Short Note On Rule of Law
Short Note On Rule of Law
Short Note On Rule of Law
term is often used by the Indian judiciary in their judgments. Rule of law has
been declared by the Supreme Court as one of the basic features of the
Constitution so it cannot be amended even by the constitutional amendment.
Rule of law is seen as an integral part of good governance.[1]
As per rule of law, it is required that the people should be governed by the
accepted rules rather than the decisions that are arbitrarily taken by the rulers.
For this, it is essential to keep in mind that the rules that are made should be
general and abstract, known and certain and it should apply equally to all
individuals. Legal limitation on government is the essential attribute of
constitutionalism. Rulers are not above law under the concept of
constitutionalism, government power is divided with laws enacted by one body
and administered by another and for that an independent judiciary exists to
ensure laws.[2]
The derivation of the phrase ‘ Rule of Law’ is from the French phrase ‘la
principe de legalite’ which implies principle of legality. By this phrase it refers
to a government based on principles of law and not of men. One of the basic
principles of Constitution is rule of law and this concept is up to standard in
both India and America Constitution.
The term ‘rule of law’ is originated from England and India has taken this
concept. The concept of rule of law further requires that no person should be
subjected to harsh or arbitrary treatment. The word ‘law’ in rule of law means
that whether he is a man or a society, he must not be governed by a man or
ruler but by law. In other words, as per Article 13 of the Indian Constitution
rule of law means law of land.
1. Supremacy of law
As per the first postulate, rule of law refers to the lacking of arbitrariness or
wide discretionary power. In order to understand it simply, every man should
be governed by law.
According to Dicey, English men were ruled by the law and the law alone and
also where there is room for arbitrarinessand that in a republic no less than
under a monarchy discretionary authority on the part of the Government must
mean insecurity for legal freedom on the part of its subjects. There must be
absence of wide discretionary powers on the rulers so that they cannot make
their own laws but must be governed according to the established laws.
In case of violation of such rights, one can approach Supreme Court or High
Court under Article 32 and 226 of the Indian Constitution. The Constitution of
India is enriched with the principles of law i.e. justice, equality and liberty. Any
law made by the Central government or State government must be complied
in accordance with the Constitution of India. If any law made by the legislature
contravenes with the provisions of the Constitution then such law will be
declared void.
Concept of Rule of Law
The originator of the concept of rule of law was Sir Edward Coke the Chief
Justice in James I Reign.
The concept of rule of law is of old origin. Greek philosophers such as Plato and
Aristotle discussed the concept of rule of law around 350 BC. Plato wrote
“Where the law is subject to some other authority and has none of its own, the
collapse of the state, in my view, is not far off; but if law is the master of the
government and the government is its slave, then the situation is full of
promise and men enjoy all the blessings that the gods shower on a state”.
Aristotle wrote “law should govern and those who are in power should be
servant of the laws.”
Under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court has the power
to issue writs in the nature of Habeas Corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo
warranto, and certiorari. The power of judicial review is also given to Supreme
Court in order to prevent any ultra vires law so as to preserve ‘Rule of law’.