Plinej Skripta1
Plinej Skripta1
When applied linguists collect quantitative data they usually carry out their research on
a particular sample of language users or learners and try to extrapolate from their finding
to make claims about language users or learners more generally. However, it is important
to bear in mind that whatever findings we obtain in our research only really apply to the
particular group of people studied, at the time they were studied and in the particular
circumstances in which they were studied. However, there are measures that we can take
in our research design that allow us to generalize beyond the group of participants with
whom we conducted our study. In order to assess the generalizability of our findings, we
need to consider three factors:
The target population refers to the group of people that we want to make a claim about.
There are several ways of making a sample more representative of the target population.
One is to make it as large as possible. The closer the sample is in size to the target
population, the more reliable predictor it is likely to be of the behavior of that population
is a whole. If quantitative study aims to make comparisons between two groups of
people, one would expect to have a minimum of 30 participants in each group, giving a
total of 60 participants. If however, we wanted to investigate statistical relationships
between a large number of variables we would need t a much larger group. (statistical
analysis);(there are also graphs, percentages, numbers, charts etc.) – The term variables
simply means “things that we are looking at and attempting to measure” so it could
include a wide range of phenomena such as “speaking ability, rest performance, level of
motivation and so on”. There are other ways of ensuring that the sample we use is
representative of our target population.
9. Qualitative data
Case studies are in-depth analyses of individual cases designed to provide answers to a
certain research question. – Ehrman (1996) (2. Hendaut p.73) case study of a
student….Myers study etc..Several types of data ? Longitudinal research – where you
observe the individual change over time and the focus is on comparisons of the individual’s
performance on a sequence of occasions.
11. Observation
Another type of qualitative research is observation. It can be simply defined as watching and
recording how participants behave and interact in certain situations. Observers may or may
not be part of the action. There are two types of observation: non-participant observation
and participant observation. Non participant observation requires the researcher to
quietly observe what is going on in a particular situation, without being involved in the
situation herself or himself. This type of data collection strategy is particularly useful for
projects that aim to find out how language teaching classrooms work. It can produce data that
are both qualitative and quantitative. – Matsumoto’s classroom observation (2009). This
type of research is also used to check effectiveness of language teacher training program.
Participant observation is closely related to ethnographic research, this approach has its
origins in anthropology and was originally used to investigate the behavior and
characteristics of particular cultures. (researcher immersing him or herself totally in the
culture under examination, living in the community and using this experience to provide very
richly detailed data about how the members of the culture behave on a day-to-day basis.
12. Experiments
Traditional behaviorists believed that language learning is simply a matter of imitation and habit
formation. Children imitate the sounds and patterns which they hear around them and
receive positive reinforcement (which could take the form of praise or just successful
communication) for doing so. Thus encouraged by their environment, they continue to
imitate and practice these sounds and patterns until they form “habits” of correct
language use. According to this view, the quality and quantity of the language which the
child hears, as well as the consistency of the reinforcement offered by other in the
environment, should have an effect on the child’s success in language learning. The
behaviourist view imitation and practice as primary processes in language development.
Imitation: Word for word repetition of all or part of someone else’s utterance.
Practice: Repetitive manipulation of form.
STIMULUS – RESPONSE - REINFORCEMENT
15. The innatist position (1st language acquisition)
The linguist Noah Chomsky claims that children are biologically programmed for
language and that language develops in the child in just the same way that other
biological functions develop. For Chomsky, language acquisition is very similar to the
development of walking. The environment makes a basic contribution – in this case, the
availability of people who speak to the child. The child, or rather, the child’s biological
endowment, will do the rest. Chomsky’s logical problem of language acquisition – refers
to the fact that children come to know more about the structure of their language than
they could reasonably be expected to learn on the basis of the samples of language which
they hear (mothers not giving enough or any response/feedback). He claims that children
are born with special ability to discover for themselves the underlying rules of a language
system. LAD (Language acquisition device) – this device was often described as an
imaginary “black box” which is thought to contain all and only the principles which are
universal to all human languages. For the LAD to work, the child needs access only to
samples of the natural language. The language samples work as a trigger to activate the
device. Once it is activated, the child is able to discover the structure of the language to
be learned by matching the innate knowledge of basic grammatical relationships to the
structures of the particular language in the environment. – UG (Universal Grammar).
“The critical period hypothesis” is a specific time and limited period during which
language can be learned. (right time for acquiring language). (CPH). There are two
versions of the CPH. The strong version and the weak version. The strong version is
that children must acquire their first language by puberty or they will never be able to
learn from subsequent exposure. The weak version is that language learning will be more
difficult and incomplete after puberty. (Natural experiments: Victor and Genie handout 3
p.11) – (Deaf signers p.15 h3)
The interactionist position is that language develops as a result of the complex interplay
between the uniquely human characteristics of the child and the environment in which the
child develops. Unlike the innatists, the interactionists claim that language which is
modified to suit the capability of the learner is a crucial element in the language
acquisition process. Caretaker talk (“motherese”) from the interactionists perspective
have studied the speech directed to children. We are all familier with the way adults
typically modify the way they speak when addressing little children. In English, the
caretaker talk involves slower rate of speech, higher pitch, more varied intonations,
shorter and simpler sentence patterns. Furthermore, topics of conversation are often
limited to the child’s immediate environment, the “here and now”. Adults often repeat the
content of a child’s utterance, but they do so with a grammatically correct sentence.
Learner characteristics:
Knowledge of a language (language transfer)
Cognitive considerations (maturity, metalinguistic awareness, world knowledge)
Affective considerations
Learning conditions
Modified input (caretaker talk /motherese (L1) / foreigner/teacher talk (L2)
Exposure to L2; error-correction
According to all behaviorists, all learning, whether verbal or non-verbal takes place through the
same underlying process, habit formation. Learners receive linguistic input from speakers
in their environment, and positive reinforcement for their correct repetitions and
imitations. As a result, habits are formed. Because language development is described as
the acquisition of a set of habits, it is assumed that a person learning a second language
start off with the habits associated with the first language. These habits interfere with
those needed for second language speech, and new habits must be formed. (Lado 1964).
For the behaviorist, errors are seen as first language habits interfering with the acquisition
of second language habits. This psychological learning theory has often been linked to
the contrastive analysis hypothesis (CAH). The CAH predicts that where there are
similarities between the two languages, the learner will acquire target language structures
with ease; where there are differences, the learner will have difficulty.
● Comprehension check – efforts by the native speaker to determine that the learner
understands (for example, “The bus leaves at 6:30. Do you understand?)
● Clarification requests – efforts to get the learner to clarify something which has not
been understood (for example “Could you say that again?”)
● Self-repetition or paraphrase – the native speaker repeats his or her sentence either
partially or in its entirety. (For example, “She got lost on her way home from school. She
was walking home from school. She got lost.”)
When researchers are interested in finding out whether an individual factor such as
motivation affects second language learning, they usually select a group of learners and give
them a questionnaire to measure the type and degree of motivation. The test and the
questionnaire are both scored and the researcher investigates whether a learner with a high
score on the proficiency test is also more likely to have a high score on the motivation
questionnaire. If this is the case, the researcher usually concludes that high levels of
motivation are correlated with success in language learning. The first problem is that it is not
possible to directly observe and measure qualities such as aptitude, motivation, extroversion
or even intelligence. In motivation questionnaires, learners are often asked whether they
willingly seek out opportunities to use their second language with native speakers and if so,
how often they do this. (p. 35 h 4) (p. 36 proficiency test – motivated students – less
motivated students)
23. L2 Proficiency – Cummins
In his early work, Cummins distinguished two types of proficiency. Basic interpersonal
communication skills (BICS) are the skills required for oral fluency and sociolinguistic
appropriateness. They are “basic” in the sense that they develop naturally as a result of
exposure to a language through communication. Cognitive/academic language
proficiency (CALP) consists of the linguistic knowledge and literacy skills required for
academic work.
24. Intelligence
Many studies using a variety of IQ tests and different methods of assessing language learning
have found that intelligence levels were a good means of predicting how successful a
learner would be at language learning. By some studies, intelligence was highly related to
performance on reading, dictation, and writing tasks and not on listening comprehension
and free oral production tasks. These findings suggest that intelligence is more related to
those second language skills which are used in the formal study of the language, but that
intelligence is much less likely to influence the way in which oral communication skills
are developed.
25. Aptitude
Aptitude is natural ability to do something. (Lorraine Obler (1989) p.37 CJ study h4). The
“aptitude” factor has been investigated most intensively by researchers who are interested
in developing test which can predict how successful language learner will be. The most
widely used aptitude tests are the Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT) and
Pimsleur Language Apttitude Battery (PLAB). Both tests measure characteristics such
as:
● The ability to identify and memorize new sounds
● The ability to understand how words function grammatically in sentences
● The ability to figure out grammatical rules from L2 samples
● Memory for new words
It is thought that learners will be more successful if they have these abilities. It is not
clear what the abilities are that constitute aptitude.
26. Personality
A number of personality characteristics have been proposed as likely to affect second language
learning, but it has not been easy to demonstrate their effects in empirical studies. It is
often argued that an extroverted person is well-suited to language learning. However,
research does not always support this conclusion. Although some studies have found that
success in language learning is highly related to learners’ scores on some characteristics
often associated with extroversion seuch as assertiveness and adventurousness, others
have found that successful language learners do not get high scores on measures of
extroversion. Another aspect of personality which has been studied is inhibition. It has
been suggested that inhibition discourages risk-taking which is necessary for progress in
language learning. (p.38 h4 Personality – effects of small doses of alcohol on
pronunciation). Several other personality characteristics such as self-esteem, empathy,
dominance, talkativeness, and responsiveness, have also been studied. – the research does
not show a clearly defined relationship between personality and second language
acquisition. Personality variables seem to be consistently related to the communicative
ability, but not to the grammatical accuracy.
● GLOBAL self-esteem – the assessment of self-worth over a period of time and across a
number of situations; relatively stable in a mature adult
● SITUATIONAL (specific) self-esteem – one’s self-appraisals in particular life situations
(at work, at home, social interactions, etc.) or on certain traits (intelligence,
communicative ability, etc.)
● TASK self-esteem – a particular task in a specific situation (e.g. geography, writing, a
special classroom exercise)
Extraversion and introversion stereotypes – gregarious people, life of the party vs.
quiet and reserved people?
Extroverts: they need to receive ego enhancement from other ppl; not necessarily loud-
mouthed and talkative
Introverts: they derive a sense of wholeness and fulfillment within themselves; an inner
strength of character
Extroverts are not necessarily good language learners, although extraversion may help
develop the oral communicative competence, but not listening, reading and writing.
27. Motivation
Motivation is probably the most frequently used catch-all term for explaning the success or
failure of virtually any complex task. It is easy to assume that success or failure of
virtually any complex task. It is easy to assume that success in any task is due simply to
the fact that someone is “motivated”. It is easy in second language learning to claim that
a learner will be successful with the proper motivation.
Characteristics of motivated learners:
● Positive task orientation – the S wants to tackle a task and has confidence in
his/her success
● Ego-involvement – it’s important for the S to succeed in his/her learning to
promote his/her (positive) self-image
● Need for achievement – the need to achieve something, to overcome difficulties
● High aspirations – the S is ambitious, wants to get good grades, goes for
demanding challenges
● Goal orientation – the S is very aware of the goals of learning and directs his/her
attention towards achieving them
● Perseverance – investing effort in learning, not being discouraged by setbacks
● Tolerance of ambiguity – the S is not frustrated by temporary lack of
understanding or confusion.
Intrinsically motivated activities are ones for which there is no apparent rewards
except the activity itself. (competence and self-determination). Extrinsically
motivated behaviors, on the other hand, are carried out in anticipation of a reward
from outside and beyond the self. Typical extrinsic rewards are money, prizes, grades.
28.
Learning styles
An area of research which has received a lot of attention in many areas of education is the issue
of learning styles. This research suggests that different learners approach a task with a
different set of skills and preferred strategies. Three groups of learning styles:
● Visual (see it)
● Auditory (aural) (they need to hear something once or twice to know it)
● Kinesthetic (do it) (they need to live the new knowledge in ways that involve
them more completely)
When learners are given some freedom to choose their preferred way of learning, they
will do better than those who forced themselves to learn in environments where a
learning style does not suit them is imposed as the only way to learn.
Attitudes have been measured both indirectly and directly. An example of indirect
measurement is the Semantic Differential Technique. This presents learners with a
series of antonyms (for example, useful-useless, ugly-beautiful) and asks them to
evaluate a given phenomenon. (for example, a language or a speaker’s accent) on
each dimension. Direct measurement of attitudes usually involves self-report
questionnaires. (social desirability). These often take the form of a series of
statements to which the learners respond on a five-point scale (for example strongly
agree to strongly disagree)
Methodology
What is a method? About four decades ago Edward Anthony (1963) gave us a definition
that has admirably withstood the test of time. His concept of “method” was the second of
three hierarchical elements, namely approach, method, and technique. An approach,
according to Anthony, was a set of assumptions dealing with the nature of language,
learning and teaching (theoretical positions/beliefs about the nature of language, language
learning&teaching). Method was described as an overall plan for systematic presentation
of language based upon a selected approach. (overall plan/classroom specifications for
accomplishing linguistic objectives (e.g. teacher role, materials)). Techniques were the
specific activities manifested in the classroom that were consistent with a method and
therefore were in harmony with an approach as well (procedures/tasks/activities/
exercises for realising lesson objectives).
In the Western world, “foreign” language tlearning in schools was synonymous with the
learning of Latin or Greek. Latin was taught by means of what has been called the
Classical Method: focus on grammatical rules, memorization of vocabulary and of
various declensions and conjugations, translation of texts, written exercises.
As other languages began to be taught in educational institutions in the eighteenth and
nineteenth centuries, the Classical Method was adopted as the chief means for teaching
foreign languages. Little thought was given to teaching someone how to speak the
language.
In the 19th century the Classical Method came to be known as the Grammar Translation
Method. The Grammar translation Method withstood attempts at the turn of the twentieth
century to “reform” language-teaching methodology and to this day it is practiced in too
many educational contexts. Prator and Celce-Murcia listed the major characteristics of
Grammar Translation:
The basic premise of the Direct Method was similar to that of Gouin’s Series Method (p.20 h5),
namely, that second language learning should be more like first language learning – lots of oral
interaction, spontaneous use of the language, no translation between first and second languages,
and little or no analysis of grammatical rules. It was most widely accepted in private language
schools where students were highly motivated and where native-speaking teachers could be
employed. The Direct Method did not take well in public education, where the constraints of
budget, classroom size, time, and teacher background made such a method difficult to use.
Moreover, the Direct Method was criticized for its weak theoretical foundations.
● Imitation of L1 acquisition
● Language of instruction: L2 (exclusively)
● Demonstration, visual aids (realia, pictures)
● Grammar is taught inductively
● Students speak as much as possible – everyday voc.
● Pronunciation – from the beginning
● Full sentences (Q&A sessions), self-correction
● Teacher directs, students less passive
● Techniques: reading aloud, Q&A, conversation practice, fill-in-the-blanks
WW2 broke out > courses for special, intensive languages that focused on aural/oral skills >
Army Specialized Training Program (ASTP)(Army Method). The army method came to be
known in the 1950s as the Audiolingual Method.
● Behaviourism – ‘to engender good habits in language learners by using the Stimulus-
Response-Reinforcement model’
● World War II (communication in FL – quickly!)
● Drills: grammatical sentence patterns (dialogues)–grammar induced from examples, TL
only
● Teacher – in control: providing a good model; banishing mistakes; providing positive
reinforcement
● Techniques: dialogue memorisation, repetition drill, chain drill, single/multiple-slot
substitution drill, transformation drill, complete the dialogue
Designer Methods (1970s)
The class was perceived as a “group” – a group in need of certain therapy and counseling. The
social dynamics of such a group were of primary importatnce. In order for any learning to take
place, group members first needed to interact in an interpersonal relationship in which students
and teacher joined together to facilitate learning in a context of valuing each individual in the
group. In such a surrounding, each person lowered the defenses that prevent open interpersonal
communication. The anxiety caused by the educational context was lessened by means of the
supportive community. The teacher’s presence was not perceived as a threat, nor was it the
teacher’s purpose to impose limits and boundaries, but rather, as a true counselor, to center his or
her attention on the clients and their needs. (Japanese > English (p.26 h5)
-Suggestopedia
Like Suggestopedia, the Silent Way rested on more cognitive than affective arguments for its
theoretical sustenance. While Caleb Gattegno, its founder was said to be interested in a
humanistic approach to education, much of the silent way was characterized by a problem-
solving approach to learning. > Discovery Learning > Independence, autonomy and
responsibility > People had to cooperate with each other in the process of solving language
problems > the teacher was a stimulator > Cuisenaire rods > they are used for vocabulary. (p.29
h5)
He was convinced that language classes were often the locus of too much anxiety, so he wished
to devise a method that was as stress-free as possible, where learners would not feel overy self-
conscious and defensive. Commands were an easy way to get learners to move about and to
loosen up: Open the window, Close the door, Stand up, Sit down, Puck up the book. Give it to
John and so on.
Task-based teaching makes an important distinction between target tasks, which students must
accomplish beyond the classroom, and pedagogical tasks, which form the nucleus of the
classroom activity. Target tasks are not unlike the functions of language that are listen in
syllabuses; however, they are much more specific and more explicitly related to classroom
instructions. Pedagogical tasks include any of a series of techniques designed ultimately to teach
students to perform the target task; the climactic pedagogical task actually involves students in
some form of simulation of the target task itself (i.e. through a role-play simulation in which
certain roles are assigned to pairs of learners)
Classroom management
● Activities
- setting up activities
- giving instructions
- checking understanding of instructions
- monitoring activities
- timing activities
- bringing activities to an end
● Grouping and seating
- forming groups (singles, pairs, groups, mingle)
- arranging seating
- deciding where you will stand or sit
- reforming class as a whole group after activities
● Authority
- gathering and holding attention
- deciding who does what (ie answer a question, make a decision)
- establishing or relinquishing authority as appropriate
- getting someone to so something
● Critical moments
- starting the lesson
- dealing with unexpected problems
- maintaining appropriate discipline
- finishing the lesson
● Tools & techniques
- using the board/equipment/aids
- using gestures
- speaking clearly at an appropriate volume and speed
- use of silence
- grading complexity and grading quantity of language
● Working with students
- spreading your attention evenly
- using intuition to gauge students feelings
- eliciting honest feedback from students
- really listening to students
Classroom interaction
Seating
Changing seating arrangements can help students interact with different people, change the focus
from you when appropriate and allow a range of different situations to be recreated within the
classroom, as well as simply adding variety to the predictability of sitting in the same place every
time.
- turn around and sit backwards, working with people behind them
- sit on the ends of their row and work with people in the next row
- sit on their desks and talk with people nearby
- stand up, move around and returnt to a different seat
- stand in the aisle space between rows
- all come to the front to talk
Giving instuctions
In monolingual classes you have a choice: English, native language or some mixture of both.
- The first 30 seconds: ’monitoring to check the mechanics’ – whether students have
understood the instuctions & are doing what they are supposed to
- Monitor actively (visible, resource, advice, correction)
- Participate (join a group/groups, alert to what others are doing)
- Monitor discretely (you want them to use their own resources)
- Vanish (get out of immediate eyeshot)
Gestures
Try to develop a range of gestures (and facial expressions) to save yourself repeating basic
instuctions and to increase opportunities for learner talk. Remember that learners will need to
learn the meaning of your gestures. For example ’pointing to the ground indicates the present’;
you must give the oral instuction a few times while also gesturing, they will soon associate the
gesture alone with that instuction.
- Students probably know a lot more than we may give them credit for
- Starting with what they know is a productive way to begin new work
- Involving people in question-and-answer movement towards new discoveries is often
more effective than simply giving ’lectures’
There are 3 steps to eliciting:
1. Convey a clear idea to the students, perhaps by using pictures, gestures or questions
2. Students then supply the appropriate language, information or ideas
3. Give them feedback
Advice when eliciting:
Teacher talking time (TTT) – The more you talk, the less opportunity there is for the learners.
Allow them the time and the quiet they need. Don’t feel the need to fill every gap in a lesson.
Echo – When you echo, the learners soon learn that they don’t need to listen to anyone except
you, because they know you’ll repeat everything. This has a negative effect on interaction
patterns within the classroom.
Helpful sentence completion – You can be so desperate for a student to say what you want them
to say that you are already predicting the words the student will produce and eagerly wishing for
them to be said- so much so that you often find yourself adding tails to sentence after sentence.
People need to finish their own sentences. If students can’t complete the sentence themselves,
they need help – but help to produce their own sentence, using their own words and their own
ideas.
The running commentary – Don’t give a running commentary about the mechanics of past,
present and future activities. Tell students what they need to know – and stop.
Insufficient authority / over-politeness – You can undermine yourself by being too polite. Say
what you need to say without hiding it. If you want to stop an activity, say Stop now, please.
(instead of ’If you don’t mind, it would be very nice if you could just stop the activity if you feel
that’s okay). Feel your own natural authority and let it speak clearly.
● Audibility: the right balance between audibility and volume (quiet teacher – quiet class,
but inaudiable teacher – insufferable class)
● Variety: you should vary your voice, depending on the activity or type of lesson (one
voice for giving instructions and/or introducing a new topic, another for chatting
informally) – speaking quietly is more effecting than shouting, but also if you almost
never raise your voice, a dramatic shouct can sometimes be very effective
● Conservation: conserve your vocal energy
Traditional teaching
It is often characterised by the teacher spending quite a lot of class time using the board to
explain things – as if ’transmitting’ knowledge to the class – with occasional questions to or from
the learners. After explanations, the students usually do some practive exercises to test whether
they have understood what they’ve been told. Teacher does most of the talking and is by far the
most active person. The student’s role is primarily to listen and concentrate and perhaps take
notes. In many cultures it represents the predominant mode of education.
Experimental learning
1. doing something
2. recalling what happened
3. reflecting on that
4. drawing conclusions from the reflection
5. using those conclusions to inform and prepare for future practical experiences
Three kinds of teacher:
● The explainer – knows the subject very well but has limited knowledge of teaching
methodology. This kind of teacher relies mainly on ’explaining’ or ’lecturing’ as a way of
conveying information to the students. The students are listening, perhaps occasionally
answering questions and making notes but are mostly not being personally involved or
challenged.
● The involver – knows the subject matter and is familiar with teaching methodology. She
is able to use appropriate teaching and organisational procedures and techniques to help
her students learn about the subject matter. This teacher is trying to involve the students
actively and puts great deal of effort into finding appropriate and interesting activitiees
that will do this.
● The enabler – confident enough to share control with the learners. Decisions made in her
classroom may often be shared or nagotiated. Sometimes this will involve her in less
traditional ’teaching’, she may become a ’guide’ or ’controller’ or a ’resouce of
information’ when needed. This teacher knows about the subject matter and about
methodology, but also has awarness of how individuals and groups are thinking and
feeling within her class. She is building effective working relationships and a good
classroom atmosphere.
Teacher roles
Teacher should be able to adapt a number of different roles in the class, depending on what the
students are doing. If the teacher always acts as a controller, standing in front of the class,
dictating everything that happens and being the focus of attention, there will be little chance for
students to take much responsibility for their own learing.Sometimes, teacher needs to be a
prompter, encouraging students, pushing them to achieve more, feeding in a bit of information or
language to help them proceed. Sometimes teachers need to act as feedback providers (helping
students to evaluate their performance), or accessors (telling students how well they’ve done or
giving them grades). They need to be able to function as a resource (for language information)
or tutor (an advisor who responds to what the student is doing and advises them on what to do
next)
Teacher skills
● Managing classes – whatever activity teachers ask their students to be involved in, they
will have thought (or be able to carry out) procedures to make the activity successful.
They’ll know how to put students into groups, or when to start or finish and activity and
so on.
● Matching groups and tasks – Students will learn more successfully if they enjoy the
activities they are involved in and are interested or stimulated by the topics that teachers
bring to classroom. Many teachers have the experience of using an activity with two or
three groups and having considerable success only to find that it completely fails in the
next class. What such experiences clearly suggest is that teachers need to think carefully
about matching activities and topics to the different groups they teach.
● Variety – good teachers vary activities and topics over a period of time. Much of the
value of an activity resides in its freshness. Even when they use same activity types for
some reason, it is important to try to ensure that learner roles are not always the same.
Children become bored of doing the same things all the time.
Teacher knowledge
● The language system – Language teacher needs to know how language works (having a
knowledge of the grammatical system and understanding the lexical system). Students
have a right to expect that teachers can explain straightforward grammar concepts, to
demonstrate and pronounce words etc. If they’re not sure what the answer to a certain
question is, they need to be able to say things like ’I’ll have to check and bring you more
complete answer tomorrow’. Bringing the promised information will demonstrate the
teacher’s knowledge of the language and reference materials.
● Materials and resources – Teachers need to know about books and websites where
technical information is available. If teacher is using a coursebook, students expect
him/her to know how the materials work.
● Classroom equipment – there used to be only pen, board and chalk but now there are tape
recorders, the language laboratory, video machines, an overhead projector, computes,
data projectors and interactive whiteboard. Some teachers are more comfortable with
these various pieces of educational technology than others. However, students will expect
the teacher to know how to use the equipment that he/she has elected to use. Learning
how to use various types of equipment is major part of modern teaching training.
● Keeping up-to-date - a good way of learning about new activities and techniques is to
read the various teacher’s magazines and journals that are available. A lot can be learned
from attending seminars and teacher’s conferences.
Art or science?
Is teaching language an art or science? Some of the technical skills that are required of teachers
(how to do things, a constant attention to innovation..) need to be almost scientific in their rigour.
Yet teaching is an art too, it works when the relationship that is created between teacher and
students, and between students in a group is at its best. If teachers manage to establish a good
rapport (relationship between teacher and students) with a group, almost anything is possible.
Some students need English for Specific Purpose (ESP). Such students need to learn legal
language, the language of tourism, banking or nursing and so on. Business English is extremely
popular (students learn about how to operate in English in the business world). Some students
need English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in order to study at an English speaking university
or college or because they need to access English-language academic texts. General English is
learned for international communication and travel.
Students of the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) is tend to be learning so that they can use
English when travelling or to communicate with other people who also speak English. English
as a Second Language (ESL) students are usually living in the target-language community.
Because there two are usually mixed up, the term English for Speakers of Other Languages
(ESOL) is used to describe both.
Schools and language schools – Students learn English in primary and secondary classrooms
around the world. They haven’t choosen to do learn it, but learn it because English is on the
curriculum. On the other hand, students choose to study English in private language schools and
they are usually better equipped than some government schools and they have smaller class
sizes.
Larger classes and one-to-one teaching – One-to-one teaching is a private session with just
student and a teacher while in larger classes teachers usually assign pairwork or groupwork so
the students have more chances for interaction than they would get with the whole-class
teaching. The size of the class will affect how we teach.
In-school and in-company – Teachers have to be aware of school policy and conform to syllabus
and curriculum decisions. There may be learning outcomes which students are expected to
achieve. But also, a number of companies offer language classes and expect teachers to go to the
company office or factory to teach. There the ’classroom’ may not be quite as appropriate as
those in schools.
Real and virtual learning environments – Some of the issues for both real and virtual learning
environmentsa are the same. Students need to be motivated and we still need to offer help. The
best virtual learning sites have online tutors who interact with their students vie email or online
chat forums. Virtual learning is significantly different from face-to-face classes; e.g. students can
attend lesson when they want rather than when lessons are timetabled; it no longer matters where
they are from because all they need is internet access. Benefit of the physical reality is having
teachers and students around you when you are learning so that you can see their expressions and
get messages from their gestures, tone of voice...
Learner differences
Age – Children (ages 2-14), Adolescents (12-17), Young Adults (16-20), Adults (20+)
Chidren – Children have short attention spans, they are physically active, egocentric and relate
new ideas to themselves, respond well to individual attention from the teacher, they are curious
and receptive to new ideas. Grammar rules and explanations are reduced to minimum. Games,
songs, shorter activities, visuals, realia are the most useful for teaching them sth.
Adolescents – have capacity for abstract thought, they are committed to things that interest them
but are also usually anxious and are searching for identity and self-esteem
Adults – have a wider range of life experiences and are usually more disciplined. They can
sustain motivation by perceiving long-term learning goals. They have affective filters.
Learning styles – All students respond to various stimuli but for most of them some
things stimulate them into learning more than other things do. The Neuro – Linguistic
Programming (NLP) model takes account of this by showing how some students are specially
influenced by visual stimuli (more likely to remember things after seeing them), some are
affected by auditory input (respond well to things they hear), and for some it is kinaestethic
activity (physical activity involved). Another variation is offered by the concept of Multiple
Intelligence which states that we all have a number of different intelligences (mathematical,
musical, interpersonal, spatial, emotional...) e.g. someone’s mathematical intelligence might be
highly developed but their musical intelligence less developed.
Educational and cultural background – Some children come from homes where
education is highly valued and where parental help is readily available. Other children, however,
may come from less supportive backgrounds where no such backup is on offer. They may have
different expectations of what teaching and learning involves. For example, some educational
cultures find learning by rote (memorising facts and figures) more attractive than learning by
doing (where students are involved in projectsand experimentation in order to arrive at
knowledge.