0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views23 pages

Chapter 4: Integrals: by Assoc - Prof. Mai Duc Thanh

This document provides an outline and overview of Chapter 4, Part 3 on integration techniques. It discusses approximate integration methods including the midpoint rule, trapezoidal rule, and Simpson's rule. It also covers error bounds for these methods and examples of applying each method. Finally, it defines improper integrals of type 1, which involve integrating from negative or positive infinity, and discusses how these integrals can exist as finite limits.

Uploaded by

Ngọc Bích
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views23 pages

Chapter 4: Integrals: by Assoc - Prof. Mai Duc Thanh

This document provides an outline and overview of Chapter 4, Part 3 on integration techniques. It discusses approximate integration methods including the midpoint rule, trapezoidal rule, and Simpson's rule. It also covers error bounds for these methods and examples of applying each method. Finally, it defines improper integrals of type 1, which involve integrating from negative or positive infinity, and discusses how these integrals can exist as finite limits.

Uploaded by

Ngọc Bích
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 23

Chapter 4: Integrals

Part 3

By
Assoc.Prof. Mai Duc Thanh
Outline
1. Approximate Integration
1. Mid-Point Rule
2. Trapezoidal Rule
3. Simpson’s Rule
2. Improper Integrals
1. Improper Integrals of Type 1
2. Improper Integrals of Type 2

10/11/2021 2
1. Approximate Integration:
Motivations
• Integration techniques can be applied to only certain
classes of (simple) functions
❖Many integrals cannot be evaluated by integration
techniques. Examples

1 2 2
sin x
0 1 x 1 dx,...
2
x x
e dx , dx , x

• In many applications: Functions are in tabular form


• In both cases we need to find approximate values of
definite integrals.
10/11/2021 3
Mid-Point Rule
-Left endpoint Rule: xi −1 = a + (i − 1)x
b−a
b n

 f ( x)dx  f ( x )x,
a i =1
i −1 x =
n

-Right endpoint Rule: xi = a + ix


b−a
b n

 f ( x)dx  f ( x )x,
a i =1
i x =
n

 f ( x)dx  f ( x )x
b n
-Mid-point Rule: i
a i =1

xi −1 + xi b−a
xi = , x =
2 n
Trapezoidal Rule
Take average of left-end and right-end point rules gives us
1 n 
b n

 f ( x)dx    f ( xi −1 )x +  f ( xi )x 


a
2  i =1 i =1 
x  n 
=  ( f ( xi−1 ) + f ( xi ) )
2  i =1
x
=  f ( x0 ) + 2 f ( x1 ) + + 2 f ( xn −1 ) + f ( xn ) 
2

Trapezoidal Rule is:


x
 a f ( x)dx  Tn = 2  f (a) + 2 ( f ( x1 ) + + f ( xn −1 ) ) + f (b) 
b

b−a
x = , xi = a + ix
10/11/2021
n 5
Example 1: Use the Trapezoidal Rule with n=5 to
approximate the integral
2
1
1 x dx
Solution

n = 5, a = 1, b = 2, and x = (2 − 1) / 5 = 0.2
2
1 0.2
1 x dx  T5 =  f (1) + 2 f (1.2) + 2 f (1.4) + 2 f (1.6) + 2 f (1.8) + f (2)
2
1 2 2 2 2 1
= 0.1 + + + + +   0.695635
 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 
10/11/2021 6
Example 2: Use the Midpoint Rule with n=5 to
approximate the integral
2
1
1 x dx
Solution

The midpoints of the five subintervals are


1.1, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.9, so the Midpoint Rule gives
2
1
1 x dx  M 5 = x  f (1.1) + f (1.3) + f (1.5) + f (1.7) + f (1.9)
 1 1 1 1 1 
= 0.2  + + + +   0.691908
 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 
10/11/2021 7
Errors in Approximating Integrals
In last Examples:
2
1
1 x dx = ln x 1 = ln 2 = 0.693147 ...
2

Errors: ET  0.002488 and EM  0.001239

In general, errors are defined by:


b b
ET =  f ( x)dx − Tn and EM =  f ( x)dx − M n
a a

10/11/2021 8
Errors

10/11/2021 9
Error Bounds
Suppose |f ''( x) | K , a  x  b. If ET and EM are errors
in the Trapezoidal and Midpoint Rules, then
K (b − a ) 3
K (b − a ) 3
ET  and EM 
12n 2 24n 2

10/11/2021 10
K (b − a )3
|f ''( x) | K , a  x  b. It holds that ET 
12n 2

Example 1: How large should we take n in order to guarantee


2
that the Trapezoidal Rule approximation for 1
is accurate to within 0.0001? x
dx 
1

Solution: 1 −1 2
f ( x) = , f '( x) = 2 , f "( x) = 3 | f "( x) | 2 for 1  x  2
x x x
Error Bound for Trapezoidal Rule gives:

2(1)3 2 1
| ET | 2
 0.0001  n 
2
n  40.8
12n 12(0.0001) 0.0006
10/11/2021
n = 41 will ensure the desired accuracy. 11
K (b − a )3
|f ''( x) | K , a  x  b. It holds that EM 
24n 2

Example 2: How large should we take n in order to guarantee


2
that the Midpoint Rule approximation for 1
is accurate to within 0.0001? x
dx 
1

Solution: 1 −1 2
f ( x) = , f '( x) = 2 , f "( x) = 3 | f "( x) | 2 for 1  x  2
x x x
Error Bound for Midpoint Rule gives:

2(1)3 1
| EM | 2
 0.0001  n   28.8675
24n 0.0012
10/11/2021
 n = 29 will ensure the desired accuracy. 12
Simpson’s Rule

b−a
x0 = a  x1  x2  ...  xn = b, xi = a + ih, h =
n
i = 0,1, 2,..., n, n : even
b
h
 f ( x)dx  S n =  f (a) + 4 ( f ( x1 ) + f ( x3 ) + ... + f ( xn −1 ) )
a
3
+ 2 ( f ( x2 ) + f ( x4 ) + ... + f ( xn − 2 ) ) + f (b) 
10/11/2021 13
Example: Use Simpson’s Rule with n=10 to approximate
2
the integral 1
Solution
 x dx
1
Putting f ( x) = 1/ x, n = 10, x = 0.1 in Simpson's Rule gives us
x
2
1
1 x dx  S10 = 3  f (1) + 4 ( f (1.1) + f (1.3) + f (1.5) + f (1.7) + f (1.9) )
+ 2 ( f (1.2) + f (1.4) + f (1.6) + f (1.8) ) + f (2) 
0.1 1  1 1 1 1 1 
=  + 4 + + + + 
3 1  1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 
 1 1 1 1  
+ 2 + + +  + f (2)   0.693150
 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8  
Error = Es = 0.693147 - 0.693150  −0.000003
10/11/2021 14
Error Bounds

Suppose |f (4) ( x) | K , a  x  b. If ES is the error


in Simpson's Rule, then
K (b − a )5
ES  4
180n

10/11/2021 15
K (b − a ) 5
Suppose |f (4) ( x) | K , a  x  b. Then ES  4
180n
Example: How large should we take n in2order to guarantee
that Simpson’s Rule approximation for 1 dx
is accurate to within 0.0001? 1
x 

Solution: 1 (4) 24
f ( x) = , f ( x) = 5 | f (4) ( x) | 24 for 1  x  2
x x
Error Bound for Simpson’s Rule gives:
24(1)5 24 1
| ES | 4
 0.0001  n 
4
n 4  6.04
180n 180(0.0001) 0.00075
 n = 8 (n must be even) gives the desired accuracy.
10/11/2021 16
2. Improper Integrals

•Improper Integrals of Type 1


•Improper Integrals of Type 2

10/11/2021 17
Definition of an Improper Integral of Type 1
t
a) If 
a
f ( x)dx exists for every number t ≥ a, then
 t
 f ( x)dx = lim f ( x)dx
a
t →
a

provided this limit exists (as a finite number).


b
b) If t f ( x)dx exists for every number t ≤ b, then
b b

−
f ( x)dx = lim f ( x)dx
t → −
t

provided this limit exists (as a finite number).


 b
The improper integrals  f ( x)dx and  f ( x)dx are called
a −
convergent if the corresponding limit exists and divergent
if the limit does not exist.
a 
c) If both − f ( x)dx and  f ( x)dx are convergent, then we define
a
 a 

−
f ( x)dx =  f ( x)dx +  f ( x)dx
− a
Examples
t
 1 1 t  1  1 1
1. 1 x 2
dx = lim  2 dx = lim −  = lim − +  = 1
t →
1 x
t →  x 1 t →  t 1

2. 
0

−
e dx = lim  e dx = lim e
x
0

t
x
  = lim e
x 0
t
0

− et = 1
t → − t → − t → −


1 0 1  1
3.  dx =  dx +  dx
− 1 + x 2 − 1 + x 2 0 1+ x2

 −1
= lim tan x t + lim tan x 0 
0
 −1
 t

t → − t →

  

= lim − tan t + lim −1
  
tan t = − −  + = 
−1

t → − t →  2 2
All three integrals are convergent.
An example of a divergent integral:

dx = lim  dx = lim ln x 1 = lim ln t − ln 1 = 


 1 t 1

t
1 x t →
1 x
t → t →

 1
Recall from the previous slide that 1 x 2
dx is convergent

The general rule is the following:

 1
1 x p
dx is convergent if p  1 and divergent if p  1
Definition of an Improper Integral of Type 2
a) If f is continuous on [a, b) and is discontinuous at b, then
b t
 a
f ( x)dx = lim f ( x)dx
t →b −
a

if this limit exists (as a finite number).


b) If f is continuous on (a, b] and is discontinuous at a, then
b b

a
f ( x)dx = lim f ( x)dx
t →a +
t

if this limit exists (as a finite number).


b
The improper integral f ( x)dx is called convergent if the
a
corresponding limit exists and divergent if the limit does
not exist.
c) If f has a discontinuity at c, where a < c < b, and both
c
 f ( x)dx
b
a
and

c
f ( x)dx are convergent, then we define
b c b

a
f ( x)dx =  f ( x)dx +  f ( x)dx
a c
Example 1:


1

0
2 x
1
dx = lim 
+
1

t
1
2 x
dx = lim
+
 x  = lim  1 − t  = 1
1
t
t →0 t →0 t →0 +
This integral is convergent.

Example 2:

dx
1
0 x 4

1 1
lim+  dx
2

1
b →0 b x
-1 0 1
1
lim+ ln x b -1

b →0

lim+ ln1 − ln b = This integral is divergent.


b →0
Comparison Theorem for Improper Integrals of Type 1:
Let 0  f ( x)  g ( x), x  a. Then,
 
a)  g ( x)dx is convergent, then  f ( x)dx
a a
is convergent

 
b)  f ( x)dx is divergent, then  g ( x)dx
a a
is divergent

b 

Similar result holds for 


−
f ( x)dx and 
−
f ( x)dx

and for Improper Integral of Type 2

10/11/2021 23

You might also like