Scribd
Upload
221 views17 pages

Simulation of 16QAM and 64QAM Modulator and Demodulator in Simulink

This document summarizes the results of a simulation experiment comparing the bit error rate (BER) of different digital modulation techniques at varying signal-to-noise ratios (Eb/No). It includes tables and graphs showing the relationship between Eb/No and BER for 16QAM and 64QAM modulation. A concluding table summarizes the BER for BPSK, QPSK, 8PSK, 16QAM and 64QAM across a range of Eb/No values, showing that higher order modulations have higher BER and the BER decreases as Eb/No increases for all techniques.

Uploaded by

Dave Winkler Magdadaro
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
221 views17 pages

Simulation of 16QAM and 64QAM Modulator and Demodulator in Simulink

This document summarizes the results of a simulation experiment comparing the bit error rate (BER) of different digital modulation techniques at varying signal-to-noise ratios (Eb/No). It includes tables and graphs showing the relationship between Eb/No and BER for 16QAM and 64QAM modulation. A concluding table summarizes the BER for BPSK, QPSK, 8PSK, 16QAM and 64QAM across a range of Eb/No values, showing that higher order modulations have higher BER and the BER decreases as Eb/No increases for all techniques.

Uploaded by

Dave Winkler Magdadaro
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

Name: Dave Winkler C.

Magdadaro
Course and Sched: ECE 3109L Tues (1:30-4:30pm)
Date of Submission: November 23, 2021

ECE 3109 Laboratory Activity


Simulation of 16QAM and 64QAM Modulator and Demodulator in Simulink
PART I. 16QAM Eb/No. = 0

Eb/No. = 2
Eb/No. = 4

Eb/No. = 6
Eb/No. = 8

Eb/No. = 10
Eb/No. = 12

Eb/No. = 14
Eb/No. = 16

Eb/No. = 18
Eb/No. = 20

Table 1. Table 1. Eb/No vs BER in QPSK


Eb/No. BER
0 0.6142
2 0.5114
4 0.3887
6 0.2565
8 0.1362
10 0.05193
12 0.0119
14 0.001254
16 3.87e-05
18 3e-07
20 0
BER vs EB/No
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
BER

0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
EB/NO.

Figure1 Eb/No. vs BER in 16QAM

From the table and the graph that was produced, it is seen that as the Eb/No. increase the
Bits Error Rate (BER) decreases. From this, it is concluded that the relationship of Eb/No is
inversely proportional to BER.
Part II 8PSK

Eb/No. = 0
Eb/No. = 2

Eb/No. = 4
Eb/No. = 6

Eb/No. = 8
Eb/No. = 10

Eb/No. = 12
Eb/No. = 14

Eb/No. = 16
Eb/No. = 18

Eb/No. = 20
Table 2. Eb/No vs BER in 8PSK
Eb/No. BER
0 0.8671
2 0.8211
4 0.7567
6 0.6685
8 0.554
10 0.415
12 0.2658
14 0.1343
16 0.04723
18 0.009521
20 0.0008405

BER vs EB/No
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
BER

0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
EB/NO.

Figure2 BER vs EB/No in 64QAM


From the table and the graph that was produced, it is seen that as the Eb/No. increase the
Bits Error Rate (BER) decreases. From this, it is concluded that the relationship of Eb/No is
inversely proportional to BER in the 64QAM.
PART III.
Summarize in tabular form the relationship between the Eb/N0 and the corresponding
BER for each digital modulation technique as shown:

DIGITAL MODULATION TECHNIQUES


BPSK QPSK 8PSK 16QAM 64QAM
Eb/No (dB) BER BER BER BER BER
0 0.07852 0.1512 0.348 0.6142 0.8671
2 0.03753 0.07373 0.2379 0.5114 0.8211
4 0.01249 0.02492 0.1376 0.3887 0.7567
6 0.002382 0.004809 0.06156 0.2565 0.6685
8 0.0001881 0.0003907 0.01861 0.1362 0.554
10 3.5e-6 9.8e-06 0.00302 0.05193 0.415
12 1e-07 2e-07 0.0001917 0.0119 0.2658
14 0 0 3.1e-06 0.001254 0.1343
16 0 0 0 3.87e-05 0.04723
18 0 0 0 3e-07 0.009521
20 0 0 0 0 0.0008405

PART IV.

Figure 3. Error Rates


of PSK modulation
systems
Figure 4. Error Rates
of QAM modulation
systems

You might also like