Perception and Knowledge of First Year MBBS Students Towards E Learning A Cross Sectional Study
Perception and Knowledge of First Year MBBS Students Towards E Learning A Cross Sectional Study
Perception and Knowledge of First Year MBBS Students Towards E Learning A Cross Sectional Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted: 25-06-2021 Revised: 06-07-2021 Accepted: 09-07-2021
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. INTRODUCTION MBBS students who consented for study of NKP
Learning is a process of achieving Salve institute of medical sciences & research
knowledge, skill, and performance. Thus learning centre and lata mangeshkar hospital, Nagpur. Total
is ultimately considered one of the fundamental 150 students from these college were
pillars of society changes . A new method of considered for this study population.The students
learning nowdays by using computers, internet whodidn’t give consent for participation were
and e-resources is E-learning.1-3. not enrolled in the study.
Nowadays, technology has obviously made The link of questionnaire was sent through
our lives easier. That means internet technology has E-mails and Whatsapp to the student. They were
been considered as an important medium for many asked to choose and tick response to each
aspects of our lives including academic learning. question. The identity of the student was not
Teacher in higher education are under pressure to disclosed on the response sheet. The participants
provide more effective and efficient learning were also assured that their responses will not
environments, new teaching paradigms and alter the academic assessment and were
educational opportunities and experiences to encouraged to provide feedback with free mind.
their students. Therefore, teachers always are The results were analysed blindly from the data
looking for ways to make their educational generated . Each item in the questionnaire was
initiatives more effective.4 The learning experience rated based on a five-point Likert scale (1-
in higher education has shifted paradigms from strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-Dont know, 4-
an teacher -focused approach to learnercentered agree and 5-strongly agree).
pedagogical methods .5
Computer education amongst medical Statistical analysis:
undergraduates in developed countries is at a Online responses were analysed for number and
relatively higher level in comparison to students of percentage.
developing resource poor countries [6]. Studies have
shown that students at resource poor settings lack III. RESULT :
the necessary skills to use computer-based learning Out of 150 student 132 students
platforms effectively and are therefore at a participated in this study. The evaluation of those
disadvantage [7]. Lack of resources, time and 132 students has been summarised in table 1 and
structured training programmes are amongst the table 2. all of these students have smartphone and
reasons for the low computer literacy of medical few ( 24.2 %) use combination of laptop and
undergraduates in developing countries [7]. In this phone.As depicted in table in table 1 majority of
COVID era most of the teaching is through online students (52.3%) feel elearning along
mode. Hence we have planned this study in first withTraditional teaching is favourable
year MBBS students to assess the perception and alternative.47% conveyed studying online help
knoledge towards e-learning. them write answers in exam. 57% of students felt
elearning need advanced technical knowledge
II. METHOD .Maximum were aware of various educational
This cross sectional study was web sites related to academic.However, many of
conducted after getting clearance from them spend more time on social siteslike
institutional ethics committee. A questionnaire Facebook, WhatsApp, YouTube etc. instead
was given online in google form to the first ofeducational web sites.
DOI: 10.35629/5252-03041922 |Impact Factorvalue 6.18| ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 19
International Journal Dental and Medical Sciences Research
Volume 3, Issue 4, July-Aug 2021 pp 19-22 www.ijdmsrjournal.com ISSN: 2582-6018
We found 58 .3 %( table no 2)students felt convenience is the important feature of elearning as they can seat
home and study whenever required .surprisingly only 18 % enjoy using computers over textbook .
DOI: 10.35629/5252-03041922 |Impact Factorvalue 6.18| ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 20
International Journal Dental and Medical Sciences Research
Volume 3, Issue 4, July-Aug 2021 pp 19-22 www.ijdmsrjournal.com ISSN: 2582-6018
learning.
I prefer video and 3 8 6 72 42 (32.1%) 131
animation to study (2.3%) (6.1%) (4.6 %) (55%)
my subjects for
better
understanding if i
don’t understand
the topic during
class.
60.00%
50.00%
SD
40.00%
DIS
30.00%
DONT KNOW
20.00%
AGREE
10.00%
SA
0.00%
elearning along with traditional teaching is a favourable alternative.
DOI: 10.35629/5252-03041922 |Impact Factorvalue 6.18| ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 21
International Journal Dental and Medical Sciences Research
Volume 3, Issue 4, July-Aug 2021 pp 19-22 www.ijdmsrjournal.com ISSN: 2582-6018
effort and time but with quality will totally modify members. Journal of Hospitality &
the traditional approach of learning which are Tourism Education, 14(3), 19-27.
geared towards modernization. [6]. Kerfoot BP, Masser BA, Hafler JP:Influence
Also the research found out that the of new educational technology on problem-
student’s attitudes towards e-learning are positive based learning at Harvard Medical
which means that they can actually adapt to a School.Med Educ2005, 39(4):380–387.
learning environment where lessons and topics are [7]. Ameh N, Kene TS, Ameh EA:Computer
delivered online and where they can acquire skills knowledge amongst clinical year medical
and knowledge online. So esources suppliments the students in a resource poor setting.Afr
traditional teaching in first year mbbs student. Health Sci2008, 8(1):40–43.
[8]. Frehywot S, Vovides Y, Talib Z, Mikhail
BIBLIOGRAPHY . N, RossH, Wohltjen H, et al. E-learning
[1]. Masic I. E-learning as new method of in medical education in resource
medicaleducation. Acta Informatica constrained low-and middleincome
Medica.2008;16(2):102-17. countries. Human Resour Health. 2013
[2]. Ranasinghe P, Wickramasinghe SA, Pieris Dec1;11(1):4.
WR,Karunathilake I, Constantine GR. [9]. Kim S. The future of e-learning in
Computer literacyamong first year medicaleducation: current trend and future
medical students in a developingcountry: opportunity. JEducational Evaluation Health
A cross sectional study. BMC Professions. 2006;3.
researchnotes. 2012 Dec;5(1):504. [10]. Choules AP. The use of elearning in
[3]. Lau F, Bates J. A review of e-learning medicaleducation: a review of the current
practices forunder graduate medical situation. PostgrMed J. 2007 Apr
education. J Med Systems.2004 Feb 1;83(978):212-6.
1;28(1):71-87. [11]. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The
[4]. Hsu, C. H. C. (1999). Learning styles of impact of elearning in medical education.
hospitality students: Nature or nurture? Academic Med. 2006 Mar 1;81(3):207-12.
International Journal of Hospitality [12]. Harley KN, Atram GG, Jankar JS, Atram
Management, 18, 17-30 PG.Viewpoint and usage of e- resources
[5]. Hsu, C. H. C., & Wolfe, K. (2003). Learning and internet by first MBBS students. Indian
styles of hospitality students and faculty J Appl Res. 2018;7(4).
DOI: 10.35629/5252-03041922 |Impact Factorvalue 6.18| ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 22