Schur - Zassenhaus Theorem: Schur's Theorem Says If The Set of Positive Integers (N) Is Finitely Coloured
Schur - Zassenhaus Theorem: Schur's Theorem Says If The Set of Positive Integers (N) Is Finitely Coloured
Schur's Theorem says If the set of positive integers (N) is finitely coloured
then there exist (x,y,z) having the same colour such that
X + y= z
X+Y
C1 C2 C3 CR
X Y
The Ramsey number R(s,t) is the minimum number n for which any edge
2-coloring of Kn, a complete graph on n vertices, in red and blue contains
a red Ks or a blue Kt.
The first important result that we shall consider deals with the general
issue of “splitting.” The problem is this: given a group G and G ▹ M, does
there exist a subgroup N ≤ G such that G =M N, and M∩N={e}? In this case
we see that G is represented as an internal semi direct product of M and
N. Clearly, such a representation is not always possible for a given normal
subgroup. Indeed, in the group Q8, if Q8 ▹ M is any subgroup of order 4,
then it is impossible to find a complementary subgroup N of order 2 with
Q8 = MN. However, if G is a finite group and if M is a normal π-Hall
subgroup, then a splitting is always possible. While this is true in general
(proof using group cohomology), we will be content to prove it in case G
is solvable.
History of this Theorem:
Example – Theorem:
An example where the Schur–Zassenhaus theorem does apply is the
symmetric group on 3 symbols, S3, , which has a normal subgroup of
order 3 (isomorphic with C3) which in turn has index 2 in S3 (in
agreement with the theorem of Lagrange), so S3 / C3 ≈ C2 .
Since 2 and 3 are relatively prime, the Schur–Zassenhaus theorem applies
and S3 ≈ C3 × C2 .
Note that the automorphism group of C3 is C2 and the automorphism of
C3 used in the semi direct product that gives rise to S3 is the non-trivial
automorphism that permutes the two non-identity elements of C3 .
Furthermore, the three subgroups of order 2 in S3 (any of which can
serve as a complement to C3 in S3 ) are conjugate to each other.
if G is a finite group, and H is a normal subgroup, such that |H| and |G/H|
are relatively prime, then G contains a subgroup K of order equal to
|G/H|.
If we see the proof, then the non-trivial part comes in the case when H
is abelian.
References:
*****