Assignment Cover Sheet

Qualification Module Number and Title

HD in Computing/HD in Software Object Oriented Programming- CSE4006
Engineering
Student Name & No. Assessor

Hand out date Submission Date

18/11/2021 05/01/2022
Assessment type Duration/Length of Weighting of Assessment
WRIT1- Assessment Type 100%
Coursework 3000 words
equivalent

Learner declaration

I certify that the work submitted for this assignment is my own and research sources are fully
acknowledged.

Marks Awarded
First assessor

IV marks

Agreed grade

Signature of the assessor Date

1
 FEEDBACK FORM
INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY
Module:
Student:
Assessor:
Assignment:

Strong features of your work:

Areas for improvement:

Marks Awarded:

2
 Coursework

Learning outcomes covered

LO1: Explain the fundamentals of Object-Oriented Programming concepts

LO2: Design Object-Oriented based applications
LO3: Develop Object-Oriented applications

Scenario and the Task

“Colombo institute of Studies” is currently handling employee details manually. They want to
automate the process so that HR manager and the Assistant can manage employee details easily.

User levels and functionalities are follows

HR Manager
1. Add new departments and designations

2. Add new Employees and allocate them to available departments and designations

3. Search Employee details based on department, designations, name, EPF number etc.

HR Assistant
1. Search Employee details based on department, name, EPF number etc.

Admin
1. Create a new account (HR Manager and HR Assistant)

You are required to apply OOP concepts for the above scenario. Data need to be saved and
retrieved from a File

3
Part A: Report

Task 1.Provide design solution (UML diagrams) for the above mention Scenario. Provide clear
explanation for all the diagrams mention below. (Provide assumption if necessary) (30 marks)
(LO2)
a) Use case Diagram
b) Class Diagram
c) Sequence Diagram

Task 2: Develop suitable system for the above scenario based on the design. Required to use
Object Oriented concepts (Object, Class, Abstraction, Inheritance, Encapsulation and
Polymorphism) for the development. Document the main functionalities and Object Oriented
concepts applied with proper explanation and source code. (Marks 20) (LO1, LO3)

Task 3: Provide a user manual for the developed solution (Marks 10) (LO3)

Guidelines for the report format

Paper A4
Margins 1.5” left, 1” right, top and bottom
Page numbers – bottom, right
Line spacing 1.5
Font
Headings 14pt, Bold
Normal 12pt
Font face- Times New Roman

Part B: Demonstration

4
Task 4: System demonstration. System should work according to the expected functionalities.
Should be able to demonstrate Object Oriented concepts (Object, Class, Abstraction, Inheritance,
Encapsulation, and Polymorphism) applied to the given scenario. (Marks 40) (LO1, LO3)

Submission Details
Please see Moodle for confirmation of the Assessment submission date.
Any assessments submitted after the deadline will not be marked and will be recorded as a
Non-Attempt.
Report must be submitted to the as a MS word file to the Turnitin.
SMIS submission: Must submit a .zip file throw the SMIS. Zip file must contain Turnitin
report with project files (contain all the project elements)
Your .zip should be titled with your Student ID Number, module code and assessment id, e.g.
st12345678_CIS5003WRIT1.zip

Assessment Criteria

This submission will be assessed as follows Total marks Marks obtained by

Allocated the student for the
answer provided
Part A: Task 1: Out of 30

POOR 0-12

Poor use of Object Oriented Design Methodology

Use case Diagram

 Poor or no identification of use cases
 Poor or no Identification of Actors and
associations
Class Diagram
 Poor or no identification of associated
methods, with correct signatures and attributes
in each class
 Poor or no identification of relationships

Sequence Diagram
 Poor or no identification of set of use cases as

5
 sequence diagrams.

SATISFACTORY 13-18
Proper use of Object Oriented Design Methodology

Use case Diagram

 Has identify few of correct use cases
 Has identify few correct Actors and
associations

Class Diagram
 Identification of associated methods, with
correct signatures and attributes in each class
 Correct identification of relationships
Sequence Diagram
 Has identified set of use cases (about 3) as
sequence diagrams.

GOOD 19-21

Use case Diagram

 Accurate use of <<include> <<extend>> stereo
types in use case diagram

Class Diagram
 Clear identification of private, public access
modifiers & it is visible in the class diagram

Sequence Diagram
 Appropriate use of lifelines, messages and
objects in proposed sequence diagrams

Correct use of UML notations with minor mistakes

Evaluation
 Student has given basic description about the
design and given a reasonable justification
 Effective judgements have been made about the
content and levels of information to be included

EXCELLENT 22-30

Excellent Design

6
  Highly detailed diagram
 Use of OO concepts clearly visible
 Backed by relevant assumptions
 Excellent use of UML notation

Evaluation
 Good justification of the design
 Judge validity of results
 Use critical reflection to evaluate the work and
justify with valid explanations

Fluency (Of design)

Evidence of critical analysis on different perspectives

covering how all UML diagrams support in designing

Task 2: Out of 20

POOR 0-8

 No proper standard coding

 Insufficient code evidence with no or poor
explanation
 Poor use of Object oriented concepts no or poor
explanation
 Poor implementation of the design

SATISFACTORY 9-12

 Proper standard coding

 Sufficient code evidence with proper
explanation
 Basic use of Object oriented concepts (at least 3
concepts) with basic explanation
 Proper implementation of the design with minor
mistakes

13-15
GOOD

7
 Proper use of Object oriented concepts (at least
4 concepts) with proper explanation
 Proper implementation of the design with no
mistakes
EXCELLENT 16-20

Excellent use of Object oriented concepts (all the

concepts) with proper explanation

Task 3: Out of 10

POOR 0-4
 Poor structure no clear explanation and
screenshots
 Content is not specific and sufficient

SATISFACTORY 5-6

 Has provide basic explanation with

screenshots
 Content is specific and sufficient

GOOD 7-8
 Has provide average explanation with
screenshots

EXCELLENT 9-10
 Excellent , clear and descriptive explanation
with screenshots

Part B: Task 4: Out of 40

POOR 0-16
 System with syntax and logical errors
 Poor or not able to explain and demonstrate
implementation of the design Poor or not able
to explain and demonstrate Object oriented
concepts used in the system
SATISFACTORY 17-24

 Error free system

 Partially able explain, demonstrate and justify
the implementation of the design Partially able
to explain and demonstrate Object oriented
concepts used in the system

8
GOOD 25-30
 Able to explain, demonstrate and justify the
implementation of the design
 Able to explain and demonstrate Object
oriented concepts used in the system

EXCELLENT 31-40

Has demonstrate excellent level of understanding of

Object oriented concepts

Total marks 100