0% found this document useful (0 votes)
210 views4 pages

Example Shadow Price

1. The document discusses how increasing the raw material B by 2 units affects the objective function value, showing an increase of ₱2,700. 2. It also analyzes how increasing the right-hand side constraint of an optimization problem by 4 units changes the optimal solution values and slack variables to minimize cost. 3. Additionally, it applies the 100% rule to show that decreasing one right-hand side constraint by 3 units and increasing another by 2 units keeps the shadow prices valid. 4. Finally, the 100% rule is used again to verify that decreasing one right-hand side constraint by 1 unit and increasing another by 6 units maintains an optimal solution.

Uploaded by

Gabriella J
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
210 views4 pages

Example Shadow Price

1. The document discusses how increasing the raw material B by 2 units affects the objective function value, showing an increase of ₱2,700. 2. It also analyzes how increasing the right-hand side constraint of an optimization problem by 4 units changes the optimal solution values and slack variables to minimize cost. 3. Additionally, it applies the 100% rule to show that decreasing one right-hand side constraint by 3 units and increasing another by 2 units keeps the shadow prices valid. 4. Finally, the 100% rule is used again to verify that decreasing one right-hand side constraint by 1 unit and increasing another by 6 units maintains an optimal solution.

Uploaded by

Gabriella J
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

1.

Raw material B increase by 2 units

Maximize z = 3,000x + 2,000y Maximize z = 3,000x + 2,000


z = 3,000 (3.33) + 2,000 (1.33) z = 3,000 (4.67) + 2,000 (0.67)
z = ₱ 12, 650 z = ₱ 15, 350

Shadow Price = New profit – Old profit


₱ 15,350 – ₱ 12,650
= ₱ 2,700

Interpretation:
An increase of 2 tons for Raw Material B will cause a change in the value of objective function
by ₱ 2, 700. It provides a direct effect between the resources (Raw material B) and the total output
(profit). The color blue shade in graphical solution shows the effect of profit and, the effect of
right-hand constraints called dual value or shadow price.
2. RHS increased by 4 computer solution (Minimization)

• The 2x + 2y ≥ 10 change into 2x + 2y ≥ 14 wherein it generates different value of x and y,


objective function and, LHS to minimize the cost

• The binding constraints in the first 2 of both pictures have a slack o zero. Meanwhile the
blue picture slack of 4 and the another one is 20 which implies that the unused resources
increase to minimize the cost.
Range of Feasibility Range of Feasibility
Material 1: 5 to 11 Material 1: 7 to 19
Material 2: 9 to 18 Material 2: 9 to 18

The range of feasibility in Material 1 change from 5 to 11 to 7 to 9 units which


means that the cost also increases in Material 1 (₱52 to ₱62) while in Material 2
the range remain the same.

Range of Cost Range of Cost

Material 1: 4 to 12 Material 1: 4 to 12

Material 2: 8 to 24 Material 2: 8 to 24

There is no change in range of cost

3. 100% rule (Shadow Price)

∑Proposed change 3
RHS Material 1: 9 – 6 = 3 = 4 = 𝟎. 𝟕𝟓
Allowable change

∑Proposed change 2
RHS Material 2: 12 – 10 = 2 = 8 = 𝟎. 𝟐𝟓
Allowable change
The sum of proposed ratio is equal to 100% rule, which means the shadow price will remain valid.
The shadow price of material 1 and 2 which is 2 and 3 respectively is valid even the constraint
RHS in material 1 decrease and increase in material 2.

4. 100% rule (Optimal Solution)

∑Proposed change 1
RHS Material 1: 8 – 7 = 1 = 4 = 𝟎. 𝟐𝟓
Allowable change

∑Proposed change 6
RHS Material 2: 18 – 12 = 6 = 12 = 𝟎. 𝟓𝟎
Allowable change

The sum of proposed ratio is 75% ≤ 100% which means the optimal solution is valid.

Jenny Rose Libo-on


Management Science
10/28/2021

You might also like