Answers To The Top 10 Questions About Gmos: Monsanto) Show A Direct Link To Breast Cancer From Glyphosate?
Answers To The Top 10 Questions About Gmos: Monsanto) Show A Direct Link To Breast Cancer From Glyphosate?
Answers To The Top 10 Questions About Gmos: Monsanto) Show A Direct Link To Breast Cancer From Glyphosate?
The following are the Top 10 consumer questions and answers have about GMOs, based on Internet
searches, traffic to the GMO Answers website, and in-person events.
This is an important question. Numerous questions like this and related topics have been submitted to
GMO Answers, including questions about reports claiming that glyphosate causes breast cancer and
about a Séralini study (now retracted) claiming GMOs caused cancer in rats, among others.
We know that consumers have concerns, so we reached out to Dr. Kevin Folta, University of Florida
interim chairman and associate professor, horticultural sciences department, for an answer. "The
short answer is no, there is absolutely zero reputable evidence that GMO foods cause cancer," he
writes. You can read Kevin Folta's full response to the question "Do GMOs cause cancer?" here.
Additionally, the health and safety of GMOs have been validated by many independent scientists and
organizations around the world. For example, there are nearly 1,800 global studies about the health
and safety of GMOs, and a decade of GMO research, funded by the European Union, which finds
that GMOs pose no greater risk than their conventional counterparts. This report can be found here.
In addition to Dr. Folta’s response, this study reviews seven cohort studies and 14 case studies and
finds that there is "no consistent pattern of positive associations indicating a causal relationship
between total cancer (in adults or children) or any site-specific cancer and exposure to glyphosate."
There are also multiple resources that explore this topic on GMO Answers:
2. Are GMOs Safe For Human Consumption?
Yes, the health and safety of GMOs have been validated by many independent scientists and
organizations around the world. "There is no substantiated case of any adverse impact on human
health, animal health or environmental health, so that’s pretty robust evidence, and I would be
confident in saying that there is no more risk in eating GMO food than eating conventionally farmed
food," the European Commission’s Chief Scientific Advisor Anne Glover told EURACTIV in a media
interview.
The U.S. National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NAS) researched this very
same question and concluded that GMOs are safe. After reviewing all available research studies on
health effects from GE crops, the study found "no substantiated evidence of a difference in risks to
human health between current commercially available genetically engineered crops and
conventionally bred crops."[1] More than 20 scientists, researchers, agricultural, and industry experts
reviewed over 20 years of data since GMOs were introduced, including nearly 900 studies and
publications, animal studies, allergenicity testing, and North American and European health data.
The health and safety of GMOs have been validated by many independent scientists and
organizations around the world. Groups ranging from the World Health Organization (WHO),
the Royal Society of Medicine - UK, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), and
the International Seed Federation (ISF), along with various governing bodies on every continent
around the world have all affirmed the safety of GMO crops.
Since 1992, more than 40 government agencies have given approvals for GMO food, feed, and
cultivation. In many countries, multiple agencies are involved in the regulation of GMOs.
[1]
Distinction Between Genetic Engineering and Conventional Plant Breeding Becoming Less Clear,
Says New Report on GE Crops, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine.
Retrieved from http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=23395.
[4]
Van Eenennaam, A. GMOs in animal agriculture: time to consider both costs and benefits in
regulatory evaluations (2013). Retrieved
from https://jasbsci.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2049-1891-4-37.
[5]
Van Eenennaam, A. Genetic Engineering and Animal Feed. Retrieved
from http://anrcatalog.ucanr.edu/pdf/8183.pdf.
8. Can GMO crops contaminate neighboring non-GMO and/or organic fields?
Co-existence in agriculture is not new, nor unique to GMO crops; it is the practice of growing crops
different quality characteristics of intended for different markets in the same vicinity without becoming
commingled and possibly compromising the economic value of both. Farmers have a long history of
cooperating with their neighbors to isolate crops from adjacent fields for the purpose of producing
high-value crops under identity-preserved systems.
Crops will only pollinate other varieties of the same crop and will only occur to a significant degree if
the crops are sufficiently close, the flowering periods are the same, and the receiving crop has not
already self-pollinated. In the United States, there is not a single documented case of an organic
farmer losing his or her organic certification due to contamination from a GMO crop.
No. Brian Scott, an Indiana farmer who grows corn and soybeans among other crops, answers this
question simply, "I choose what seeds I plant every year. I’m not locked into buying seed from one
company from one season to the next."
Kenyan agricultural researcher Dr. Esther Ngumbi notes:
"There is no one perfect solution to solving our global challenges. Therefore, governments, farmers,
scientists, non-governmental organizations and all stakeholders in the space of developing
sustainable solutions to agriculture should be open minded and accommodative to using the many
tools that are available including the use of biotech crops. At the end, it will take a broad array of
solutions to eradicate hunger, feed our rapidly expanding population, and tackle the many challenges
that come with a changing climate and biotech crops have proven that they can be part of the
solution."
The sudden and widespread disappearances of adult honey bees from hives, termed Colony
Collapse Disorder (CCD), became a national concern more than 10 years ago. [6] Claims have been
circulated that insect protected GM crops harm bees, but these assertions have been refuted by the
mainstream scientific community.
If a variety of factors are impacting bee health, could GMOs be one of them? Bee Ambassador for
Bayer Chris Sansone, who has more than 30 years of experience as a professor and extension
specialist at Texas A&M University, points to several scientific studies indicating this is not the case.
He notes that "genetically modified plants and their impact on honey bees have been widely studied,
and the results indicate that GM plants are not harmful to bees."