Ipv4 and Ipv6
Ipv4 and Ipv6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction…………………………………3
Papers…………………………………4
References…………………………………6
INTRODUCTION
The exponential expansion of the Internet has exhausted the IPv4 addresses provided by IANA. The new IP edition, IPv6 introduced
by IETF with new features such as a simplified packet header, a greater address space, a different address sort, improved encryption,
powerful section routing, and stronger quality of service. ISPs are slowly seeking to migrate from current IPv4 physical networks to
The Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) is a protocol for use on packet-switched Link Layer networks. IPv4
The Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) is more advanced and has better features compared to IPv4. It has the
capability to provide an infinite number of addresses. It is replacing IPv4 to accommodate the growing number of
Below is the summary of the differences between the IPv4 and IPv6:
IPv4 IPv6
No. of bits on IP Address 32 128
Format decimal hexadecimal
Capable of Addresses 4.3 billion infinite number
How to ping ping XXX.XXX.XXX ping6
The use of IPv6 hosts and routers must be distributed over the Internet in a simple and progressive way, with a little
interdependence.
Network administrators and end users must think that the migration is easy to understand and implement.
A set of mechanisms called SIT (Simple Internet Transition) has been implemented; it includes protocols and management rules to
simplify the migration. The main characteristics of SIT are the following:
Possibility of a progressive and nontraumatic transition: IPv4 hosts and routers can be updated to IPv6, one at a time, without
Minimum requirements for updating: The only requirement for updating hosts to IPv6 is the availability of a DNS server to manage
Low initial cost: No preparatory work is necessary to begin the migration to IPv6.
The co-existence has created several core issues like packet traversing, routing scalability, a guarantee of network performance, and
security during the transition. In their survey, they focused on all these challenges during the transition process and provided
corresponding solutions. Moreover, they highlighted limitations in all these corresponding solutions and suggested some new research
directions.
Application layer attacks, Flooding attacks, Rogue devices, And Man-in-the-middle attacks. IPv6 specific security threats :
Reconnaissance attacks in IPv6 networks, Security threats related to IPv6 routing headers, Fragmentation related security threats,
Security threats related to ICMPv6 and multicast, 1SEND and CGAs,And Security issues related to transition mechanisms.
loss ….etc. The mechanisms and architectures used to provide QoS in a network are implemented in the same way in both versions of
IP. The difference between IPv4 and IPv6 QoS focuses on the process of traffic classification in which packets or flows are
differentiated by various parameters such as source or destination address, DSCP, or IP precedence values and types of protocol
levels. IPv6 provides easier classification of packets with identifiers of traffic. Additionally, the flow label field has the advantage of
being located before the address fields, helping to reduce delays in the verification of the package.
CONCLUSION
Ipv6 compared to ipv4 on many metrics like QoS and etc. This prove that IPv6 is much better compared to IPv4 and can meet future
performance demand.
Future work :
The internet will keep increasing and more ips are required people need to start working on advancing ipv6.
REFRENCES
[1] Ali, A.N.A., 2012. Comparison study between IPV4 & IPV6. International Journal of Computer Science Issues
(IJCSI), 9(3), p.314.
[2] Ashraf, S., Muhammad, D. and Aslam, Z., 2020. Analyzing challenging aspects of IPv6 over IPv4. J. Ilm. Tek. Elektro
[3] Durdağı, E. and Buldu, A., 2010. IPV4/IPV6 security and threat comparisons. Procedia-Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 2(2), pp.5285-5291.
[4] Parra, O.J.S., Rios, A.P. and Rubio, G.L., 2011, September. Quality of Service over IPV6 and IPV4. In 2011 7th
International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (pp. 1-4). IEEE.