Morphology: Based On Victoria Fromkin Book
Morphology: Based On Victoria Fromkin Book
Morphology: Based On Victoria Fromkin Book
Boy and
Red but
Online a, an
Bound morphemes
If a morpheme must be attached to a base morpheme
because they are always the parts of words, these
morpheme are called Bound morphemes and they may
attached at the beginning, middle or the ends of the
worlds
A) If the affixes are attached in the beginning of
Bound morphemes also can be B) Suffixes are the affixes if they are placed in the
end of a morpheme
called Affixes.
Ex: Running, singer, dancer, friendly
Affixes can be attached to the
C) Infixes are Affixes in the middle of the words,
beginning, middle or end of there are not many in English language the
the morpheme common example of the infixes are the words,
f*ckin and all the euphemisms for it like
friggin, freakin, flippin
1.Not all words undergo regular morphological 3. Borrowed words may retain borrowed
processes morphology.
(Example: feet, went, sing, children) *Latin datum and data (rather than *datums).
(e.g. curiouser)
Other Morphological Processes
Back-formations:
New words can be created through misanalysis of
morpheme boundaries
which determines its meaning and part of speech there may not be an upper limit
*Noun + adjective = adjective (headstrong) * Dr. Seuss’s “Tweetle beetle puddle paddle battle”
2. The stress on English compounds falls on the 4. The meaning of a compound is not always the sum of
- Like spoken languages, signs have parts of speech, roots and affixes, and morphemes that
can be free, bound, derivational or inflectional
- Like spoken languages, sign languages have rules for combining morphemes to make
complex signs
- Affixation can occur by adding another sign before or after the root sign.
*The negation suffix is a rapid turning over of the hand(s) after the root sign
- Sign languages can also allow the stem and the affixes to be signed simultaneously, an
option not available in spoken languages.
Morphological Analysis: Identifying Morphemes
Example prefixes in- and im- are seen to be variants of the "same" prefix in
English ( intolerable, impeccable) just as democrat and democrac are stem
variants of the same morpheme, which shows up in democratic with its "t" and in
democracy with its "c."
How would you determine whether a word in that language had one or two or more
morphemes ?
To determine what the morphemes are in such a
list, the first thing a field linguist would do is to see
The first thing to do would be to ask native
if there are many forms that mean the same thing
speakers how they would say various words.
in different words, that is, to look for recurring
Then, you collected the following sets or
forms. We find them: ugly occurs in ugly, uglier,
paradigms of forms:
ugliest, all three of which words include the
meaning ‘very unattractive’.
ANY QUESTION?