SP351 HW6: Nikhil Vasan September 2021
SP351 HW6: Nikhil Vasan September 2021
Nikhil Vasan
September 2021
A
e1 = = (0, 1, 0, 0) (1)
|A|
B − (e1 · B)e1
e2 = = (1, 0, 0, 0) (2)
|B − (e1 · B)e1 |
A
e1 = = (0, 0, 0, 1) (5)
|A|
B − (e1 · B)e1
e2 = = (1, 0, 0, 0) (6)
|B − (e1 · B)e1 |
1
C − (C ė1 )e1 − (C · e2 )e2 1 1
e3 = = (0, √ , √ , 0) (7)
|C − (C ė1 )e1 − (C · e2 )e2 | 2 2
c. A = (6, 0, 0, 0), B = (1, 0, 2, 0), C = (4, 1, 9, 2)
A
e1 = = (1, 0, 0, 0) (8)
|A|
B − (e1 · B)e1
e2 = = (0, 0, 1, 0) (9)
|B − (e1 · B)e1 |
2
√ p
As we can see, 130 < (41)(43), and the inequality holds.
p √ √
|B| = |5i − 2| + |1| + |3 + i| + |2i| + |4| = 29 + 1 + 10 + 4 + 16 = 60
(17)
3
2. Verify that the matrix is orthogonal
" #
√1 −2
√
5 5
C= √2 √1
(20)
5 5
" # " #
√1 −2
√
5 5
and that the eigenvectors A = √2
,B= √1
, are orthogonal. Let us first
5 5
determine whether the eigenvectors are orthogonal.
1 −2 1 2
A · B = ( √ )( √ ) + ( √ )( √ ) = 0 (21)
5 5 5 5
Furthermore, we notice something interesting about the magnitude of these
vectors ...
1
A · A = (12 + 22 ) = 1 (22)
5
Interesting! Let’s see if this holds in B
1
B · B = (12 + (−2)2 ) = 1 (23)
5
We also notice something interesting about the matrix C
C= A B (24)
C is an orthogonal matrix, as CC T = I.
2b. Verify the following statements.
a. If C is orthogonal, and M is symmetric, prove that C −1 M C is symmetric.
Proof. We use direct proof. By hypothesis, C is orthogonal, that is, CC T =
CC −1 = I, therefore C T = C −1 . As such, C −1 M C = C T M C. By definition
of matrix transposition, (C T M C)T = C T M T (C T )T = C T M C = C −1 M C.
4
Proof. We use direct proof. By hypothesis, M is anti-symmetric, that is
M T = −M . Therefore, (C −1 M C)T = (C T M C)T = C T M T C = −C −1 M C.
Therefore, C −1 M C is anti-symmetric.
5
3. Find the
eigenvalues and eigen-vectors of the following matrix. a
3 −2
M=
−2 0
the eigen-vectors of this matrix come in the form
M⃗v = λ⃗v (26)
Our constraints are satisfied when λ = −1, 4. We can substitute these values
of λ into our earlier equation to obtain our eigenvectors
3 − (−1) −2 v1 0
= (30)
−2 0 − (−1) v2 0
Let us create a system of equations and see how v1 and v2 are related.
0 = 4v1 − 2v2 (31)
= −2v1 + v2 (32)
1
Therefore any vector of the form α is and eigenvector of this matrix with
2
eigenvalue -1 Let us solve when λ = 4
3 − (4) −2 v1 0
= (33)
−2 0 − (4) v2 0
Let us create a system of equations and see how v1 and v2 are related.
0 = −1v1 − 2v2 (34)
= −2v1 − 4v2 (35)
6
As we previously solved, we can solve
for the eigenvector with eigenvalue 4,
2
which is any vector of the form α
−1
2 0 2
b. M = 0 2 0
2 0 −1
As in 3a. We can solve for eigenvalues of this matrix
2 − λ 0 2
0 2 − λ 0 = (2 − λ)2 (−1 − λ) − 4(2 − λ) = (2 − λ)((2 − λ)(−1 − λ) − 4)
2 0 −1 − λ
(36)
= (2 − λ)(λ2 − λ − 2 − 4) = (2 − λ)(λ2 − λ − 6) = 0
(37)
= (2 − λ)(λ − 3)(λ + 2) = 0 (38)
7
v2 = 0 as is indicated by the second row. However we notice equations 1 and
3 are multiples
of each other. As such, v1 = 2v2 , and any multiple of the
2
vector 0 is an eigenvector with eigenvalue λ = 3
1
Finally we solve for our last eigenvalue, λ = −2.
4 0 2 v1 0
0 4 0 v2 = 0 (44)
2 0 1 v3 0
8
0 −i
4a. Diagonalize the pauli spin matrix σy = . That is, find hte
i 0
matrix D = C −1 σy C.
We notice that σy is hermitian, as such it’s eigenvalues are real and the
eigenvectors are orthogonal, and if we normalize our eigenvectors we will
produce a unitary matrix with our eigenvectors as our column vectors.
−λ −i 2
i −λ = λ − 1 = 0 (45)
We see that
v1 = −iv2 (49)
v1 = −i (50)
−i
Solving this system we notice that v1 = −i, v2 = 1, our eigenvector
1
with eigenvalue λ = 1. Let us now solve for λ = −1
1 −i v1 0
= (51)
i 1 v2 0
v1 − iv2 = 0 (52)
iv1 + v2 = 0 (53)
We reduce
v1 = iv2 (54)
v1 = iv2 (55)
9
i
Our eigenvector with eigenvalue λ = −1 is . Let us define the matrix
1
1 i −i
U= 2√ . We note that U is unitary.
1 1
† 1 i 1 −i i 1 0
U U= = (56)
2 −i 1 1 1 0 1
1 0 −i i −i 1 i −i −1 0
σy U = √ =√ (57)
2 i 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 1
We multiply by U −1 from the left and obtain
−1 1 −i 1 0 −i i −i
U σy U = (58)
2 i 1 i 0 1 1
Equation (57) comes from the fact that because the columns of U are eigen-
vectors of σy we know that σy U is equivalent to U times a matrix that
−1 0
multiplies each column by a scalar, which is what the matrix D =
0 1
−1 dagger
does. (58) comes after we multiply U by U = U .
−1 −1
b. What are U σx U and U σx U ?
−1 1 −i 1 0 1 i −i 1 −i 1 1 1
U σx U = = (59)
2 i 1 1 0 1 1 2 i 1 i −i
1 0 −2i 0 −i
= = (60)
2 21 0 i 0
We notice that
U −1 σx U = σy (61)
Let us atttempt σz
−1 1 −i 1 1 0 i −i 1 −i 1 i −i
U σz U = = (62)
2 i 1 0 −1 1 1 2 i 1 −1 −1
1 0 −2
= = −σx (63)
2 −2 0
U −1 σx U = −σx (64)
10