2 Instruments and Techniques of Risk Management

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Unit 2 : Instruments and Techniques of Risk Management

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.1 Introduction to Hedging Techniques.
2.2 Internal Hedging Techniques : i) Netting, ii) Matching, iii) Leading and lagging, iv) Price
Variation, v) Invoicing in foreign currency, vi) Asset Liability Management.
2.3 External Hedging Techniques : i) Hedging through forward contract, ii) Hedging through
future contract, iii) Hedging through options, iv) Hedging through swaps, v) Hedging
through Money Market.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introduction to Hedging Techniques :
Foreign exchange risk is managed through two means (a) internal i.e. use of tools which
are internal to the firm such as netting, matching, etc. and (b) external techniques i.e. use of
contractual means such as forward contracts, future, option, etc. to insure against potential
exchange losses. The usage of internal techniques is also known as passive hedging, while the latter
is known as active hedging. Usage of internal tools among the group companies may at times be
difficult to practice owing to local exchange control regulations. Nevertheless, they are worth
implementing for they do not involve extra payouts while being significantly effective in
minimizing the forex exposure.

Management of Foreign Exchange Risk

Internal (Passive hedging) External (Active hedging)


Netting, Matching, etc. e.g. Forward contract, future contract, etc.
It is essential to understand the difference between forex exposure and forex risk. Foreign
exchange exposure is the sensitivity to changes in the real domestic currency value of assets,
liabilities or operating incomes to unanticipated change in exchange rates. Foreign exchange risk
exposure is quite often used interchangeably with the term ‘foreign exchange risk’, although they
are conceptually quite different. Foreign exchange risk is defined in terms of variance of
unanticipated changes in exchange rates. It is measured by the variance of the domestic currency
value of an asset, liability or operating income that is attributable to unanticipated changes in
exchange rates.
Difference between forex exposure and forex risk
No. Basis Forex Risk Forex Exposure
1. Meaning Foreign exchange risk is the change of Foreign exchange exposure is the
value in one currency relative to another degree to which a company is
which will reduce the value of affected by changes in exchange
investments denominated in a foreign rates.
currency.
2. Control Foreign exchange risks can usually be Foreign exchange exposure is
mitigated through the use of hedging difficult to manage.
techniques and using a less volatile
currency to report results.

Instruments and Techniques of Risks Management Page 1


3. Types Transaction, translation and economic Risk exposure due to imports and
risk are types of foreign exchange risks. exports are main types of foreign
exchange exposure.
Internal Hedging Techniques :
Companies having subsidiaries in different countries or the parent company having
subsidiaries across the globe can effectively practice internal techniques to minimize foreign
exchange exposure and the eventual need for its active hedging. The important tolls of internal
hedging techniques are –
a) Netting :
It is possible to net the payments and receipts among the associated companies which
trade with one another. It involves mere settlement of inter-affiliate indebtedness for the net
amount owing. One of the simplest ways of netting is bilateral netting. It involves pairs of
companies. It basically reduces the number of inter-company payments and receipts that pass over
the foreign exchanges.
However, it poses a problem, which currency is to be used for settlement? Multilateral
netting is a little complex phenomenon though similar to bilateral netting. It involves more than
two associated companies and their debt. Hence it calls for the services of a group’s centralized
treasury. Multilateral netting results in considerable savings, since it eliminates exchange and
transfer costs. Besides reducing costs, it enables the central office to exercise control over inter-
company settlements.

Netting and Matching


a) Where two or more entities have mutual indebtedness.
b) Look at the net forex exposures before considering external heding techniques.

Netting Matching
Involves two or more entities within a Involves two or more companies with a formal
single group. agreement to net off.

b) Matching :
Netting or matching are frequently used interchangeably. But there is a slight difference
i.e. netting refers to potential flows within the group companies, while matching extends from
group companies to third party companies too. It basically matches a company’s foreign currency
inflows with its foreign currency outflows in respect of both time and amount of flow. Receipts in a
particular currency are used to make payments in that currency alone, and thereby eliminate the
need to go through exchange markets for such conversions.
However, to practice this technique, there must be a two-way cash flow in the same foreign
currency within the group companies. For all practical purposes matching is parallel to multilateral
netting and hence calls for centralized group finance function. It is of course likely to pose
problems, uncertain timings of third party receipts and payments can delay payments but the
central treasury shall endeavor to streamline the collection of information and processing thereof.

Instruments and Techniques of Risks Management Page 2


c) Leading and lagging:
Leading means paying an obligation in advance of the due date and lagging means
delaying payment of an obligation beyond its due date. It basically refers to credit terms and
payment between associate companies within a group. In forex market where exchange rates are
constantly fluctuating, the leading and lagging tactics come handy to take advantage of expected
rise / fall in exchange rates.
For instance, Company ‘A’ is a subsidiary of company ‘B’ located in India, owes money to
subsidiary ‘C’ in Canada. The bill is invoiced in US dollars and due for payment in three months
time. Assume that rupee is likely to devalue in three months time by around 20%. In such a
situation, it makes great sense to lead the payment to Canadian company in dollars, so that it needs
to part with less units of rupees today than after three months. Thus, leading becomes pretty
tempting and the converse holds good for lagging. However, it is quite essential for companies to
factor the impact of relative interest rates, expected currency movements, and after tax effects into
leading and laggings decisions.
While practicing leading and lagging the management must realize that the performance
measurement of those subsidiaries which were asked to ‘lead’ payments may suffer as they incur
losses on interest receivable and incurs interest charges on the funds ‘led’. At times, lead and lag
techniques may also be constrained by local exchange control regulations. Practicing of leading and
lagging techniques indeed goes beyond the realm of risk minimization. It amounts to taking
aggressive stances on financing viz-a-viz anticipated movements in exchange rates. For instance,
an expected devaluation of host country’s currency may make an international company borrow
locally and repay the foreign currency denominated borrowings.
d) Price Variation :
It involves increasing selling prices to counter exchange rate fluctuations. But the question
is whether a firm can raise its price in tandem with anticipated exchange rate movements. This is
only possible when the selling company is a market leader. In some South American countries,
price increase is the only legally tenable tactic of foreign exchange exposure management.
Inter company trade transfer price variations can also be effected as a foreign exposure
risk management tool. There is of course a danger here, unless the firm maintains arm’s length
price, taxation and customs authorities may question such variations in transfer prices.
Nevertheless, it is common knowledge that multinationals attempt to maximize after tax group
cash flows by transfer pricing with the objective of minimizing tax liability and moving funds
around the world.
e) Invoicing in foreign currency :
Exporters and importers of goods always face a dilemma in deciding the currency in which
the goods are to be involved. It is obvious that sellers always prefer to invoice in their domestic
currency or the currency in which they incur cost, so that it avoids foreign exchange exposure. On
the other hand, buyers will have their own preferences for a particular currency. In the buyer’s
market, a seller hardly has any choice to invoice in his desired currency. At least, in such situations,
one should choose only the major currency in which forward markets are pretty active. Currencies
that are of limited convertibility and with a weak forward market must he shunned.

Instruments and Techniques of Risks Management Page 3


f) Asset Liability Management :
It is used to manage balance sheet, income statement or cash flow exposures by
aggressively shifting cash inflows into currencies expected to be strong or increase exposed cash
outflows denominated in weak currencies. Alternatively, a firm may practice defensive approach,
matching of cash inflows and outflows according to currency denomination, irrespective of
whether they are in strong or weak currencies.
As a part of aggressive financing policy, c0mpanies may prefer to increase their exposure
under cash flows, debts and receivables in strong currencies and increase borrowings and trade
creditors in weak currencies. Simultaneously, they reduce exposed borrowing and trade creditors
in strong currencies.
External Hedging Techniques :
External techniques which are also known as active hedging techniques, essentially
involve contractual relationship with outside agency. Hedging is a method whereby one can reduce
the financial exposure faced in an underlying asset due to volatility in prices by taking an opposite
position in the derivatives market in order to offset the losses in the cash market by a
corresponding gain in the derivatives market. Constructing a hedge essentially involves –
a) Identification of the exposure one is facing
b) Measurement of that exposure , and
c) Construction of another position with the opposite exposure.
Construction of an exact opposite position to the existing risk exposure results in a perfect
hedge. Such opposing position, which they come together, automatically offset each other. But,
there is always a problem, how to strike a balance between uncertainty and the risk of opportunity
loss.
The problem of setting an effective hedge ratio has two dimensions –
a) Uncertainty : If a firm does not hedge the transaction, it cannot know with certainty at
what rate of exchange it can exchange its dollar export proceeds for rupees, it could be at a better
rate or a worse rate.
b) Opportunity : If firms enter into a hedge transaction such as a forward contract they
would, of course, be certain of the rate at which they would be exchanging the export proceeds. But
now they have taken an infinite risk of ‘opportunity loss’.
During 1984, Lufthansa, a German airline, signed a contract to buy $3 billion – worth of
aircraft from an American Company – Boeing. At that time, dollar was strong and market held an
opinion that it was sure to get even stronger. In that context the CFO of Lufthansa hedged the
company’s exposure to dollar by buying a forward contract for $1.5 billion. The central ideal
behind this hedging is, if the dollar strengthens, it would lose on its aircraft contract but gain on
the forward contract. There is another interesting dimension to this hedge. Lufthansa’s cash flow
was also in effect dollar denominated and thus had a fair level of ‘natural hedge’. In this episode,
dollar weakened by around 30% during 1985 and thus the forward contract inflicted heavy losses
on the company. The moral is, deciding to hedge is one thing, and getting it right in quite another.
There is yet another dimension to hedging, hedging has a cost. If a depreciation /
devaluation of it is unlikely, hedging will prove an ineffective way of doing business. All these

Instruments and Techniques of Risks Management Page 4


complexities associated with hedging through derivatives pose a great challenge to arrive at a right
hedge ratio.
The true purpose of hedging is to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows by setting
pre-defined limits on any loses. The first step under hedging through derivatives is to estimate the
size of the short position that must be held in the derivatives market – say, future market, as a
proportion of the long position held in the spot market that maximizes the firm’s expected utility,
defined over the risk and expected return of the hedge portfolio. This is the problem of estimating
the Optimal Hedge Ratio. OHR is the hedge ratio that equates the agent’s marginal rate of
substitution between the expected return and the standard deviation of the hedged portfolio with
the slope of this feasible set.
a) Hedging through forward contract :
Forward contracts obligate one party to buy the underlying at a fixed price at a certain time
in the future from a counter party who is obligated to sell the underlying at that fixed price. These
are one of the oldest and commonest hedging tools of the forex market. Consider an Indian
exporter who expects to receive US $1 million in six months. Suppose that the price of the dollar is
Rs. 74.60 now. If the price of the dollar falls by 10%, the exporter loses Rs. 74 lakhs. But by selling
dollars forward the exporter locks in the current forward rate of Rs. 74.65 which means even after
dollar depreciating by 10% in the next 6 months, the exporter would still get Rs. 74.65 per dollar.
Thus, the exporter has fully hedged himself i.e. he took a financial position to reduce his exposure
to exchange rates.
b) Hedging through future contract :
Futures contract is an agreement to buy and sell a standard quantity of specific financial
instrument at a future date and at a price agreed between the parties through open outcry on the
flow of an organized financial futures exchange. The terms under the contract such as amount
maturity date, range of price movement are all standardized. A buyer of the futures contract has
the right and obligation under the contract. Under a futures contract, there will always be a buyer
and seller, whose obligation is not to each other but to a clearing house. After a transaction is
eliminated, financial futures provide a means of hedging for those who wish to lock in exchange
rates on future transactions.
Hedging through futures contract is almost akin to hedging with forward contract. An
exporter having a receivable can hedge by selling futures while a payable is hedged by buying a
futures contract. However, as the amounts and delivery dates for futures are standardized, a
perfect hedge through futures is not possible. There is another difference between hedging through
futures and forward contract, there are intermediate cash flows under futures contract owing to
‘mark-to-market’ mechanism. Such cash flows could be positive or negative.
c) Hedging through options :
Options provide hedging characteristics different from forward or futures contracts.
Option contract allows the buyer to participate in the good side of the risk, while insuring against
the bad side of the risk. An option has a right but no obligation to perform. Thus, an importer who
purchased a call option will have a right to buy the underlying i.e. dollar at the agreed price, even if
the current spot price is par above the price under option. On the other hand, if the spot price is

Instruments and Techniques of Risks Management Page 5


much less than the price under option, the option holder can ignore the option and acquire dollars
from the spot market.
Options are more suited to hedge uncertain cash flows. For instance, assume that an
Indian company is bidding for a project in a foreign country. Its forex flows will materialize only if
the bid is successful. Similarly, if an Indian investor who invested in foreign stock market and
assumes that due to falling dollar is portfolio value may decline. In all such cash flows that are
contingent upon happening a even than better be hedged through options.
d) Hedging through swaps :
Swap is a contract to exchange cash flows over the life of the contact. Swap is simply a
portfolio of forward contracts. As in the case of forward contracts, the market’s assessment of the
present value of the cash flows of a swap is zero at the initiation of the contract. Swaps could
involve currencies or interest rates. They help the corporate treasurer to manage his portfolio of
liabilities. Swaps also help businesses to arbitrage on market imperfections and thereby raise
finance at rates below market rates, otherwise available.
Whilst on hedging one should always remember that forward hedging of contractual
exposures does not removes a firm’s forex exposure. It merely, removes the uncertainty regarding
the home currency value of that particular cash flow and nothing beyond. I other words such
hedging only stabilizes the firm’s cash flows or profits.
e) Hedging through Money Market :
In imperfect markets there is always room for covered interest arbitrage opportunities.
Similarly, absence of covered interest arbitrage opportunities does not necessarily imply that
forward cover and money market cover would be same. In fact, money market hedge may
sometimes prove to be a better alternative to hedge foreign exchange risk. However, this is only
possible to firms, which have access to international money markets / Euro markets for short-term
borrowings or investments where forward premiums and interest rates are strikingly low.
For instance, assume an Indian exporter is having a receivable in dollar due for payments
three months henceforth. If the exporter had access to Euro market, he / she can borrow dollars
equivalent to the receivable amount and convert them into Indian rupees at the current Re / $ spot
rate 74.49 / 48.5 and use it for domestic payments or for lending in the domestic market.
Subsequently, the amount due under the export bill / receivable can be used to pay off the Euro
loan. Such money market coverage can at times result in gain, particularly when the differences in
interest rates / forward premiums are high.
*****

Instruments and Techniques of Risks Management Page 6

You might also like