Scribd
Upload
33 views19 pages

Session 06

Uploaded by

Amanda Wang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
33 views19 pages

Session 06

Uploaded by

Amanda Wang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 19

Worker Scheduling Model

Decision Variables Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday


No. of FT Employees: 6 3 2 7 0 3

Constraints
Monday 1 1 1 1
Tuesday 1 1 1 1
Wednesday 1 1 1 1
Thursday 1 1 1 1
Friday 1 1 1 1 1
Saturday 1 1 1 1 1
Sunday 1 1 1 1
Sunday Total No. of FT Employees
0 21

RHS
1 16 >= 17
1 12 >= 13
1 14 >= 15
1 18 >= 19
18 >= 14
15 >= 16
1 12 >= 11
Microsoft Excel 16.0 Sensitivity Report
Worksheet: [Session_05.xlsx]H&K
Report Created: 9/20/2019 8:50:54 PM

Variable Cells
Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
$B$3 Amount LA Municipal Bonds 50000 0 0.053 0.014 0.406
$C$3 Amount Thompson Electronics, Inc. 0 -0.016 0.068 0.016 1E+030
$D$3 Amount United Aerospace Corp. 0 -0.035 0.049 0.035 1E+030
$E$3 Amount Palmer Drugs 175000 0 0.084 0.034 0.009333333
$F$3 Amount Happy Days Nursing Homes 25000 0 0.118 0.028 0.034

Constraints
Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
$G$10 175000 0 0 75000 1E+030
$G$11 25000 0.034 0 75000 25000
$G$8 250000 0.0812 250000 1E+030 250000
$G$9 50000 -0.014 0 50000 50000
United
LA Municipal Thompson Aerospace Happy Days
Investment Bonds Electronics, Inc. Corp. Palmer Drugs Nursing Homes
Projected Return (%) 5.3 6.8 4.9 8.4 11.8
Amount 50000 0 0 175000 25000

Total Return 20300

Constraints
1 1 1 1 1
1
1 1 1
1
250000 <= 250000
50000 >= 50000
175000 >= 100000
25000 <= 25000
Executive Furniture Corporation (Transportation)

Source Des Moines Evansville Fort Lauderdale Demand Sum


Destination Albuquerque 100 0 200 300
Boston 0 200 0 200
Cleveland 0 100 100 200
Supply Sum 100 300 300

Model Parameters Des Moines Evansville Fort Lauderdale Demand


Albuquerque $ 5.00 $ 8.00 $ 9.00 300
Boston $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 7.00 200
Cleveland $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 5.00 200
Supply 100 300 300

Total Cost $ 3,900.00


Production Planning Model

Decision variables
Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4
Overtime 500 1500 0 0 OT Cost Rate
Production 3125 3375 2000 1000 Raw Material Cost
# of workers
OT Limit 1500 1500 1500 1500
Total hours 12500 13500 12000 12000 Normal Hours
Production Capacity 3125 3375 3000 3000 Production Efficiency

Beginning Inventory 1500 1625 0 0


Demand 3000 5000 2000 1000
Ending Inventory 1625 0 0 0 Holding Cost Rate
>= >= >= >=
Demand Satisfaction 0 0 0 0
Production Cost $ 46,875.00 $ 50,625.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 15,000.00
Holding Cost $ 4,875.00 $ - $ - $ -
OT Cost $ 6,500.00 $ 19,500.00 $ - $ -
Total Cost $ 58,250.00 $ 70,125.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 15,000.00 Grand Total
OT Cost Rate $ 13.00
Raw Material Cost $ 15.00
# of workers 75
OT Limit 20
Normal Hours 160
Production Efficiency 4

Holding Cost Rate $ 3.00

Grand Total $ 173,375.00


Production Planning Model

Decision variables
Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4
Sales 3000 4500 2000 1000
Overtime 0 0 0 0 OT Cost Rate
Production 3000 3000 2000 1000 Raw Material Cost
# of workers
OT Limit 1500 1500 1500 1500
Total hours 12000 12000 12000 12000 Normal Hours
Production Capacity 3000 3000 3000 3000 Production Efficiency

Beginning Inventory 1500 1500 0 0


Available Inventory 4500 4500 2000 1000
Demand 3000 5000 2000 1000
Ending Inventory 1500 0 0 0 Holding Cost Rate
Lost Sales 0 500 0 0 Lost Sales Penalty
Production Cost $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 15,000.00
Holding Cost $ 4,500.00 $ - $ - $ -
OT Cost $ - $ - $ - $ -
Lost Sales Cost $ - $ 25,000.00 $ - $ -
Total Cost $ 49,500.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 15,000.00 Grand Total
OT Cost Rate $ 13.00
Raw Material Cost $ 15.00
# of workers 75
OT Limit 20
Normal Hours 160
Production Efficiency 4

Holding Cost Rate $ 3.00


Lost Sales Penalty $ 50.00

Grand Total $ 164,500.00


Simplified Model

Group Exp. Prof. Proj. Dem.Allocation Total Prof.


0 1000 119 119 372900
1 800 128 128
2 600 126 126
3 400 150 150
4 300 155 53
5 200 168 0
6 100 144 0
7 50 103 0
8 0 92 0
9 0 45 0 Total No. Rooms
Total 576 <= 576
Extended Model: The focal customer is booking for two days
Day 1 Day 1 Day 2 Day 2 Profit
Group Exp. Prof. Proj. Dem.Allocation Proj. Dem.Allocation Day 1 Day 2 Total Profit
0 1000 119 119 98 98 372600 339700 712300
1 800 128 128 114 114
2 600 126 126 110 110 Calculate the shadow price:
3 400 150 150 102 102 No. Rooms 576 575
4 300 155 52 135 135 Total Prof. 712800 712300
5 200 168 0 152 16 Shadow Price 500
6 100 144 0 124 0 (Total value for 2 days)
7 50 103 0 110 0
8 0 92 0 89 0
9 0 45 0 33 0
Total 575 575 Rooms for Allocation 575
<= <= <=
Rooms for Allocation 575 575 Total No. Rooms 575
Total Profit

ue for 2 days)
Branch Input 1 Input 2 Input 3 Output 1 Output 2 Output 3 Branch Input 1
A 27 3.5 15 11 9 1 A 27
B 15 2 12 10 8 0.4 B 15
C 43 7 39 24 20 5 C 43
Weights 0 0 0.066667 0 0.0925 0.15 Weights 0.066667

Branch A Evaluation: Branch B Evaluation:


Branch TOV TIV Efficiency Branch TOV
A 0.9825 <= 1 Fixed as 1 98% A 1.1
B 0.8 <= 0.8 100% B 1
C 2.6 <= 2.6 100% C 2.4
Input 2 Input 3 Output 1 Output 2 Output 3
3.5 15 11 9 1
2 12 10 8 0.4
7 39 24 20 5
0 0 0.1 0 0

Evaluation:
TIV Efficiency
<= 1.8 61%
<= 1 Fixed as 1 100%
<= 2.866667 84%
Branch A Evaluation: Branch B Evaluation:
Branch Input 1 Input 2 Input 3 Output 1 Output 2 Output 3 Weights Branch
A 27 3.5 15 11 9 1 1 A
B 15 2 12 10 8 0.4 0 B
C 43 7 39 24 20 5 0 C
Virtual 27 3.5 15 11 9 1 Sum Virtual
Constraint 1: Weights sum up to 1 1

Constraint 2: Lower inputs Constraint 3: Higher than k-multiple outputs Constraint 2: Lower inputs
<= <= <= >= >= >= Multiple k
Branch A 27 3.5 15 11 9 1 1 Branch B
Branch B Evaluation: Branch C Evaluation:
Input 1 Input 2 Input 3 Output 1 Output 2 Output 3 Weights Branch Input 1
27 3.5 15 11 9 1 0 A 27
15 2 12 10 8 0.4 1 B 15
43 7 39 24 20 5 0 C 43
15 2 12 10 8 0.4 Sum Virtual 43
Constraint 1: Weights sum up to 1 1

Constraint 2: Lower inputs Constraint 3: Higher than k-multiple outputs Constraint 2: Lower inputs
<= <= <= >= >= >= Multiple k <=
15 2 12 10 8 0.4 1 Branch A 43
Evaluation:
Input 2 Input 3 Output 1 Output 2 Output 3 Weights
3.5 15 11 9 1 0
2 12 10 8 0.4 0
7 39 24 20 5 1
7 39 24 20 5 Sum
Constraint 1: Weights sum up to 1 1

t 2: Lower inputs Constraint 3: Higher than k-multiple outputs


<= <= >= >= >= Multiple k
7 39 24 20 5 1
Branch A Evaluation:
Branch Input 1 Input 2 Input 3 Output 1 Output 2 Output 3 Weights
A 27 3.5 15 11 9 1 1
B 15 2 12 10 8 0.4 0
C 43 7 39 24 20 5 0
Virtual 27 3.5 15 11 9 1 Sum
Constraint 1: Weights sum up to 1 1

Constraint 2: Lower inputs Constraint 3: Higher than k-multiple outputs


<= <= <= >= >= >= Multiple k
Branch A 27 3.5 15 11 9 1 1

You might also like