Peat Inventory East Kalimantan - DR

Samarinda
October 10th, 2021

To: GIZ assisted project PROPEAT
Contents
Company Profile.........................................................................................................................................4
Methodological...........................................................................................................................................5
List of Activities.......................................................................................................................................5
FLORA......................................................................................................................................................7
GIS data collection................................................................................................................................12
Drone data collection............................................................................................................................12
Ground water, inundation, or flood data collection............................................................................12
Output explanation data collection:.....................................................................................................13
Land cover, land use, forest product utilization and condition data collection..................................13
Dense canopy cover:..........................................................................................................................13
Medium canopy cover:......................................................................................................................13
Rare Canopy Cover:...........................................................................................................................13
Forest products utilization:................................................................................................................13
Natural and artificial drainage conditions data collection...................................................................14
Water quality data collection...............................................................................................................14
Peat thickness data collection..............................................................................................................14
Substrate characteristics under the peat layer data collection...........................................................14
Weight proportion of peat material data collection............................................................................14
Development of conditions or levels of damage to peatlands data collection...................................15
Soil characteristics and depth of the pyrite layer data collection........................................................15
Social data collection............................................................................................................................15
Work Plan..................................................................................................................................................17
Our Team..................................................................................................................................................18
Team Leader:........................................................................................................................................18
Field Coordinator 1:..............................................................................................................................18
Drone Pilot I:.........................................................................................................................................20
Drone Pilot II:........................................................................................................................................21
Drone Pilot III:.......................................................................................................................................21
GIS Operator I:......................................................................................................................................22
GIS Operator II:.....................................................................................................................................22
GIS Operator III:....................................................................................................................................23
Social I:..................................................................................................................................................23
Social II:.................................................................................................................................................23
Social III:................................................................................................................................................24
Company Profile
YAYASAN MEDIA BELAJAR BERDAYA LINGKUNGAN (Meja belakang)
YAYASAN MEDIA BELAJAR BERDAYA LINGKUNGAN (Meja belakang) working to support
each other for work to environmental, improved human resource management, Biodiversity and
wildlife management; Community Spatial Planning including Villages Spatial Plan, Villages
Information System and Government Spatial Training that has been working in East Kalimantan
since 2020. YAYASAN MEDIA BELAJAR BERDAYA LINGKUNGAN (Meja belakang), focuses
of activities on:
 Forest protection and conservation services
 Rahabilitation and restoration forest services
 Forest activities services outside forest area
 Forest management services
 Forest, Biodiversity, and Wildlife survey
 Drone and UAV Mapping and analysis
 Community Based Management Plan
 HCV survey an identification Some current work has been do as part of Yayasan Meja
Belakang:
 Training Geography Information System and Remote Sensing Basic Level for Kutai
Timur
 District- UNDP Kalfor
 Procurement ArcGIS Licenses 50 Unit for Kutai Timur GIS Training Participants- UNDP
KalFor
 Survey Terrestrial Biodiversity and Ecology Assessment in The Middle Mahakam, East
Kalimantan
 Drafting Nursery Business Plan, KPH Meratus
 Event Organizer for HCV Discussion, Incentives for NRM and Sustainable Plantation
Forum at East Kutai District and East Kalimantan Province Level.
 Rapid biodiversity inventory at HCV area and smallholder oil-palm in Kongbeng.
YAYASAN MEDIA BELAJAR BERDAYA LINGKUNGAN (Meja belakang) is also open

organization to work together with the other organization and personal researcher or
professional. We have personal networking members that have professional experienced, such
as:
 Forest management and technical planning for forest and land rehabilitation
 Boundary & Landuse Mapping and Masterplan Protected Area Identification for HCV in
unit management and landscape scale in Borneo
 Biodiversity and wildlife survey
 Partisipatory Mapping in local areas (Kampung)
 Strategic Environmental Assessments
 UAV mapping
Methodological
The implementation of peat characteristic inventory that we using in this survey is going to be
implemented in TOR and accordance with them Minister of Environment and Forestry
Regulation Number: P.14 / MENLHK / SETJEN / KUM.1 / 2/2017 concerning Procedures for
Inventory and Determination of Peat Land Functions, for 14 PHU/KHG in East Kalimantan. The
method for Inventory of characteristics of the peat ecosystem refers to Government Regulation
Number 71 of 2014 in conjunction with Government Regulation Number 57 of 2016 concerning
Protection and Management of Peat Ecosystems, Regulation of the Minister of Environment and
Forestry Number P.14 / MenLHK / Setjen / Kum.1 / 2 / 2017 concerning Procedures for
Inventory and Determination of Peat Ecosystems Functions, and Guidelines for Procedures for
Implementing Inventories of Characteristics of Peat Ecosystems. The activity to be carried out in
order to obtain data Transaction number-ToRs 6 and information about the characteristics of the
peat ecosystem at the KHG location which included the following stages:
 Preparation
 Field implementation
 Compilation of field results data; and
 Preparation of reports.
List of Activities
1.1 Preparation
1. Consultation with Ministry of Environment and Forestry Directorate of Peat Degradation
Control, MoEF together with GIZ Propeat;
2. Data and equipment preparation.
3. Preparation of work map
4. Preliminary report preparation
5. Planning consolidation meeting
1.2 Planning consolidation meeting
1.2.1 Meeting with local Government.
Prior to the field survey is being carried out, a meeting is necessary to be held with the
Provincial Government and the District/ City Government where the KHG is located. The
meeting is in a Focused Group Discussion form with all relevant stakeholders including
representatives of the concessions/private sector and the community at the KHG
location to be surveyed.
1.2.2 Field survey
The field survey was carried out on non-permit/concessions area according to the work
plan that had been made. The type of information observed is as follows in Table 3. (in
TOR)
1.3 Fauna
1.1 Visual Encounter Survey
On this observation team will set transect for every plot area to conduct The Visual Encounter
Survey (VES), this method is applied to identify any wildlife surrounding the transect area, and
held during the day and also at night to observe nocturnal fauna. The method is used to
produce a species list for an area, to determine the species richness, and estimate relative
diversity (Crump and Scott, 1994). Procedure for a VES involves searching a fauna, either along
a transect or in a plot, and recording the number of individuals encountered per unit of time
(person-hours) (Crump and Scott, 1994). VES generally requires minimal equipment:
datasheets, pencil/pen, calipers, and spring balance (if measurements are taken), plastic bag,
and a marker pen (if individuals are to be collected) (Crump and Scott, 1994). Sticks or rakes
may also be used to turn over leaves and small logs (Crump and Scott, 1994). The VES works
best for surveying forest understory anurans that are active in the open (Crump and Scott,
1994). It is also the best method for surveying rare species or those which are unlikely to be
caught with traps (Crump and Scott, 1994). However, this technique cannot be used to survey
fossorial species or those that live in the canopy (Crump and Scott, 1994). To avoid biases
between individuals, each person must have had the same training, be at the same level of
expertise, and put the same effort in when surveying (Crump and Scott, 1994). Another bias
with the VES is that not all habitat types and microhabitats within a habitat can be sampled with
equal success due to differences in strata (Crump and Scott, 1994). Open habitats can be
surveyed more efficiently than those with dense vegetation as visibility is better (Crump and
Scott, 1994). Weather can also affect visibility, with rain and mist generally decreasing it (Crump
and Scott, 1994).
1.2 MacKinnon List Method

MacKinnon’s List is a rapid assessment method for surveying avifauna which was first
suggested by MacKinnon and Phillips in 1993 (O’Dea et al., 2004). It is an effective way to
create species discovery curves to estimate the total number of species inhabiting a specific
area (Bibby et al., 1998). The method also provides a way to calculate an index of relative
abundance between species within an area as well as within species between areas (Bibby et
al. 1998). Although typically used to survey avifauna it has been suggested that this method is
also effective when assessing amphibian populations (Muir, unpublished). Muir’s results show
that the MacKinnon’s List technique outperforms the traditional Visual Encounter Survey
technique when assessing species richness, and indicating when an area is adequately
surveyed. The advantage of this method is that data collection is simple and can therefore be
carried out by an inexperienced observer, as it is unaffected by skill and concentration (Bibby et
al., 1998). It allows opportunistic sightings to be standardized in terms of sampling effort and
included in the lists and therefore used in the analysis. This is a useful tool as there are usually
a lot of opportunistically encountered individuals when surveying forests for amphibians.
However, this method can be biased against certain species which are difficult to detect which
leads to an under-estimation of these species. The converse is also true, especially when
including vocalizations. As the study progresses the observer learns more calls which will bias
the results like those at the beginning may be missed.
1.3 Camera Trap
The modern camera trap is simply a digital camera connected to an infrared sensor that can
“see” warm objects that are moving, like animals. When an animal moves past the sensor it
causes the camera to fire, recording an image or video to the memory card for later retrieval.
Camera traps provide data on species location, population sizes, and how species are
interacting. They also help us to understand how humans and livestock interact with each other
and other forms of wildlife. In this observation, the camera trap will be set around the sampling
survey using a purposive sampling method with a distance range of 100-200 meters between
cameras.
1.4 Biodiversity indicator identification

In addition to direct total or sample counts of species or individuals in a given area and an
understanding of population dynamics, there are sets of information that facilitate or add to
biodiversity indicators in support of decisions on biodiversity conservation:
 Keystone species. These species are recognized as playing a major role in maintaining
ecosystem structure and integrity; for the classification of types of keystone species
Bond (1993). There has been considerable debate about the concept and reality of
keystone species but there seems little doubt that in some cases a species or species
group may have a major role in the survival of the ecosystem as currently recognized,
e.g. the fruits of figs are a fundamental resource for primates and many species like
frugivorous birds.
 Ecological indicator species. These species are adapted to (or react characteristically
to) changes in specific environmental factors or their diversity appears to be correlated
with that of several or many other species.
 Economic valuation species. Towards the assessment methods for biodiversity, land
use or conservation decisions are commonly based on overriding economic valuations.
These are species of the known or potential economic value per se or that occur in
assemblages that have other individually valuable species. In the Kalimantan, ironwood
timbers in the Lauraceae family is one of the most wanted wood in the Kalimantan,
fauna such a bearded pig, Muntiacus, and Rusa is a source of protein and also can be
sold in the local market.
FLORA
2.1 Metode Pengambilan dan Pengolahan Data
3.1.1 Flora/Vegetation
Determination of the plot point is at the specified area (TOR) in each location. The location
should be considered to be able to represent a certain type of vegetation cover. Vegetation data
were collected using the vegetation analysis method by combining the transect method and the
multiple plot method. At each point will be one transect, and 2-5 plots were made in each
transect.
10 m
2m
5m
2m
10 m
5m
20 m
Figure 1 Vegetation Plot Design
Size of sub – petak for every seedling layer are:

a. Seedlings and understory plant : 2 x 2 m.
b. Sapling : 5 x 5 m.
c. Tree : 20 x 20 m.
Vegetation data collection includes:

1. Tree level vegetation, diameter> 10 cm.
- Species
- Diameter (1.5 m above the ground)
2. Sapling level vegetation wich high as 1,5 m and diameter max about 10 cm.
- Species
- Diameter (1.5 m above the ground)
3. Seedling, with plant high maximum about 1,5 m.
- Species
- Total
4. Understory plant, Herba, beside scrub, strangler, and crawler.
- Species
- Total
Figure 2. Measurement of trees diameter
Source: Anonim (2011)
The data that we collected from field will be analized with this process:
1. Important Value Index (Menghitung Indeks Nilai Penting Jenis (NPJ)).

a. Density (Kerapatan (K) ) & Relative Density (Karapatan relatif (KR))
K=
∑ individu suatu jenis
KR=
K suatu jenis
x 100%
Luas petak contoh K seluruh jenis
b. Frequency (F) dan Relative Frequency (FR)
F=
∑ Sub- petak ditemukan suatu jenis FR=
F suatu jenis
x 100%
∑ Seluruh sub- petak contoh F seluruh jenis
c. Domination (D) dan Relative Domination (DR). D* is only count on tree level vegetation
LBD = ¼ π d2, d = diameter (m
Luas bidang dasar suatu jenis D suatu jenis

D= DR= x 100%
Luas petak contoh D seluruh jenis
d. Species Index (Indeks Nilai Penting (INP))
NPJ = KR + FR + DR atau NPJ = KR + FR
The Species index (INP) value category:
Table 1. Category Important Value Index
Criteria Value
High INP > 42,66
Medium 21,96 – 42,66
Low INP < 21,96
Source: Fachrul (2007)
2. Species Richnes Index (R)

Species richness that we used is formulated by Margalef (Wijana, 2014) which is:
S-1
R=
ln (N)
R = Species richness index
S = Total Species
N = Total population species
ln = Log Natural
Table 2. Diversity index criteria
Criteria Value
High R > 5,0
Medium 3,5 – 5,0
Low R < 3,5
Source: Magurran (1988)
3. Diversty Index (H’).

Diversity Index that we used is formulated by Shannon dan Wiener (1949) in Odum
(1994), diversity index is used from this formula:
S
'
H = - ∑ (Pi x ln ( Pi ) )
i=1
H’ = Diversity index
S = Species count
Pi = (ni/N) Species ratio i (ni) ; pi – pro-portion of the registered species from species
(N)
ln = Log Natural
Table 3. Diversity index criteria
Criteria Value
High >3
Medium 2–3
Low 0–2
Source: Barbour et al. (1987)
4. Dominace Index (C)

To determine whether individuals are more focused on one or several types of a growth rate or
an area, the amount of the Dominance index according to Simpson (1949) in Odum (1993) is
used with the following formula:
S
C= ∑ Pi 2
i=1
Keterangan :
C = Dominance index Simpson
S = Total species
ni = Total count species i
N = pro-portion of the registered species from species n
Pi = ni/N = iproporsi species ke i
Table 4. Dominance index criteria (C)
Criteria Dominance Index

High 0,75 < C < 1
Medium 0,5 < C < 0,75
Low 0 < C < 0,5
Source: Krebs (1978)
5. Evenness index (Indeks kemerataan berdasarkan rumus Shannon-Wienner (Odum, 1996)):

(e) from Pielou (1966) in Odum (1994):
H'
e=
ln (S)
e = Evenness index
H’ = Diversity index
S = Total Species
ln = Log Natural
Evenness index higher than a growth rate indicates a more even distribution of the
number of individuals in each species. Evenness index ranges from 0.
Table 5. Evenness index criteria
Criteria Evenness Index

Uneven 0,00 – 0,25
Less evenly 0,26 – 0,50
Pretty even 0,51 – 0,75
Almost evenly 0,76 – 0,95
Spread Evenly 0,96 – 1,00
Source: Magurran (1988)
In addition to calculating the quantitative value, a list of plant species is also made along with
their protected status by referring to the Regulation of the Minister of Environment and Forestry
of the Republic of Indonesia Number P.106/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/12/2018, CITES
Appendix version 22 June 2021 for international trade and the IUCN Red List version 2021-2 for
its conservation status. Information about the distribution of these plants is also collected so that
it is known that these plants are endemic and their distribution is limited or not. It is hoped that
this information can be taken into consideration for the management of these plant species in
particular, which is an integral part of the management of the area as a whole.
GIS data collection

- Support field data entry
- Support Specifications: 3D Nav EPE 3 meter (GPS Navigation 3D)
- Support the integration of sample points position with field data tracking into base map
- Observation points location with coordinate + geo tagged photo
Drone data collection

- Creating and determining routes / paths and observation points for data collection / land
cover coverage using Drone media.
- Taking photo and video documentation in the field, complete with location coordinates,
10% of the total observation points, evenly distributed (stratified).
- Processing and presenting data taken from photos and videos with drones, presented in
the form of Drone Coverage Maps and Photo and Video Documentation digitally
Ground water, inundation, or flood data collection

- Groundwater depth (below ground level): measured from ground level to groundwater
level (cm)
- Shallow (0-50 cm), Medium (50-100 cm) or Deep (> 100 cm)
- Inundation (above ground): measured depth (cm). Shallow (0-50 cm), Medium (50-100
cm) or Deep (>100 cm) Flood:
- Frequency: how many times a year and how long is the flood (days)
- Beside depth (describe above) also consider the frequency and flood inundation duration
(days)
Output explanation data collection:

Parameters in the form of depth characteristics of ground water, inundation, flood inundation
can indicate land hydro topographic conditions and land typology based on overflow type
Land cover, land use, forest product utilization and condition data collection
Primary forests, secondary forests, plantation, shrubs (no trees): seasonal crops, settlements.
Canopy cover conditions are divided into dense, medium, and rare.
Dense canopy cover:

Tree canopy covering each other because of the distance between trees is dense. Areas with
good canopy cover indicate that the area is less dynamic, and the intensity of utilization is low,
so the condition of peatlands is still natural or close to its natural condition. The condition of
canopy cover is interpreted from Landsat imagery, such as forests included in the dense canopy
cover. Land use that classified as dense forest cover is forest plantation (ht).
Medium canopy cover:

The canopy of the tree is less covering because the distance between trees is relatively farther
away. Areas with moderate canopy cover indicate that the area is quite dynamic, and the
intensity of utilization is quite high. The condition of canopy cover is interpreted from Landsat
imagery, such as bushes included in medium canopy cover. Land cover / land use reclassified
into medium canopy cover is plantation (Pb), mixed plantation (Kc), shrubs (Sb).
Rare Canopy Cover:

areas with no or little canopy cover because the area does not or has little trees. Areas with
canopy cover rarely indicate that the area is very dynamic, and the intensity of utilization is high.
This canopy cover condition is interpreted from Landsat imagery, such as land without
vegetation, ex-mining included in rare canopy cover. Land cover/ land use reclassified as rare
canopy cover is crop land (Ld), rice fields (Sw), settlements (Pk), swamps (Rw), shrimps/
fishponds (Tb) and water body (Ta)
Forest products utilization:

Utilization of forest products conducted by the community in the form of timber forest products,
non-timber forest products (NTFPs), Environmental Services (tourism), or other uses.
Explanation
Input: according to the data availability.
Output: first check with SNI, if not suitable, refer to the needs based on guidelines. Provide
example of satellite image that shows density level.
Is there any concession permit on the observed area, if yes, take the coordinate and photo of
concession’s boundary on the field, as well as type of land cover and land use (crop or forest
plantation or other)
Natural and artificial drainage conditions data collection
Density or natural drainage; the presence or absence of artificial drainage, density and depth of
water
Explanation:
Input: density is calculated from the results of field observations and / or imagery
Output: (according to above-mentioned category)
Water quality data collection

pH and EC Water quality measurements are conducted for acidity (pH) and electrical
conductivity (EC) parameters using a pH meter and EC meter. Measurements are taken on
groundwater, river water and artificial drainage water.
Explanation
Input: time when sampling is taken (note the day, date, time, and tide condition -high or recede)
Output: according to water quality classification
Peat thickness data collection

Peat thickness measurements are carried out by drilling up to the substrate/ main material,
and classification of peat thickness classes is made at intervals of 50 centimeters as
follow:
 0 – 50 cm: non peat/ mineral.
 50 – 100 cm: peat;
 100 – 150 cm: peat;
 150 – 200 cm: peat; etc.
Explanation:
Input: actual number
Output: according to substance description
For peat depth measurement, the drill must penetrate until touches mineral soil.
Substrate characteristics under the peat layer data collection

Substratum or mineral material under the peat layer: quartz sand, clay, pyrite sediment, granite,
lime, or other
Explanation:
Input: in addition to the characteristics of the Mineral material, the depth of the soil is also
measured.
Output: according to above-mentioned criteria.
Weight proportion of peat material data collection

The proportion of the weight of peat material or the weight of peat content is the ratio between
the absolute dry weight of peat in a certain volume. The volume in this case is bulk volume (20 x
30 x 30 cm3) or wing drill bit volume. The absolute dry weight of peat is the dry weight of
samples carried in plastic samples (samples from bulk or wing drill bits)
Explanation:
- Measurements are carried out by means of 20 x 30 x 30 cm3 (top 1 m of peat layer)
- Measuring the peat content weight with a wing peat drill is carried out on flooded peat and
/ or peat layer more than 1 m and at each interval of 1 m to the mineral soil layer.
- Documented any information about the peat characteristic in each layer.
Development of conditions or levels of damage to peatlands data collection
Damage criteria of Protected Function
- There is artificial drainage
- Exposure of pyrite and / or quartz sediments
- Land cover conditions that do not support protected functions
Damage criteria of Cultivation Function:

- There is artificial drainage
- Exposure of pyrite and / or quartz sediments
Explanation:
Input: identification of sediment outcrops, about pyrite content, estimating the extent of the
distribution of open pyrite sediments
Output: according to above-mentioned criteria.
Soil characteristics and depth of the pyrite layer data collection

 In the peat layer, the characteristics observed are thickness, color, and level of
decomposition. On mineral soils and/ or mineral materials under peat layer, characteristic
observed are layers and thickness, and texture, color, consistency, pH, and EC are defined
at each layer. The tool used is a mineral drill and / or peat drill.
 The depth of the pyrite layer is measured from the ground to the material containing pyrite
(peat and mineral). The potential of pyrite in soil or sediment materials is identified by using
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) solution, which is by comparing the soil/ sediment pH before
oxidizing with hydrogen peroxide and after oxidizing with hydrogen peroxide. Indications of
the potential for pyrite can be seen if the pH difference before and after oxidation with
hydrogen peroxide drops 2 digits or after oxidation has a pH <2.5.
Explanation:
- Input: water pH measurement with pH H2O2.
- Output: the depth of the pyrite layer (qualitatively if it is already open will be found
yellow straw spots on the ground, the water will look clear and the pH is very acidic,
and if it is not open, smells of sulfur, or when tested with H2O2, pyrite is detected.
Social data collection

Survey on local perception of peat forest utility:
 This study measures the level of local wisdom from locals’ community appreciation in the
management and protection of peat hydrological areas. The research method carried out
begins with preparation, a survey of research sites, data collection (primary and
secondary data), and data analysis
 Sampling on the respondents conducts by cluster sampling technique. Cluster sampling
is a data analysis method that selects a sample from small groups of units. Data
collection methods used in this study were structured interviews, questionnaires, and
direct surveys in the field.
 Community knowledge, local wisdom, appreciation, intention to protect the peatland,
community perceptions of the benefits and conservation, each variable observed in the
study will be measured and assessed by first determining the measurement parameters.
Table 6. Social Variable and Parameters
No Variabel Rating Description Parameters

1 Public perception: local Local Knowledge about 1) Do not understand
knowledge of the peatland: Condition of 2) Partial
ecosystem peatlands, Ecological and 3) Understand
peat economic value, how to
restore damaged
peatlands, and peat
management systems
towards the Development
of local community
2 Local Knowledge about benefits 1) No Beneficial
Perceptions that directly and not 2) Beneficial
about the benefit directly impacted the 3) Very Beneficial
of peatland community, and a problem
if peatlands are not
managed properly
3 The value about peatland The understanding level of 1) No Beneficial

for local wisdom for local local community about the 2) Beneficial
community value and customs 3) Very Beneficial
towards management of
peatland
4 community aspirations The importance of 1) No Beneficial
regarding community protecting peat areas for 2) Beneficial
responses regarding society and ecology 3) Very Beneficial
protection and
management of peat
ecosystems including
land use and control of
peat damage
Source: Community perceptions of peat land use were calculated by scoring each indicator
using a Likert Scale (Singarimbun, 1987 referred to in Harahap 2001).
Kisaran
Interval Skor = Kisaran = (Skor tertinggi x jumlah soal) - (Skor terendah x
Kelas
jumlah soal)
Work Plan
Table 7. Work Plan
No Activity / Wee
Milestones k
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. Preparation
a. Consultation with MoEF and GIZ
b. Compilation of secondary data
c. Preparation of work map
d. Preparation of preliminary report
e. Planning consolidation meeting with Ministry and GIZ
f. Preliminary report
2. Meeting with local government
3. Field survey
4. Progress report, including field data of 13 peat
ecosystem
characteristics, photo and video recording with drone
5. Supervision and monitoring of activity progress and
compiled
data check by MoEF/KLHK and GIZ
6. Photo and video recording with drone
7. Compilation of data from field surveys and Laboratory
analysis
8. Preparation and discussion of the final report, including
field
data of 13 peat ecosystem characteristics, photo and
video recording with drone
9. Supervision and monitoring of activity progress and
compiled
data check by MoEF/KLHK and GIZ
10. Finalization of Reports and Printing of Characteristics of
KHG Observation Points Maps on 1: 50,000 scale, Tally
Sheet and GPS log documentation, Drone Land Cover
Map (10% of total
observation points)
Our Team
Team Leader:
Name : Rustam
Nationality : Indonesia
Education : PhD
Summary Experience:
1. Consultant/ Technical Support for Berau District Action Plan of Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs), 2020, GGGI
2. Consultant/Technical Support for Forest Management Unit (KPH) on Landscape
conservation and biodiversity data based to support business plan and emission
reduction, 2018, GGGI
3. Training for Trainer of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), 2017,
Environmental Study Center (PSL) Kalimantan Region.
4. Identification for High Conservation Value on Landscape Based in East Kalimantan
province, Indonesia, 2017, TNC.
5. High Conservation Value Forest Assessment in PT. Adimitra Lestari North
Kalimantan, 2013, WWF.
Field Coordinator 1:
Name : Brian Martin
Education : Bachelor
Summary Experience:
1. Biodiversity inventory Project in Kayan Mentarang National Park, Malinau 2015,
Mulawarman University (UNMUL)
2. Pro Natura, Biodiversity Inventory Project in Wain River Protected Forest,
Balikpapan. 2016, Small wild Cat Project.
3. Biodiversity Inventory and Environmental indicator Project in Reclamation Area
of PT. KITADIN site Tandung Mayang, 2016-2017, PT. KITADIN
4. Project Species Officer (Siamensis Crocodile) Mesangat, 2018, WCS-IP
5. Borneo crocodile expedition Malaysia – Kalimantan (Indonesia), 2018, UNIMAS
6. Intern, 2019, CLP (Conservation Leadership Program)
7. Field Research Officer, 2019-2021, Yayasan Ulin (Ironwood Foundation)
Indonesia.
8. HCV assessment PT. Spice Island Maluku, 2020-2021, PT. Spice Island Maluku
9. Species Distribution Modeling with Remote Sensing ARSET Project, 2021,
NASA
10. Biodiversity analyst – Project Ecosystem Essentials Area of Mesangat Wetland
2021-2024, Consortium of YU and YASIWA TFCA
Name : Raharjo Ari Suwasono
Education : Master of Forestry
1. Biology Team Sampling Flora and Fauna of Environmental Monitoring at PT
Sago Prima Pratama, Nunukan Every Semester from 2016 to 2019, PT
Smart Teknik.
2. Botanist on Environmental Monitoring activities at the PT. Kitadin Site
Tadung Mayang Former Mine Site, Bontang. Every year from 2017 to 2019,
Collaboration between PT. Kitadin and UPT CTESD UNMUL.
3. Botanist on Development of PSP (Permanent Sample Plot) in Secondary
Secondary Slash Forest in PT. Hanurata Forest Area; August 2019, PT.
Hanurata Forest Area.
4. Botanist on Biodiversity Study and Monitoring activities at PT. Pupuk
Kalimantan Timur’s Biodiversity Park in Bontang. July 2019, PT. Pupuk
Kalimantan Timur
5. Vegetation Survey to collect data on the importance of forest communities
from the vegetation aspect of the prospective location of the Forest Park in
Kutai Kartanegara Regency, July 2019, Kutai Kartanegara Government.
6. Vegetation Survey to collect data on the importance of forest communities
from the vegetation aspect which will be used as consideration for applying
for permission to the Ministry of Environment and Forestry to obtain the
designation as Forest Park in West Kutai District, May 2019, Cooperation
between the Faculty of Forestry UNMUL and the West Kutai Regional
Government.
7. Botanist on Field Survey for the Development of the Belantara Foundation
Baseline Data Area in East Kalimantan Province, April 2019, Belantara
Foundation
8. Botanist on PT Daya Maju Lestari's AMDAL Document Preparation Activity in
West Kutai Regency and Mahakam Ulu East Kalimantan, February 2019,
Collaboration between PT Daya Maju Lestari and PPLH UNMUL.
9. Botanist on High Conservation Value Forest (HCVF) Assessment by PT
Geomap International Engineering and Environmental Consultant at Batu
Ampar – Mentawir, East Kalimantan,January 2019, PT Inhutani I.
10. Botanist on Biodiversity Study and Monitoring in PT Badak LNG Bontang
Forest Area, East Kalimantan, December 2018, Collaboration between PT
Badak LNG and the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, UNMUL
Name : Saparwadi
Education : Master of Forestry
1. Summary Experience: MCAI Indonesia BIOMA Foundation's Mapping Team
for the Spatial Planning of Lung Barang Village, Mentarang Ulu Subdistrict,
and Metut Village, South Malinau Subdistrict, Malinau Regency, East
Kalimantan Province
2. In Murung Raya Regency, social mapping and the preparation of the PPM
Master Plan (Community Development and Empowerment Program) in seven
Adaro Metcoal PKP2B areas (6 sub-districts) Mahakam Ulu District and
Central Kalimantan (2 Districts)
3. Tuana Tuha Village, Kenohan District, Kutai Kartanegara Regency – Bumi
Foundation – Instructor of Mapping and Spatial Planning Training
4. As Secretary of the Human Biosphere Foundation's Daily Management
(BIOMA)
5. Planete Urgence & BIOMA Foundation's Mahakam Delta Mangrove
Ecosystem Rehabilitation Project Coordinator
6. The FPIC/FPIC of the greenhouse gas emission reduction program in the
district of West Kutai, the FPCPF Carbon Fund cooperation program, the
Ministry of Forestry, and the Province of East Kalimantan's socialization and
implementation team
7. PT. NPC (Nala Plama caudasa) – Consulting JUMP, the survey team of the
flora and fauna biodiversity of the East Kutai District
8. JUMP Konsulting has developed management materials for High
Conservation Areas (HCV) in collaboration with the Kutai Kartanegara
Plantation Service.
9. Tabang sub-social district's forestry acceleration team (Muara Salung Village,
Muara Belinau Village, Muara Belianu Village, Muara Tuboq Village, Muara
Kebaq Village, Umaq Bekuay Village) BIOMA-TNC
Drone Pilot I:
Name : Muhammad Fajar Tegar Wahyudi
Summary Experience:
1. Certificated in Pilot drone, APDI (Asosiasi Pilot Drone Indonesia), 2020.
2. Trainer of GIS Training for East Kutai District, 2020, UNDP.
3. Pilot Drone and GIS Analyst of Aerial Mapping for Land Use Planning in Semuntai
and Sandeley Villages, Paser District, 2020, UKCCU.
4. GIS Analyst of Prototype Initiative, 2019, Green Growth Compact (GGC).
Drone Pilot II:
Name : Armansyah
Summary Experience:
1. Trainer of GIS Training for East Kutai District, 2020, UNDP.
2. Pilot Drone and GIS Analyst of Aerial Mapping for Land Use Planning in
Semuntai and Sandeley Villages, Paser District, UKCCU, 2020.
3. Pilot Drone in Participatory Land Use Planning in Pura Sajau, 2020, Pura Sajau
Village
4. Pilot Drone in Master Plan of Sigending Protection Area and Ecotourism, 2019,
Collaboration of TAF, TFCA and Teluk Sulaiman Village
Drone Pilot III:

Name : Arie Prasetya
Summary Experience:
1. Internship at GIZ PROPEAT to support the implementation of Participatory land
use planning, April – October 2021, GIZ PROPEAT
2. Pilot Drone Samboja Campground Development Planning, July 2021, Samboja
Sub - District
3. Aerial Mapping Survey Palm oil plantation, January 2021, PT. Persatuan Warga
Rimba
4. Team Of PLUP Atap Village, Nunukan, December 2020, GIZ PROPEAT
5. Team Members of Field Trip and Data Retrieval Activities in Preparation of
Master Plan (MP) of The Nation's Capital (IKN) in East Kalimantan Province,
September 21st 2020, Bappenas
GIS Operator I:
Name : Dewi Ratna Ningrum
Summary Experience:
1. GIS Analyst Samboja Campground Development Planning, July 2021, Samboja
Sub – District
2. Aerial Mapping Survey Palm Oil Plantation PT. Perkumpulan Warga Rimba,
January 2021, PT. Perkumpulan Warga Rimba
3. Team Of PLUP Atap Village, Nunukan, December 2020, GIZ PROPEAT
4. Assistant Trainer in Basic Training of Geographic Information Systems and Remote
Sensing in East Kutai, 24 – 28 August 2020, UNDP
5. GIS Analyst in Participatory Mapping and Settlement Mapping Training in Pura
Sajau Village, 13 – 17 August 2020, Pura Sajau Village
GIS Operator II:

Name : Aspianor
Summary Experience:
1. GIS Experts in the preparation of the Emission Reduction Program Document
(ERPD), September – November 2016, DDPI Prov. East Kalimantan
2. Mapping and GIS Experts in New Renewable Energy Development Activities
Based on Solar Power in the Framework of Providing Electricity and Improving
the Welfare of Inland Residents in Malinau Regency, North Kalimantan, 2016,
PT. Cahaya Inti Trimanunggal (MCA Indonesia)
3. GIS Experts in the preparation of the Emission Reduction Program Document
(ERPD), September – November 2016, DDPI Prov. East Kalimantan
GIS Operator III:
Name : Aang Gunaifi
Summary Experience:
1. Assistant Consultant GIZ for Supply Chain and Market Performance Assessment
forSwamp Buffalo in Middle Mahakam, east Kalimantan, 2021
2. Pilot Assistant in Survey Palm Oil Plantation PT. Perkumpulan Warga Rimba,
January 2021, PT. Perkumpulan Warga Rimba
3. Individual Consultant Global Green Growt InstituteTechnical Support Consultant for
Emission Reductions Program in East Kalimantan, 2020
4. Technical Suport in Basic Training of Geographic Information System and Remote
Sensing in East Kutai, at 24-28 August 2020.
5. GIS Assistant for Cities Without Slums (KOTAKU) 2020
6. Assistant for Social Forestry and Conflict Management Program at BUMI Foundation
2019
Social I:
Name : Rina Wahyu Cahyani
Summary Experience:
1. Study of Ecological and Development in Social Economic of Kratom Plant (Mitragyna
speciosa), 2018, KPHL Gerbang Barito Unit IX Central Kalimantan.
2. Identification, Preparation, Support and Gap Analyst on Local Community
Characteristic (Kampung Iklim Plus Program) to support the emission reduction in
East Kalimantan Province, 2019, FCPF
3. Modeling Study of Kampung Iklim Plus based on Forest and Land Characteristic,
2020, IPB Press
Social II:
Name : Achmad Sopian
1. NTFP Talkshow Series Training on Managing Aroma and Energy from the
Forest, October 24, 2020, Faculty Forestry Mulawarman University
2. Student Assistant for Laboratory Biology, 2020, Dendrology and Forest Ecology
Courses Conservation Ecology and Tropical Rainforest Biodiversity
3. FCPF/climate village socialization and consultation committee in paser 2019,
DDPI
4. Research Student Assistant for Research Types of Litsea, 2019, Faculty's
Educational Forest Forestry Mulawarman University.
Social III:
Name : Mita Priskawati
1. Biodiversity Surveyor, 2017, YASIWA
2. Internship Giz Forclime in Northh Kalimantan, 2016, Giz Forclime.
3. Student Research Technical Staff ITC University of Twente Netherlands in Delta
Mahakam, 2018, ITC University of Twente Netherlands.
4. The EIA Biological Surveyor Team, 2018 of PT. West Kutai Wilsa Kencana
Wilderness Foundation.
5. Kalimantan Forest Surveyor TeamSurveyor, 2020, of PT. Kitadin Jaya Agung
KalTim
6. Carbon-Fund FPIC Team, 2020, DDPI
Administration I:
Name : Ninda Annisa Putri
Education : Student
1. Administration of AWP KalFor for Kalimantan Timur, 2020, UNDP KalFor
2. Administration of AWP KalFor for Kutai Timur, 2020, UNDP KalFor
3. Administration of Insentive NRM and ANKT, 2020 – 2021, UNDP KalFor
4. Administration of Safety Drone for Kalimantan Timur Government, 2021, 16 –
17 September, UNDP KalFor
5. Administration of Increasement Of Understandin to Manage and Protect The
Non- State-Owned Forest Area in East Kutai Region, 5 October 2020, UNDP
KalFor
Administration II:
Name : Nurirah Hidayat
Education : Student
1. Administration of AWP KalFor for Kalimantan Timur, 2020, UNDP KalFor
2. Administration of AWP KalFor for Kutai Timur, 2020, UNDP KalFor
3. Administration of Insentive NRM and ANKT, 2020 – 2021, UNDP KalFor
Administration I:
Name : Norhayati
Education : Student
1. Administration of Safety Drone for Kalimantan Timur Government, 2021, 16 –
17 September, UNDP KalFor
2. Administration of Increasement Of Understandin to Manage and Protect The
Non- State-Owned Forest Area in East Kutai Region, 5 October 2020, UNDP
KalFor
Surveyor I:
Name : Stela Serliani
3. The EIA Biological Surveyor Team, 2018 of PT. West Kutai Wilsa Kencana
Wilderness Foundation.
4. Kalimantan Forest Surveyor TeamSurveyor, 2020, of PT. Kitadin Jaya Agung
KalTim
Surveyor II:
Name : Sabat Sandrania
Education : Student
Courses Conservation Ecology and Tropical Rainforest Biodiversity.
2. FCPF/climate village socialization and consultation committee in paser, 2019,
DDPI
3. NTFP Talkshow Series Training on Managing Aroma and Energy from the Forest,
Faculty Forestry Mulawarman University, October 24, 2020
4. Intern program, 2021, Kawal Borneo Community Foundation (KBCF)
5. Assistant GIS Instructor, 2020, PPIG UNMUL and the East Kalimantan Forestry
ServiceTraining on GIS Analysis and Emission Calculation in MMR Readiness East
Kalimantan
Surveyor III:
Name : Audina
1. Event Organizer (EO) Annual Work Plan (AWP) and Botanical Garden in East Kutai,
2021-2021, East Kutai Government.
2. Incentive Event Organizer (EO) NRM and Areal of High Conservation Value in East
Borneo, 2020-2021, East Kutai Government.
Surveyor IV:
Name : Nurma
2. The EIA Biological Team, 2020, PT. West Kutai Wilsa Kencan Wilderness
Foundation
3. GIS assistance, 2019,PT. Kitadin Jaya AgungKalTim
Surveyor V:
Name : Murang Herkanus
1. Social Survey of land use and sustainability in Mentarang District 2018, UNMUL
2. Vegetation inventory team at Delta Mahakam 2019, UNMUL
3. Biodiversity and Social Survey Team in the Delta Kayan River Basin, 2020,
Fahutan UNMUL and GIZ
4. Supervision team for verification of in situ plant enrichment at Kutai National
Park , 2018 PT INDOMINCO
5. Monitoring of PT.BBE post-mining land in Kutai Kartanegara, 2018, PT
INDOMINCO
6. Monitoring of post-mining, 2018/2019 PT. KTD Bontang
Surveyor VI:
Name : Arkhan
Education : Student
Courses Conservation Ecology and Tropical Rainforest Biodiversity
2. FCPF/climate village socialization and consultation committee in paser, 2019,
DDPI Kaltim
3. Research Student Assistant for Research Types of Litsea, 2019, Faculty's
Educational Forest Forestry Mulawarman University
4. NTFP Talkshow Series Training on Managing Aroma and Energy from the
Forest, 2020, Forestry of Faculty- UNMUL
Surveyor VII:
Name : Fajriansyah
1. Research assistant in the field of Flora Biodiversity Project, 2020, Badak LNG
2. EDLH Consultant in Eskapindo Flora-Fauna, 2019, Adindo Kaltara Company
3. Amdal Consultant in MPJ Flora-Fauna, 2020, Kobexindo Company
4. Amdal Consultant in MPJ Flora-Fauna and Kutai Kartanegara, 2018, BBE
Company
5. Mangrove Forest Inventory expert energy assistant in Penajam, 2018, GAKKUM
Kaltim-Kaltara Company
6. KLHS IKN BAPENAS Team, 2020, BAPENAS
7. Village socialization facilitator in Paser with FPIC, 2020, DDPI
8. Peat swamp survey in Berau, 2018, GIZ
9. Flora environmental monitoring, 2020, Pertamina Sanga-Sanga
10. Flora environmental monitoring in Nunukan, 2020, DTR Sembakung Company
Surveyor VIII:
Name : Arung Aulia Pujangga
Education : Student
1. Bird Monitoring in Kec. Big Bentian Regency. West Kutai , 2019, UNMUL
2. Biodiversity (Bird) Survey at Muara Siran, 2019, GIZ
3. Landscape Biodiversity Survey, 2020, GIZ and Faculty Collaboration Forestry
Mulawarman University
4. Vegetation Inventory, 2021, PT. Human Baraperkasa
Surveyor IX:
Name : Lasmito
1. Botanist on Vegetation Survey to collect data on the importance of forest
communities from the vegetation aspect which will be used as consideration for
submitting an application for permission to the Ministry of Environment and
Forestry to obtain the designation as Forest Park in West Kutai District. May 2019
Cooperation between the Faculty of Forestry Unmul and the West Kutai
Regional Government.
2. Botanist on Field Survey for the Development, April 2019 Belantara Foundation
Baseline Data Area in East Kalimantan Province.
3. Botanist on PT Daya Maju Lestari's AMDAL Document Preparation Activity in
West Kutai Regency and Mahakam Ulu East Kalimantan. February 2019 ,
Collaboration between PT Daya Maju Lestari and PPLH Unmul.
4. Botanist on High Conservation Value Forest (HCVF) Assessment, January 2019,
PT Geomap International Engineering and Environmental Consultant at PT
Inhutani I Batu Ampar - Mentawir, East Kalimantan.
5. Botanist on Biodiversity Study and Monitoring in PT Badak LNG Bontang Forest
Area, East Kalimantan. December 2018, Collaboration between PT Badak LNG
and the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Mulawarman University.
Surveyor X:
Name : Doni H Limbong
3. Peat swamp survey in Berau, 2018, GIZ
4. Flora environmental monitoring, 2020, Pertamina Sanga-Sanga Company
6. Flora environmental monitoring, 2020, Kitadin Company (Ambalut site)
7. Vegetation analysis in Delta Mahakam Mangrove Area, 2020, BIOMA
8. Biodiversity research assistant for peat swamp land in Muara Siran, 2021, GIZ
Company
9. Leader of Timber Cruising in Separi, 2021, PT Insani Bara Perkasa
Surveyor XI:
Name : Diky Hermawan
3. Peat swamp survey in Berau, 2018-2019, GIZ
4. Flora environmental monitoring, 2020, Pertamina Sanga-Sanga Company
6. Flora environmental monitoring, 2020, Kitadin (Ambalut site)
7. Vegetation analysis in Delta Mahakam Mangrove Area, 2020, BIOMA
8. Biodiversity research assistant for peat swamp land in Muara SiraN, 2021, GIZ
Company
9. Leader of Timber Cruising, 2021, Separi under PT Insani Bara Perkasa
Surveyor XII:
Name : Loby
Education : Student
1. Real Work Lecture in Muara Java Coastal (Handil) Kab. Kutai Kartanegara,
2019, UNMUL
2. Field Work Practice Population Survey of Bornean Gibbons in Weheya
Protection Forest Collaboration, 2020, Faculty of Forestry, Mulawarman
University
3. Fauna environmental monitoring in Nunukan, 2020, DTR Sembakung Company
4. Fauna environmental monitoring, 2020, Kitadin (Ambalut site)
Surveyor XIII:
Name : Bonifasius
Education : Student
1. Training on Introduction to Reduce Emission from Deforestation and Forest
Degradation (REDD) +; April 26, 2014, DDPI
2. Training Participants of Geospatial Information System to Increase the Scale of
Land Cover Maps in Forest Management Units, October 2020, UNMUL
3. Fauna environmental monitoring in Nunukan, 2020, DTR Sembakung Company
4. Fauna environmental monitoring, 2020, Kitadin (Ambalut site)
Surveyor XIV:
Name : Daniel Musa
Education : Student
4. Kalimantan Gibbon Population Survey in the Forest Protect Weheya, 2020,
TNC -YAKAN
5. Vegetation Inventory, 2021, PT. Human Baraperkasa
Surveyor XV:
Name : Heri
Education : Student
1. Assistant Trainer in Basic Training of Geographic Information System and
Remote Sensing in East Kutai, 24-28 August 2020, UNMUL
2. Event Organizer (EO) Annual Work Plan (AWP) and Botanical Garden in East
Kutai, 2021-2021, East Kutai Government
Surveyor XVI:
Name : Rafles Ginting
Education : Student
1. Assistant Trainer in Basic Training of Geographic Information System and
Remote Sensing in East Kutai, 24-28 August 2020, UNMUL
2. Landscape Biodiversity Survey, 2020, GIZ and Faculty Collaboration
Forestry Mulawarman University
Surveyor XVII:
Name : Tri Setiawan
Education : Student
1. Participants in the training on the use of drones organized by Indonesia training
June 24 - 26, 2020 September 2020. Mapping Center (IMC) and Papua Mapping
5. Participants of the HCVF training, 15 July 2016, MAPFLOFA Fahutan Unmul

Peat Inventory East Kalimantan - DR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Peat Inventory East Kalimantan - DR

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Peat Inventory East Kalimantan - DR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Samarinda

October 10th, 2021

YAYASAN MEDIA BELAJAR BERDAYA LINGKUNGAN (Meja belakang) is also open

1.2 MacKinnon List Method

1.4 Biodiversity indicator identification

Figure 1 Vegetation Plot Design

Size of sub – petak for every seedling layer are:

Vegetation data collection includes:

Source: Anonim (2011)

1. Important Value Index (Menghitung Indeks Nilai Penting Jenis (NPJ)).

b. Frequency (F) dan Relative Frequency (FR)

Luas bidang dasar suatu jenis D suatu jenis

2. Species Richnes Index (R)

Table 2. Diversity index criteria

3. Diversty Index (H’).

4. Dominace Index (C)

Criteria Dominance Index

5. Evenness index (Indeks kemerataan berdasarkan rumus Shannon-Wienner (Odum, 1996)):

Criteria Evenness Index

GIS data collection

Drone data collection

Ground water, inundation, or flood data collection

Output explanation data collection:

Dense canopy cover:

Medium canopy cover:

Rare Canopy Cover:

Forest products utilization:

Water quality data collection

Peat thickness data collection

Substrate characteristics under the peat layer data collection

Weight proportion of peat material data collection

Damage criteria of Cultivation Function:

Soil characteristics and depth of the pyrite layer data collection

Social data collection

No Variabel Rating Description Parameters

3 The value about peatland The understanding level of 1) No Beneficial

Drone Pilot III:

GIS Operator II:

You might also like