Chapter Two 2. Rainfall-Runoff Relation Ships (Application of Different Rain Fall Run Off Models)
Chapter Two 2. Rainfall-Runoff Relation Ships (Application of Different Rain Fall Run Off Models)
Chapter Two 2. Rainfall-Runoff Relation Ships (Application of Different Rain Fall Run Off Models)
CHAPTER TWO
o Deterministic models permit only one outcome from a simulation with one set of
inputs and parameter values.
o The three main groups of deterministic models:
• Empirical Models (black box)
• Lumped Conceptual Models (grey box)
• Distributed Process (Physically) Description Based Models (white box)
o The equation was derived from a simplified conceptual model of travel times on
basins with negligible surface storage.
o C is not a constant parameter, but varies from storm to storm on the same catchment,
and from catchment to catchment for similar storms.
o When adequate data are not available this method can be applied.
Where x = subscript designating values for incremental areas with consistent land cover
Rainfall intensity
o Is the average rain fall rate for a particular drainage catchment or sub catchment.
o Rainfall intensity, duration curve and frequency curves are necessary to use the
rational method.
Design return period (frequencies) vary with the type of the project and degree of
protection desired. Commonly used return periods are
5-10 years for storm sewers in residential areas,
10-50years for storm sewers in commercial areas, and
50-100 years for flood protection works.
tc= to+tf
n
o Tc=0.948(L3/H)0.385
In choosing storm sewer pipe diameters, the minimum required diameter is computed ,and
the next larger commercially avilable size selected. Ones the design discharge Q entering the
sewer pipe has been calculated by the rational formula, the diameter of the pipe required to
carry this discharge is determined. It is usually assumed that the pipe is flowing full under
gravity but is not pressurised ,so the pipe capacity can be calculated by the manning or
darcy-wiesbach equation for open channel flow.
1.using manning’s equation:-
Q=(AR2/3 Sf1/2)/n
D = ((0.811fQ2)/(gSo))1/5
(Proof or/and show the necessary steps as home take assignment)
23∗AMCII
AMCIII =
10+0 . 13∗AMCCII
A hydrograph is a graph showing the rate flow (discharge) versus time past at a specific point
in a river or other channel carrying water flow. The rate of flow is typically expressed in
metric units of cubic meters per second (m3/s). It consists the following parameters:
Peak discharge: the highest point on the hydrograph when the rate of discharge is greatest.
Time to peak: time interval from the start of the resulting hydrograph
Discharge: the rate of flow (volume per unit time) passing a specific location in a river or
other channel
Figure 2.4: Runoff Hydrograph for a single block of rainfall with duration D
o Hydrograph describes the whole time history of the changing rate of flow from a
catchment due to rainfall event rather than predicting only the peak flow (Rational
Method).
o A natural hydrograph would be the result of continuous measurements of discharge
(with a recording device) producing the required relationship for any times interval,
e.g. for a single flood event related to a single storm.
The portion of rainfall that finds its way into a river is known as the effective rainfall, the
rest being lost in evaporation, detention on the vegetation and ground surface or retention in
the soil. As the storm proceeds, the portion of effective rainfall increases and that of lost
rainfall decreases.
For the purposes of correlating direct runoff hydrograph (DRH) with the rainfall, which
produces the flow, it is necessary to obtain the effective rainfall hydrograph (hyetograph)
(ERH) which can be obtained by deducting the losses from the total rain. At the beginning of
a storm there could be considerable interception of the rainfall and initial wetting of surfaces
before the rainfall become ‘effective’ to form surface runoff.
The loss-rate is dependent on the state of the catchment before the storm and is difficult to
assess quantitatively. The two simplified methods of determining the effective rainfall are:
I. The φ-index method
II. The initial and continuing loss method.
I. The φ-index method: this method assumes a constant loss rate of φ-mm from the
beginning of the rainfall event. This amount accounts for interception, evaporation loss and
surface detention in pools and hollows.
II. Initial and continuing loss rate method: In this method all the rainfall up to the time of
rise of the hydrograph is considered lost, and there is a continuing loss-rate at same level
after words.
A choice between the two methods depends on knowledge of the catchment but, as the
timing of the extent of initial loss is arbitrary, the fixing of the beginning of effective rainfall
at the beginning of runoff in the stream neglects any lag time in the drainage process and thus
somewhat unrealistic. A constant loss-rate, the φ-index, would therefore seem to be more
readily applicable.
o Defined as the hydrograph produced by unit depth of runoff (1in or 1cm) uniformly
distributed over the entire catchment and lasting at specific duration.
o The unit hydrograph (UH) of duration T is defined as the storm runoff due to unit
depth (e.g. 1 mm rain depth) of effective rainfall, generated uniformly in space and
time on the catchment in time T.
o Unit hydrograph can also be defined as the hydrograph of a drainage basin which
gives one centimeter of direct runoff from a rain storm of specific duration.
o The duration can be chosen arbitrarily so that we can have a 1h UH, a 6h UH, etc.
1. The effective rainfall is uniformly distributed over the entire drainage basin.
This requirement calls for selection of storms of so small a duration which would generally
produce an intense and nearly uniform effective rainfall and would produce a well defined
single peak of hydrograph of short time base. Such a storm can be termed as “unit storm”.
3. The effective rainfalls of equal (unit) duration will produce hydrographs of direct runoff
having same or constant time base.
4. The ordinates of the direct runoff hydrographs having same time base (i.e., hydrographs
due to effective rainfalls of different intensity but equal duration) are directly proportional to
the total amount of direct runoff given by each hydrograph. This important assumption is
called principle of linearity or proportionality or superposition.
5. The hydrograph of runoff from a given drainage basin resulting, from a given pattern of
rainfall reflects all the combined physical characteristics of the basin. In other words the
hydrograph of direct runoff resulting from a given pattern of effective rainfall will remain
invariable irrespective of its time of occurrence. This assumption is called principle of time
invariance
1. The principle of unit hydrograph is applicable to a drainage basin of any size. In practice,
however, uniformly distributed effective rainfall rarely occurs on large areas. Also on large
areas effective rainfall is very rarely uniform at all locations, within its specified duration.
Obviously bigger the area of the drainage basin lesser will be the chances of fulfilling the
assumptions enunciated above. The limiting size of the drainage basin is considered to be
5000 km2. Beyond it the reliability of the unit hydrograph method diminishes.
2. The unit hydrograph method cannot be applied when appreciable portion of storm
precipitation falls as snow because snow-melt runoff is governed mainly by temperature
changes.
3. When snow covered area in the drainage basin is significant the unit hydrograph method
becomes inapplicable. The reason is that the storm rainfall gets mixed up with the snow pack
and may produce delayed runoff differently under different conditions of snow pack.
4. The physical basin characteristics change with seasons, man-made structures in the basin,
conditions of flow etc. Obviously the principle of time invariance is really valid only when
the time and condition of the drainage basin are specified.
5. It is commonly seen that no two rain storms have same pattern in space and time. But it is
not practicable to derive separate unit hydrograph for each possible time- intensity pattern.
Therefore, in addition to limiting drainage basin area up to 5000 km2 if storms of shorter
duration say 1/3 to 1/4 of peaking times are selected it is seen that the runoff patterns do not
vary drastically.
6. The principle of linearity is also not completely valid. This is so because due to variability
in proportion of surface, subsurface and groundwater runoff components during smaller and
larger storms of same duration, the maximum ordinate (peak) of the unit hydrograph derived
from smaller storm is smaller than the one derived from larger storm. Obviously the
character and duration of recession limb which is a function of the peak flow will also be
different. When appreciable non-linearity is seen to exist it is necessary to use derived unit
hydrographs only for reconstructing events of similar magnitude.
7. The unit hydrograph can be used theoretically to construct a flood hydrograph resulting
from a storm having same unit duration. Obviously it necessitates construction of several unit
hydrographs to cover different durations of storms. Thus a 2 hour unit hydrograph can be
applied to storms of 1.5 to 2.5 hours duration.
Flood hydrograph can be calculated with the help of very short record of data.
In addition to peak flow unit hydrograph also gives total volume of runoff and its
time distribution.