Assessment of Cardiovascular Fitness VO2
Assessment of Cardiovascular Fitness VO2
Assessment of Cardiovascular Fitness VO2
418
*Correspondence Info:
Dr. Tauseef Nabi
Department of Medicine,
MMIMSR, Mullana, Ambala, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
Objective: Cardio respiratory fitness in terms of maximum oxygen uptake [VO2max] reflects physical fitness of a
person.VO2max is single best measure of cardio respiratory capacity and is considered as a bench mark to
quantify cardiovascular function capacity and aerobic fitness. The main aim of study was to assess and compare
the cardio respiratory fitness in terms of maximum aerobic capacity [VO 2max] among the young adult male and
female medical students of Maharishi Markandeshwar University [MMU], Mullana, Haryana.
Method: A total of fifty seven young adult male [n=30] and female [n=27] students, around age group of 18-24
years were recruited by simple random sampling from Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Haryana.VO 2max
was estimated indirectly by following the protocol of Queen’s College Step Test [QCT] method. QCT is the
simplest one to determine cardio respiratory fitness in terms of maximum oxygen uptake.
Result: In present study it was found that mean value of VO2max for males was [45.66+8.96] ml/kg/min and for
females it was [37.85+4.3] ml/kg/min. The mean value of VO2max was found significantly higher in male as
compared to female students [P value <0.0001].
Conclusion: From the study it was concluded that our subjects fitted in the category of fair on cardio respiratory
fitness scale, could be because of the decreased physical activity, unhealthy lifestyle behaviors as are established
during the years of gaining education, which may influence adult behavior and health status. Physical fitness
performance was better in male students than female students. Health promotion policies and physical activity
programs should be designed to improve cardio respiratory fitness.
Keywords: Cardio respiratory fitness, step test, VO2max
1. Introduction
Cardio respiratory fitness, also called or in milliliters /kg/min as relative VO2 max. The
cardiovascular fitness or maximal aerobic power, is VO2max can be estimated using maximal or sub
the overall capacity of the cardiovascular and maximal tests, by direct or indirect methods. The
respiratory systems and the ability to carry out most commonly used tests are walking/running tests
prolonged strenuous exercise. The maximal oxygen followed by cycling and step tests.[2] VO2 max is often
consumption [VO2max] attained during a graded estimated using prediction equations rather than
maximal exercise to voluntary exhaustion has long direct measurement as it is cost effective and
since been considered by the World Health relatively easier.
Organization as the single best indicator of cardio VO2 max is often used as marker of physical
respiratory fitness.[1] fitness and considered the best indicator of aerobic
VO2 max is the maximum amount of oxygen a fitness.[3] VO2 max estimation by step test is one such
person can intake and the value does not change test and is considered to be a practical field test for
despite an increase in workload over time period. assessing individual aerobic fitness.[4]
VO2 max is expressed as liters/min as an absolute value
category of fair on cardio respiratory fitness scale. the level of physical fitness among medical college
Mean values of VO2max in non-obese students [42.2 + students of Maharishi Markandeshwar University,
7.9 ml/Kg/min] was slightly higher than in obese Haryana. The result of the present study showed that
[41.3 + 8.7 ml/Kg/min] but the difference was not mean value of VO2max for males was 45.66+8.96
statistically significant [p = 0.69] ml/kg/min and for females it was 37.85 +4.3
Higher values of VO2max was found in non- ml/kg/min, which was found significantly higher in
obese males [46.1+ 8.8ml/Kg/min] versus obese males than in females [p<0.0001]. On comparison of
males [44.7 + 9.6 ml/Kg/min] [p =0.68] and non- our VO2max value with the standard VO2max
obese females [38.16 + 3.9 ml/Kg/min] versus obese classification, our subjects fitted in the category of
females [37.12 + 5.6 ml/Kg/min] [p = 0.5853]. fair on cardio respiratory fitness scale.[11]
Table 1: Comparative study of some The reason for reduced VO2max in our
anthropometric parameters along with VO2max subjects could be because of the decreased physical
amongst the male and female medical students activity, unhealthy lifestyle behaviors as are
Male Female
Variables
[mean ± SD] [mean ± SD]
established during the years of gaining education,
Age [years] 19.0 + 1.6 18.5 + 1.5 which may influence adult behavior and health status.
Height [cm] 166.13+2.3 154.66+2.1 Cardio respiratory fitness has also shown a stronger
Weight [kg] 68.23+ 3.2 58.96+2.9 association with total adiposity, as measured by
BMI [kg/m2] 24.5+4.0 23.31+ 4.9
BMI.[12] Overweight and obesity in our subjects
VO2max [ml/kg/min] 45.66+8.9 37.85 +4.3
Table 2: Comparison of VO2max between various could also be the reason for reduced VO2max.
groups of obese with non-obese. The results of this study also suggest that
Obese Non obese female students have lower levels of aerobic fitness
[VO2max [VO2max compared with male students. Our findings are in
[ml/kg/min]] [ml/kg/min]] agreement with other studies that have examined
All subjects aerobic fitness levels in African-American adults.[13]
41.3 + 8.7 42.2 + 7.9
[Male+ Female] Aerobic capacity of male students was significantly
Male 44.7 + 9.6 46.1 + 8.8
higher compared to that of female participants. This
Female 37.12 + 5.6 38.16 + 3.9
has been confirmed by correlations between
considered variables in female and male participants
4. Discussion disregarding their physical activity levels.
The maximum oxygen uptake [VO2 max], an Studies have suggested that achieving 60
internationally accepted parameter to evaluate the min or more of moderate–vigorous physical activity
cardio respiratory fitness reflects the amount of daily is associated with a healthier cardio respiratory
oxygen utilized by working muscles during maximal fitness level in adolescents, independently of their
exercise. It is the best index of aerobic capacity and adiposity status.[14] Improvements in cardio
gold standard for cardio respiratory fitness. Thus respiratory fitness have positive effects on
measure of maximum oxygen consumption offer depression, anxiety, mood status and self-esteem, and
insight into ability of cardiovascular, respiratory and seem also to be associated with a higher academic
muscular system to deliver and utilize oxygen. performance. So, it is suggested that adequate
During exercise, up to a point the increase in oxygen physical activity programmers should be included in
consumption is proportionate to energy expended and the curriculum of educational institutes.
all the energy needs are met my aerobic process. So There are a few limitations to the study that
in a person, the more is the maximum oxygen need to be considered. First, the motivation of the
consumption capacity [VO2max], the more will be his/ subjects in performing the physical fitness tests, were
her aerobic capacity. VO2max is the measure of the uncontrollable. It might affect the results of the study.
functional limit of the cardio-respiratory system and Secondly, the performance of the subjects might
the single most valid index of maximal exercise affect due to their physical lifestyle and different
capacity.[9] physical characteristics.
Decrease in VO2 max is therefore an indicator
of reduced exercise capacity or tolerance. It is the
References
product of maximum cardiac output and maximal
[1] Shephard RJ, Allen C, Benade AJ, Davies CT, Di
arterio-venous oxygen difference.[10] As direct
Prampero PE, Hedman R et al. The maximum
estimation of VO2max is exhaustive, laborious and
oxygen intake. An international reference
difficult experimental protocol, a reliable indirect
standard of cardio respiratory fitness. Bull World
method[6][8] was followed for prediction of VO2max.
Health Organ 1968; 38: 757–764.
The purpose of our study was to assess and compare
[2] Leger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J. [9] Ainsworth BE, Berry CB, Schnyder VN, Vickers
The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for SR. Leisure time physical activity and aerobic
aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci 1988; 6: 93–101. fitness in Afarican American young adults. J
[3] Verma SS, Sengupta J. Regression Model for Adolesc Health. 1992; 13:606-611.
establishment of maximum aerobic power in [10] McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Essentials of
man. Def Sci J 1990; 40:293-298. exercise Physiology. Philadelphia: Lea and
[4] Chin-Mou Liu, Kuei-Fu Lin. Estimation of Febiger 1994; 271.
VO2max: a comparative analysis of post-exercise [11] Heyward V. H. Advanced Fitness Assessment
heart rate and physical fitness index from 3- and Exercise Prescription, Fifth Edition, 2006,
minute step test. J Exerc Sci Fit 2007; 5[2]. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Original
[5] Morteza Jourkesh, Iraj Sadri, Ali Ojagi and Source: The Cooper Institute for Aerobics
Amineh Sharanavard. Comparison of Physical Research, the Physical Fitness Specialist
fitness level among the students of IAU, Manual. Dallas, TX. 2005.
Shabestar. Branch. Annals of Biological [12] Ara I, Moreno LA, Leiva MT, Gutin B, Casaju’s
Research, 2011; 2 [2]:460-467. A. Adiposity, physical activity, and physical
[6] Chatterjee S, Chatterjee P, Bandyopadhyay A. fitness among children from Aragon. Obesity
Cardio respiratory fitness of obese boys. Indian J 2007; 15: 1918–1924.
Physiol Pharmacol 2005; 49: 353-7. [13] Sidney S, Haskell WL, Crow R, et al. Symptoms
[7] Garrow JS, Webster J. Quetlet’s index as a limited graded treadmill exercise testing in
measure of fatness. Int J Obes. 1985; 9 [2]:147- young adults in the CARDIA study. Med Sci
153. Sports Exerc. 1992; 24:177-183.
[8] Chatterjee S, Chatterjee P, Bandyopadhyay A. [14] Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Hurtig-Wennlo¨f A,
Enumeration of validity for predicted VO2 max by Sjo¨stro¨m M. Physical fitness in childhood and
Queen’s college step test in Bangalee boys. adolescence: a powerful marker of health.
Indian J Physiol allied Sci 2001; 55: 123-7. International Journal of Obesity 2008; 32:1–11.