0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views10 pages

LCE Lab. Quadripolos

The document reports on an experiment involving quadrupoles. It provides theoretical and experimental values for the impedance, admittance, and transfer parameters of the quadrupole network. The theoretical and experimental results are compared.

Uploaded by

ColeBerry BR
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views10 pages

LCE Lab. Quadripolos

The document reports on an experiment involving quadrupoles. It provides theoretical and experimental values for the impedance, admittance, and transfer parameters of the quadrupole network. The theoretical and experimental results are compared.

Uploaded by

ColeBerry BR
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

UNIVERSIDADE DO ESTADO DE SANTA CATARINA - UDESC

CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS TECNOLÓGICAS - CCT


DEPARTAMENTO DE ENGENHARIA ELÉTRICA - DEE
Prof.: CELSO JOSÉ FARIA DE ARAÚJO

Relatório do Experimento: Quadripolos

Aluno: Rafael Germano Haidar


20/08/2021
6.1.1 –
𝑅1′ = 4,7𝐾Ω 𝑅2′ = 5,6𝐾Ω 𝑅3′ = 6,8𝐾Ω

6.1.2 –
𝑉1′ (𝑉 ) 𝐼1′ (𝐴) 𝑉2′ (𝑉 ) 𝐼2′ (𝐴)
5 485𝜇′ 2,718 0 (𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜)
5 643𝜇 0 (𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑡𝑜) −290𝜇
2,258 0 (𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜) 5 403𝜇
0 (𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑡𝑜) −290𝜇 5 534𝜇

6.1.3 –
TEÓRICO EXPERIMENTAL
𝑧′ ′
= 10,3𝐾, 𝑧12 = 5,6𝐾 𝑧 ′ = 10,3𝐾, 𝑧12

= 5,6𝐾
𝑍′ = [ 11
′ ′ ] 𝑍 ′ = [ 11
′ ′ ]
𝑧21 = 5,6𝐾, 𝑧22 = 12,4𝐾 𝑧21 = 5,6𝐾, 𝑧22 = 12,4𝐾

Parte teórica:
𝑉1
𝑧11 = | → 𝑉1 − 𝐼1 × 𝑅1 − 𝐼1 × 𝑅2 = 0
𝐼1 𝐼2 =0
𝑉1 ′
= 𝑅1 + 𝑅2 ⇒ 𝑧11 = 10,3𝐾Ω
𝐼1

𝑉2 𝑉2 ′
𝑧21 = | → 𝐼1 − = 0⇒ 𝑧21 = 5,6𝐾Ω
𝐼1 𝐼2=0 𝑅2

𝑉1 𝑉2 ′
𝑧12 = | → 𝐼1 = ⇒ 𝑧12 = 5,6𝐾Ω
𝐼2 𝐼1=0 𝑅2

𝑉2 ′
𝑧22 = | → 𝑉2 = 𝐼2 × 𝑅3 + 𝐼2 × 𝑅2 ⇒ 𝑧22 = 12,4𝐾Ω
𝐼2 𝐼1 =0

Experimental:
𝑉1 5
𝑧11 = | → = 10,3𝐾Ω
𝐼1 𝐼2 =0 485𝜇

𝑉2 2,718
𝑧21 = | → = 5,6𝐾Ω
𝐼1 𝐼 486𝜇
2 =0

𝑉1 2,258
𝑧12 = | → = 5,6𝐾Ω
𝐼2 𝐼1 =0 403𝜇

𝑉2 5
𝑧22 = | → = 12,4𝐾Ω
𝐼2 𝐼1 =0 403𝜇
TEÓRICO EXPERIMENTAL
′ ′
𝑌 𝑌
𝑦′ = 1,3 × 10 , −4 ′
𝑦12
= −5,8 × 10 −5
𝑦11′ ′
= 1,3 × 10−4 , 𝑦12 = −5,8 × 10−5
= [ 11
′ ′ ] =[ ′ ′ ]
𝑦21 = −5,8 × 10 , 𝑦22 = 1,1 × 10−4
−5
𝑦21 = −5,8 × 10−5 , 𝑦22 = 1,07 × 10−4

Parte teórica:
𝐼1 𝑅3 × 𝑅2
𝑦11 = | → −𝑉1 + 𝐼1 × 𝑅1 + 𝐼1 × ( )=0
𝑉1 𝑉2 =0 𝑅3 + 𝑅2
𝐼1 𝑅3 + 𝑅2 ′
= ⇒ 𝑦11 = 1,3 × 10−4 𝑚ℎ𝑜
𝑉1 𝑅1 × (𝑅3 + 𝑅2 ) + 𝑅3 × 𝑅2

𝐼2 (−𝑅3 − 𝑅2 ) (−𝑅3 − 𝑅2 ) × 𝑅_2


𝑦21 = | → (𝑅1 × + + 𝑅2 ) × 𝐼2 = 𝑉1
𝑉1 𝑉2 =0 𝑅2 𝑅2

𝐴
𝑦21 = −5,8 × 10−5
𝑉

𝐼1 (−𝑅1 − 𝑅2 )
𝑦12 = | → −𝐼1 × 𝑅1 = (𝐼2 + 𝐼1 ) × 𝑅2 → 𝑉2 = ( × 𝑅3 − 𝑅1 ) × 𝐼1
𝑉2 𝑉1 =0 𝑅2
𝐼1 ′
𝐴
= −0,0000581 ⇒ 𝑦12 = −5,8 × 10−5
𝑉2 𝑉

𝐼2 ′
𝑦22 = | → (𝑅3 + 𝑅1 //𝑅2 )−1 = 0,00010689 ⇒ 𝑦22 = 1,1 × 10−4 𝑚ℎ𝑜
𝑉2 𝑉1 =0

Experimental:

𝐼1 643𝜇
𝑦11 = | → = 1,3 × 10−4
𝑉1 𝑉2 =0 5

𝐼2 290𝜇
𝑦21 = | → − = −5,8 × 10−5
𝑉1 𝑉2 =0 5

𝐼1 290𝜇
𝑦12 = | → − = −5,8 × 10−5
𝑉2 𝑉1 =0 5

𝐼2 534𝜇
𝑦22 = | → = 1,07 × 10−4
𝑉2 𝑉1 =0 5
TEÓRICO EXPERIMENTAL
𝑎′ = 1,8, 𝑎12

= 1,7 × 10 4
𝑎′ = 1,8, 𝑎12

= 1,72 × 104
𝑇′ = [ ′11 −4 ′ ] 𝑌′ = [ ′ 11 ′ ]
𝑎21 = 1,8 × 10 , 𝑎22 = 2,2 𝑎21 = 1,78 × 10−4 , 𝑎22 = 2,22

Parte teórica:
𝑉1 𝑉1
𝑎11 = | → − 𝑉1 = 𝐼1 × 𝑅1 + 𝐼1 × 𝑅2 → 𝐼1 =
𝑉2 𝐼2 =0 (𝑅1 + 𝑅2 )
−1
𝑉1 × 𝑅1 𝑉1 𝑅1 ′
𝑉
𝑉1 + + 𝑉2 = 0 → + (1 − ) ⇒ 𝑎11 = 1,8
(𝑅1 + 𝑅2 ) 𝑉2 (𝑅1 + 𝑅2 ) 𝑉

𝐼1
𝑎21 = | → − 𝑉1 + 𝐼1 × 𝑅1 + 𝑉2 = 0 → − 𝐼1 𝑅1 − 𝐼1 𝑅2 + 𝐼1 𝑅1 + 𝑉2 = 0
𝑉2 𝐼2=0
𝑉1 = 𝐼1 × 𝑅1 + 𝐼1 × 𝑅2 𝑉2 = 𝐼1 × 𝑅2
𝐼1 1 ′
𝐴
= ⇒ 𝑎21 = 1,8 × 10−4
𝑉2 𝑅2 𝑉

𝑉1 𝑅3 × 𝑅2 (−𝑅2 + 𝑅3 )
𝑎12 = | → − 𝑉1 + 𝐼1 × 𝑅1 + 𝐼1 × = 0→ 𝐼1 = × 𝐼2
−𝐼2 𝑉2 =0 𝑅2 + 𝑅3 𝑅2
𝑅1 × (−𝑅2 − 𝑅3 ) 𝑉1 ′
𝑉
−( − 𝑅3 ) = ⇒ 𝑎12 = 1,7 × 104
𝑅2 −𝐼2 𝐴

𝐼1 𝑅3 × 𝑅2
𝑎22 = | → − 𝑉1 + 𝐼1 × 𝑅1 + 𝐼1 × = 0 → 𝐼1 × 𝑅2 + (𝑅3 + 𝑅2 ) × 𝐼2 = 0
−𝐼2 𝑉2 =0 𝑅3 + 𝑅2
(𝑅3 + 𝑅2 ) ′
𝐴
𝐼1 = −𝐼2 × ⇒ 𝑎22 = 2,2
𝑅2 𝐴

Experimental:
𝑉1 5
𝑎11 = | → = 1,839
𝑉2 𝐼2 =0 2,718

𝐼1 485𝜇
𝑎21 = | → = 1,784 × 10−4
𝑉2 𝐼2 =0 2,718

𝑉1 5
𝑎12 = | → = 17241,379
−𝐼2 𝑉2 =0 290𝜇

𝐼1 643𝜇
𝑎22 = | → = 2,217
−𝐼2 𝐼2 =0 290𝜇
6.1.4 –

𝑅1′ = 1,5𝐾Ω 𝑅2′ = 3,9𝐾Ω 𝑅3′ = 2,7𝐾Ω


6.1.5 –
𝑉1′ (𝑉 ) 𝐼1′ (𝐴) 𝑉2′ (𝑉 ) 𝐼2′ (𝐴)
5 925𝜇 0 (𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜)
5 1,615𝑚 0 (𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑡𝑜) −954𝜇
2,955 0 (𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜) 5 757𝜇
0 (𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑡𝑜) −954𝜇 5 1,322𝑚

6.1.6 –
TEÓRICO EXPERIMENTAL
𝑧 ′′ ′′
= 5,4𝐾, 𝑧12 = 3,9𝐾 𝑧 ′′ = 5,4𝐾, 𝑧12
′′
= 3,9𝐾
𝑍 ′′ = [ 11
′′ ′′ ] 𝑍 ′′ = [ 11
′′ ′′ ]
𝑧21 = 3,9𝐾, 𝑧22 = 6,6𝐾 𝑧21 = 3,9𝐾, 𝑧22 = 6,6𝐾

Parte teórica:
𝑉1 ′′
𝑧11 = | → 𝑅1 + 𝑅2 ⇒ 𝑧11 = 5,4𝐾Ω
𝐼1 𝐼2 =0

𝑉2 𝑉2 ′′
𝑉
𝑧21 = | → 𝐼1 − =0⇒ 𝑧21 = 3,9𝐾
𝐼1 𝐼2 =0 𝑅2 𝐴

𝑉1 𝑉1 ′′
𝑉
𝑧12 = | → 𝐼2 = ⇒ 𝑧12 = 3,9𝐾
𝐼2 𝐼1 =0 𝑅2 𝐴

𝑉2 ′′
𝑧22 = | → 𝑅3 + 𝑅2 ⇒ 𝑧22 = 6,6𝐾Ω
𝐼2 𝐼1 =0

Experimental:
𝑉1 5
𝑧11 = | → = 5,405 × 103
𝐼1 𝐼2 =0 925𝜇

𝑉2 3,611
𝑧21 = | → = 3,903 × 103
𝐼1 𝐼2 =0 925𝜇

𝑉1 2,255
𝑧12 = | → = 3,903 × 103
𝐼2 𝐼1 =0 757𝜇

𝑉2 5
𝑧22 = | → = 6,605 × 103
𝐼2 𝐼 757𝜇
1=0
TEÓRICO EXPERIMENTAL
′′ ′′
𝑌 𝑌
𝑦 ′′ = −4
3,2 × 10 , 𝑦12′′
= −1,9 × 10−4 𝑦 ′′ = 3,23 × 10−4 , 𝑦12
′′
= 1,9 × 10−4
= [ 11
′′ ′′ ] = [ ′′11 ′′ ]
𝑦21 = −1,9 × 10−4 , 𝑦22 = 2,6 × 10−4 𝑦21 = −1,9 × 10−4 , 𝑦22 = 2,64 × 10−4

Parte teórica:
𝐼1 𝑅3 + 𝑅2 ′′
𝑦11 = | → ⇒ 𝑦11 = 3,2 × 10−4 𝑚ℎ𝑜
𝑉1 𝑉2 =0 𝑅1 × (𝑅3 + 𝑅2 ) + 𝑅3 × 𝑅2

−1
𝐼2 (−𝑅3 − 𝑅2 ) ′′
𝐴
𝑦21 = | → (𝑅1 × + (−𝑅3 − 𝑅2 ) + 𝑅2 ) ⇒ 𝑦21 = −1,9 × 10−4
𝑉1 𝑉2 =0 𝑅2 𝑉

−1
𝐼1 (−𝑅1 − 𝑅2 ) ′′
𝐴
𝑦12 = | → ( × 𝑅3 − 𝑅1 ) ⇒ 𝑦12 = −1,9 × 10−4
𝑉2 𝑉1 =0 𝑅2 𝑉

𝐼2 𝑅1 × 𝑅2 −1 ′′
𝑦22 = | → (𝑅3 + ) ⇒ 𝑦22 = 2,6 × 10−4 𝑚ℎ𝑜
𝑉2 𝑉1 =0 𝑅1 + 𝑅2

Experimental:
𝐼1 1,615𝑚
𝑦11 = | → = 3,23 × 10−4
𝑉1 𝑉2 =0 5

𝐼2 954𝜇
𝑦21 = | → − = −1,908 × 10−4
𝑉1 𝑉2 =0 5

𝐼1 954𝜇
𝑦12 = | → − = −1,908 × 10−4
𝑉2 𝑉1 =0 5

𝐼2 1,322𝑚
𝑦22 = | → = 2,644 × 10−4
𝑉2 𝑉1 =0 5

TEÓRICO EXPERIMENTAL
𝑎′′ = 1,4, 𝑎12
′′
= 5,2 × 10 4
𝑎′′ = 1,38, 𝑎12
′′
5,24 × 104
=
𝑇 ′′ = [ ′′11 −4 ′′ ] 𝑇 ′′ = [ ′′11 ′′
−4 ]
𝑎21 = 2,6 × 10 , 𝑎22 = 1,7 𝑎21 = 2,56 × 10 ,
𝑎22 = 1,69

Parte teórica:
−1
𝑉1 𝑅1 ′′
𝑉
𝑎11 = | → (1 − ) ⇒ 𝑎11 = 1,4
𝑉2 𝐼2 =0 𝑅1 + 𝑅2 𝑉

𝐼1 1 ′′
𝐴
𝑎21 = | → ⇒ 𝑎21 = 2,6 × 10−4
𝑉2 𝐼 𝑅2 𝑉
2=0
𝑉1 𝑅1 × (−𝑅2 − 𝑅3 ) ′′
𝑉
𝑎12 = | → −( − 𝑅3 ) ⇒ 𝑎12 = 5,2 × 104
−𝐼2 𝑉2 =0 𝑅2 𝐴

𝐼1 (𝑅3 + 𝑅2 ) ′′
𝐴
𝑎22 = | → ⇒ 𝑎22 = 1,7
−𝐼2 𝐼2=0 𝑅2 𝐴

Experimental:
𝑉1 5
𝑎11 = | → = 1,384
𝑉2 𝐼2 =0 3,611

𝐼1 925𝜇
𝑎21 = | → = 2,561 × 10−4
𝑉2 𝐼2 =0 3,611

𝑉1 5
𝑎12 = | → 5241,09
−𝐼2 𝑉2 =0 954𝜇

𝐼1 1,615𝑚
𝑎22 = | → = 1,6928
−𝐼2 𝐼2 =0 954𝜇

6.2.2 –
𝑉𝑠1 (𝑉 ) 𝐼𝑠1 (𝐴) 𝑉𝑠2 (𝑉 ) 𝐼𝑠2 (𝐴)
5 318𝜇 3,025 0 (𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜)
2,5 0 (𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜) 5 263𝜇

6.2.3 –
TEÓRICO EXPERIMENTAL
𝑧 = 15,7𝐾, 𝑧𝑠12 = 9,5𝐾 𝑧 = 15,7𝐾, 𝑧𝑠12 = 9,5𝐾
𝑍𝑠 = [ 𝑠11
′′ ] 𝑍 ′′ = [ 𝑠11
′′ ]
𝑧𝑠21 = 9,5𝐾, 𝑧𝑠22 = 19𝐾 𝑧𝑠21 = 9,5𝐾, 𝑧𝑠22 = 19𝐾

Parte teórica:
𝑍𝑠 = 𝑍 ′ + 𝑍 ′′
10,3𝐾 5,6𝐾 5,4𝐾 3,9𝐾
𝑍𝑠 = [ ]+[ ]
5,6𝐾 12,4 3,9𝐾 6,6𝐾
15,7𝐾 9,5𝐾
𝑍𝑠 = [ ]
9,5𝐾 19𝐾

Experimental:
𝑉1 5
𝑍𝑠11 = | = = 15723,27
𝐼1 𝐼2 =0 318𝜇
𝑉2 3,025
𝑍𝑠21 = | = = 9512,58
𝐼1 𝐼 318𝜇
2 =0
𝑉1 2,5
𝑍𝑠12 = | = = 9505,70
𝐼2 𝐼1 =0 263𝜇

𝑉2 5
𝑍𝑠22 = | = = 19011,407
𝐼2 𝐼1 =0 263𝜇

6.3.2 –
𝑉𝑝1 (𝑉 ) 𝐼𝑝1 (𝐴) 𝑉𝑝2 (𝑉 ) 𝐼𝑝2 (𝐴)
5 2,259𝑚 0 (𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑡𝑜) −1,245𝑚
0 (𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑡𝑜) −1,245𝑚 5 1,856𝑚

6.3.3 –
TEÓRICO EXPERIMENTAL
𝑌𝑝 𝑌𝑝
𝑦𝑝11 = 4,5 × 10−4 , 𝑦𝑝12 = −2,48 × 10−4 𝑦𝑝11 = 4,52 × 10−4 , 𝑦𝑝12 = −2,49 × 10−4
=| | =| |
𝑦𝑝21 = −2,48 × 10−4 , 𝑦𝑝22 = 3,7 × 10−4 𝑦𝑝21 = −2,49 × 10−4 , 𝑦𝑝22 = 3,71 × 10−4

Parte teórica:
𝑌𝑝 = 𝑌 ′ + 𝑌 ′′
1,3 × 104 − 5,8 ×−5 3,2 × 10−4 − 1,9 × 10−4
𝑌𝑝 = [ ] + [ ]
−5,8 × 10−5 1,1 × 10−4 −1,9 × 10−4 2,6 × 10−4
4,5 × 10−4 − 2,48 × 10−4
𝑌𝑝 = [ ]
−2,48 × 10−4 3,7 × 10−4

Experimental:
𝐼1 2,259𝑚
𝑌𝑝11 = | = = 4,518 × 10−4
𝑉1 𝑉2 =0 5

𝐼2 1,245𝑚
𝑌𝑝21 = | =− = −2,49 × 10−4
𝑉1 𝑉 =0 5
2

𝐼1 1,245𝑚
𝑌𝑝12 = | = − = −2,49 × 10−4
𝑉2 𝑉1 =0 5

𝐼2 1,856𝑚
𝑌𝑝22 = | = = 3,712 × 10−4
𝑉2 𝑉1 =0 5

4,52 × 10−4 − 2,49 × 10−4


𝑌𝑝 = [ −4 ]
−2,49 × 10 3,71 × 10−4
6.4.2 –
𝑉𝑝1 (𝑉 ) 𝐼𝑝1 (𝐴) 𝑉𝑝2 (𝑉 ) 𝐼𝑝2 (𝐴)
5 604𝜇 0 (𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑡𝑜) −129𝜇
5 585𝜇 718𝑚 0 (𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜)

6.4.3 –
TEÓRICO EXPERIMENTAL
𝑎′ ′
= 6,94, 𝑎12 = 12,25 × 104 𝑎′ ′
= 6,96, 𝑎12 = 3,876 × 10−4
𝑇′ = [ 11
′ ′ ] 𝑌′ = [ 11
′ ′ ]
𝑎21 = 8,24 × 10−4 , 𝑎22 = 13,1 𝑎21 = 8,15 × 10−4 , 𝑎22 = 4,682

Parte teórica:
𝑇𝑝 = 𝑇 ′ × 𝑇 ′′
1,8 1,7 × 104 1,4 5,2 × 104
𝑇𝑐 = [ −4 ][ ]
1,8 × 10 2,2 2,6 × 10−4 1,7
6,94 12,25 × 104
𝑇𝑐 = [ ]
8,24 × 10−4 13,1

Experimental:
𝑉1 5
𝑎11 = | = = 6,964
𝑉2 𝐼2 =0 718𝑚

𝐼1 585𝜇
𝑎21 = | = = 8,148 × 10−4
𝑉2 𝐼2=0 718𝑚

𝑉1 5
𝑎12 = | = = 38759,69
−𝐼2 𝑉2 =0 129𝜇

𝐼1 604𝜇
𝑎22 = | = = 4,682
−𝐼2 𝑉2 =0 129𝜇

7 – Questionário:

7.1
Sim, os valores práticos e teóricos ficaram praticamente os mesmos,
tirando a última questão, que por algum motivo os valores práticos ficaram um
pouco longe dos obtidos teoricamente. Mas considerando o restante do trabalho,
foi possível analisar as propriedades relacionadas a associação de circuitos nos
parâmetros dos quadripolos.
7.2
Os erros encontrados no relatório estão concentrados na última questão,
já que no restante do trabalho os valores são bem próximos tendo no máximo
um erro de aproximação. Na última questão os valores experimentais não
condizem cem porcento ao teórico, porém não sei dizer ao certo se foi erro de
simulação ou cálculo.

You might also like