Applied Linguistics Research Journal Original Research

ALR Journal 2020;4(1):53–62 doi: 10.14744/alrj.2019.40427

The Impact of Literature Teaching Techniques on the

Learners’ Performance on Academic Reading Course
Tests
Saeid Rahimipour,1 ABSTRACT
Literature and its genres have always been impressive in the process
of teaching and learning alongside the natural function of literature
and literary research. Although second or foreign language teaching
has received great attention by applied linguists, recently there has
1
Assistant Professor, been a growing concern for the development of literature teaching
Farhangian University, Iran methods too. This paper basing its approach on posttest only control
group design has dealt with the introduction of Carter and Long’s (1991)
literature teaching approaches in a teacher training college in Iran to one
hundred to-be-teacher students, aged between 18-24, divided into four
experimental groups, to examine the effectiveness of these literature
teaching approaches on the students’ performance on academic reading
course test. The statistical analysis of the results revealed that the
performance of the three experimental groups was significantly higher
than the control group. The results further revealed that the performance
of Personal Growth Model was significantly higher than the other two
models. The difference between the performance of the Culture Model
group with that of the Language Model was not that much significant.
The incorporation of literature teaching approaches in the skill-based
academic courses is highly suggested. Among the many approaches
and models developed, the Personal Growth Model by Carter and Long
(1991) which proved to be working well with the academic students and
their performance on reading skill course and may work well with other
language skills too is suggested for the deployment in the process of
teaching elsewhere and with other learners.
Keywords: Literature teaching approaches; Reading courses; to-be-
teacher students; Test performance.

Corresponding Author: Saeid 1. Introduction

Rahimipour, Assistant Professor, The field of language teaching and learning has witnessed the
Farhangian University, Iran
changes and trends of different types in the last century or so. The
Phone: +98 918 342 8011 role of literature as the prime teaching material was crucial at the
e-mail: [email protected]
beginning of 20th century with the same degree of importance in
Article citation: Rahimpour, S. the ancient times. It was driven to the corner by communicative
(2020). The impact of literature approaches’ proponents for a few decades. Recently, this genuine
teaching techniques on the learners’
performance on academic reading
and authentic source of information and knowledge has got a
course tests, Applied Linguisics profound status as the real and powerful materials for teaching
Research Journal, 4(1): 53–62. in the classrooms with different individuals and across different
Received Date: June 20, 2019 proficiency levels. These paved the way for the development of
Accepted Date: December 1, 2019 the literature-based teaching of reading courses which is novel
Online Date: January 5, 2020
Publisher: Kare Publishing
and whose implications can be applied to many areas of language
© 2018 Applied Linguistics Research Journal
teaching and learning. This experience was applied to the first
E-ISSN: 2651-2629
year to-be-teacher students of Farhangian University in Ilam, Iran.
54 Rahimipour

The administration of literature-based and literary genre-based materials was, for the first time,
which was tried out with these subjects knowing the fact that regular normal texts developed
for this purpose exist which adds to this research’s novelty too. The real practice and introduction
of literary texts in such academic centers and on the courses of this type prove novel which is
worthy of research and appraisal on the line of finding novel ways for more efficient teaching and
learning processes. This research based its major variable on the literature teaching approaches
advocated by Carter and Long (1991) in the process of language teaching and learning. There have
been different kinds of approaches which best serve the needs of EFL teachers who are willing
to use literary works in their syllabi as well as academic instructors who have a better chance of
maneuvering over the selection of materials. The courage to take such a creative use of materials
would lead to promising results and practical implications. What has been the clarifying variables
for this research are Carter and Long’s (1991) three main approaches to teaching literature in the
EFL classrooms presented as follows by Oktan and Kaymakamoğlu (2017):
1. The Cultural Model: This model serves the traditional approach in using literary
texts in EFL classrooms. It encourages students to discover and analyze the social,
literary and historical elements of the text. With the help of this model, teacher aims
to reveal the specific thoughts and perspectives so the students can be more familiar
with various cultures and ideologies. This approach to a great extent deals with the
nature of the abstract elements and ideas whose achievement is the ultimate aim of
many education systems and instructors.
2. The Language Model: This is one of the most popular approaches which were
named as “language-based approach” by Carter and Long (1991). This approach helps
students to examine the text in a more systematic and methodical way. Linguistic
elements such as direct and indirect speech are aimed to be taught in this model.
Cloze procedure, exercises, jumbled sentences, summarizing the texts, creative writing
and role plays are the main activities used by the EFL teachers for teaching linguistic
structures. Therefore, literary goals are minimized in this kind of teaching method.
The learner is less engaged to the lesson. It is more teacher-centered. It means that
literature is underestimated and linguistic practice is more important in this model.
When it comes to the question of the real and sheer language and its components,
the idea of language model would work well. This is highly prioritized when the idea
of literature with a linguistic framework in intended.
3. The Personal Growth Model: This model is a kind of bridge between the cultural
model and the language model. It concentrates on the use of language in the literary
texts within its cultural context. Students are more tend to express their ideas and
feelings about their personal experiences and cultural knowledge in relation to the
specific literary text. Various themes and topics are perfect resources to develop
themselves. The implementations of this approach in practice show the fact that
it would incorporate the elements of the two previous approaches. The way it has
got to be managed and deployed in the class makes the difference visible and
understandable for the instructors and the learners respectively. Moreover, the
coverage of the components and the learning orientations prove promising in this
approach. For sure, it would call for greater competencies on the part of the learner
and the greater command on the part of the instructor.
The real application of these models and their sub disciplines would pave the way for the better
crystallization of theoretical findings and the real practices in the class. Hence, this research has
been an attempt on this line.

2. Review of the Related Literature

The application of literature to language teaching has recently received a great attention
and consideration in the field of applied linguistics. “The issue of teaching language through
literature first came out at the King’s College conference on education held in Cambridge in 1963.
Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2020, 4 (1), 53–62 55

The importance of literary texts as useful tools in the language teaching / learning process was
highlighted in this conference while the traditional approach was called into question for its
incapacity to develop language skills and communicative abilities” (Bobkina & Dominguez, 2014,
p. 249).

2.1. Literature status in TEFL methodology

The curriculum objectives in any society aim at training the learners for special purposes. In the
majority of EFL settings, less care has been given to the role of literature in intellectual practices
and activities which is to a large extent the outcome of the reaction to the exclusion of literature
and literary texts and exercises in the past which were in close and widespread practice. With the
advent of new methods and teaching techniques, different aspects of human being mind and
personality were incorporated in the theoretical foundations and considerations of language
teaching and learning. Many proponents of these methods assigned literature and literary materials
either a peripheral or no role at all, a procedure elapsed for a few decades or so which roughly
started in 1930 and ended in 1960. With the emergence of communicative approaches in language
teaching and language learning, new required sources called for authentic and communicative
materials; therefore, concern and attention was redirected towards literature and its genres. The
role of literature in EFL situations received a focal and pivotal attention and consideration. In the
past, in the field of language teaching, when GTM and Audiolingualism were in less common
practice, no attention was paid to language learning from mental and affective power view point.
Rather, literature and its genres occupied and served as the major at hand materials for work in the
classes, as these materials from Gestalt psychology view point best served the aim theoretically.
As the psychological trends changed, much attention was paid to the role of mind and materials
which challenged different intelligences of the mind. From this era onwards, literature and literary
materials again received interest and attention for learning but this time via the framework of
literature characteristics and its applications not just as muscle challenging materials like those
deployed by GTM proponents. Meanwhile, critical thinking regained newer perspectives and
was defined as the ability to use, interpret, analyze, and assess learning and learning procedures
which received profound fortune among applied linguists. Literature proved its role as one of
the powerful materials and sources of educational endeavor on the line of critical thinking and
critical evaluation of the phenomena and activities. This motivated many researchers dealt with
the introduction of literature teaching approaches and literary materials and their incorporation
into the ESL/EFL teaching methodology. For sure, the achievement of the command of reading
ability called for dynamic critical thinking strategies whose achievement would sound impossible
without the introduction of the igniting and enticing approaches like Carter and long’s models.
Many researchers have tried and worked on literature and literary genre-based materials and
approaches. Just like what Frederking, et al. (2016, p. 11) have done one the “effects of two types of
task instructions on text comprehension, motivation, and emotional involvement”. This paper has
tried to detect the impact of different literature approaches to language teaching in the classroom.
Some researchers have directly made the use of literature a necessity not just a suggestion.
“Literary works such as poetries, novels, stories, or plays should be used in foreign language
teaching because these works include all the features needed to teach a foreign language” (Erdem,
2016, p. 158). Moreover, Daskalovska and Dimova (2017) have enumerated the advantages of
using literature including its referential versus representational materials, its creativity as an
omnipresent phenomenon, authenticity and motivation, active involvement of learners, the good
choice of deploying literary materials for the purpose of extensive reading. On can simply infer why
literature is finding its way so rapidly and drastically and is proceeding into the 21st so vigorously
and motivates and allures many intellectuals to write about the impact of literature on children’s
reading ability. One of these writes is Wooten, et al. (2018) who have asserted that “a major theme
in these books is the power of literacy, both to open realms of knowledge and imagination for
readers, but also to be used by others as weapon to humiliate those who lack it”. This phenomenon
has been tried out with different variables. For example, Krsteva and ukubajska (2014) conducted
a research on literary and language interactive reinforcement at the University Goce Delchev
56 Rahimipour

Stip, School of Philology and came up with this idea that at advanced levels foreign learners gain
great imagination through literature which results in the accomplishment of speaking capabilities
that resemble the fluency of near native-like speakers.   In their paper, Tonne and Pihl  analyzed
“a  literature based  literacy   program   in   the   language   of   instruction   and   results   in   terms   of  
reading   engagement  in  three  classes  where  the  vast  majority  were  multilingual  students”.
The insertion of literature and its powerful impact in a research done by Stan (2015, p. 455) has
stabilized the role of literature in the curriculum as he has asserted that “students use literary texts
not only for information, they interpret them, decode their meaning”; thus, literature becomes an
effective means of teaching language. Literature provides a language model for those who hear and
read it because by using literary texts, students learn new words, syntax, and discourse functions
and they learn correct sentence patterns, standard story structures; consequently, they develop
their writing skills. To this end, the dichotomy of language-literature has been institutionalized in
our curricula for the primary school. Butler (2006, as cited in Bobkina and Dominguez, 2014, p. 257)
has provided “an example of an attempt to incorporate literature into language classes in a South
African context. The English course he describes, implemented in the context of the University of
North West, included four components: Introduction to English Studies, Introduction to Textual
Analysis, Introduction to Literary Genres and Grammar Awareness”. Two other great advocates
of using literature and teaching it at EFL settings, Duff and Maley (2007), have highlighted the
merits of literature in language learning in its linguistic value, cultural value, and affective value.
Aydinoğlu (2013) has tried to reveal to “what extent and how literature has been integrated into
course books specially prepared for language teaching” (2013, p. 36). Collie and Slater (1987) have
put forwarded the question, “should we be teaching literature in the foreign language classroom
at a pre-university level or not? This is a question which is certainly in the forefront of debate today,
yet it remains controversial and the attitude of many teachers’ ambivalent” (p. 1). More pertinent
to this research topic, they have asserted that simplified texts “stimulate interest in literature as
well as contributing to language improvement” (ibid., p. 11). Tevdovska (2016) has dealt with a
roughly similar academic setting, like this research setting, and has tried to detect the “study and
implementation of literary texts in the context of language and literature courses offered at South
East European University at Faculty of Languages, Cultures and Communications and the Language
Center” (p. 162). As for the language skill at hand in this research, literature teaching and “genre-
based pedagogies offer a valuable resource for assisting students’ ability to both comprehend and
produce texts” (Almacıoğlu & Okan, 2018, p. 72). The significance of the impact of literature on the
whole process of language learning and teaching has gone as far that literature has stabilized itself
in the syllabus in ELT settings whose best example can be seen in Sivapalan’s research revealing that
“with the revival of a literature enhanced curriculum in the 80s, there has been much discussion on
the significance of teaching literature as part of the English language syllabus. Like many countries
in which English is used as a second or foreign language, Malaysia relies on the use of literary
materials in ELT. In the year 2000, literature was officially initiated in the Malaysian ELT syllabus,
further acknowledging the function of literature in Malaysian ELT” (pp. 27-28).
Regarding the real impact of literature on language and language skills, reading has been
confirmed by many other researchers who have, for example, asserted that “emphasis on reading,
particularly the reading of culturally authentic texts, has become one of the central claims for
curriculum reform in EFL teaching (Arens & Swaffar, 2000 ; Swaffar, 1999; Dupuy, 2000 as cited in
Bobkina & Dominguez, 2013: p. 248). This paves the way for many intellectuals including teachers,
researchers, and curriculum developers to confirm that the “inclusion of literature in the English
language classroom for some plausible reasons e.g. Literature is useful in developing the students’
linguistic knowledge both on a usage and use level; it may increase their motivation to interact
with a text and thus, ultimately, increase their reading proficiency” (Burhanuddn, 2018, p. 25).
To Collie and Slater (1987), different reading pieces can be given out, such as poetry, essays or
stories as a reading assignment. The similarities or differences of plots, characters or types can
be discussed in class. The use of novel, for example, as a “teaching tool introduces an exclusive
method of teaching reading skill. It further motivates the students to become lifelong readers”
(Ganesan, 2016, p. 3). Teaching reading in such academic centers has focused mainly on the artificial
reading passages which are of different orientations and create themes serving solely the purpose
Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2020, 4 (1), 53–62 57

of teaching reading comprehension and vocabulary. The final learning has been defined as the
ability of the learners to read original texts for their researches and learning purposes which upon
research, has been approved that it has its own disadvantages and demerits. One great shortage
with this regard has been the fact that the educational views have not been pacing the changes in
the theoretical foundations of teaching and learning language skills. The insertion of literature and
literary materials in the course of reading instruction in such settings, with these subjects, in the
researcher’s best recollection, has been an attempt to capture the discourse competence defined
by modern applied linguists like Canale, et al. (1978), Canale and Swain (1980), and many other
modern intellectuals involved in the field of applied linguistics. To come up with a vivid impact of
the introduction of literature in TEFL and its impact on language skills the following design and
questions emerged.

3. Method
As this study was concerned with the detection of the impact of three literature teaching
approaches and their implementation in the academic classes, posttest only control group design
was deployed to determine the possible impact of these approaches on the learners’ performance
on academic reading courses. For this purpose, the following hypotheses were formulated:

1.The deployment of literature teaching courses does not affect the performance of
to-be-teacher students on academic reading course tests.
2. There is no significant difference between the impacts of the three literature
teaching approaches with regard to the learners’ performance on academic reading
course test.
3. There is no significant difference between the three models of teaching literature
regarding the learners’ performance on reading course tests.

3.2. Participants
In this study, a total number of 100 to-be-teacher students in Ilam Farhangian University, Iran,
aged 18-25 were selected and divided into three experimental groups and one control group based
on random sampling selection procedure. Their initial proficiency and academic knowledge were
checked out through their ranks and grades in their entrance examination reports. They are the
first groups who receive treatment on these constructs that upon success their future performance
would be highly motivating for further research. The point to be taken into account regarding the
subjects is the fact that they were not aware of the real nature of the research in action and their
involvement in the course of the research as it was totally natural and intermingled with the natural
trend of their academic endeavor.

3.3. Materials and Procedures

A week before starting to use a literary text, the researcher as the instructor checked out their
depth and degree of familiarity with literature, literature studies and manifestations, their prior
familiarity with the literature-based instruction on language four skills as well their individual
familiarity, if any. Thereafter, they were immerged into the regular reading courses without being
informed of the fact that research was going on in the classes.
The three experimental and the control groups all were administered literature-based and
literary genre-based materials as their academic texts to be covered during the term. The first
experimental class was run by the administration of the Culture Model activities including the
analysis of the social, literary, and historical elements of the text and the materials; the second
experimental group class was managed by the administration of the activities of Language Model
including cloze procedure, exercises, jumbled sentences, summarizing the texts, creative writing
and role plays as the model’s main activities; the third experimental group were taught using the
elements of the Personal Growth Model including the use of language in the literary texts within its
58 Rahimipour

cultural context in which the students tended more to express their ideas and feelings about their
personal experiences and cultural knowledge in relation to the literary texts at hand in the class.
This group having been based on the premise of the incorporation of the elements of the other two
approaches as the model’s real nature and function indicated by Carter and Long (1991), enjoyed
this greater scope of maneuver in the activities. As the teacher was the researcher, great care and
concern was taken to illustrate the exact techniques and principles in each group. The control
group class was handled by the regular reading class procedure which was confined to the text
reading, translation if necessary, and question completion as the final step in class management.
The reading classes were carried out every Monday and Wednesday for 90 minutes during 16
weeks with the four groups. In this process, the teacher as a researcher presented each portion of
the materials and touched upon the selected activities for each group.

4. Results
Table 1 shows the output of the ANOVA analysis and reveals whether there is a statistically
significant difference between group means or not.
Table 1. ANOVA analysis

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 40.00 3 13.33 3.71 .01
Within Groups 319.23 89 3.58
Total 359.24 92

As shown, the significance value is 0.014 (i.e., p = .014), which is below 0.05; therefore, it indicates
that there is a statistically significant difference in the mean type of treatments taken. Yet, it is not
known which of the specific groups differed. This is identified in the Multiple Comparisons table
which contains the results of the Dunnett T3 test.
Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2020, 4 (1), 53–62 59

Table 2. Multiple comparisons

(I) Student (J) Student Mean Dif- Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval
ID ID f e r e n c e Sig. L o w e r Upper Bound
(I-J) Bound
Dunnett T3 C u l t u r a l Language .545 .566 .910 -1.02 2.11
Model Model
P e r s o n a l -.087 .524 1.000 -1.53 1.36
Growth
Model
C o n t r o l 1.542* .493 .018 .19 2.89
group
Language C u l t u r a l -.545 .566 .910 -2.11 1.02
Model Model
P e r s o n a l -.632 .620 .886 -2.34 1.08
Growth
Model
C o n t r o l .996 .594 .459 -.64 2.63
group
P e r s o n a l C u l t u r a l .087 .524 1.000 -1.36 1.53
G r o w t h Model
Model Language .632 .620 .886 -1.08 2.34
Model
C o n t r o l 1.629* .554 .031 .11 3.15
group
C o n t r o l C u l t u r a l -1.542* .493 .018 -2.89 -.19
group Model
Language -.996 .594 .459 -2.63 .64
Model
P e r s o n a l -1.629* .554 .031 -3.15 -.11
Growth
Model
Dunnett t C u l t u r a l C o n t r o l 1.542 .547 1.000 2.69
(<control)b Model group
Language C o n t r o l .996 .559 .997 2.17
Model group
P e r s o n a l C o n t r o l 1.629 .553 1.000 2.79
G r o w t h group
Model
* The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Dunnett t takes one group as the control group and measures other groups against it. In this
way, the groups’ statistical differences will be identified. In this case, all the four groups were bigger
than .05 and therefore all differed regarding their performance.
Table 3. Chi-square Tests

Value df Asymptotic Significance

(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 30.014a 24 .184
Likelihood Ratio 33.238 24 .099
Linear-by-Linear Associ- 4.999 1 .025
ation
N of Valid Cases 93
60 Rahimipour

As shown in the table, the significance level in all three columns is larger than .05 indicating
the rejection of null hypotheses. On the other hand, the p values are also > .05 (i.e. the significance
level) which reject any significant association among the variables.
The two assumed null hypotheses, on the two research questions, are rejected revealing that
the deployment of literature teaching courses affects the performance of to-be-teacher students
on academic reading course tests as well as the existence of the significant difference between the
impact of the three literature teaching approaches with regard to the learners’ performance on
academic reading course test which are confirmed by the statistical reports at hand.
Table 4. Descriptive statistics regarding student ID

Data M N SD Variance
11 2.00 1 . .
12 4.00 3 .00 .00
13 2.79 14 1.12 1.25
14 2.86 14 1.23 1.51
15 2.50 14 1.16 1.34
16 2.24 17 1.09 1.19
17 2.25 12 1.28 1.65
18 1.92 12 .90 .81
19 2.83 6 .73 .56
Total 2.51 93 1.13 1.29

As this table indicates, the total mean score is 2.51 and the squared average of the SD is 1.296
subtracted from the mean score, the result is 1.214 which reveals the distance from the mean
around which the scores are distributed. This could mean that the treatments might bear different
results. What can be inferred is the fact, proved by statistics, that the personal growth group has
outperformed all other groups showing its efficacy in its deployment for the real practice in the
classes.

5. Discussion and Conclusion

As shown through the analysis in the results sections, the three research hypotheses were
rejected. It was revealed that the deployment of literature teaching courses do affect the students’
reading course tests. The three teaching methods in their respective groups worked well with the
students’ performance on reading tests in comparative with the control group. This result confirms
the many characteristics put forwarded by practitioners of the use of literature and literary genres
in the classrooms. Authenticity, creativity, feasibility, culture-boundedness, and many more
characteristics and advantages of using literature in the classroom appraise the use of this rich
source of materials in the academic settings. Among the three approaches for teaching literature
in the classroom namely, cultural model, language model, and personal growth model, the last
one proved to work well the performance of students on summative achievements tests. Based
on the recent trends of literary criticism, the reader response model has been highly welcomed
by the researchers and practitioners in the field occurring to the researcher’s mind the idea to
conclude that the superiority of personal growth model may be due to accompanying the same
characteristics of reader response approach to reading and interpreting literature. The instantiation
of the exercises and procedures of the other two approaches to teaching literature, in a simpler and
more compete manner, in the personal growth model stabilizes its superiority over the other two
approaches as was confirmed by the research.
Many techniques and materials have been deployed for the better reading and teaching of
languages. The application of different literature teaching methods in the EFL classes has recently
found profound consideration and reappraisal. This paper dealt with the introduction of Carter
and Long’s (1991) literature teaching approaches in a teacher training college to survey the
Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2020, 4 (1), 53–62 61

effectiveness of these literature teaching approaches namely Personal Growth Model, Culture Model,
and Language Model on the students’ performance on academic reading course test. The results
revealed that the performance of the group who were exposed to the personal growth model was
significantly higher than the other two models. This is, to a great extent, because this model sounds
more authentic in materials selection and presentation, more personal and cultural loaded, and
above all more novel in practice and implementation. The results revealed that the EFL instructors,
curriculum designers, and EFL learners can maneuver over the implementation and deployment
of the Personal Growth Model of the English literature teaching method as it would lead to better
learning of the English language skills and more specifically it has worked well with the reading
skill as the prime intended skill incorporated in the ministry of higher education curriculum
development objectives. It further strengths the insertion of literature teaching methods in the
EFL teaching and learning settings. It can be inferred that the deployment of such a technique
proves to be a necessity for the to-be-English-teacher students as it would enable them to be more
initiative in their teaching and handling the concepts and learners’ educational needs.
62 Rahimipour

References
Aydinoğlu, N. (2013). Use of literature in language teaching course books. International Journal of New Trends
in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 2(2), 36-44.
Bobkina, J. & Dominguez, E. (2014). The use of literature and literary texts in the EFL classroom; between
consensus and controversy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3(2), 248-260.
https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.2p.248
Burhanuddn, A. (2018, 5, 19.). Incorporating the use of literature as an innovative technique for teaching English.
The 1st Annual International Conference on Language and Literature: KnE Social Sciences. DOI 10.18502
Collie, J., & Slater, S (1987). Literature in the language classroom. Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Collie, J. & Slater, S. (1987). Literature in the classroom. A resource book of ideas and activities. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Daskalovska, N. & Dimova, V. (2012). Why should literature be used in the language classroom? Procedia -
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1182 - 1186.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.271
Duff, A. & Maley, A. (2007). Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Erdem, Mustafa (2016). Literature in English language teaching. European Journal of Language and Literature
Studies, 4(1), 157-162.
https://doi.org/10.26417/ejls.v4i1.p157-162
Ganesan, S., Durgadevi, M., Ahila, A., & Kannan, T. R. (2016). Use of novels to teach ESL to the technical students
in the engineering colleges—a study. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(16), 1-4.
https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i16/92229
Frederking, V. , Henschel, S. , Meier, C. , Roick, T. , Stanat, P. , & Dickhäuser, O. (2012). Beyond functional aspects
of reading literacy: theoretical structure and empirical validity of literary literacy. (Special issue guest
edited by Irene Pieper & Tanja Janssen). L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 12, pp. 1-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.17239
https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2012.01.02
Krsteva, M. & Kukubajska, E. M. (2014). The role of literature in foreign language acquisition. 5th World
Conference on Educational Sciences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3605 - 3608.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.810
Oktan, D. & Kaymakamoğlu, S. E. (2017). Using literary texts in EFL classrooms: Cultural awareness and
vocabulary enrichment. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports &Science Education, 6 (4).
Sivapalan, S. et al. (2015). Engineering students’ perception of the influence of young adult literature on
developing appreciation for Reading. The English Teacher, 37, 27 - 39.
Stan, R. V. (2015). The importance of literature in primary school pupils’ development and personal growth.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 454 - 459.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.144
Tevdovska, E. S. (2016). Literature in ELT setting: Students’ attitudes and preferences towards literary texts.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 161 - 169.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.041
Tonne, I. & Pihl, J. (2017). Literacy education, reading engagement and library use in multilingual classes. In:
Pihl J., van der Kooij K.S., Carlsten T.C. (Eds.) Teacher and librarian partnerships in literacy education in the
21st century. New Research – New Voices. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-899-0_5
Wooten, A. , Debora, L. , Aimonette, & Cullinan, E. B. (Eds.). (2018). children’s literature in the reading program.
New York & London: The Gull Ford Press.