Project ENL 104 Fall 2021-2022
Project ENL 104 Fall 2021-2022
20 Marks
• Low: Scores below 15 percent: This work typically includes some quotes and few
common phrases or blocks of text that match other documents. Typically, such
work may not require further analysis as there might be no evidence of plagiarism.
• Medium: Scores between 15 percent and 40 percent: This work include extensive
quoted or paraphrased material, or might include plagiarism. Review such work to
determine if the matching text is properly referenced.
1
• High: Scores over 40 percent: A very high probability exists that text in this work
was copied from other sources. Such work includes quoted or paraphrased text
in excess and need to be reviewed for plagiarism.
Remember that well-chosen headings and sub-headings make it easier for your
reader to follow your report.
The project should be submitted in the following format:
1 Times New Roman, font size 12. Text aligned on the left; full
justification not required.
2 1.5 lines spaced, margins 2.5 cm at left, right and top, 2.0 cm at bottom.
3 No lines between paragraphs.
4 Paragraphs indented except when they come directly after a heading.
5 For lists please use numbers or, if more appropriate, standard bullet
points.
6 For emphasis, please use italics, not bold.
2
7 Single quote marks (‘…’) should be used around quotations, though
quotations of more than two lines will start on a new line and be
indented, without quote marks.
References
Please list only those works you have specifically mentioned in your project. Do
not include general background reading.
Tomalin, B. and M. Nicks. 2008. The World’s Business Cultures and How to
Unlock Them. London: Thorogood.
An edited book
3
Coombe, C. and C. Canning. 2002. ‘Using self-assessment in the classroom:
rationale and suggested techniques’. Karen’s Linguistics Issues, February.
Retrieved 28 November 2007 from
http://www3.telus.net/linguisticsissues/selfassess2.html.)
- Displays unity and coherence - Effective and adequate use of structures, grammar and
vocabulary
- Well-developed
- Wide range of structures, grammar and vocabulary
- Generally displays unity and coherence - Adequate use of structures, grammar and vocabulary
- Minor errors
- Fairly displays unity and coherence, as required - Relatively limited control of structures, grammar and
vocabulary
- Fairly well-developed
- Relatively limited range of structures, grammar and
vocabulary
7-10 - Does not address the topic adequately - Lacks organization in places
- Limited development in response to the topic - Limited range of structures, grammar and vocabulary
4
- Frequent inaccuracy of structures, grammar and vocabulary
- Lacks unity and coherence - Severely limited control of structures, grammar and
vocabulary
- Serious underdevelopment
- Severely limited range of structures, grammar and
vocabulary
- Severely serious underdevelopment - Too limited range of structures, grammar and vocabulary
Written but with plagiarism of more than 20% Written but with plagiarism of more than 20%