Dharmasastras and Itihasas: Unit 3 Ethics in History of Indian Philosophy
Dharmasastras and Itihasas: Unit 3 Ethics in History of Indian Philosophy
Dharmasastras and Itihasas: Unit 3 Ethics in History of Indian Philosophy
Contents
3.0 Objectives
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Sources of Moral Ideals in India
3.3 Ethics: Its Meaning in Indian Tradition
3.4 Ethics in Vedic Period
3.5 Ethics in Dharmasastras and Itihasas
3.6 Way of Righteousness in the Gita
3.7 Ethical Concepts of Hindu Tradition
3.8 Ethics in Buddhism
3.9 Jaina Ethics
3.10 Let us Sum up
3.11 Key Words
3.12 Further Readings and References
3.0 OBJECTIVES
• To give the students of philosophy general glimpse of ethics in Indian tradition
• To enable them understand the ethical consciousness of India
• To enumerate various ethical concepts of different Indian philosophical and religious
traditions
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Moral consciousness is an undeniable fact of human experience. The moral sensibility is
something essential for the peaceful society and the work. Even gods are believed to incarnate to
restore righteousness and peace in the society. Down through the centuries, many religious
teachers, and philosophers were interested in the rational ground of morality. The caste duties of
the Hindus prescribed in the Dharmasastras are well articulated commands, which are meant to
regulate the life of the community. Ethics as a speculative science is based on the foundations of
the moral behavior of man, but a substantial portion of the moral codes are based on religious
beliefs, social customs and traditions. When we take the Indian ethics too the morality is very
much based on certain beliefs, customs and traditions of Indian religions.
It is true that the foundations of Indian ethics can be sought in the metaphysical and the
theological beliefs in the form of worship, prayers and in the form of ideals and principles that
directed man’s life in the society. When we speak of Indian ethics, we cannot deny the intimate
relationship that prevails between ethics and Hindu or any other religion. Ethics and religion are
so closely related and whatever may be the religion, it contains within itself some system of
morality for the guidance of its followers. And thus Indian ethics is the indispensable part of
Hindu religion and other religions of Indian origin. Indian ethical ideals and principles are very
much found in the Vedas and in other Indian literatures and in other teachings of the Indian
religions.
Like religion and art, morality also is an institution of life for anyone to adopt in his life. By this
institution of morality one’s actions from the moral point of view might be branded as good or
bad, right or wrong, praiseworthy or blameful etc. And again by morality one may be entitled to
2
judge others’ action as good or bad, right or wrong. In this sense morality can be regarded as a
particular way of looking at issues of character and conduct. It is in this sense of morality, that
we talk of human beings as moral agents but not of animals, we also talk of moral concepts, laws
and principles etc for a morally good or morally right life.
Morality means conscious living within the frame of certain principles of conduct laid down by
those regarded as authorities. So in general morality as an institution of life consists in the
awareness of an important distinction between what is and what ought to be. So men should live
not merely in the light of what is but also what ought to be. Specifically speaking morality is the
awareness of a living based on a distinction between our animal demands and the demands of the
higher faculties of human life, which make the human distinct from the animals.
Since the ancestors of Hindus in India were spiritual in nature they fixed their attention on a life
beyond death. They regarded the human soul (inner being) as an eternal entity co-existing with
the Supreme Being. They believed that every human soul goes to the round of births, rebirths and
reaps the fruits of actions. When a soul comes to be associated with the gross material body, it is
bound to perform certain deeds and in conformity with laws divine, reaps the fruits thereof. The
belief is that, if good deeds are performed, happiness results and if evil deeds are performed,
misery falls to the lot of the doer. The human soul never dies; it can never remain without doing
‘actions’ and can never claim exemptions from reaping the fruits of its deeds. It reaps as it sows.
Any man ultimately looks for happiness which is the fruit of Karma and so he should necessarily
know what is good and what is bad. Every law giver and every thinker of India in ancient period
felt, the supreme necessity of framing certain rules of conduct and of presenting the ultimate end
to which all the life of a human being is to be directed in this lesson on Indian ethics we will be
dealing with the Hindu ethics, some ethical notions of Buddhism and Jainism.
The very concept of Indian morality is both authority based and social reasoning. Both in
Buddhism and Jainism reason has been given a prestigious place. In Jainism right faith is given
the first place among the three jewels. One is advised to use his reason in ascertaining the
validity and worth of the precepts before following them. In Buddhism too the use of personal
reason is neither disallowed nor despised. The four noble truths are to be followed but even then
3
Buddha says wherever there is disagreement, questions can be asked for removing doubts. In
modern Hindu thought, reason is given better place, especially in the ideas of Vivekananda and
Gandhi. For them reason is not the source of moral ideas, but yet they believe in the role of
reason in the matters of morality. Hence, the primary role is given to Vedas and Smrtis as the
fundamental source of morality in Indian tradition, but besides them, all the above mentioned
sources also played their roles in deciding the question of morality and immorality in Indian
tradition.
The highest goal of life for the Upanishads is no longer happiness as in the Rig Veda, but
liberation from bondage to the transitory existence and the re-attainment of the inner essence of
the soul. The Upanishadic ethics is primarily atman-centric and intellectualistic. The Upanishads
declare that the Vedic sacrifices are totally irrelevant for the realization of moksa. And so man is
4
constantly exhorted to seek his individual liberation and not worry about other social, moral
obligation. This kind of philosophical individualism definitely undermines the values of social
morality. For the Upanishads, the identification and the realization of the self with Brahman is
very important. In this metaphysical realm only we can speak of Upanishadic ethics. The oldest
Upanishads say that the perfect sage is a saint who burns evil away and he is free from evil. So it
is in the avoidance of evil, we can see the clear moral teaching in the Upanishads. Katha
Upanishad declares in 1,2,24 that he who is always impure is born again and again that he fails to
reach the highest goal. Good conduct is very much necessary for the attainment of man’s
metaphysical good (identification of the self with Brahman). And man who is wise is morally a
good man whose nature approximates to the divine model (Kat.Up 1, 2, 24, Ch.Up 8, 6, 1). So
the Upanishads are clear in saying that the man who has wisdom does not sin. He ceases to do
evil and through his wisdom he annuls the evil of his former life.
There is another way promoted by the Gita to attain the ultimate realization in life and liberation
from the cycle of births and deaths, which is known as Karma Yoga (Path of activity). The Gita
has described this way as the method of disinterested action (NishkamaKarma). To attain moksa
one has to be freed from the bondage to one’s own actions. So the Gita suggests the golden rule
that actions should be done with the spirit of non-attachment to their fruits. Both the epics,
itihasas have a bundle of ethical and moral codes and injunctions. The practical guidelines of
the essential ethical ideals and thoughts of Hindu tradition.
Transmigration of Soul
The doctrine of Karma and transmigration of soul are so closely bound up together. After the
death of the body the life of the individual is continued in another body and so on in indefinite
series. According to this theory, the soul though pure and blessed in itself, gets entangled in the
Samsara (cycle of birth and rebirth). It is because of the Karma it passes through innumerable
births (transmigration) before it regains its original state.
1) Dharma 2) Artha 3) Kama 4)moksa. Dharma is usually distinguished into sadharana dharma
and varnashrama dharma. sadharana dharma refers to the duties of the universal scope and
validity. There are ten cardinal virtues known as sadharana dharma according to Manu,
endurance, patience, self-control, integrity, purity, and restraint of senses, wisdom, learning, and
truth, absence of anger or non-violence. The varnasrama dharma refers to the duties of persons
according to the castes and the stages of life. Thus ‘dharma’ is considered to be a means value
for attaining personality integration in the spiritual level or liberation.
The term ‘artha’ generally indicates the attainment of riches and worldly prosperity, advantage,
profit and wealth. Kama is a comprehensive term, which includes all desires: desires ranging
from the cravings of the flesh and the yearnings of the spirit. In Hindu thought there is always a
clear emphasis on the enjoyment of secular pleasures along with the emphasis on the realization
of spiritual values. The uniqueness of the concept of kama and enjoyment in the Hindu ethics is
that all of them were to be related to the spiritual goal of human existence and so the Indian
ethics insisted on a regulated enjoyment. In every school of philosophy in India the first three
Purusharthas are treated as the instrumental values, which directly or indirectly promote the
Parama Purusharthas - the highest values of human life namely moksa. moksa is also known as
by other names such as mukti, apavarya, kaivalya and nirvana. This liberation is intimately
bound up with the Karma samsara, the doctrine of transmigration.
Svadharma
By this term we mean each individual has to grow to his best according to his own dharma, that
is to say the principle of individual growth is called Svadharma. Svadharma is in relation to an
individual’s temperament and stage and duties in life, based on varna and asrama. It is made in
terms of three gunas, the sattva (purity), rajas (virility), and ‘tamas’ (darknesss). These three
qualities are found in each individual in varying proportions and thus this varying proportion of
qualities is regarded as the basis of different types of actions and of four castes. The concept of
Svadharma is very much based on these three classifications and it is well promoted by Indian
ethical code that if the society is to function smoothly there should certainly be a hierarchical
arrangement of functions and duties in it.
Varnadharma
In Hindu ethics, we find varnasrama dharma as a social stratification, based on above said
gunas, profession and birth. Although theoretically it is justified to have such a classification of
people in the name of their propensity and quality they posses in terms of their attitude, caste
system in Indian ethics remains an issue. It has been very much practiced and all ethical
principles and codes are based on it. By way of profession one’s caste is determined in some
ways, both in theory and in practice. This looks somehow fine and rationally justified. Yet
social mobility in the ladder of categories of people is not very much practical and it is not
ensured. Even if a person develops sattva guna and becomes a teacher of scriptures, he / she
cannot become a ‘Brahmin’ for the very reason that he was not born a Brahmin. Although
theoretically Hindu ethics preaches it, social mobility in such practice remains only an utopia.
One’s birth, jati determines everything in caste systems. A Sudra is denied of the right of
undertaking purificatory rite in the form of investiture of sacred thread (Upanayana), which is
supposed to give a man his second birth. He is not allowed to perform Vedic sacrifices or read or
listen to the Vedas. Severest punishments were prescribed and carried out, if a Sudra even dared
7
to recite or had a chance to hear the Vedas. A Brahmin unconditionally deserved the greatest
honour and all kinds of gifts. He could not be given any corporeal punishment. He was exempt
from the state taxes. The severest punishments were prescribed for the offender of a Brahmin.
Hence, Hindu ethics regarding varnadharma is still a contested and controversial moral and
social code.
There are ten demeritorious deeds from which the Buddhist are advised to keep away. These
deeds are rooted in greed, hatred, and delusion and they will bring suffering to others. These ten
deeds are divided into three sets: 1. Actions of the Body 2. Verbal Actions 3. Actions of the
Mind. Bodily actions are killing of living beings, stealing, and unlawful sexual intercourse. 2.
Four verbal actions are: Lying, Slander, Harsh Speech, and Meaningless Talk. 3. The other three
actions of the mind are: Covetousness or being desirous especially of things belonging to others,
ill-will, wrong views.
Buddhist morality judges an action good or bad basing on the intention or motivation from which
it originates. If a person performs an action out of greed, hatred, delusion, his action is
considered to be bad. On the other hand, if he performs an action out of love, charity and
wisdom, his action is good. Love, charity and wisdom are known as the “the three Good Roots.”
Here the word ‘root’ refers to the intention from which that action originates.
In Buddhism a person’s first duty is to cleanse him of the mental defilements of greed, hatred
and ignorance. The reason for doing this cleansing is not because of fear or desire to please some
Divine beings. If this is so, that would mean that the person is still lacking in wisdom. He is only
acting out of fear like the little child who is afraid of being punished for being naughty. A
Buddhist should act out of understanding and wisdom. He performs good actions because he
realizes that by so doing he develops his moral strength, which provides foundation for spiritual
growth, leading to liberation.
Five precepts
Telling about ten meritorious and ten evil actions, the Buddhism invites the lay Buddhists to
adopt five precepts voluntarily to follow in order to live together in civilized communities with
mutual trust and respect. Following these five precepts helps the lay Buddhist to make a spiritual
9
journey towards liberation. These five precepts are purely voluntary ones. A good Buddhist
should remind himself to follow the five precepts daily they are as follows, I take the training
rule to refrain from Killing living creatures, Taking which is not given, Sexual misconduct, False
speech, and Taking intoxicating drugs and liquor. The precepts are the basic practice in
Buddhism. They are also an indispensable basis for people who wish to cultivate their minds.
Without some basic moral code, the power of meditation can often be applied for some wrong
and selfish motive. These five refrains is called as Pancasila
Then that preliminary faith should be supported by right knowledge again for having right faith
based on general acquaintance (samyag- darsana) in support of right knowledge. Right faith
does not imply that one must blindly follow the Tirthankaras. But one must have the right
attitude of respect towards truth. Further by studying the teachings of the Tirthankaras one can
10
strengthen his belief. But these two are rendered useless unless they are followed by rigorous
practice. Right conduct is the third indispensable (samyag-caritra) condition of liberation. It is
this that enables one to stop the influx of new karmas and also to eradicate old ones. It consists in
the control of passions, senses, thought, speech etc. Right conduct is therefore described as
refraining from what is harmful and doing what is good. Right conduct enables man to liberate
himself from bondage. The Jaina prescription for right conduct: One must follow the five great
vows namely the panca-maha-vrata for the perfection of right conduct. They are Ahimsa,
Sathyam, Asteyam, Brahamacaryam and Aparigraha. Ahimsa denotes abstinence from all
injuries to life – either trasa or sthavara. Satyam is abstinence from falsehood. It is speaking
what is true, good and pleasant. Asteyam refers to abstinence from stealing. Brahmacaryam
pertains to abstinence from sensual and casual pleasures. One must refrain himself from karma
of any form altogether either in speech talk or action. Aparigraha: By this what is meant here is
that abstinence from all kinds of attachments. It lies in giving up attachment for the objects of
five senses.
We come to know that the Indian religion, philosophy and morality are so integrally related and
it is impossible to understand morality without a proper understanding of the religious and
philosophical traditions in India. Ethics in India is a complex and multi-faceted one, being
constituted of divergent and several religious and philosophical traditions. This diversity of
metaphysical beliefs and valuational attitudes is reflected in Indian morality, which is diverse
and multi-faceted as the rest of the Indian culture. But however we must not have any impression
that there is neither any specific world view or ethos nor any definite moral code, which can be
called Indian as such. Indian tradition has been receptive to new ideas and values but yet it has
been choosing certain ideas to be incorporated in its religio-moral thought.
11
Hinduism also accepted the fact that man’s dharma comprising of all his duties and virtues,
changes with the changing times. Hindu religio-culture is very composite, so we need to choose
those aspects of Hindu-religio culture, which are most in harmony with our modern values and
we also need to frankly reject other ideals, which are not in harmony with modern values. From
all these that we saw above, we can conclude this lesson on Buddhists ethics basing our
concentration on the urgent call of Buddhism to the modern world today. Buddhism calls for
tolerance in the world today so that peaceful co-existence among the people can be possible. The
Buddha’s advice is, “Let us live happily not hating those who hate us. Let us live free from
hatred among those who hate us. Let us live happily and be free from ailment. Let us live happily
and be free from greed among those who are greedy (Dhammapada 197-200). Buddha says, “If a
person foolishly does the wrong, I will return to him the protection of my boundless love. The
more evil that comes from him the more good will go from me. I will always give of only the
fragrance of goodness.
Hindery, Roderick, Comparative Ethics in Hindu and Buddhist Traditions, New Delhi: Motilal
Banarsidas, 1978.
Jhingran, Saral, Aspects of Hindu Morality, New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt.
Ltd. 1989.
Sadguru, Keshavadass, Liberation from Karma and Rebirth, Bombay: Bharathiya Vidhya
Bhavan, 1978.
Tandon, Nirmala, Contemporary Indian Ethics, Mumbai: English Edition Publishers and
Distributors, Pvt. Ltd.
Ranganathan, Shyam. Ethics and the History of Indian Philosophy. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass,
2007.