Mathematical Modeling of Brown Stock Washing Problems and Their Numerical Solution Using MATLAB
Mathematical Modeling of Brown Stock Washing Problems and Their Numerical Solution Using MATLAB
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The mechanism of the displacement washing of the bed of pulp fibers is mathematically modeled by the
Received 3 September 2008 basic material balance equation. Non-linear Langmuir type adsorption isotherm is used to describe the
Received in revised form 14 August 2009 relationship between the concentration of the solute in the liquor and concentration of the solute on the
Accepted 30 August 2009
fibers. In the present study, the numerical solutions are obtained of the displacement washing model for
Available online 9 September 2009
multistage in counter current manner. For the numerical solution “pdepe” solver in MATLAB is applied
on the axial domain of the system of governing partial differential equations. Numerical solutions thus
Keywords:
obtained are in good agreement with the results of earlier workers. The technique used in the present
MATLAB, “pdepe” solver
Pulp washing model
investigation is simple, elegant and convenient for solving two point boundary value problems with
Peclet number varying range of parameters.
Adsorption isotherm © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Multistage
Counter current
1. Introduction (macroscopic). Lapidus & Amundson (1952) have studied the effect
of longitudinal diffusion in ion-exchange and chromatographic
Modeling of pulp washing is done mainly using three columns and obtained differential equation for the wash liquor.
approaches namely: (a) process modeling, (b) physical modeling Brenner (1962) studied the washing of filter cake by neglecting the
and (c) statistical modeling. In process modeling approach, each accumulation capacity of fibers and assumed that the phenomena
stage in pulp washing operation is treated as black box. Using of longitudinal mixing and obtained model in terms of the differen-
material balances, process models express the efficiency of an indi- tial equation. Sherman (1964) has described the overall movement
vidual washing stage in terms of some performance parameters of solute in the bed of non-porous granular material with the dif-
such as displacement ratio, Norden efficiency factor, and equivalent fusion like differential equation by replacing molecular diffusion
displacement ratio. Although these models are useful for routine coefficient with longitudinal dispersion coefficient as molecular
process design calculations, but provide little information as to diffusion coefficient was found very small as compared to longitu-
how the design or operation of a washer improves its efficiency. A dinal dispersion coefficient. An additional term was used to account
complete review of the various process models used so far describ- for the accumulation (or depletion) capacity of material sorbed by
ing the pulp washing process has been presented by Pekkanen & the solids. Pellett (1966) has studied the longitudinal dispersion of
Norden (1985). solute, intraparticle diffusion of solute and liquid-phase mass trans-
Physical models describe the washing operation in terms of fer for the particles of cylindrical and spherical geometry by using
fundamental fluid flow and mass transfer principles, occurring a modified step function input. Kuo & Barret (1970) neglected the
at microscopic level during displacement washing of a fibrous longitudinal dispersion coefficient to study sodium chloride wash-
bed. These models involve parameters such as longitudinal dis- ing and obtained differential equation for the wash liquor. Grah
persion coefficient and mass transfer coefficients. Physical models (1975) has divided the packed bed of cellulose fibers into three dif-
proposed by various investigators such as Lapidus & Amundson ferent zones namely zone of flowing liquor, stagnant liquor and
(1952), Brenner (1962), Sherman (1964), Pellett (1966), Kuo & fibers. Longitudinal dispersion and mass transfer in the flowing
Barret (1970), Grah (1975) and Perron & Lebeau (1977) has been liquor zone is characterized by the differential equation. Perron &
classified based on mass transfer principles of two types (1) dif- Lebeau (1977) had taken the model equation without considering
ferential contact models (macroscopic) and (2) dispersion models the effect of longitudinal dispersion coefficient.
Most of the researcher described the washing model by cou-
pling the transport equation with various adsorption isotherms
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 9927090165; fax: +91 1322714011. to describe the relationship between the concentration of the
E-mail address: [email protected] (D. Kumar). solute in the liquor and concentration of the solute on the fibers.
0098-1354/$ – see front matter © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.08.005
10 D. Kumar et al. / Computers and Chemical Engineering 34 (2010) 9–16
Nomenclature
Table 1
Existing mathematical models for washing zone used in present investigation (dimensionless form).
where z < z− < z + z. Taking εt and A as constant and taking the and assumed the liquid solid concentration inside the fibers and
limit as z → 0, one can obtain the following expression: surrounding the fibers to be identical at any time and at any
position within the bed, implying that diffusion, both within the
∂u ∂c ∂c ∂n fiber and between the fiber and the surrounding fluid is suffi-
−εt c = εt u + εt + (1 − εt ) (2)
∂z ∂z ∂t ∂t ciently rapid which does not affect the rate of the overall transport
process.
The above equation contains principally two accumulation terms,
Perron & Lebeau (1977) used the isotherm equation, i.e.:
one related to dispersion–diffusion and another related to
adsorption–desorption. Other terms are velocity gradient and con- ∂n
vective flow terms. Using Fick’s second law of diffusion, i.e.: = k(c − n) (8)
∂t
∂u ∂2 c the diffusion of the solute within the fibers towards the washing
−c = (DL + DV ) (3)
∂z ∂z 2 liquor is described by a partial differential Eq. (8), which is solved
assuming that the mass transfer rate through the stagnant film is
the following equation is obtained: finite.
Fogelberg & Fugleberg (1963) used non-linear Langmuir type
∂2 c ∂c ∂c 1 − εt ∂n
(DL + DV ) =u + + (4) adsorption isotherm to describe the relationship between the con-
∂z 2 ∂z ∂t εt ∂t
centration of the solute in the liquor and concentration of the solute
According to Sherman (1964) the longitudinal dispersion coeffi- on the fibers as
cient DL is a function of flow pattern within the bed (unless very low ABc
flow rates are used). The molecular diffusion coefficient DV is very n= (9)
1 + Bc
small compared to DL and so may be neglected. Writing (1 − εt )/εt
as for convenience, Eq. (4) may be written as where A and B are Langmuir constants.
Arora et al. (2006b) successfully used non-linear Langmuir type
∂2 c ∂c ∂c ∂n adsorption isotherm using one dimensional axial dispersion model
DL =u + + (5)
∂z 2 ∂z ∂t ∂t for single stage washing, by using orthogonal collocation on finite
elements. Thus in the present investigation for sodium species,
This is a non-homogeneous, non-linear, first degree, second order, non-linear Langmuir type adsorption isotherm is used for the solu-
parabolic, partial differential equation. Here u, εt and DL are func- tion of four stage counter current washing problem.
tions of z while c and n are functions of both z and t. As the lumen
of the fiber is porous and the same is true with the wall of the fiber,
2.2. Initial and boundary conditions
the porosity values for these cases are different from the porosity
of the interfiber mass. Therefore three porosity values are required
For the solution of washing models for multistage the initial
to represent the pulp mat system. It is extremely difficult to dis-
condition is c(z, t) = n(z, t) = C0 for 0 < t < L/u, where L/u corresponds
tinguish precisely between the values of porosity at the lumen and
to displacement time. Boundary conditions for Langmuir type
at the wall. Therefore, for practical calculations these are assumed
isotherm are as follows:
to be the same. Hence, to describe the system two porosity values
are assumed, one for the interfibers εd and another for intrafibers ∂c
uc − DL = uCS at z = 0 and t > 0 and
εs, so that εd + εs = εt , the total porosity for the entire system. The ∂z
model Eq. (5) is same as dispersion model for pulp washing given
∂c
by Sherman (1964) and Pellett (1966). = 0 at z = L and t > 0
∂z
2.1. Adsorption isotherms Perron & Lebeau (1977) give the boundary condition at the inlet of
the bed c = Cs , at z = 0 and t > 0.
The details of the adsorption isotherms which are used by some In the present investigation both the cases of inlet boundary
earlier workers are as follows. conditions are used. Thus two sets of model are obtained for dif-
Lapidus & Amundson (1952) used the adsorption isotherm given ferent boundary conditions. The initial condition is same for both
by the models, i.e. C(Z, 0) = 1 = N(Z, 0) in dimensionless form. Thus pos-
∂n sible models which are differing in boundary conditions only are
= k1 c − k2 n (6) summarized in Table 1 (dimensionless form).
∂t
and assumed that the rate of adsorption is finite and plotted the
effect of longitudinal diffusion for an infinite column in which equi- 2.3. Dimensionless models
librium is established locally. Initial adsorbate concentration was
assumed to be zero. Singh et al. (2008) used this linear isotherm The dimensionless form of the models is obtained by using cer-
successfully and give comparable results. tain dimensionless parameters like Peclet number (or Bodenstein
Sherman (1964) used the adsorption of diacetyl solution by number), dimensionless time, dimensionless thickness and dimen-
porous viscous fibers with simple isotherm equation, i.e.: sionless concentrations given below:
∂n ∂c uL ut z c n N0
n = kc or =k (7) Pe = ,T = ,Z = ,C = ,N = and =
∂t ∂t DL L L C0 N0 C0
12 D. Kumar et al. / Computers and Chemical Engineering 34 (2010) 9–16
Fig. 2. Flow diagram of a counter current washing system with four drum washers.
Thus the dimensionless form of the transport equation, adsorption ranges (generally 80–100). Poirier et al. (1987) categorically men-
isotherm and boundary conditions are given in Table 1. tioned that displacement efficiency decreases below Pe number 20
and therefore one expects inconsistencies in the profiles. An order
2.4. Steady state modeling for multistage washing process of estimate values of Pe therefore should be predicted. As washing
efficiency has been expressed by Potucek (1997) as a function of
In the present investigation a typical four stages counter current Pe, it becomes more relevant to evaluate for washer performance
washing system is considered. A series of four washers are set up study. The modified Peclet number, Pem and modified dispersion
for pulp washing with the final wash being performed with clean coefficient DLm are then calculated as
water. The steady state material balance equations can be obtained uL
for each washer, with the help of Fig. 2. Pem =
DLm
Steady state mass balance equations for washer 1 are given
below. The algorithmic procedure given by Kumar (2002) is used for
First washer mass balance: estimation of Peclet number. According to Kumar (2002), first we
obtain the C vs. T data from this present investigation for both
Liquor : Lb +Lr1 +Ls1 =Lf 1 +Ld1 , Lf 1 =Lb1 +Le , Lb1 =Lb2 +Lr1 , Li1 =Lr1 +Lb the models by using the Peclet number 71.26 for washer no. 1 is
(10) obtained from the data of Grah (1974), which is used for the sim-
ulation. Then the Peclet number for displacement zone of second
Solids : Lb xb + Lr1 xr1 + Ls1 xs1 = Lf 1 xf 1 + Ld1 xd1 , Lf 1 xf 1 = Lb1 xb1 washer is estimated approximately avoiding iterative calculations
and considering open vessel as used by Han & Edwards (1988),
+ Le xe , Lb1 xb1 = Lb2 xb2 + Lr1 xr1 , Li1 xi1 = Lr1 xr1 + Lb xb (11) Edward, Peyron, and Minton (1986) and Potucek (1997).
First we use the data of Grah (1974) for the kappa no. 49.7 and
Fiber : Lb Cyb = Ld1 Cyd1 (12) for this data we obtain the Peclet number for the first washer of the
series by using the formula, Pe = uL/DL . After that we use the fol-
Water : Lb (1 − Cyb )(1 − Xb ) + Lr1 (1 − Xr1 ) + Ls1 (1 − Xs1 ) lowing algorithm given by Kumar (2002) for calculating the Peclet
number for the subsequent washers.
= Lf 1 (1 − Xf 1 ) + Ld1 (1 − Cyd1 )(1 − Xd1 ) (13)
• obtain C vs. T data for the first washer by solution of the model;
In a similar manner mass balance equations are obtained for • find out the mean time i = (˙Ti Ci Ti )/(˙Ci Ti );
each washer and then solved, using actual data of a near by pulp • find the spread of the distribution, measured by the
and paper mill. The steady state operational data is given below: variance
representing the spread of the distribution
2 = ( Ti2 Ci Ti )/( Ci Ti ) − i2 ;
(a) Pulp yield = 47%. • fit the dispersion model for the large extent of the dispersion for
(b) Consistency of blown pulp = 13%. open vessel 2 = ( 2 /i2 ) = 10(DL /uL) = (10/Pe).
(c) Solids in blown pulp = 22%.
(d) Liquor in blown pulp = 6.69 kg of liquor/kg of pulp. 3. Result and discussion
(e) Standard consistency = 12%.
The mathematical model of pulp washing given by transport
2.5. Algorithm to calculate approximate Peclet number for the equation (Eq. (5)), combined with the corresponding equation of
displacement zone for second and subsequent washers isotherm and various boundary conditions is given in Table 1.
The model is extremely intricate in nature and practically appears
As varying flow conditions can be assumed in different parts to be unsolvable for multistage washing system, even by using
of the pulp bed, an average value of the dispersion coefficient is sophisticated numerical techniques. As mentioned earlier that the
required to be estimated. This is important as various authors simu- problem for single washer with its simplified version has been
lated with various ranges of Peclet number though the pulp quality solved analytically by Brenner (1962) and Kukreja (1996) using
remains almost the same. As for example Potucek (1997) used very Laplace transform and numerically using orthogonal collocation
low Pe (1.0–11.3) for pulp fibers and high for glass fibers following by Grah (1975) and Arora et al. (2006a). Arora et al. (2006b)
Brenner (1962), whereas Grah (1974), Poirier, Crotogino, Trinh, and first discretized the partial differential equations into differential
Douglas (1987) and Crotogino, Poirier, and Trinh (1987) used high algebraic equations, which are then solved using ODE15s solver
D. Kumar et al. / Computers and Chemical Engineering 34 (2010) 9–16 13
Table 2
Process data of four stage brown stock washing system.
Input parameters Washer no. 1 Washer no. 2 Washer no. 3 Washer no. 4
sionless time is divided into 21 equal parts and then the influence
of Z and T on C is estimated. The behavior of exit solute concen- been included as dimensionless parameters in the solution of the
tration with respect to time as well as variable cake thickness is models. For the washer no. 1 we used the Peclet number Pe = 71.26
shown by (input curve at Z = 0 to break through curves at Z = 1) 3D based on the simulation data. Since the dimensionless time for the
graphs. The solution obtained for all washers’ are given in Table 4, first and second washers is 10.33/7.33 = 1.41, for the third washer
for both the models, respectively. The variations in the dimension-
less solute concentration with respect to dimensionless time as well
as dimensionless cake thickness are shown in Figs. 3–6 for model
1 and Figs. 7–10 for model 2 for all four washers’, respectively.
In the present investigation Langmuir type non-linear isotherm
is used to describe the relationship between the concentration of
the solute in the liquor and concentration of the solute on the fibers.
Dimensionless initial solute concentrations on fiber for all four
washers’ is obtained are 0.009, 0.002, 0.0002 and 0.00001 (kg/m3 ),
respectively. The solution of the washing zone models of a rotary
vacuum washer is obtained for multistage in counter current man-
ner by pdepe solver in MATLAB source code. Peclet number has
Table 3
Data for simulation for sodium species.
L 0.105 m
DL 10.8 × 10−7 m2 /s
εt 0.928 –
u 7.33 × 10−4 m/s
C0 0.570 kg/m3
Cs 0.005 kg/m3
A 0.01263 m3 /kg
B 3.955 m3 /kg Fig. 4. Solution for washer 2 (Model 1).
14 D. Kumar et al. / Computers and Chemical Engineering 34 (2010) 9–16
Table 4
Dimensionless exit solute concentration in for washer for dimensionless time T = 0 to T = 1.49.
T Model 1 Model 2
Washer no. 1 Washer no. 2 Washer no. 3 Washer no. 4 Washer no. 1 Washer no. 2 Washer no. 3 Washer no. 4
Fig. 5. Solution for washer 3 (Model 1). Fig. 7. Solution for washer 1 (Model 2).
Fig. 6. Solution for washer 4 (Model 1). Fig. 8. Solution for washer 2 (Model 2).
D. Kumar et al. / Computers and Chemical Engineering 34 (2010) 9–16 15
4. Conclusion
References
Arora, S., Dhaliwal, S. S., & Kukreja, V. K. (2006a). Simulation of washing of packed
bed of porous particles by orthogonal collocation on finite elements. Computers
and Chemical Engineering, 30, 1054–1060.
Arora, S., Dhaliwal, S. S., & Kukreja, V. K. (2006b). Modelling of the displacement
washing of pulp fiber bed. Indian Journal of Chemical Technology, 13, 1–6.
Brenner, H. (1962). The diffusion model of longitudinal mixing in beds of finite
length. Chemical Engineering Science, 17, 229–243.
Crotogino, R. H., Poirier, N. A., & Trinh, D. T. (1987). The principals of pulp washing.
Tappi Journal, 70(6), 95–103.
Edward, L., Peyron, M., & Minton, M. (1986). Models for cross-flow pulp washing
calculations. Pulp and Paper Canada, 87(1), T17–T21.
Fogelberg, B. C., & Fugleberg, S. (1963). A study of factors influencing the amount of
residual alkali in sulphate pulp. Paprija Puu—Papper och Tra, 45, 675–680.
Grah, L. E. (1974). Washing of cellulose fibers analysis of displacement washing
operations. PhD Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden.
Fig. 10. Solution for washer 4 (Model 2). Grah, L. E. (1975). Displacement washing of packed beds of cellulose fibers. Part 1.
Mathematical model. Svensk Paperstidning, 78(12), 446–450.
Han, Y., & Edwards, L. (1988). Optimization of filter washer operation and control.
is 9.69/6.69 = 1.45 and finally for the last washer is 9.14/6.14 = 1.49. Tappi Journal, 71(6), 101–104.
Thus the exit dimensionless solute concentration for washer no. 1 Kuo, M. T., & Barret, E. C. (1970). Continuous filter cake washing performance. AIChE
Journal, 16(4), 633–638.
and 2 is taken at T = 1.41 and similarly for third and fourth washers Kukreja, V. K. (1996). Modeling of washing of brown stock on rotary vacuum washer.
at T = 1.45 and 1.49, respectively. The exit dimensionless solute con- PhD Thesis, University of Roorkee, Roorkee, India.
centrations for all four washers with respect to dimensionless time Kumar, M. (2002). Mathematical modeling of pulp washing systems and solutions.
PhD Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India.
are shown in Table 4, for both the models, respectively. Exit dimen- Lapidus, L., & Amundson, N. R. (1952). Mathematics of adsorption in beds. Part vi. The
sionless solute concentrations for each washers’ are converted into effect of longitudinal diffusion in ion exchange and chromatographic columns.
absolute concentrations. The exit absolute concentration of previ- Journal of Physical Chemistry, 56, 984–988.
Neretnieks, I. (1974). Mathematical model for continuous counter current adsorp-
ous washer is use to calculate the various parameters like N0 , , etc. tion. Svensk Paperstidning, 77(11), 407–411.
for the subsequent washer. Based on C vs. T data of previous washer Pellett, G. L. (1966). Longitudinal dispersion, intraparticle diffusion and liquid-phase
the Peclet number of subsequent washer is obtained by using algo- mass transfer during flow through multiparticle systems. Tappi Journal, 49(2),
75–82.
rithm given by Kumar (2002). The Peclet number obtained by this
Pekkanen, M., & Norden, H. V. (1985). Review of pulp washing models. Paperija Puu,
algorithm for washers nos. 2, 3 and 4 are 21.94, 19.90 and 19.70 for 67(11), 689–696.
model 1 and 21.93, 19.90 and 19.67 for model 2, respectively. Perron, M., & Lebeau, B. (1977). A mathematical model of pulp washing on rotary
drums. Pulp and Paper Canada, 78(3), TR1–TR5.
The washing results for both the models are slightly different at
Poirier, N. A., Crotogino, R. H., Trinh, D. T., & Douglas, W. J. M. (1987). Displace-
three or four decimal places, so it may conclude that the bound- ment washing of wood pulp—A one parameter model for high initial liquor
ary conditions do not influence much on the washing results. It concentration. In Pulp washing symposium, Helsinki, 18–21 May (pp. 49–72).
is clear from figures that the dimensionless concentration of the Potucek, F. (1997). Washing of pulp fiber bed. Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical
Communications, 62, 626–644.
solute in the liquor decreases with the increase of the dimensionless Sherman, W. R. (1964). The movement of a soluble material during the washing of
time, whereas increases with the increase in the dimensionless dis- a bed of packed solids. AIChE Journal, 10(6), 855–860.
16 D. Kumar et al. / Computers and Chemical Engineering 34 (2010) 9–16
Singh, V. P., Kumar, V., & Kumar, D. (2008). Numerical solution of diffusion model Tervola, P. (2006). Fourier series solution for multistage counter current cake wash-
of brown stock washing beds of finite length using MATLAB. In Proceeding of ing and segregated wash effluent circulation. Chemical Engineering Science, 61,
“Second UKSIM European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation”, IEEE 3268–3277.
Digital Library (pp. 295–300). Viljakainen, E. (1985). Mass transfer models and multizone washing efficiency cal-
Towers, M., & Scallan, A. M. (1996). Predicting the ion-exchange of kraft pulps using culations. Pulp and Paper Canada, 86(10), T301–T305.
Donnan theory. Journal of Pulp and Paper Science, 22(9), J332–337.
Tervola, P., & Rasanen, E. (2006). A cake washing model with an overall cation
transfer in kraft pulp washing. Chemical Engineering Science, 61, 3268–3277.