Scribd
Upload
167 views1 page

FS 2 - Learning Rubric

This rubric evaluates a student's learning episode submission across several criteria: learning activities, analysis of the learning episode, reflections/insights, learning portfolio, and submission deadline. For each criterion, the student can receive a score from 1 to 4, with 4 being exemplary work that exceeds expectations and 1 needing improvement. The student's total score is then converted to a final grade on a 5.0 scale.

Uploaded by

CARMI GRACE JABONETE
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
167 views1 page

FS 2 - Learning Rubric

This rubric evaluates a student's learning episode submission across several criteria: learning activities, analysis of the learning episode, reflections/insights, learning portfolio, and submission deadline. For each criterion, the student can receive a score from 1 to 4, with 4 being exemplary work that exceeds expectations and 1 needing improvement. The student's total score is then converted to a final grade on a 5.0 scale.

Uploaded by

CARMI GRACE JABONETE
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

My Learning Rubric

Name of FS Student: _________________________________________________________ Date


Submitted:_______________________________
Year & Section: _______________________________________________________________Course:
________________________________________

Learning Episodes Exemplary Superior Satisfactory Needs Improvement


4 3 2 1
All tasks were done with All or nearly all tasks Nearly all tasks were Fewer than half of tasks
outstanding quality; work were done with high done with acceptable were done; or most
Learning Activities exceeds expectation quality quality objectives met but with
poor quality
4 3 2 1

Analysis questions were Analysis questions Analysis questions Analysis questions were
answered completely; in were answered were not answered not answered.
depth answers; thoroughly completely completely.
grounded on theories. Grammar and spelling
Exemplary grammar and Clear connection with Vaguely related to unsatisfactory.
Analysis of the
spelling theories the theories
Learning Episode
Grammar and spelling Grammar and
are superior spelling acceptable
4
3 2 1
Reflection statements are Reflection statements Refection statements Reflection statements are
profound and clear, are clear, but not are shallow; unclear and shallow and
supported by experiences clearly supported by supported by are not supported by
Reflections/Insights from the learning episode. experiences from the experiences from the experiences from the
learning episode learning episode episode.

4 3 2 1
Portfolio is complete, clear, Portfolio is complete, Portfolio is Portfolio has many lacking
well- organized and all clear, well- organized incomplete components; is
supporting documentation and most supporting supporting unorganized and unclear
are located in sections documentation are documentation is
clearly designated available and/or in organized but is
Learning Portfolio
logical and clearly lacking
marked location
4 3 2 1

Submitted before the Submitted on the Submitted a day after Submitted two days or
Submission of
deadline deadline the deadline more after the deadline
Learning Episode
4 3 2 1
TRANSMUTATION OF SCORE TO GRADE/RATING
Score 20 19-18 17 16 15 14 13-12 11 10 9-8 7-below
Grade 1.0 1.25 1.5 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.5 5.00

99 96 93 90 87 84 81 78 75 72 71-below

You might also like