and the mechanism for PEG sensitization lead- Immunol 2016;137:868-78.
ing to PEG allergy has not been determined. 8. Stone CA Jr, Rukasin CRF, Beachkofsky TM, Phillips EJ. Immune-mediated
adverse reactions to vaccines. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2019;85:2694-706.
Alongside guidance from public health and regulatory 9. Nakayama T, Aizawa C. Change in gelatin content of vaccines associated with
agencies, our goal was to provide a framework and guidance to reduction in reports of allergic reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;106:
practicing Allergists. As the US prepares for massive COVID-19 591-2.
vaccination, allergists must prepare for 2 main population health 10. Andersen DV, Jørgensen IM. MMR vaccination of children with egg allergy is
safe. Dan Med J 2013;60:A4573.
challenges: (1) ensuring that highly allergic individuals feel
11. Stone CA Jr, Liu Y, Relling MV, Krantz MS, Pratt AL, Abreo A, et al. Im-
appropriately informed and supported to receive the COVID-19 mediate hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycols and polysorbates: more
vaccines and (2) ensuring that patients who suffer from a common than we have recognized. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2019;7:
potentially allergic reaction to the first dose of a SARS-CoV-2 1533-1540.e8.
vaccine have a careful evaluation to determine if a true allergic 12. Institute for Vaccine Safety. Excipients in vaccines per 0.5 mL dose. Available
from: https://vaccinesafety.edu/components-excipients.htm. Accessed December
reaction occurred along with the requisite information and 21, 2020.
support needed to decide whether and how to receive the second 13. Krantz MS, Liu Y, Phillips EJ, Stone CA Jr. Anaphylaxis to PEGylated lipo-
dose. Allergists are well versed in applying risk-benefit assess- somal echocardiogram contrast in a patient with IgE-mediated macrogol allergy.
ments in relative data and evidence free zones by using shared J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020;8:1416-1419.e3.
J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL PRACT BANERJI ET AL 1437
VOLUME 9, NUMBER 4
14. U.S. National Library of Medicine. DailyMed Advanced Search. Available from: SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil,
https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/advanced-search.cfm. Accessed December South Africa, and the UK. Lancet 2020;397:99-111.
21, 2020. 32. Tannenbaum H, Ruddy S, Schur PH. Acute anaphylaxis associated with serum
15. Yang Q, Lai SK. Anti-PEG immunity: emergence, characteristics, and unad- complement depletion. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1975;56:226-34.
dressed questions. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2015;7: 33. Szebeni J, Fontana JL, Wassef NM, Mongan PD, Morse DS, Dobbins DE, et al.
655-77. Hemodynamic changes induced by liposomes and liposome-encapsulated he-
16. Zhou ZH, Stone CA Jr, Jakubovic B, Phillips EJ, Sussman G, Park J, et al. Anti- moglobin in pigs: a model for pseudoallergic cardiopulmonary reactions to li-
PEG IgE in anaphylaxis associated with polyethylene glycol. J Allergy Clin posomes: role of complement and inhibition by soluble CR1 and anti-C5a
Immunol Pract 2021;9:1718-20. antibody. Circulation 1999;99:2302-9.
17. Wenande E, Garvey LH. Immediate-type hypersensitivity to polyethylene gly- 34. de Vrieze J. Suspicions grow that nanoparticles in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine
cols: a review. Clin Exp Allergy 2016;46:907-22. trigger rare allergic reactions. Science Magazine. December 21, 2020. Available
18. Sellaturay P, Nasser S, Ewan P. Polyethylene glycol-induced systemic allergic from: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/suspicions-grow-nanoparticles-
reactions (anaphylaxis). J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2021;9:670-5. pfizer-s-covid-19-vaccine-trigger-rare-allergic-reactions. Accessed December 24,
19. Pidaparti M, Bostrom B. Comparison of allergic reactions to pegasparaginase 2020.
given intravenously versus intramuscularly. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012;59: 35. Neun BW, Barenholz Y, Szebeni J, Dobrovolskaia MA. Understanding the role
436-9. of anti-PEG antibodies in the complement activation by doxil in vitro. Mole-
20. Hasan H, Shaikh OM, Rassekh SR, Howard AF, Goddard K. Comparison of cules 2018;23:1700.
hypersensitivity rates to intravenous and intramuscular PEG-asparaginase in 36. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevaccination checklist for
children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A meta-analysis and systematic COVID-19 vaccines. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/
review. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2017;64:81-8. downloads/pre-vaccination-screening-form.pdf. Accessed January 9, 2021.
21. Lee SH, Hwang SH, Park JS, Park HS, Shin YS. Anaphylaxis to polyethylene 37. Broyles AD, Banerji A, Barmettler S, Biggs CM, Blumenthal K,
glycol (ColyteÒ) in a patient with diverticulitis. J Korean Med Sci 2016;31: Brennan PJ, et al. Practical guidance for the evaluation and management of
1662-3. drug hypersensitivity: specific drugs. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020;8:
22. Coors EA, Seybold H, Merk HF, Mahler V. Polysorbate 80 in medical products S16-116.
and nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 38. Kelso JM, Greenhawt MJ, Li JT, Nicklas RA, Bernstein DI, Blessing-Moore J,
2005;95:593-9. et al. Adverse reactions to vaccines practice parameter 2012 update. J Allergy
23. Hawe A, Filipe V, Jiskoot W. Fluorescent molecular rotors as dyes to Clin Immunol 2012;130:25-43.
characterize polysorbate-containing IgG formulations. Pharm Res 2010;27: 39. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Food and Drug Administra-
314-26. tion, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Vaccine Adverse Event
24. Price KS, Hamilton RG. Anaphylactoid reactions in two patients after omali- Reporting System (VAERS). Washington, DC: United States Department of
zumab administration after successful long-term therapy. Allergy Asthma Proc Health and Human Services. Available from: https://vaers.hhs.gov. Accessed
2007;28:313-9. December 24, 2020.
25. Badiu I, Geuna M, Heffler E, Rolla G. Hypersensitivity reaction to human 40. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. V-safe after vaccination health
papillomavirus vaccine due to polysorbate 80. BMJ Case Rep 2012;2012. checker. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/
bcr0220125797. safety/vsafe.html. Accessed January 9, 2021.
26. Steele RH, Limaye S, Cleland B, Chow J, Suranyi MG. Hypersensitivity re- 41. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim considerations: preparing
actions to the polysorbate contained in recombinant erythropoietin and darbe- for the potential management of anaphylaxis after COVID-19 vaccination.
poietin. Nephrology (Carlton) 2005;10:317-20. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/
27. Limaye S, Steele RH, Quin J, Cleland B. An allergic reaction to erythropoietin managing-anaphylaxis.html?CDC_AA_refVal¼https%3A%2F%2Ffanyv88.com%3A443%2Fhttps%2Fwww.cdc.
secondary to polysorbate hypersensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;110: gov%2Fvaccines%2Fcovid-19%2Finfo-by-product%2Fpfizer%2Fanaphylaxis-
530. management.html. Accessed January 9, 2021.
28. Bibera MAT, Lo KMK, Steele A. Potential cross-reactivity of polysorbate 80 42. Shaker MS, Wallace DV, Golden DBK, Oppenheimer J, Bernstein JA,
and cremophor: a case report. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020;26:1279-81. Campbell RL, et al. Anaphylaxis—a 2020 practice parameter update, systematic
29. Palacios Castaño MI, Venturini Díaz M, Lobera Labairu T, González review, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and
Mahave I, Del Pozo Gil MD, Blasco Sarramián A. Anaphylaxis due to Evaluation (GRADE) analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020;145:1082-123.
the excipient polysorbate 80. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2016;26: 43. Winnipeg Regional Health Authority. Anaphylaxis vs vasovagal reactions.
394-6. Available from: https://professionals.wrha.mb.ca/old/professionals/immuni
30. Cabanillas B, Akdis C, Novak N. Allergic reactions to the first COVID-19 zation/files/AnaphyvsVasReactionTable.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2020.
vaccine: a potential role of polyethylene glycol? [published online ahead of print 44. Manivannan V, Decker WW, Stead LG, Li JTC, Campbell RL. Visual repre-
December 15, 2020]. Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14711. sentation of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and Food Al-
31. Voysey M, Clemens SAC, Madhi SA, Weckx LY, Folegatti PM, Aley PK, et al. lergy and Anaphylaxis Network criteria for anaphylaxis. Int J Emerg Med 2009;
Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against 2:3-5.