SCM Chapter 6 To 11
SCM Chapter 6 To 11
11/13/2021 2
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Network Design Decisions
• Facility role
• What role should each facility play?
• What processes are performed at each facility?
• Facility location
• Where should facilities be located?
• Capacity allocation
• How much capacity should be allocated to each facility?
11/13/2021 3
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Factors Influencing
Network Design Decisions
• Strategic
• Technological
• Macroeconomic
• Political
• Infrastructure
• Competitive
• Logistics and facility costs
11/13/2021 4
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Strategic Factors
11/13/2021 5
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Strategic Factors (Cont.)
According to Kasra Fredows, the strategic role
of various facilities in a global supply chain
network are as follows
1: Offshore facility: Low cost facility for export
production
2: Source Facility: Low cost for global
production
3:Server Facility: Regional production facility
11/13/2021 6
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Strategic Factors (Cont.)
11/13/2021 12
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
INFRASTRUCTURE FACTORS
• Key infrastructure elements to be
considered during network design
include:
• Availability of sites,
• Labor availability
• Proximity to transportation terminals
• Rail service, proximity to air ports and sea ports
• High way access
• Congestion
• Local utilities.
11/13/2021 13
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
COMPETITIVE FACTORS
• A fundamental decision firm’s
make is to whether their facilities
close to their competitors or far
from them.
11/13/2021 14
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Positive externalities between the
firms
11/13/2021 15
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Locating to Split market
11/13/2021 17
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
LOGISTICS AND FACILITY COSTS
• Logistics and facility costs incurred
within a supply chain change as the
number of facilities, their location,
and capacity allocation is changed.
• Companies must consider inventory,
transportation and facility costs
when designing their supply chain
networks.
11/13/2021 18
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
A Framework for Global Site Location
Competitive STRATEGY GLOBAL COMPETITION
PHASE I
Supply Chain
INTERNAL CONSTRAINTS Strategy TARIFFS AND TAX
Capital, growth strategy, INCENTIVES
existing network
PHASE III
Desirable Sites AVAILABLE
INFRASTRUCTURE
PRODUCTION METHODS
Skill needs, response time
11/13/2021 19
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Gravity Methods for
Location
( x − x n ) + ( y − y n)
2 2
– x,y: Warehouse Coordinates d n
=
– xn, yn : Coordinates of delivery
Dn * Fn
n=k
location n ∑
n =1 dn
* X n
– dn : Distance to delivery location n x=
– Fn : Cost of shipping one unit for n
Dn * Fn
unit distance between the facility ∑
i =1 dn
and either market or supply
source ‘n’. Dn * Fn
n=k
11/13/2021 20
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Factor-Rating Method
Popular because a wide variety of factors
can be included in the analysis
Six steps in the method
1. Develop a list of relevant factors called critical
success factors
2. Assign a weight to each factor
3. Develop a scale for each factor
4. Score each location for each factor
5. Multiply score by weights for each factor for each
location
6. Recommend the location with the highest point
score
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Factor-Rating Example
Critical Scores
Success (out of 100) Weighted Scores
Factor Weight France Denmark France Denmark
Labor
availability
and attitude .25 70 60 (.25)(70) = 17.5 (.25)(60) = 15.0
People-to-
car ratio .05 50 60 (.05)(50) = 2.5 (.05)(60) = 3.0
Per capita
income .10 85 80 (.10)(85) = 8.5 (.10)(80) = 8.0
Tax structure .39 75 70 (.39)(75) = 29.3 (.39)(70) = 27.3
Education
and health .21 60 70 (.21)(60) = 12.6 (.21)(70) = 14.7
Totals 1.00 70.4 68.0
Table 8.4
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Locational
Break-Even Analysis
Three locations:
–
$180,000 –
–
$160,000 –
$150,000 –
–
$130,000 –
–
Annual cost
$110,000 –
–
–
$80,000 –
–
$60,000 –
–
–
Akron Chicago
$30,000 – Bowling Green
lowest lowest cost
– lowest cost
cost
$10,000 –
| | | | | | |
–
Figure 8.2 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000
Volume
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Thank You
11/13/2021 27
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Supply Chain Management
∑dixQi
i
x - coordinate =
∑Qi
i
∑diyQi
i
y - coordinate =
∑Qi
i
60 –
30 –
Atlanta (60, 40)
–
| | | | | |
East-West
30 60 90 120 150
Arbitrary
origin Figure 8.3
Number of Containers
Store Location Shipped per Month
Chicago (30, 120) 2,000
Pittsburgh (90, 110) 1,000
New York (130, 130) 1,000
Atlanta (60, 40) 2,000
60 –
30 –
Atlanta (60, 40)
–
| | | | | |
East-West
30 60 90 120 150
Arbitrary
origin
• yi = 1 if plant is Min∑
n
f y + ∑∑ c x
n m
ij ij
located at site i, 0 i =1
i i
i =1 j =1
otherwise s.t.
n
∑ y ≤ K ; y ∈{0,1}
j =1
i i i
11/13/2021 9
5-9
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Demand Allocation Model
s.t.
• Which supply sources n
∑ xij = D j
are used by a plant? i =1
m
∑ xij ≤ K i
xij = Quantity shipped from j =1
11/13/2021 10
5-10
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Locating Plants and Warehouses
Simultaneously
• Location and Capacity allocation decisions
have to be made for both factories and
warehouses.
11/13/2021 11
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Assumption
• The units have been appropriately adjusted such that one unit of input
from a supply source produces one unit of finished product.
The model requires the following inputs:
• m = Number of markets or demand points
• n = Number of Potential factory locations
• l = Number of suppliers
• t = Number of Potential warehouses
• Dj = Annual demand from customer j
• Ki = Potential annual capacity of factory at site i
• SL = Annual Supply capacity at supplier L
• We = Potential annual warehouse capacity at site e
• Fi = Fixed annual cost of locating plant at site i
• Fe = Fixed annual cost of locating warehouse at site e
• Chi = Cost of shipping one unit from supply source h to factory i
• Cie = Cost of producing and shipping one unit from factory i to warehouse e
• Cej = Cost of shipping one unit from warehouse e to customer j
11/13/2021 12
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Decision variables
11/13/2021 14
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Constraints
11/13/2021 15
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Summary of Learning Objectives
• What is the role of network design decisions in
the supply chain?
• What are the factors influencing supply chain
network design decisions?
• Describe a strategic framework for facility
location.
• How are the following optimization methods
used for facility location and capacity allocation
decisions?
– Gravity methods for location
– Network optimization models
11/13/2021 16
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Supply Chain Management
Network Design in an
Uncertain Environment
11/13/2021 17
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Outline
• The Impact of Uncertainty on Network Design Decisions.
• Discounted Cash Flow Analysis.
• Representations of Uncertainty.
• Evaluating Network Design Decisions Using Decision
Trees.
11/13/2021 18
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
The Impact of Uncertainty on Network Design
where
C0 , C1 ,..., CT is a stream of cash flows over T periods
NPV = the net present value of this stream of cash flows
k = rate of return
11/13/2021 23
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
NPV Example: Trips Logistics
C1 C2
NPV (no lease) = C0 + +
1 + k (1 + k )2
22000 22000
= 22000 + + = $60,182
1.1 1.12
The NPV of signing the lease is $54,711 higher; therefore, the manager
decides to sign the lease.
However, uncertainty in demand and costs may cause the manager to
rethink his decision.
11/13/2021 24
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Representations of Uncertainty
11/13/2021 25
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Binomial Representations of Uncertainty
• When moving from one period to the next, the value of the
underlying factor (e.g., demand or price) has only two possible
outcomes – up or down.
• The underlying factor moves up by a factor or u > 1 with
probability p, or down by a factor d < 1 with probability 1-p.
• Assuming a price P in period 0, for the multiplicative binomial,
the possible outcomes for the next four periods:
– Period 1: Pu, Pd
– Period 2: Pu2, Pud, Pd2
– Period 3: Pu3, Pu2d, Pud2, Pd3
– Period 4: Pu4, Pu3d, Pu2d2, Pud3, Pd4
11/13/2021 26
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Binomial Representations of Uncertainty
11/13/2021 28
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Evaluating Network Design Decisions
Using Decision Trees
• A manager must make many different decisions when
designing a supply chain network.
• Many of them involve a choice between a long-term (or less
flexible) option and a short-term (or more flexible) option.
• If uncertainty is ignored, the long-term option will almost
always be selected because it is typically cheaper.
• Such a decision can eventually hurt the firm, however,
because actual future prices or demand may be different from
what was forecasted at the time of the decision.
• A decision tree is a graphic device that can be used to evaluate
decisions under uncertainty.
11/13/2021 29
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Decision Tree Methodology
1. Identify the duration of each period (month, quarter, etc.) and
the number of periods T over the which the decision is to be
evaluated.
2. Identify factors such as demand, price, and exchange rate,
whose fluctuation will be considered over the next T periods.
3. Identify representations of uncertainty for each factor; that is,
determine what distribution to use to model the uncertainty.
4. Identify the periodic discount rate k for each period.
5. Represent the decision tree with defined states in each
period, as well as the transition probabilities between states
in successive periods.
6. Starting at period T, work back to period 0, identifying the
optimal decision and the expected cash flows at each step.
Expected cash flows at each state in a given period should be
discounted back when included in the previous period.
11/13/2021 30
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Decision Tree Methodology: Trips
Logistics
• Decide whether to lease warehouse space for the
coming three years and the quantity to lease.
• Long-term lease is currently cheaper than the spot
market rate.
• The manager anticipates uncertainty in demand and
spot prices over the next three years.
• Long-term lease is cheaper but could go unused if
demand is lower than forecast; future spot market rates
could also decrease.
• Spot market rates are currently high, and the spot
market would cost a lot if future demand is higher than
expected.
11/13/2021 31
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Trips Logistics: Three Options
• Get all warehousing space from the spot market
as needed.
• Sign a three-year lease for a fixed amount of
warehouse space and get additional
requirements from the spot market.
• Sign a flexible lease with a minimum change that
allows variable usage of warehouse space up to a
limit with additional requirement from the spot
market.
11/13/2021 32
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Trips Logistics
D=80 D=96
p=$1.32 p=$0.97
0.25 D=64
p=$1.45
D=80
p=$1.32 D=64
p=$1.19
D=64
p=$0.97
11/13/2021 34
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Thank You
11/13/2021 35
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Supply Chain Management
D=80 D=96
p=$1.32 p=$0.97
0.25 D=64
p=$1.45
D=80
p=$1.32 D=64
p=$1.19
D=64
p=$0.97
11/13/2021 3
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Trips Logistics Example
11/13/2021 4
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Trips Logistics Example
11/13/2021 5
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Trips Logistics Example
11/13/2021 6
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Trips Logistics Example
• The present value of this expected value in Period 1 is
PVEP(D=12, p=1.32,1) = EP(D=120,p=1.32,1) / (1+k)
= -$12,000 / (1+0.1)
= -$10,909
• The total expected profit P(D=120,p=1.32,1) at node
D=120,p=1.32 in Period 1 is the sum of the profit in Period 1
at this node, plus the present value of future expected profits
possible from this node
P(D=120,p=1.32,1) = [(120,000x1.22)-(120,000x1.32)] +
PVEP(D=120,p=1.32,1)
= -$12,000 + (-$10,909) = -$22,909
• The total expected profit for the other nodes in Period 1 will
be calculated..
11/13/2021 7
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Trips Logistics Example
• For Period 0, the total profit P(D=100,p=120,0) is the sum of
the profit in Period 0 and the present value of the expected
profit over the four nodes in Period 1
EP(D=100,p=1.20,0) = 0.25xP(D=120,p=1.32,1) +
0.25xP(D=120,p=1.08,1) +
0.25xP(D=96,p=1.32,1) +
0.25xP(D=96,p=1.08,1)
= 0.25x(-22,909)+0.25x32,073+0.25x(15,273)+0.25x
21,382 = $3,818
PVEP(D=100,p=1.20,0) = EP(D=100,p=1.20,0) / (1+k)
= $3,818 / (1 + 0.1) = $3,471
11/13/2021 8
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Trips Logistics Example
P(D=100,p=1.20,0)=100,000x1.22-
100,000x1.20 +PVEP(D=100,p=1.20,0)
= $2,000 + $3,471 = $5,471
• Therefore, the expected NPV of not signing the
lease and obtaining all warehouse space from
the spot market is given by NPV(Spot Market)
= $5,471
11/13/2021 9
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Trips Logistics Example
11/13/2021 10
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Evaluating Flexibility Using Decision
Trees
• Decision tree methodology can be used to evaluate flexibility within the
supply chain.
• Suppose the manager at Trips Logistics has been offered a contract where,
for an upfront payment of $10,000, the company will have the flexibility of
using between 60,000 sq. ft. and 100,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space at $1
per sq. ft. per year. Trips must pay $60,000 for the first 60,000 sq. ft. and
can then use up to 40,000 sq. ft. on demand at $1 per sq. ft. as needed.
• Using the same approach as before, the expected profit of this option is
$56,725.
• The value of flexibility is the difference between the expected present
value of the flexible option and the expected present value of the inflexible
options.
• The three options are listed, where the flexible option has an expected
present value $8,361 greater than the inflexible lease option (including
the upfront $10,000 payment).
11/13/2021 11
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Making Supply Chain Design Decisions
Under Uncertainty in Practice
• Combine strategic planning and financial
planning during network design.
11/13/2021 12
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Summary of Learning
Objectives
• What are the uncertainties that influence supply
chain performance and network design?
11/13/2021 13
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Question
11/13/2021 14
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Solution
• Supply chain risks include the chance of
disruptions and delays due to natural
disaster, war, terrorism, labor disputes, and
poor supplier performance.
11/13/2021 15
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Solution
11/13/2021 16
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Forecasting
1. Naive approach
2. Moving averages
Time-Series
3. Exponential Models
smoothing
4. Trend projection
5. Linear regression Associative
Model
Trend Cyclical
Seasonal Random
Seasonal peaks
Actual
demand
Average
demand over
Random four years
variation
| | | |
1 2 3 4
Year Figure 4.1
0 5 10 15 20
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Thank You
11/13/2021 39
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Supply Chain Management
3
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Role of Inventory in the Supply Chain
Improve Matching of Supply
and Demand
Improved Forecasting
4
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Role of Cycle Inventory
in a Supply Chain
• Lot, or batch size: quantity that a supply chain stage either
produces or orders at a given time.
• Cycle inventory: average inventory that builds up in the
supply chain because a supply chain stage either produces
or purchases in lots that are larger than those demanded
by the customer
– Q = lot or batch size of an order
– d = demand per unit time
• Inventory profile: plot of the inventory level over time.
Cycle inventory = Q/2 (depends directly on lot size)
• Average flow time = Avg inventory / Avg flow rate
• Average flow time from cycle inventory = Q/(2d)
5
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Role of Cycle Inventory
in a Supply Chain
Q = 1000 units
d = 100 units/day
Cycle inventory = Q/2 = 1000/2 = 500 = Avg
inventory level from cycle inventory.
Avg flow time = Q/2d = 1000/(2)(100) = 5 days.
• Cycle inventory adds 5 days to the time a unit
spends in the supply chain.
• Lower cycle inventory is better because:
– Average flow time is lower
– Working capital requirements are lower
– Lower inventory holding costs
6
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Role of Cycle Inventory
in a Supply Chain
• Cycle inventory is held primarily to take advantage of
economies of scale in the supply chain.
• Supply chain costs influenced by lot size:
– Material cost = C
– Fixed ordering cost = S
– Holding cost = H = hC (h = cost of holding $1 in inventory for one year)
8
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Economies of Scale
to Exploit Fixed Costs
Annual demand = D
Number of orders per year = D/Q
Annual material cost = CD
Annual order cost = (D/Q)S
Annual holding cost = (Q/2)H = (Q/2)hC
Total annual cost = TC = CD + (D/Q)S + (Q/2)hC
9
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Fixed Costs: Optimal Lot Size
and Reorder Interval (EOQ)
D: Annual demand
S: Setup or Order Cost H = hC
C: Cost per unit
h: Holding cost per year as a fraction of
2 DS
product cost
Q* =
H: Holding cost per unit per year
Q: Lot Size
H
2S
T: Reorder interval
n* =
Material cost is constant and therefore
is not considered in this model DH
10
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Example
11
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Example
Demand, D = 12,000 computers per year
d = 1000 computers/month
Unit cost, C = $500
Holding cost fraction, h = 0.2
Fixed cost, S = $4,000/order
Q* = Sqrt[(2)(12000)(4000)/(0.2)(500)] = 980
computers
Cycle inventory = Q/2 = 490
Flow time = Q/2d = 980/(2)(1000) = 0.49 month
Reorder interval, T = 0.98 month
12
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Example (continued)
Annual ordering and holding cost =
= (12000/980)(4000) + (980/2)(0.2)(500) = $97,980
14
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Example
If desired lot size = Q* = 200 units, what would S
have
to be?
D = 12000 units
C = $500
h = 0.2
Use EOQ equation and solve for S:
S = [hC(Q*)2]/2D =
[(0.2)(500)(200)2]/(2)(12000) = $166.67
To reduce optimal lot size by a factor of k, the fixed
order cost must be reduced by a factor of k2
15
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Key Points from EOQ Model
21
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Delivery Options
22
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
No Aggregation: Order Each Product
Independently
Litepro Medpro Heavypro
S * = S + s L + sM + s H
Annualordering cos t = S * * n
D * h * C L DM * h * CM DH * h * C H
Annualhoding cos t = L + +
2n 2n 2n
DL * h * C L DM * h * CM DH * h * C H
TotalCost = + + + S *n
2n 2n 2n
DL * h * C L + DM * h * CM + DH * h * C H
n* =
2* S*
k
*
∑ D * h *C
i i
n = i =1
2* S*
24
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Complete Aggregation:
Order All Products Jointly
Litepro Medpro Heavypro
26
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Frequency of most frequently
ordered products=11
The frequency nL = 11
with which it is included with
the
most frequently ordered product
nm = 3.5
nH = 1.1
27
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Step 2 for example problem
nM = 7.7; nH = 2.4
11
mM = = 1.4
7. 7
11
mH = = 4.5
2.4
mM = 1.4 = 2
mH = 4.5 = 5
28
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Applying step 3, the ordering frequency of most
frequently ordered model is recalculated as=11.47
29
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
n L = 11.47 / year
11.47
nm = = 5.74 / year
Applying 2
step 4 nH =
11.47
= 2.29 / year
5
30
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Tailored Aggregation: Using Heuristic
No Aggregation $155,140
32
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Lessons from Aggregation
33
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Quantity Discounts
34
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
All-Unit Quantity Discounts: Example
$3
$2.96
$2.92
37
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Example
Drugs Online (DO) is an online retailer of prescription
drugs and health supplements. Vitamins represent a
significant percentage of its sales. Demand for vitamins
is 10,000 bottles per month. DO incurs a fixed order
placement, transportation, and receiving cost of $100
each time an order for vitamins is placed with the
manufacturer. DO incurs a holding cost of 20 percent.
The price charged by the manufacturer follows the all
unit discount pricing schedule is shown following.
Evaluate the number of bottles that the DO manager
should orderln each lot.
38
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
All-Unit Quantity Discount: Example
39
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Step 1: Calculate Q2* = Sqrt[(2DS)/hC2]
= Sqrt[(2)(120000)(100)/(0.2)(2.92)] = 6410
Not feasible (6410 < 10001)
Calculate TC2 using C2 = $2.92 and q2 = 10001
TC2=(120000/10001)(100)+(10001/2)(0.2)(2.92)+
(120000)(2.92)= $354,520
Step 2: Calculate Q1* = Sqrt[(2DS)/hC1]
=Sqrt[(2)(120000)(100)/(0.2)(2.96)] = 6367
Feasible (5000<6367<10000) Stop
TC1=(120000/6367)(100)+(6367/2)(0.2)(2.96)+(120000)(2.
96) = $358,969
TC2 < TC1 The optimal order quantity Q* is q2 = 10001
40
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Marginal Unit Quantity Discount
41
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
MUQD______
Vi be the cost of ordering qi units. Define V0=0 and Vi for 0 ≤ i ≤ r
D
ACO =
Q
S
The material cost of each order of size Q
(qi ≤ Q ≤ qi +1 ) is given by
h
AHC = [Vi ( )
+ Q − qi Ci ]
2
D
AMC = [Vi + (Q − qi )Ci ]
Q 42
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
MUQD______
D h D
= S + [Vi + (Q − qi )Ci ] + [Vi + (Q − qi )Ci ]
Q 2 Q
2 D(S + Vi − qi Ci )
Qi =
hCi
43
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Example
• Assume that manufacturer uses the following
MUQD
pricing schedule.
Order quantity Unit Price
0-5000 $3.00
5001-10000 $2.96
Over 10000 $2.92
44
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Solution
q0 = 0; q1 = 5,000; q2 = 10,000
C0 = $3.00; C1 = $2.96; C2 = $2.92
q0 = 0; q1 = 5,000; q2 = 10,000
C0 = $3.00; C1 = $2.96; C2 = $2.92
= $29,800
D = 120,000; S = $100 / lot ; h = 0.2
45
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Solution
• For i=0, evaluate Q0=6,324 (it is not feasible).
• Optimum order size is 5,000 and corresponding
total cost is $363,900 in this price range.
• For i=1, evaluate Q1=11,028 (it is not feasible)
• Optimum order size is 10,000 and
corresponding total cost is $361,780 in this
price range.
• For i=1, evaluate Q2=16,961 (it is feasible).
• Optimum order size is 16,961 and
corresponding total cost is $360,365 in this
price range.
• Optimum order size is 16,961.
46
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Why Quantity Discounts?
47
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Coordination for
Commodity Products
• D = 120,000 bottles/year
• SR = $100, hR = 0.2, CR = $3
• SS = $250, hS = 0.2, CS = $2
48
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Coordination for
Commodity Products
• What can the supplier do to decrease supply
chain costs?
– Coordinated lot size: 9,165; Retailer cost =
$4,059; Supplier cost = $5,106; Supply chain
cost = $9,165
• Effective pricing schemes
– All-unit quantity discount
• $3 for lots below 9,165
• $2.9978 for lots of 9,165 or more
– Pass some fixed cost to retailer (enough that he
raises order size from 6,324 to 9,165)
49
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Two-Part Tariffs and
Volume Discounts
• Design a two-part tariff that achieves the coordinated
solution.
– In this case the manufacture charges its entire profit as an up-
front franchise fee and then sells to the retailer at cost.
– In this particular situation, up-front fee is $180,000 and CR=$2.
• Design a volume discount scheme that achieves the
coordinated solution.
– The manufacture offers a price of CR=$4 per bottle if the
quantity DO purchases per year is less than 120,000,
otherwise CR=$3.50 per bottle.
50
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Lessons from Discounting Schemes
• Lot size based discounts increase lot size and
cycle inventory in the supply chain.
• Lot size based discounts are justified to achieve
coordination for commodity products.
• Volume based discounts with some fixed cost
passed on to retailer are more effective in
general.
– Volume based discounts are better over rolling
horizon
51
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Short-Term Discounting:
Trade Promotions
• Trade promotions are price discounts for a limited period of time
(also may require specific actions from retailers, such as displays,
advertising, etc.).
• Key goals for promotions from a manufacturer’s perspective:
– Induce retailers to use price discounts, displays, advertising to increase sales
– Shift inventory from the manufacturer to the retailer and customer
– Defend a brand against competition
– Goals are not always achieved by a trade promotion
• What is the impact on the behavior of the retailer and on the
performance of the supply chain?
• Retailer has two primary options in response to a promotion:
– Pass through some or all of the promotion to customers to spur sales
– Purchase in greater quantity during promotion period to take advantage of
temporary price reduction, but pass through very little of savings to
customers.
52
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Short Term Discounting
CQ
*
dD
Q
d
Forward buy = Qd - Q* = +
(C - d )h C - d
53
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
DO is a retailer that sells vitaherb, a popular
vitamin diet supplement. Demand for vitaherb is
120,000 bottles per year. The manufacturer
currently charges $3 for each bottle and DO
incurs a holding cost of 20 percent. DO currently
orders in lots of Q* = 6,324 bottles. The
manufacturer has offered a discount of $0.15 for
all bottles purchased by retailers over the coming
month. How many bottles of vitaherb should DO
order given the promotion?
54
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Short Term Discounts:
Forward Buying
Normal order size, Q* = 6,324 bottles
Normal cost, C = $3 per bottle
Discount per tube, d = $0.15
Annual demand, D = 120,000
Holding cost, h = 0.2
0.15 * 120,000 0.15*6324
Q
d
= +
(3 − 0.15)0.2 (3 − 0.15)
Qd = 38,236
Forward buy = 38,236-6324=31,912
55
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Promotion Pass Through
to Consumers
Demand curve at retailer: 300,000 - 60,000p
Normal supplier price, CR = $3.00
– Optimal retail price = $4.00
– Customer demand = 60,000
Promotion discount = $0.15
– Optimal retail price = $3.925
– Customer demand = 64,500
Retailer only passes through half the promotion
discount and demand increases by only 7.5%
56
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Trade Promotions
• Counter measures
– EDLP
– Customer coupons
57
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Summary of Learning Objectives
11/13/2021 59
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Supply Chain Management
3
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
The Role of Safety Inventory
in a Supply Chain
• Forecasts are rarely completely accurate.
• If average demand is 1000 units per week, then
half the time actual demand will be greater than
1000, and half the time actual demand will be
less than 1000; what happens when actual
demand is greater than 1000? - Gucci
• If you kept only enough inventory in stock to
satisfy average demand, half the time you would
run out.
• Safety inventory: Inventory carried for the
purpose of satisfying demand that exceeds the
amount forecasted in a given period.
4
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Role of Safety Inventory
5
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Two Questions to Answer in
Planning Safety Inventory
6
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Determining the Appropriate
Level of Demand Uncertainty
7
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Measuring Demand Uncertainty
9
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Measuring Product Availability
11
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Continuous Review Policy: Safety Inventory
and Cycle Service Level
D
L: Lead time for replenishment
D: Average demand per unit L
= DL
time
σD:Standard deviation of demand
per period
DL: Mean demand during lead
σ L
= L σD
ss = F S (CSL) ×σ L
−1
time
σL: Standard deviation of
ROP = D L + ss
demand during lead time
CSL: Cycle service level
ss: Safety inventory
ROP: Reorder point CSL = F ( ROP, D L ,σ L )
Average Inventory = Q/2 + ss
12
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Estimating Safety Inventory (Continuous
Review Policy)
Assume that weekly demand for Palms at B&M Computer World is
normally distributed, with a mean of 2,500 and a standard
deviation of 500. The manufacturer takes two weeks to fill an
order placed by the B&M manager. The store manager currently
orders 10,000 Palms when the inventory on hand drops to 6,000.
Evaluate the safety inventory carried by B&M and the average
inventory carried by B&M. Also evaluate the average time spent
by a Palm at B&M.
D = 2,500/week; σD = 500
L = 2 weeks; Q = 10,000; ROP = 6,000
DL = DL = (2500)(2) = 5000
ss = ROP - RL = 6000 - 5000 = 1000
Cycle inventory = Q/2 = 10000/2 = 5000
Average Inventory = cycle inventory + ss =
5000 + 1000 = 6000
Average Flow Time = Avg inventory /
throughput = 6000/2500 = 2.4 weeks
14
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Estimating Cycle Service Level (Continuous
Review Policy)
D = 2,500/week; σD = 500
L = 2 weeks; Q = 10,000; ROP = 6,000
σ =σ
L R
L = (500) 2 = 707
Cycle Service Level, CSL = Prob. (z less than equal to
1.414)= 0.92.
15
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Fill Rate
• Proportion of customer demand
satisfied from stock ESC
fr = 1 −
• Stockout occurs when the Q
demand during lead time
exceeds the reorder point ss
• ESC is the expected shortage ESC = − ss{1 − F S }
per cycle (average demand in σ L
excess of reorder point in each
replenishment cycle) ss
+ σ L f S
• ss is the safety inventory σ L
• Q is the order quantity
17
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Evaluating
Safety Inventory Given CSL
D = 2,500/week; σD = 500
L = 2 weeks; Q = 10,000; CSL = 0.90
ROP ?
18
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Evaluating
Safety Inventory Given CSL
D = 2,500/week; σD = 500
L = 2 weeks; Q = 10,000; CSL = 0.90
DL = 5000, σL = 707 1.28
19
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Evaluating Safety Inventory
Given Desired Fill Rate
SS=67 20
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Evaluating Safety Inventory Given Fill Rate
(try different values of ss)
21
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Impact of Required Product Availability and
Uncertainty on Safety Inventory
• Desired product availability (cycle service level or fill
rate) increases, required safety inventory increases
• Demand uncertainty (σL) increases, required safety
inventory increases
• Managerial levers to reduce safety inventory without
reducing product availability
– reduce supplier lead time, L (better relationships with
suppliers)
– reduce uncertainty in demand, σL (better forecasts,
better information collection and use)
22
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Impact of Supply Uncertainty
σ σ D s
2 2 2
L
= L D
+ L
23
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Example
24
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Impact of Supply Uncertainty
σ L
= L σ + D sL
2
D
2 2
2 2
= (7) 500 + (2500) (7) = 17500
2
• Information centralization
• Specialization
• Product substitution
• Component commonality
• Postponement
27
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Impact of Aggregation
D = ∑D
C
i
i =1
n
σ ∑σ
C 2
D
= i
i =1
σ = Lσ D
C C
L
ss = F s (CSL) ×σ L
−1 C
28
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Impact of Aggregation
29
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Impact of Aggregation
30
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Safety Inventory in the Disaggregate and
Aggregate options
ρ Disaggregate Safety Inventory Aggregate Safety
Inventory
0 36.24 18.12
0.2 36.24 22.92
0.4 36.24 26.88
0.6 36.24 30.32
0.8 36.24 33.41
1.0 36.24 36.24
31
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Impact of Supply Uncertainty
σ L
= L σ + D sL
2
D
2 2
2 2
= (7) 500 + (2500) (7) = 17500
2
• Information centralization
• Specialization
• Product substitution
• Component commonality
• Postponement
34
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Information Centralization
• Virtual aggregation.
35
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Specialization
36
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Product Substitution
37
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Product Substitution
38
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Component Commonality
39
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Component Commonality
40
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Postponement
41
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Supply Chain Management
44
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Benefits of Effective
Sourcing Decisions
• Better economies of scale can be achieved if orders are
aggregated.
• More efficient procurement transactions can
significantly reduce the overall cost of purchasing.
• Design collaboration can result in products that are
easier to manufacture and distribute, resulting in lower
overall costs.
• Good procurement processes can facilitate coordination
with suppliers.
• Appropriate supplier contracts can allow for the sharing
of risk.
• Firms can achieve a lower purchase price by increasing
competition through the use of auctions
45
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Supplier Scoring and
Assessment
46
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Supplier Assessment Factors
47
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Example Problem
48
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Example Problem
49
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Example Problem
50
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
The cost of using current
supplier
• Annual material cost: 1,000*52*1=$52,000
• Average cycle inventory: 2,000/2 =1,000
• Annual cost of holding cycle inventory:
1,000*1*0.25=$250
• SD of demand during lead time:
(2*3002+ 10002*12)0.5= 1086.28
• SS= NORMSINV(0.95)*1086.28=3,787
• Annual cost of holding SS= 3,787*0.25*1=
$946.75
• Annual cost of using current supplier: $52,000+
$250+$946.75= $53,196.75
51
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
The cost of using new supplier
52
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Supplier Selection- Auctions and
Negotiations
53
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Contracts and Supply Chain
Performance
54
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Contracts for Product Availability
and Supply Chain Profits
• Many shortcomings in supply chain performance occur
because the buyer and supplier are separate
organizations and each tries to optimize its own profit.
• Total supply chain profits might therefore be lower than
if the supply chain coordinated actions to have a common
objective of maximizing total supply chain profits.
• Double marginalization results in suboptimal order
quantity.
• An approach to dealing with this problem is to design a
contract that encourages a buyer to purchase more and
increase the level of product availability.
• The supplier must share in some of the buyer’s demand
uncertainty.
55
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Contracts to Coordinate
Supply Chain Costs
• Differences in costs at the buyer and supplier
can lead to decisions that increase total supply
chain costs.
• Example: Replenishment order size placed by
the buyer. The buyer’s EOQ does not take into
account the supplier’s costs.
• A quantity discount contract may encourage the
buyer to purchase a larger quantity (which
would be lower costs for the supplier), which
would result in lower total supply chain costs.
• Quantity discounts lead to information
distortion because of order batching.
56
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Contracts to Increase Agent
Effort
57
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Contracts to Induce
Performance Improvement
• A buyer may want performance
improvement from a supplier who otherwise
would have little incentive to do so.
• A shared savings contract provides the
supplier with a fraction of the savings that
result from the performance improvement.
• Particularly effective where the benefit from
improvement occurs primarily to the buyer,
but where the effort for the improvement
comes primarily from the supplier.
58
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Design Collaboration
60
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Product Categorization by Value and
Criticality
High
Critical Items Strategic Items
Criticality
Low High
Value/Cost
61
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Global Supply Chain
Management V2 Simulation
How to Play Guide
This simulation illustrates how a few key decisions can improve the
ability of a company to accurately predict and fulfill demand.
You have just been hired as the Supply Chain Manager responsible for
production of two new lines of mobile phones. You will be able to make
key decisions and see the impact of your decisions on the performance
of your company over the span of 4 years.
Copyright © 2016 President and Fellows of Harvard College.
This publication may not be digitized, photocopied, or otherwise reproduced, posted, or transmitted, without the
permission of Harvard Business Publishing.
• Decide which features to include and with whom to outsource the work.
Important Info:
• Sales season is May through December—there is no demand before May or after December
• Demand is anticipated to be consistent over these months
Good Luck!
11/13/2021 71
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Supply Chain Management
• Market Segmentation
– For a specific time and flight (origin to
destination),
– Different products designed and priced to target
different market segments
– Products feature different restrictions
• Non-refundable
• Available up to 21 days before the flight.
• Booking Control
– Allocates available seats to fare classes
– Setting limits on the number of seats that can be
allocated to lower fare classes
• Requires:
– Sophisticated algorithms
– Basic criterion: Equal marginal revenues in each
class BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Optimal Allocation of Flights
• Group Pricing
– Discounts to specific groups of customers very common in many
industries
– Senior citizen discounts at diners, software discounts to universities,
student discounts at movie theaters, “ladies night” at bars
– Works only when there is a correlation between group members and
price sensitivity
• Channel Pricing
– Charging different prices for the same product sold through different
channels
– Different prices on web sites vs. retail stores
– Works only if customers who use different channels have different price
sensitivities
• Regional Pricing
– Exploiting different price sensitivities at different locations
– Beer is much more expensive in a typical stadium than in a bar
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Differential Pricing Strategies
• Time-based Differentiation
– Similar products differentiated based on time
– Amazon.com charges different rates for different
delivery times
• A technique for segmenting price sensitive customers and
customers who are more delivery time sensitive.
• Dell charges different prices for repair contracts that
complete repairs in different amounts of time (overnight
vs. within a week)
• Product Versioning
– Offer slightly different products in order to
differentiate price sensitivities
– May take the form of branding.
• Store brand vs Generic brand
• Additional features added to products at the higher end of
the line
» High end buyers are inclined to buy the higher end products in
the line
» Pay significantly more than the lower end products
» Cost very little more to manufacture.
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Differential Pricing Strategies
Coupons and Rebates
• Distinguish between customers that place a
high value on time or flexibility
• Those who are willing to spend the time to
get a lower price by using a coupon or
submitting a rebate form
• Mail-in rebates at the point of sale
– Adds a significant hurdle to the buying process
– Customers willing to pay the higher price will
not necessarily send the coupon
– Do not incorporate fences
– Require a more detailed analysis.
• No rebate
– Each retailer decides on the price and the amount
to order from the manufacturer to maximize its
profit.
– Retailer needs to find a price and an order quantity
so as to maximize its expected profit
– Manufacturer would like the retailer to order as
much as possible @ the wholesale price
• Mail-in-rebates
– manufacturer influences customer demand
– provides an upside incentive to the retailer to
increase its order quantity
– Retailer’s profit increases
– Increase in demand forces the retailer to order
more from the manufacturer.
– Optimal order quantity:
• Compensates for the rebate/ Implies an increase in the
manufacturer’s expected profit.
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Dynamic Pricing
• Visibility
– to the back-end of the supply chain
– makes it possible to coordinate pricing, inventory, and production
– information has facilitated growth of smart pricing
• Customer segmentation
– using buyers’ historical data is possible on the Internet
– very difficult in conventional stores
• Testing capability
– Internet can be used to test pricing strategies in real time
– On-line seller may test a higher price on a small group of the site
visitors
– Use those data to determine a pricing strategy
43
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Revenue Management
for Perishable Assets
44
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Revenue Management
for Perishable Assets
45
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Revenue Management
for Seasonal Demand
• Text book
• Lecture slides of Willam swan on RM
• Lecture slides of simchi Levi et al. on RM
• Lecture slides of Yossi Sheffi on RM
19
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Lack of SC Coordination
and the Bullwhip Effect
51
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
The Effect of Lack of
Coordination on Performance
• Manufacturing cost • Level of product
(increases) availability (decreases)
52
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Obstacles to Coordination
in a Supply Chain
• Incentive Obstacles
• Operational Obstacles
• Pricing Obstacles
• Behavioral Obstacles
53
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Incentive Obstacles
54
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Information Processing
Obstacles
55
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Operational Obstacles
56
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Pricing Obstacles
57
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Behavioral Obstacles
• Problems in learning, often related to communication in SC and
how SC is structured.
• Each stage of the SC views its actions locally and is unable to
see the impact of its actions on other stages.
• Different stages react to the current local situation rather than
trying to identify the root causes.
• Based on local analysis, different stages blame each other for
the fluctuations, with successive stages becoming enemies
rather than partners.
• No stage learns from its actions over time because the most
significant consequences of the actions of any one stage occur
elsewhere, resulting in a vicious cycle of actions and blame.
• Lack of trust results in opportunism, duplication of effort, and
lack of information sharing.
58
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Managerial Levers to
Achieve Coordination
59
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Aligning Goals and Incentives
60
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Improving Information Accuracy
61
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Improving Operational Performance
• Reducing replenishment lead time.
– Reduces uncertainty in demand
– EDI is useful
62
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Designing Pricing Strategies
to Stabilize Orders
• Encouraging retailers to order in smaller lots and reduce
forward buying.
• Stabilizing pricing.
– Eliminate promotions (everyday low pricing, EDLP)
– Limit quantity purchased during a promotion
– Tie promotion payments to sell-through rather than amount purchased
64
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Building Strategic Partnerships
and Trust in a Supply Chain
• Trust-based relationship
– Dependability
– Leap of faith
65
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Trust in the Supply Chain
66
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Building Trust into a
Supply Chain Relationship
• Deterrence-based view
– Use formal contracts
– Parties behave in trusting manner out of self-
interest
• Process-based view
– Trust and cooperation are built up over time as a
result of a series of interactions
– Positive interactions strengthen the belief in
cooperation of other party
• Neither view holds exclusively in all situations
67
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Effects of Interdependence on Supply Chain
Relationships
Relatively Interdependence
High
Powerful Effective Relationship
Organization
Low Level of Relatively
Low Interdependence
Powerful
Low High
Partner’s Dependence
68
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Creating Effective Contracts
70
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Managing Supply Chain Relationships for
Cooperation and Trust
• Effective management of a relationship is
important for its success.
• Top management is often involved in the
design but not management of a
relationship.
• Process of alliance evolution.
• Perceptions of reduced benefits or
opportunistic actions can significantly
impair a supply chain partnership
71
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Achieving Coordination in Practice
72
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus
Thank You
11/13/2021 73
BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus