Module of GE 111 (Prelim)
Module of GE 111 (Prelim)
LEARNING MODULE
FOR
GE 111: UNDERSTANDING THE SELF
_____________________________________________________
WEEK 1
September 2020
Overview:
Introduction and concern issues of self and identity for a better and proper way of
understanding one’s self. Integration of personal daily experiences of the students with their
learning experiences inside the classroom to encourage them to improve themselves for a
better quality of life.
Enables to understand the construct of the self from various disciplinal perspectives:
philosophy, sociology, anthropology, and psychology including the more traditional division
between East and the West. It deals also with some of the various aspects that make up
the self like the biological self, the material self, the spiritual self, the political self, and the
digital self. Provides a discussion on some issues or concern for young students these
days, which are learning, goal setting, and stress. The new skills for practical application of
the concepts learned that aim to help them become better and significant individuals of our
society.
General Objective:
To help the students understand the nature of identity including factors that
influence and shape identity.
Each chapter in this module contains a major lesson involving the Disciplinal
Perspectives, Aspects of Self, Physical and Sexual self, and Learning to be a Better
Learner.The lesson are characterized by continuity, and are arranged in such a manner that
the present unit is related to the next unit. For this reason, you are advised to read this
module. After each unit, there are exercises to be given. Submission of task will be given
during your scheduled class hour.
GETTING STARTED:
Answer the following questions about yourself as fully and precisely as you can.
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
2. What makes you stand out from the rest? What makes yourself special?
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
Before we even had to be in any formal institution of learning, among the many things
that we were first taught as kids is to articulate and write our names. Growing up, we were
told to refer back to this name when talking about ourselves. A name is not the person itself
no matter how intimately bound it is with the bearer. It is only signifier. A person who named
after a saint most probably thought to be something else than the name. The self is
something that a person perennially molds, shapes, and develops. The self is not a static
thing that one is simply born with like a mole on one’s face or is just assigned by one’s
parents just like a name. Everyone is tasked to discover one’s self. Have you truly
discovered yours?
Abstraction
The history of philosophy is replete with men and women who inquired into the
fundamental nature of the self. Along with the question of the primary substratum that
defines the multiplicity of things in the world, the inquiry on the self has preoccupied the
earliest thinkers in the history of philosophy: the Greeks. The Greeks were the ones who
seriously questioned myths and moved away from them in attempting to understand reality
and respond to perennial questions of curiosity, including the question of the self. The
different perspectives and views on the self can be best seen and understood by revisiting
its prime movers and identity the most important conjectures made by philosophers from
the ancient times to the contemporary period.
Descartes
Rene Descartes, Father of Modern Philosophy, conceived of the human person as
having a body and a mind. In his famous treatise, The Meditations of First Philosophy, he
claims that there is so much that we should doubt.
Descartes thought that the only thing that one cannot doubt is the existence of the self.
The self then for Descartes is also a combination of two distinct entities, the cogito, the
thing that thinks, which is the mind, and the extenza or extension of the mind, which is the
body. In Descartes’s view, the body is nothing else but a machine that is attached to the
mind.
Hume
David Hume, a Scottish philosopher, has a very unique way of looking at man. As an
empiricist who believes that one can know what comes from the senses and experiences.
Hume argues that the self is nothing like what his predecessors thought of it.
To David Hume, the self is nothing else but a bundle of impressions. What are
impressions? For David Hume, if one tries to examine his experiences, he finds that they
can all be categorized into two: Impressions and Ideas.
Impressions are the basic objects of our experience or sensation. When one touches
an ice cube, the cold sensation is an impression. Impressions therefore are vivid because
they are products of our direct experience with the world. Ideas, on the other hand, are
Ryle
Gilbert Ryle solves the mind-body dichotomy that has been running for a long time in
the history of thought by blatantly denying the concept of an internal, non-physical self. For
Ryle, what truly matters is the behavior that a person manifests in his day-to-day life. Ryle
suggest that the “self” is not an entity one can locate and analyze but simply the convenient
name that people use to refer to all the behaviors that people make.
Merleau-Ponty
Merleau-Ponty is a phenomenologist who asserts that the mind-body bifurcation that
has been going on for a long time is a futile endeavor and an invalid problem. Unlike Ryle
who simply denies the “self”, Merleau-Ponty instead says that the mind and body are so
intertwined that they cannot be separated from one another .One cannot find any
experience that is not an embodied experience. All experience is embodied.
Direction: In your own words, state what “self” is for each of the following Philosophers.
After doing so, explain how your concept of “self” is compatible with how they conceived of
the self. Answers must be composed of five sentences. Use the criteria below as your
guide. Write your answers on a one whole sheet of paper.
1. Socrates
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
2. Plato
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
3. Augustine
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
4. Descartes
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
5. Hume
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
6. Kant
________________________________________________________________________
7. Ryle
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
8. Merleau- Ponty
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Criteria: Points
Content 20
Organization 10
Grammar 10
Language 10
Total 50
ACTIVITY #2
(To be submitted on next week)
Direction: Circle the words that describes you. Add additional words.
LEARNING MODULE
`
GE 111: UNDERSTANDING THE SELF
_____________________________________________________
WEEK 2
September 2020
Introduction
Across time the history, the self has been debated, discussed, and fruitfully or
otherwise conceptualized by different thinkers in philosophy. Time pass by, people put a
halt on speculative debates on the relationship between the “Body and the Soul of
Socrates” and renamed “Body and Mind of Rene Descartes.”
Thinkers got tired of focusing on long-standing debate since sixth century BC between
these two components of the human person. The debate shifted to another discussion
given the news, one of loci, if not the most important axis of analysis is the relationship
between the self and the external world.
The self and external reality is the reason for the self to have a clear understanding of
what might be, what it can be, and what it will be. This perspectives is known as the social
constructionist perspective. “social constructionist argue for a merged view of the person”
and context” where the boundaries of one cannot easily be separated from the boundaries
of the other” (Stever 1996).
Self in Families
Apart from the anthropological and psychological basis for the relationship between the
self and the social world, the sociological likewise struggled to understand the real
connection between the two concepts. While every child is born with certain givenness,
disposition coming from his parents genes and general condition of life, the impact of one’s
family is still deemed as a given in understanding the self. The kind of family that we are
born in, resources available to us (human, spiritual, economic), and the kind of
development that we will have will certainly affect us as we go through life.
As a matter of evolutionary fact, human persons are one of those beings whose
importance of family cannot be denied. Human beings are born virtually helpless and the
dependency period of a human baby to its parents for nurturing is relatively longer than
most other animals. Learning therefore is critical in our capacity to actualize our potential of
becoming humans. In trying to achieve the goal of becoming a fully realized human, a child
enters a system of relationships, most important of which is the family.
ACTIVITY #1
(To be submitted on next week)
Direction: Paste a picture of you when you were in elementary, in high school, and now
that you are in college. Below the picture, list down your salient characteristics that you
remember.
My College Self
ACTIVITY #2
(To be submitted on next week)
Direction: Answer the following questions cogently but honestly. Write your answers in the
space provided. Answers must be composed of five sentences. Use the rubric below as
your guide.
3. Think of a time when you felt you were your “true self”. What made you think you were
truly who you are during this time of your life?
4. Following the question above, can you provide a time when you felt you were not living
your “true self”? Why did you have to live a life like that? What did you do it?
5. What social pressures help shape yourself? Would you have wanted it otherwise?
LEARNING MODULE
FOR
GE 111: UNDERSTANDING THE SELF
_____________________________________________________
WEEK 3
THE SELF AS COGNITIVE CONSTRUCT
Introduction
As discussed in the previous lesson, every field of study, at least in the social sciences,
have their own research, definition, and conceptualization of self and identity. Some are
similar while some specific only in their field. Each field also has thousands of research on
self and identity as well as related or synonymous terms. The trend lessons also seems to
define the concept of the “self” from a larger context (i.e., culture and society) down to the
individual.
Abstraction
In confidence or in an attempt to avoid further analytical discussions, a lot of people
say, “I am who I am.” Yet, this statement still begs the question “if you are who you are,
then who are you that makes you who you are?”
As mentioned earlier, there are various definitions of the “self” and other similar or
interchangeable concepts in psychology. Simply put, “self” is the sense of personal identity
and of who we are as individuals (Jhangiani and Tarry, 2014.)
William James (1890) was one of the earliest psychologists to study the self and
conceptualized the self as having two aspects --- the “I” and the “me”. The “I” is the
thinking, acting, and feeling self (Gleitman, Gross, and Reisberg, 2011; Hogg and
Vaughan,2010). The “me” on the other hand, is the physical characteristics as well as
Other concepts similar to self are identity and self-concept. Identity is composed of
personal characteristics, social roles, and responsibilities, as well as affiliations that define
who one is (Oyserman, Elmore, and Smith, 2012). Self-concept is what basically comes to
your mind when you are asked about who you are (Oyserman, Elmore, and Smith, 2012).
Theories generally see the self and identity as mental constructs, created and
recreated in memory (Oyseman, Elmore, and Smith, 2012). Current researches point to the
frontal lobe of the brain as the specific area in the brain associated with the processes
concerning the self (Oyserman, Elmore, and Smith, 2012).
Several psychologists, especially during the fields earlier development, followed this
trend of thought, looking deeper into the mind of the person to theorize about the self,
identity, self-concept, and in turn, one’s personality. The most influential of them is Sigmund
Frued. Basically, Frued saw the self, its mental processes, and one’s behavior as the
results of the interaction between the Id, the Ego, and the Superego.
Under the theory of symbolic interactionism, G.H. Mead (1934) argued that the self is
created and developed through human interaction (Hogg and Vaughan 2010). Basically,
there are three reasons why self and identity are social products (Oyserman, Elmore, and
Smith, 2012).
There are times, however, when we are aware of our self-concepts; this is also called
self-awareness. Carver and Scheier (1981) identified two types of self that we can be
aware of: (1) the private self or your internal standards and private thoughts and feelings,
and (2) the public self or your public image commonly geared toward having a good
presentation of yourself to others (Hogg and Vaughan 2010).
Our group identity and self-awareness also has a great impact on our self-esteem, one
of the common concepts associated with the “self”. It is defined as our own positive or
negative perception or evaluation of ourselves (Jhangiani and Tarry 2014; Gleitman, Gross,
and Reisberg, 2011).
One of the ways in which our social relationship affects our self-esteem is through
social comparison. According to the Social Comparison Theory, we learn about ourselves,
the appropriateness of our behaviors, as well as our social status by comparing aspects of
ourselves with other people (Jhangiani and Tarry 2014; Hogg and Vaughan, 2010).
The downward social comparison is the more common type of comparing ourselves
with others. As the name implies, we create a positive self- concept by comparing
ourselves with those who are worse off than us (Jhangiani and Tarry, 2014). By having the
advantage, we can raise our self- esteem. Another comparison is the upward social
comparison which is comparing ourselves with those who are better off than us (Jhangiani
and Tarry, 2014). While it can be a form of motivation for some, a lot of those who do this
actually felt lower self-esteem as they highlight more of their weakness or inequities.
Social comparison also entails what is called self-evaluation maintenance theory, which
states that we can feel threatened when someone out performs us, especially when that
person is close to us (i.e., a friend or family) (Tesser 1988 in Jhangiani and Tarry, 2014). In
this case, we usually react in three ways.
1. First, we distance ourselves from that person or redefine our relationship with them
(Jhangiani and Tarry, 2014).
2. Second, we may also reconsider the importance of the aspect or skill in which you were
outperformed (Jhangiani and Tarry, 2014).
3. Lastly, we may also strengthen our resolve to improve that certain aspect of ourselves
However, in the attempt to increase or maintain self- esteem, some people become
narcissistic. Narcissism is a “trait characterized by overly high self-esteem, self-admiration,
and self-centeredness” (Jhangiani and Tarry, 2014)
This duality in the behavior and attitudes only proves the above-mentioned correlation.
Baumeister, Smart, and Boden (1996) in their research on self-esteem concluded that
programs, activities, and parenting styles to boost self- esteem should only be for
rewarding good behavior and other achievements and not for the purpose of merely trying
to make children feel better about themselves or to appease them when they get angry or
sad (Jhangiani and Tarry, 2014).
ACTIVITY #1
(To be submitted on next week)
Direction: Do a research and list ten (10) things to boost your self-esteem or improve your
self-concept. Cite your sources. Analyze which of those tips are more likely to backfire and
make someone conceited or narcissistic and revise them to make the statements both
helpful to the as well society in general.
ACTIVITY #2
(To be submitted on next week)
Hobbies
Family
SELF Religion
Criteria Points
Organization 15
Relevance 10
Content 5
Total 30
LEARNING MODULE
FOR
GE 111: UNDERSTANDING THE SELF
_____________________________________________________
WEEK 4
THE SELF IN EASTERN AND WESTERN THOUGHTS
Introduction
Different cultures and varying environment tend to create different perceptions of the
“self” and one of the most common distinctions between cultures and people is the Eastern-
vs-Western dichotomy wherein Eastern represents Asia and Western represents Europe
and Northern America.
Abstraction
There are actually a lot of sources in which you can analyze the perspective of each
culture and country about the concept of “self”. You can see it in their literature like how one
culture depicts a hero or a villain in their stories. You can see it in their social organization
like how they see their boss or their subordinate. Artworks, dances, even clothing may
show you clues about the “self”.
In this lesson, we will look at religious beliefs and political philosophies that greatly
influenced the mindset of each nation or culture. Since almost all the theories about the
self, which were discussed in the previous lessons, also came from the western scientific
research, we will highlight the eastern thoughts in this lesson.
The second philosophy is Taoism. Taoism is living in the way of the Tao or the universe.
However, Taoism rejects having one definition of what the Tao is, and one can only state
clues of what it is as they adopt a free-flowing, relative, unitary, and strictness brought by
Confucianism and would prefer a simple lifestyle and its teachings thus aim to describe
how to attain that life (Ho, 1995).
The self is not just an extension of the family or the community; it is part of the
universe, one of the forms and manifestations of the Tao (Ho, 1995). The ideal self is
selflessness but this is not forgetting about the self, it is living balanced-life with society and
nature, being open and accepting to change, forgetting about prejudices and egocentric
ideas and thinking about equality as well as complementary among humans as well as
other beings (Ho, 1995). In this way, you will be able to act spontaneously because you will
not be restricted by some legalistic standards but because you are in harmony with
everything.
The third belief is Buddhism. There are various groups who have adopted Buddhism;
thus, you may find differences in their teachings with our discussion but more likely, their
core concepts remained the same. The self is seen as an illusion born out of ignorance, of
trying to hold and control things, or human centered needs; thus, the self is also the source
of all these sufferings (Ho, 1995). It is, therefore, our quest to forget about the self, forget
the cravings of the self, break the attachments you have with the world, and to renounce
the self which is the cause of all suffering and in doing so, attain the state of Nirvana (Ho,
1995).
The self or the individual is not the focus of the abovementioned Asian or Eastern
philosophies or beliefs. Even with extended discussions about how the self should work,
Confucianism and Taoism still situate the self within a bigger context. In striving to become
a better person, one does not create a self above other people or nature but a self that is
beneficial to his community as well as in order and harmony with everything else. As for
Buddhism, the self, with all its connections and selfish ideas, is taken not just out of the
center of the picture, but from the whole picture entirely.
The Western culture is what we would call an individualistic culture since their focus is
on the person. Asian culture, on the other hand, is called a collectivistic culture as the group
and social relations that is given more importance than the individual needs and wants.
By valuing the individual, Westerners may seem to have loose associations or even
loyalty to their groups. Competition is the name of the game and they are more likely
straightforward and forceful in their communication as well as decision-making. Eastern or
oriental persons look after the welfare of their groups and values cooperation. They would
also be more compromising and they tend to go around the bus in explaining things, hoping
that the other person would “feel” what they really want to say (Qingxue, 2003).
Westerners also emphasize more on the value of equality even if they see that the
individual can rise above everything else. Because everyone is on their own in the
competition, one can say that they also promote ideals that create “fair” competition and
protect the individual. Asians, with their collectivistic culture, put more emphasis on
hierarchy as the culture wants to keep things in harmony and order (Qingxue 2003).
It must be emphasized, however that these are general commonalities among Western
cultures as compared to Asian or Oriental cultures. In the case of the Philippines, we can
also consider the colonization experience for differences and similarities with our Asian
neighbors. We might also find variation among provinces and regions due to geographical
conditions.
With the social media, migration, and intermarriages, variety between the Western and
Asian perceptions may either be blurred or highlighted. Whereas conflict is inevitable in
diversity, peace is also possible through understanding of where each of us is coming from.
Direction: Write top five (5) differences between Western and Eastern society, culture, and
individuals in the table below.
Western Eastern
LEARNING MODULE
FOR
GE 111: UNDERSTANDING THE SELF
_____________________________________________________
WEEK 5
September 2020
WEEK 5
Introduction
It has been believed that the sex chromosomes of humans define the sex (female or
male) and their secondary sexual characteristics. From childhood, we are controlled by our
genetic makeup. It influences the way we treat ourselves and others. However, there are
individuals who do not accept their innate sexual characteristics and they tend to change
Abstraction
Marieb, E.N. (2001) explains that the gonads (reproductive glands that produce the
gametes; testis or ovary) begin to form until about the eight week of embryonic
development. During the early stages of human development, the embryonic reproductive
structures of males and females are alike and are said to be in the indifferent stage. When
the primary reproductive structures are formed, development of the accessory structures
and external genitalia begins. The formation of male or female structures depends on the
presence of testosterone.
Any intervention with the normal pattern of sex hormone production in the embryo
results in strange abnormalities. For instance, a genetic male develops the female
accessory structures and external genitalia if the embryonic testes fail to produce
testosterone. On the other hand, if a genetic female is exposed to testosterone (as in the
case of a mother with androgen-producing tumor of her adrenal gland), the embryo has
ovaries but may develop male accessory ducts and glands, as well as a male reproductive
organ and an empty scrotum. As a result, pseudohermaphrodites are formed who
individuals are having accessory reproductive structures that do not “match” their gonads
while true hermaphrodites are individuals who possess both ovarian and testicular tissues
but this condition is rare in nature.
A critical event for the development of reproductive organs takes place about one
month before birth wherein the male testes formed in the abdominal cavity at approximately
the same location as the female ovaries, descend to enter the scrotum. If this normal event
fails, it may lead to cryptorchidism. This condition usually occurs in young males and
causes sterility (which is also a risk factor for cancer of the testes) that is why surgery is
usually performed during childhood to solve this problem.
Puberty is the period of life, generally between the ages of 10 and 15 years old, when
the reproductive organs grow to their adult size and become functional under the influence
of rising levels of gonadal hormones (testosterone in males and estrogen in females). After
this time, reproductive capability continues until old age in males and menopause in
females.
The changes that occur during puberty is similar in sequence in all individuals but the
age which they occur differs among individuals. In males, as they reach the age of 13,
puberty is characterized by the increase in the size of the reproductive organs followed by
the appearance of hair in the pubic area, axillary, and face. The reproductive organs
continue to grow for two years until sexual maturation marked by the presence of mature
semen in the testes.
In females, the budding of their breasts usually occurring at the age of 11 signals their
Erogenous Zones
Erogenous zones refer to parts of the body that are primarily receptive and increase
sexual arousal when touched in a sexual manner. Some of the commonly known
erogenous zones are the mouth, breasts, genitals, and anus. Erogenous zones may vary
from one person to another. Some people may enjoy being touched in a certain area more
than the other areas. Other common areas of the body that can be aroused easily may
include the neck, thighs, abdomen, and feet.
Types of Behavior
The various types of human sexual behavior are usually classifies according to the
gender and number of participants. There is solitary behavior involving only one individual,
and there is sociosexual behavior involving more than one person. Sociosexual behavior is
generally divided into heterosexual behavior (male with female) and homosexual behavior
(male with male or female with female). If three or more individuals are involved, it is,
possible to have heterosexual and homosexual activity is simultaneously (Gebhard, P.H.
2017).
1. Solitary Behavior
Self-gratification means self-stimulation that leads to sexual arousal and generally,
sexual climax. Usually, most self-gratification takes place in private as an end in itself, but
can also be done in a sociosexual relationship.
Self-gratification, generally beginning at or before puberty, is very common among
young males, but becomes less frequent or is abandoned when sociosexual activity is
available. Consequently, self-gratification is most frequent among the unmarried. There are
more males who perform acts of self-gratification than females. The frequency greatly
varies among individuals and it usually decreases as soon as they develop sociosexual
relationships.
2. Sociosexual Behavior
Heterosexual behavior is the greatest amount of sociosexual behavior that’s occurs
between only male and female. It usually begins in childhood and maybe motivated by
curiosity, such as showing or examining genitalia. There is varying degree of sexual
impulse and responsiveness among children. Physical contact involving necking or petting
is considered as an ingredient of the learning process and eventually of courtship and the
selection of a marriage partner.
Petting differs from hugging, kissing, and generalize caresses of the clothed body to
practice involving stimulation of the genitals. Petting maybe done as an expression of
affection and a source of pleasure, preliminary to coitus. Petting has been regarded by
others as near-universal human experience and is important not only in selecting the
partner but as a way of learning how to interact with another person sexually.
Coitus, the insertion of the male reproductive structure into the female reproductive
organ, is viewed by society quite differently depending upon the martial status of the
Sexual Problems
Sexual problems may be classified as physiological, psychological and social in origin.
Any given problem may involve all three categories.
Physiological problems are the least among the three categories. Only a small number
of people suffer from diseases that are due to abnormal development of the genitalia or that
part of the neurophysiology controlling sexual response. Some common physiologic
conditions that can disturb sexual response include vaginal infections, retroverted uteri,
prostatitis, adrenal tumors, diabetes, sentile changes of the vagina, and cardiovascular
problems.
Psychological problems comprise by far the largest category.
They are usually caused by socially induced inhibitions, maladaptive attitudes, ignorance
and sexual myths held by the society. An example of the latter is the belief that good,
mature sex must rapid erection, prolonged coitus, and simultaneously orgasm.
Premature emission of semen is a common problem, especially for young males.
Sometimes this is not the consequence of any psychological problem but the natural result
of excessive tension in a male who has been sexually deprived. Erectile impotence is
almost always of psychological origin in males under 40; in older males, physical causes
are more often involved.
Ejaculatory impotence, which results from the inability to ejaculate in coitus, is
uncommon and is usually of psychogenic origin. It appears to be associated with ideas of
contamination or with memories of traumatic experiences. Occasional ejaculatory inability
can be possibly expected in older men or in any who has exceeded his sexual capacity.
Vaginismus is a strong spasm of the pelvic musculature constricting the female
reproductive organ so that penetration is painful or impossible. It can be due to anti-sexual
conditioning or psychological trauma that serves as an unconscious defense against coitus.
It can be treated by psychotherapy and by gradually dilating the defense female
reproductive organ with increasingly large cylinders.
ACTIVITY #1
(To be submitted on next week)
Analysis
1. When do we usually observe the changes listed above for males and females?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
2. Were you able to experience the same changes? When?
3. If you were not able to experience the above listed changes, what might have used
caused such difference?
5. Can we really change our natural or innate sexual organ and sexual response?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________