Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 181 views

    Fs 2 Scoring Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    Llianne Abines
    This document contains an evaluation rubric for a performance task assessing a field study on effective teachers. The rubric evaluates students on participation in learning activities, analysis of questions, reflection on lessons, use of learning artifacts, and timely submission. Performance is rated on a scale of 1 to 4 in various criteria, such as excellent, very satisfactory, satisfactory, and needs improvement. Overall scores are then transmuted to a letter grade on a scale of 1.0 to 5.0.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Fs 2 Scoring Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    Llianne Abines
    181 views1 page
    This document contains an evaluation rubric for a performance task assessing a field study on effective teachers. The rubric evaluates students on participation in learning activities, analysis of questions, reflection on lessons, use of learning artifacts, and timely submission. Performance is rated on a scale of 1 to 4 in various criteria, such as excellent, very satisfactory, satisfactory, and needs improvement. Overall scores are then transmuted to a letter grade on a scale of 1.0 to 5.0.

    Original Title

    Fs 2 Scoring Rubrics (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains an evaluation rubric for a performance task assessing a field study on effective teachers. The rubric evaluates students on participation in learning activities, analysis of questions, reflection on lessons, use of learning artifacts, and timely submission. Performance is rated on a scale of 1 to 4 in various criteria, such as excellent, very satisfactory, satisfactory, and needs improvement. Overall scores are then transmuted to a letter grade on a scale of 1.0 to 5.0.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    181 views1 page

    Fs 2 Scoring Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    Llianne Abines
    This document contains an evaluation rubric for a performance task assessing a field study on effective teachers. The rubric evaluates students on participation in learning activities, analysis of questions, reflection on lessons, use of learning artifacts, and timely submission. Performance is rated on a scale of 1 to 4 in various criteria, such as excellent, very satisfactory, satisfactory, and needs improvement. Overall scores are then transmuted to a letter grade on a scale of 1.0 to 5.0.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    EVALUATE Performance Task

    Evaluate Your Work Task Field Study 2, Learning Episode 1 – The Teacher We Remember!
    Learning Outcome: * Cite the personal qualities of an effective teacher
    *State the professional competencies expected of a teacher.

    Name of FS Student____________________________ Date Submitted:_______________


    Year and Section_______________________________Course:______________________

    Learning Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Needs Improvement


    Episode 3 1
    4 2

    Accomplished All participation One (1) to two (2) Three (3) participation Four (4) or more
    Participation activities/questions/tasks participation activities/tasks not participation
    Activities completely activities/questions/tasks answered/accomplish activities/questions/tasks
    answered/accomplished not not
    answered/accomplished answered/accomplished
    Analysis All questions were All questions were Questions were not Four(4) or more
    answered completely; answered completely; answered completely; observation questions
    answers are with depth answers are clearly answers are not clearly were not answered;
    and are thoroughly connected to theories; connected to theories; answers not connected to
    grounded on theories; grammar and spelling are one (1) to three (3) theories; more than four
    grammar and spelling are free from errors. grammatical errors (4) grammatical errors
    free from error.
    Reflection Profound and clear; Clear but lacks depth; Not so clear and Unclear and shallow; rarely
    supported by what were supported by what were shallow; somewhat supported by what were
    observed and analyzed observed and analyzed supported by what were observed and analyzed
    observed and analyzed
    Learning Portfolio is reflected on in Portfolio is reflected on in Portfolio is not reflected Portfolio is not reflected on
    Artifacts the context of the learning the context of the learning on in the context of the in the context of the
    outcomes; Complete, well- outcomes; Complete, well- learning outcomes; learning outcomes;
    organized, highly relevant organized, very relevant to Complete, not- Complete, not organized,
    to the learning outcome the learning outcome organized, highly not relevant
    relevant to the learning
    outcome
    Submission Submitted before the Submitted on the Submitted a day after Submitted two(2) or more
    deadline deadline the deadline days after the deadline
    COMMENT/S Over-all Score Rating:
    (Based on Transmutation)

    TRANSMUTATION OF SCORE TO GRADE/RATING


    SCORE 20 19-18 17 16 15 14 13-12 11 10 9-8 7-below
    Grade 1.0 1.25 1.5 1.75 2.0- 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.5 5.00
    99 96 93 90 87 84 81 78 75 72 72-Below

    MICHAEL MARK M. CALUSCUSIN Date:


    FS Facilitator

    You might also like