Families of Distributions: Beamer-Tu-Logo
Families of Distributions: Beamer-Tu-Logo
Families of Distributions
In statistics we are interested in some families of distributions, i.e.,
some collections of distributions.
For example, the family of binomial distributions with p ∈ (0, 1) and a
fixed n; the family of normal distributions with µ ∈ R and σ > 0.
Exponential families
A family of pdfs or pmfs indexed by θ is called an exponential family iff
it can be expressed as
!
k
fθ (x) = h(x)c(θ ) exp ∑ wi (θ )ti (x) , θ ∈ Θ,
i=1
Proof.
From the exponential family expression for fθ (x),
k
log fθ (X ) = log h(X ) + log c(θ ) + ∑ wi (θ )ti (X )
i=1
Differentiating this expression leads to
k
∂ log fθ (X ) ∂ log c(θ ) ∂ wi (θ )
= +∑ ti (X ) beamer-tu-logo
∂ θj ∂ θj i=1
∂ θj
UW-Madison (Statistics) Stat 609 Lecture 9 2015 3 / 19
Taking expectation, we obtain
!
k
∂ log fθ (X ) ∂ log c(θ ) ∂ w (θ )
E
∂ θj
=
∂ θj
+E ∑ ∂iθj ti (X )
i=1
If fθ (x) is a pdf (the proof for pmf is similar), then the left side of the
previous expression is
∂ log fθ (x) ∂ fθ (x) ∂1
Z ∞ Z ∞ Z ∞
∂
fθ (x)dx = dx = fθ (x)dx = =0
−∞ ∂ θj −∞ ∂ θj ∂ θj −∞ ∂ θj
We interchanged the differentiation and integration, which is justified
under the exponential family assumption.
This proves the first result.
Note that
∂ fθ (X )
∂ 2 fθ (X )
∂ fθ (X )
2
∂ 2 log f θ (X ) ∂ ∂ θj ∂ θj2 ∂ θj
2
= = −
∂ θj ∂ θj fθ (X ) fθ (X ) fθ (X )
Then beamer-tu-logo
∂ log fθ (X ) 2
Z ∞ 2 Z ∞
∂ fθ (X )
= dx − fθ (x)dx
−∞∂ θj2 −∞ ∂ θj
" #2
k
∂ log c(θ ) ∂ wi (θ )
Z ∞
=− +∑ ti (X ) fθ (x)dx
−∞ ∂ θj i=1
∂ θj
!
k
∂ wi (θ )
= −Var ∑ ti (X )
i=1
∂ θj
Also,
!
2
∂ log c(θ ) µ 2 1 X 2 2µX
∂ w (θ )
−
∂σ
= 3 + =E
σ σ ∑ ∂iσ ti (X ) =E
σ3
− 3
σ
i=1
Using E(X ) = µ, we obtain from this equation that Var(X ) = σ 2 . beamer-tu-logo
beamer-tu-logo
Then
α(α + 1) α2 αβ
Var(X ) = − 2
= 2
(α + β )(α + β + 1) (α + β ) (α + β ) (α + β + 1)
beamer-tu-logo
beamer-tu-logo
beamer-tu-logo
beamer-tu-logo
because xe−|x|
is an odd function, and
1 ∞ 2 −|x|
Z Z ∞
Var(Z ) = E(Z 2 ) = x e dx = x 2 e−x dx = Γ(3) = 2
2 −∞ 0
If X ∼ double-exponential(µ, σ ), then X = σ Z + µ,
Z = (X − µ)/σ ∼ double-exponential(0, 1), and
beamer-tu-logo
E(X ) = E(σ Z + µ) = µ, Var(X ) = Var(σ Z + µ) = σ 2 Var(Z ) = 2σ 2
UW-Madison (Statistics) Stat 609 Lecture 9 2015 16 / 19
Logistic distribution logistic(µ, σ )
For constants µ ∈ R and σ > 0, the logistic(µ, σ ) distribution has pdf
e−(x−µ)/σ
f (x) = , x ∈R
σ [1 + e−(x−µ)/σ ]2
This pdf is again bell-shaped and symmetric about µ.
The cdf of logistic(µ, σ ) has a close form:
Z x
1
F (x) = f (t)dt = , x ∈R
−∞ 1 + e−(x−µ)/σ
By symmetry, E(X ) = µ if X ∼ logistic(µ, σ ).
The variance of X ∼ logistic(µ, σ ) is not easy to obtain, but we
give the result here: Var(X ) = σ 2 π 2 /3.
Pareto distribution pareto(α, β )
For constants α > 0 and β > 0, the pareto(α, σ ) distribution has pdf
αβ α x −(α+1)
(
x >β
f (x) = beamer-tu-logo
0 x ≤β
UW-Madison (Statistics) Stat 609 Lecture 9 2015 17 / 19
First, f is indeed a pdf, because
Z ∞ Z ∞ β
−(α+1) α −α α −α
α
f (x)dx = αβ x dx = β x =β β =1
−∞ β ∞
Using a similar argument, we can obtain the cdf of pareto(α, β ) as
α
1− β x >β
x
F (x) =
0 x ≤β