RB fracionamento

Isabel Bravo 1
 RB fracionamento
X- or -radiation is sparsely ionizing; most damage can be
repaired
4 nm

Repairable Sublethal Damage

2 nm

Isabel Bravo 2
 RB fracionamento

Isabel Bravo 3
 RB fracionamento

4Rs OF DOSE FRACTIONATION

These are radiobiological mechanisms that impact the

response to a fractionated course of radiation therapy

• Repair of sublethal damage

– spares late responding normal tissue preferentially
• Redistribution of cells in the cell cycle
– increases acute and tumor damage, no effect on late responding normal
tissue
• Repopulation
– spares acute responding normal tissue, no effect on late effects,
– danger of tumor repopulation
• Reoxygenation
– increases tumor damage, no effect in normal tissues

Isabel Bravo 4
 RB fracionamento

In general, history has shown repeatedly that single

high doses of radiation do not allow a therapeutic
differential between tumor and critical normal tissues.

Dose fractionation does.

Isabel Bravo 5
 RB fracionamento

• Reoxygenation
• Redistribution
• Repair
• Repopulation (or Regeneration)
• Radiosensitivity

Isabel Bravo 6
 RB fracionamento

Isabel Bravo 7
 RB fracionamento
Relevance of Radiobiology to Clinical Fractionation
Protocols
Conventional treatment:
Tumors are generally irradiated with 2Gy dose per fraction delivered
daily to a more or less homogeneous field over a 6 week time period to
a specified total dose

The purpose of conventional dose fractionation is to increase dose to the

tumor while PRESERVING NORMAL TISSUE FUNCTION
• Deviating from conventional fractionation protocol impacts outcome
• How do you know what dose to give; for example if you want to change dose
per fraction or time? Radiobiological modeling provide the guidelines. It uses
– Radiobiological principles derived from preclinical data
– Radiobiological parameters derived from clinical altered fractionation
protocols
• hyperfractionation, accelerated fractionation, some hypofractionation schedules

The number of non-homogeneous treatment plans (IMRT) and extreme hypofractionated

treatments are increasing. Do existing Isabel
models cope?
Bravo 8
 RB fracionamento

Radiobiology allows the optimization of a

radiotherapy schedule for individual
patients in regards to:
• Total dose and number of fractions

• Overall time of the radiotherapy course

• Tumour control probability (TCP) and normal

tissue complication probability (NTCP)
Isabel Bravo 9
 RB fracionamento

Radiobiological models
• Many models exist
• Based on clinical experience, cell experiments
or mathematics

• One of the simplest and most used is the so

called “linear quadratic” or “alpha/beta” model
developed and modified by Thames, Withers,
Dale, Fowler and many others.
Isabel Bravo 10
 RB fracionamento

LQ Model

• α Lethal cell kill

• β Sub-lethal damage

Isabel Bravo 11
 RB fracionamento

It is hypothesized that the lethal lesions are

large double strand breaks with Multiply
4 nm Damaged Sites (MDS) that can not be
repaired. They are more likely to occur at the
end of a track

Unrepairable Multiply Damaged Site

Single lethal hit

2 nm Also known as  - type killing

Isabel Bravo 12
 RB fracionamento
At high dose, intertrack repairable Sublethal
Damage may Accumulate forming
unrepairable, lethal MDS

Also known as  - type killing

Isabel Bravo 13
 RB fracionamento

Isabel Bravo 14
 RB fracionamento

Linear Quadratic model

Isabel Bravo 15
 RB fracionamento

Two Component Model

• Two Component Model

n single (or single target, single hit +
lethal multi-target (n), single hit)
1.0 hits
1D0 =
reciprocal
• S.F.=e-D/1D0[1-(1-e-D/nD0)n]
S.F.
0.1 initial slope
Single hit Extrapolation
Number
Accumulated
damage

0.01
Accumulation
of sublethal nD0 =
reciprocal
damage final slope
0.001

DOSE Gy

Isabel Bravo 16
 RB fracionamento

Linear Quadratic model

single-hit injury (e –αD)

= exponential curve
(linear in half-log cell surv. curve)

• multi-hit (cumulative)
injury (e –βD2)
= continuously bending curve
related by a coefficient “ β“
to the square of the dose

• α/β = dose, at which single

and multi-hit mechanisms
contribute equally to cell killing

Isabel Bravo 17
 RB fracionamento

The linear quadratic model

1
0 2 4 6 8 10
Probability of cell survival

0.1

0.01

cell kill (low a/b)

cell kill (high a/b)

0.001
Dose (Gy)

Isabel Bravo 18
 RB fracionamento

The linear quadratic model

1
0 2 4 6 8 10
Alpha determines
initial slope
Probability of cell survival

0.1

Beta determines
0.01 curvature
cell kill (low a/b)
cell kill (high a/b)

0.001
Dose (Gy)
Isabel Bravo 19
 RB fracionamento

.
•The slope of an isoeffect curve
changes with size of dose per
fraction depending on tissue
type

• Acute responding tissues have

flatter curves than do late
responding tissues

•  measures the sensitivity of

tumor or tissue to fractionation i.e.
it predicts how total dose for a given
effect will change when you change
the size of dose fraction

Isabel Bravo 20
 RB fracionamento

α/β ratios
• Large α/β ratios • Small α/β ratio
• α/β = 10 to 20 • α/β = 2
– Early or acute – Late reacting
reacting tissues tissues, e.g. spinal
– Most tumours cord
– potentially prostate
– breast cancer
cancer

Isabel Bravo 21
 RB fracionamento
Sensitivity of Tissue to Dose
Fractionation can be estimated by
the  ratio

Isabel Bravo 22
 RB fracionamento

Fractionation
• Tends to spare late reacting normal tissues - the smaller the
size of the fraction the more sparing for tissues with low α/β
1
0 2 4 6 8 10
Probability of cell survival

0.1

0.01 cell kill (low a/b)

cell kill (high a/b)
fractionated (low a/b)
fractionated (low a/b)

0.001
Dose (Gy)

Isabel Bravo 23
 RB fracionamento

Response to Fractionation Varies With Tissue

1 1

Acute Responding
S.F. S.F. Fractionated
Tissues  = 10Gy
Late Effects

.1
.1 Fractionated
Late Responding
Tissues -  = 2Gy Acute Effects

Single Dose Single Dose

/ is high (>6Gy) when survival Late Effects Acute Effects
curve is almost exponential and low  = 2Gy  = 10Gy
.01 (1-4Gy) when shoulder is wide
.01
0 4 8 12 16 0 4 8 12 16 20
Dose (Gy) Dose (Gy)

Fractionation spares late responding tissues

Isabel Bravo 24
 RB fracionamento

Impact of fraction size on tumor and

normal tissues response
• Radiobiological data show that both tumores and acutely
tissues are less sensitive to change in fraction size then
late responding tissues.

• The sensitivity to changes in fraction size for each tissue

can be quantified with the use of the α/β ratio which
marks the shape of the fractionation response.

• Dose per fraction is the dominant factor in determining

late effects.
Isabel Bravo 25
 RB fracionamento

Impact of fraction size on tumor and

normal tissues response
• A high α/β ratio (7 - 20 Gy), as in acutely responding
tissues and in tumors, indicates a more linear survival
response of the target cells.

• A low α/β ratio (0,5 – 6 Gy), as in late responding

tissues, defines a survival curve of the target cells that is
significantly curved.

• Therefore, the effects of fractionation are relatively larger

in the latter than in the former tissues.
Isabel Bravo 26
 RB fracionamento

Need to know the radiobiological data for

patients
• Important assumptions:
– There is full repair between two fractions
– There is no proliferation of tumour cells -
the overall treatment time does not play a
role.

Isabel Bravo 27
 RB fracionamento

• Reoxygenation
• Redistribution
• Repair
• Repopulation (or Regeneration)
• Radiosensitivity

Isabel Bravo 28
 RB fracionamento

Isabel Bravo 29
 RB fracionamento

Repopulation/
Regeneration
• Normal tissue repopulation is an important
mechanism to reduce acute side effects from
e.g. the irradiation of skin or mucosa

• Radiation schedules must allow sufficient

regeneration time for acutely reacting tissues.

Isabel Bravo 30
 RB fracionamento

Repopulation
• The repopulation time of tumour cells appears
to vary during radiotherapy - at the
commencement it may be slow (e.g. due to
hypoxia), however a certain time after the first
fraction of radiotherapy (often termed the “kick-
off time”, Tk) repopulation accelerates.

• Repopulation must be taken into account

when protracting radiation e.g. due to
scheduled (or unscheduled) breaks such as
holidays.
Isabel Bravo 31
 RB fracionamento

Repopulation in Tumor Tissue

Rat rhabdosarcoma Human SCC head and neck

T2 T3

70
Total local control
Dose
(2 Gy equiv.)
55 no local control

40
Treatment Duration
4 weeks to start of accelerated repopulation.
Thereafter T1/2 of 4 days = loss of 0.6Gy per day

Treatment breaks are often “bad”

Isabel Bravo 32
 RB fracionamento

The 5 Rs of radiotherapy: Influence on

time between fractions, t, and overall
treatment time, T

• Reoxygenation • Need minimum T

• Need minimum t
• Redistribution
• Need minimum t for
• Repair normal tissues
• Repopulation (or • Need to reduce T for
Regeneration) tumour

Isabel Bravo 33
 RB fracionamento

The 5 Rs of radiotherapy: Influence on

time between fractions, t, and overall
treatment time, T

• Reoxygenation • Need minimum T

• Need minimum t
• Redistribution
Cannot achieve •allNeed
at once -
minimum t for
• RepairOptimization of schedule
normal tissues
for individual circumstances
• Need to reduce T for
• Repopulation (or
Regeneration) tumour

Isabel Bravo 34
 RB fracionamento

Time, dose and fractionation

• Need to optimize fractionation schedule
for individual circumstances
• Parameters:
Total dose
Dose per fraction
Time between fractions
Total treatment time

Isabel Bravo 35
 RB fracionamento

Altered Fractionation

or

How to optimally distribute

dose over time
Isabel Bravo 36
 RB fracionamento

Players
• Total dose (D)
• Dose per fraction (d)
• Interval between fractions (t)
• Overall treatment time (T)
• Tumor type
• Acute reacting normal tissues
• Late reacting normal tissues
Isabel Bravo 37
 RB fracionamento

Definitions
• Conventional fractionation
– Dose per week of 9 to 10 Gy
– Daily doses (d) of 1.8 to 2 Gy
– Total dose (D) of 40 to 70 Gy

• Hyperfractionation
– The number of fractions (N) is increased
– T is kept the same
– Dose per fraction (d) less than 1.8 Gy
– Two fractions per day (t)

Rationale: Spares late responding tissues

Isabel Bravo 38
 RB fracionamento

Definitions
• Accelerated fractionation
• Shorter overall treatment time
– Dose per fraction of 1.8 to 2 Gy
– More than 10 Gy per week
Rationale: Overcome accelerated tumor repopulation

• Hypofractionation
– Dose per fraction (d) higher than 2.2 Gy
– Reduced total number of fractions (N)
Rationale: Tumor has low  ratio and there is no therapeutic
advantage to be gained with respect to late complications

Isabel Bravo 39
 RB fracionamento

α/β ratios
• Large α/β ratios • Small α/β ratio
• α/β = 10 to 20 • α/β = 2
– Early or acute – Late reacting
reacting tissues tissues, e.g. spinal
– Most tumours cord
– potentially prostate
– breast cancer
cancer

Isabel Bravo 40
 RB fracionamento

Conventional

70 Gy - 35 fx - 7 wks

Hyperfractionated
81.6 Gy - 68 fx - 7 wks

Very accelerated
with reduction of dose
54 Gy - 36 fx - 12 days

Moderately accelerated

72 Gy - 42 fx - 6 wks

Isabel Bravo 41
 RB fracionamento
EORTC hyperfractionation trial in oropharynx cancer (N
= 356)
Oropharyngeal Ca T2-3, N0-1

80.5 Gy - 70 fx - 7 wks control: 70 Gy - 35-40 fx - 7-8 wks

SURVIVAL p = 0.08
LOCAL CONTROL p = 0.02

Years Years

Isabel Bravo 42
 RB fracionamento

Very Accelerated: CHART (N = 918)

54 Gy - 36 fx - 12 days control: 66 Gy - 33 fx - 6.5 wks

Loco-regional control Survival

conventional conventional
CHART CHART

Favourable outcome with CHART: well differentiated tumors

larynx carcinomas
Isabel Bravo 43
 RB fracionamento
Moderately Accelerated
DAHANCA 6: only glottic, (N = 694)
DAHANCA 7: all other sites, + nimorazole (N = 791)

66-68 Gy - 33-34 fx - 6 wks control: 66-68 Gy - 33-34 fx - 7 wks

Actuarial 5-year rates 5 fx/wk 6 fx/wk

Local control
DAHANCA 6 73% 81% p=0.04
DAHANCA 7 56% 68% p=0.009
Nodal control
DAHANCA 6 + 7 87% . 89% n.s.
Disease-specific survival
DAHANCA 6 + 65% 72% p=0.04
7
n.s.
n.s.
Overall survival
Late effects (edema, fibrosis)
Isabel Bravo 44
 RB fracionamento
Altered fractionation in head and neck cancer:
meta-analysis
Randomized trials 1970-1998 (no postop RT) Bourhis, Lancet 2006
15 trials included (6515 patients)

Survival benefit: 3.4% (36% 39% at 5 years, p = 0.003)

Loco-regional control benefit: 7% (46.5% 53% at 5 years, p < 0.0001)

Isabel Bravo 45
 RB fracionamento
% Loss of local control/day

“CONVENCIONAL”

Larynx 2.5 Maciejewski et al, 1983

Oropharynx 2.3 Wang, 1988
Head & neck 2.0 Bataini et al, 1989
Head & neck 1.7 Mendenhall et al, 1989
Larynx 2.9 Taylor et al, 1991
Head & neck 1.0 Pajak et al, 1991
Larynx 1.7 Barton et al, 1992
Larynx 1.6 Robertson et al, 1996
Head & neck 1.2 Roberts et al, 1994
1.5 Isabel Bravo 46
 RB fracionamento

% Loss of local control/day

“CERVIX CA”

1.1 Fyles et al, 1992

0.3 Lanciano et al, 1993
1.4 Girinsky et al, 1993
0.7 Petereit et al, 1995
0.5 Pedersen et al, 1994
0.8

Isabel Bravo 47
 RB fracionamento

Conclusions for HNSCC

• Benefits from altered fractionation
• In principle, tumors should be treated for an overall
treatment time that is as short as possible consistent with
acceptable acute morbidity, but with a dose per fraction
that does not compromise late responding normal tissues,
or total dose.

• Avoid treatment breaks and treatment prolongation

wherever possible – and consider playing “catch-up” if
there are any

• working Saturdays

Isabel Bravo 48
 RB fracionamento

Use of the LQ model in

external beam radiotherapy:
• Calculate ‘equivalent’ fractionation
schemes
• Determine radiobiological parameters
• Determine the effect of treatment gaps
– e.g. Do we need to give extra dose for the
long weekend break?

Isabel Bravo 49
 RB fracionamento
Relevance of Radiobiology to Clinical Fractionation
Protocols
Conventional treatment:
Tumors are generally irradiated with 2Gy dose per fraction delivered
daily to a more or less homogeneous field over a 6 week time period to
a specified total dose
The purpose of conventional dose fractionation is to increase dose to the
tumor while PRESERVING NORMAL TISSUE FUNCTION
• Deviating from conventional fractionation protocol impacts outcome
• How do you know what dose to give; for example if you want to change dose
per fraction or time? Radiobiological modeling provide the guidelines. It uses
– Radiobiological principles derived from preclinical data
– Radiobiological parameters derived from clinical altered fractionation
protocols
• hyperfractionation, accelerated fractionation, some hypofractionation schedules

The number of non-homogeneous treatment plans (IMRT) and extreme

hypofractionated treatments are increasing. Do existing models cope?

Isabel Bravo 50
 RB fracionamento

• Know the linear quadratic model formulation and how to use the
LQ model to change dose and dose per fraction

• Understand the 4Rs of radiobiology as they relate to clinical

fractionated regimens and the sources of heterogeneity that
impact the concept of equal effect per fraction

• Know the major clinical trials on altered fractionation and their

outcome

• Recognize the importance of dose heterogeneity in modern

treatment planning

Isabel Bravo 51
 RB fracionamento

• Reoxygenation
• Redistribution
• Repair
• Repopulation (or Regeneration)
• Radiosensitivity

Isabel Bravo 52