0% found this document useful (0 votes)
62 views7 pages

Analyzing The Statistical Error of Physical Chemistry Experimental Data

The document outlines the objectives and assignments for quantitative measurements and statistical data analysis experiments. It includes: 1) Measuring ammonium concentration in aquaculture samples and determining if outliers should be rejected. 2) Measuring the accuracy of a 400mL beaker graduation and calculating mean, variance, standard deviation, and confidence limits. 3) Creating a calibration curve for flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry to measure calcium concentration in aerosol samples and determining concentrations within the curve's limitations. Modifications to samples and curve are needed to accurately measure all samples.

Uploaded by

Nurin Batrisyia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
62 views7 pages

Analyzing The Statistical Error of Physical Chemistry Experimental Data

The document outlines the objectives and assignments for quantitative measurements and statistical data analysis experiments. It includes: 1) Measuring ammonium concentration in aquaculture samples and determining if outliers should be rejected. 2) Measuring the accuracy of a 400mL beaker graduation and calculating mean, variance, standard deviation, and confidence limits. 3) Creating a calibration curve for flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry to measure calcium concentration in aerosol samples and determining concentrations within the curve's limitations. Modifications to samples and curve are needed to accurately measure all samples.

Uploaded by

Nurin Batrisyia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Objectives:

1. To acquire, analyze and interpret data.

2. To demonstrate a competency and proficiency with experimental skills involved

in quantitativemeasurements and statisticaldataanalysis.

3. To use a spreadsheet and excel statisticalfunctionto plot a graph.

Assignment 1

a.Thefollowingvalues were obtained forthe measurement ammoniumconcentration

(mg/L)in a aquaculture sample :

0.403,0.410, 0.401, 0.380

Thelast measurement is suspicious, should it be rejected?

Answer:

By using Q test at 90% confidencelevel :

�2 − �1
�=
�� – �1

x1 : the lowest value(suspicious)

x2 : the second lowest

xn : thegreatest value

0.401−0.380
�= = 0.7
0.410–0.380

The suspicious measurement, 0.380 should not be rejected because it meets the Q test at

90%confidence level.
b. If three further measurements were added to those given in the above question so that

thecomplete results became :

0.403, 0.410,0.401, 0.380, 0.400, 0.413,0.411

Should0.380still beretained?

Answer :

By using Q test at 90% confidencelevel :

�2 − �1
�=
�� – �1

0.400−0.380
�=
0.413–0.380
= 0.606

Thesuspicious value,0.380 is rejected because it does not comply the Q test at 90% confidencelevel.

Assignment 2

A chemistry student wanted to measure the accuracy of the graduations on a

400 ml beaker. The student placed the beaker on a scale accurate to one

decimal place and added water until the water reached the 400 mL line. This

was repeated 8 times and recorded the following masses of water 403.2g,

402.7g, 399.6g, 401.4g, 397.3g, 400.1g, 395.6g and 398.3g. Assuming the

density of water of is 1.00 g/ml, and by constructing a table as shown below,

calculate:

a. The mean of the measurements

�1 + �2 + … + ��
���� =
N

N : total number of samples

403.2+ 402.7+399.6+ 401.4+397.3+400.1+395.6+398.3


���� = 8
= 399.8 g
b. The variance of the measurements

2
�� − �
�2 =
n−1

S2 : sample variance

xi : the value of the one observation

� : the mean value of all observations

� : the number of observations

400− 399.8 2
�2 =
8−1
= 0.0057

c. The standard deviation of the measurements

�� − � 2
�=
n−1

�= 0.0057 = 0.0755

d. The standard error of the measurements

S
�������� ����� =

S : standard deviation
n : number of observations

0.0755
�������� ����� =
8
= 0.0267

e. The 95% confidence limits

By using Q test at 95% confidence level :

�2 − �1
�=
�� – �1

397.3 −395.6
�= = 0.22
403.2 – 395.6
Assignment 3

You are to measureCa2+concentration associated with aerosol particles collected onto 4

filtered samples using flame atomicabsorption spectrophotometry asthe detector.You

prepare8 standard solutionsfor yourcalibration curve. The followingdata was collected :

Standard Ca2+ Solutions (ppm) Average Absorbance (A)


0.5 0.085
1 0.177
2 0.342
5 0.707
6 0.873
8 1.05
10 1.149
12 1.202
Filtered Samples Average Absorbance (A)
A 0.266
B 1.121
C 1.09
D 0.759

a. In Microsoft Excel, plot the calibration data as Absorbance versus Concentration (M units).

(Note : 1 ppm = 0.00002495 M)

Standard Ca2+ solutions (M) Average Absorbance (A)


1.248 x 10-5 0.085
2.495 x 10-5 0.177
4.990 x 10 -5
0.342
1.2475 x 10 -4
0.707
1.497 x 10 -4
0.873
1.996 x 10-4 1.05
2.495 x 10 -4
1.149
2.994 x 10 -4
1.202
b. Define the linear region of your calibration curve. Using the trendline function, generate the
equation and standard deviation of the calibration curve for the linear region.
[Based on the graph in (a)]

c. Using your calibration curve equation, calculate the calcium concentrations (M units) for the four
samples. Remember, your calibration curve has limitations.

Filtered Samples Average Absorbance (A)


A 0.266
B 1.121
C 1.09
D 0.759

y = 0.1782 x – 0.1038

Sample A : Sample C :

0.266 = 0.1782 x – 0.1038 1.09 = 0.1782 x – 0.1038

x = 2.08 M x = 6.70 M

Sample B : Sample D :

1.121 = 0.1782 x – 0.1038 0.759 = 0.1782 x – 0.1038

x = 6.87 M x = 4.84 M
Sample Concentration (M) Average Absorbance (A)
A 2.08 0.266
B 6.87 1.121
C 6.70 1.09
D 4.84 0.759

d. For which samples are you able to determine the calcium concentration with your calibration
curve? Which ones cannot be determine? Explain.

Sample A, B and C can be determined with the calibration curve but sample D cannot. This is
because the value of sample D exceed the limitation of the calibration curve. For example, the
average absorbance of sample D is 0.759 therefore, the calcium concentration should be within
5.0 ppm to 6.0 ppm.

e. What modifications must you do to your samples or calibration curve so that you can accurately
measure the absorbance and calculate the correct calcium concentrations for all samples?

First, increase the accuracy by increasing the number of sampling calibration. Next, the accuracy of
some methods can be improved by adding a suitable internal standard to both calibration standards
and test samples and basing the regression on the ratio of the analyte response to that of the
internal standard. The use of an internal standard corrects for small variations in the operating
conditions. Other than that, the average absorbance and calcium concentration need to be adjusted.
For instance, the average absorbance should be within 47.74 to 57.74 hence we can get the calcium
concentration within 5.0 ppm to 6.0 ppm.

You might also like