2011 Upper Primary Division Second Round Test (Solution) : Answer: (A)
2011 Upper Primary Division Second Round Test (Solution) : Answer: (A)
2011 Upper Primary Division Second Round Test (Solution) : Answer: (A)
1. The sides of the square 1600 cm2 and 900 cm2 are 40 cm and 30 cm respectively.
Hence the area of the large square is 4900 cm2, the shaded area is
4900 − 1600 − 900 × 3 = 600 cm2. Therefore, the shaded area required 6 pieces of
square brick of 100 cm2.
Answer: (A)
2. In the figure, there are 6 − 4 = 32 squares. And 32 × 75% = 24 . There are 10
2
B
Answer: 14cm
9. Let the great common divisor of a and b be d, and a = dm, and b = dn; m and n are
relatively prime. The L.C.M of a and b is then dmn. From the information of the
question, we have
dm+dn=d(m+n)=432 and dmn+d= d(mn+1)=7776.
The two equations give us
mn+1=18(m+n) or mn-18(m+n)+1=0.
Hence (m-18)(n-18) = 182-1 = 17×19. Assume m > n, we have (m-18)
=17×19=323 and n-18=1; or (m-18) =19 and (n-18) =17. If m=341 and n =19;
then m+n=360 and there is no positive integer d satisfying d(m+n) = 432. So this
set of solution is not the required solution. If m = 37 and n = 35, then
d=432/(37+35)=6. Hence a = dm = 222 and b = dn = 210. The product of a and b
is 46620
Answer: 46620
10. Let x be the weight of the turnip just harvested, and then the turnip contain 0.9x kg
of water. After an hour under the sun, the water content decreases by 10%, that is a
decrease of 10%×0.9x= 0.09x kg. The weight of the turnip is x − 0.09 x = 0.91x kg,
and the percentage of water in turnip is
81
( 0.9 − 0.09 ) x ÷ (0.91x) × 100% = × 100% ≈ 89.01%
91
Answer: 89.01%
11. If the surface of the wood and the mouth of the bottle are in the same horizontal
level, the height of water inside the bottle is 20 − 6 × 13 = 18 cm. the volume of the
water is 3.14 × 52 × 18 − 63 × 23 = 1269 cm3.
Answer: 1269 cm3
12. Let a, b and c be the number of frames made respectively for equilateral triangle,
square and regular pentagon by using 100 sticks. In order that at least one of the
three kinds of frames was made, we have the condition 100 – 3 – 4 – 5 = 88. If we
want to have as many frames made as possible, then more frame of equilateral
triangle should be made, and the maximum number of frame made is 29+3=32. In
order to have as few frames made as possible, then more regular pentagons should
be made, and the minimum number of frames made is 18+3=21. We will prove
that the number of frames made could be any integer between 21 and 32. Let the
total number of the frames made be 21+x, where 1 ≤ x ≤ 10. As 21+x = a+b+c,
then 100=3(a+b+c)+b+2c=3(21+x)+b+2c. Simplified, we have b+2c=37–3x.
When 1 ≤ x ≤ 10, b and c could be positive integers, and b+c < 21+x. Hence the
total number of frames is a positive integer between 21 and 32. Therefore, there
are 12 possible values for the total number of the frames made.
Answer: 12
13. According to the symmetric property of square, there are three different settings
for block (b) to be placed in a 4×4 square. Block (a) cannot be place in the third
setting. If block (a) is put in the two other settings, it will lead to an empty region
where no blocks could be placed. Hence, block (a) and block (b) could not be
selected simultaneously. Similarly, block (b) and (e) cannot be selected
simultaneously.
According to the symmetry property of a square, there are two settings for block
(e) to be placed in a 4×4 square. Hence, a 4×4 square could not be formed by
using block (e) alone. If block (e) is selected, block (d) should also be selected
simultaneously.
(1) Only one kind of blocks is used: The first four kinds of blocks can form a 4×4
square (4 pieces each). There are has four choices.
(2) Two kinds of blocks are used together: Block (a) could not be used together
with other blocks to form a 4×4 square. Block (e) could only be used together
with block (d) to form a 4×4 square. In the remaining three blocks, any two
types of blocks could be put together to form a 4×4 square. Hence there are
four choices.
(3) Three kinds of blocks are used together: Block (a) and (b) could not be selected
at the same time; similarly blocks (b) and (e) could not be selected
simultaneously. Hence, there are four choices. They are (a)(c)(d), (a)(d)(e),
(b)(c)(d) and (c)(d)(e). The arrangements of blocks are as follows:
(4) Four kinds of blocks are used together: As block (a) and (b) could not be
selected simultaneously, similarly block (b) and (e) could not be selected
simultaneously. And block (a) (b) (c) (d) could not form a 4x4 square. Hence,
so such arrangement exists.
To conclude, there are 12 choices to form a 4×4 square
Answer:12
14. There is no five-digit “Magic Number”. Suppose not, let N be the five-digit
“Magic Number”. The five digits of the “Magic Number” is arranged as a, b, c, d
and e according to their magnitude in descending order. From the condition,
N = abcde − edcba . According to the magnitude of a, b, c, d and e, the order of
the five digits of N’s is a − e , b − d − 1 , 9, 9 + d − b and 10 + e − a . (5 points)
Noted that 9 is the largest number, and obviously a = 9. As 9 + d − b and
10 + e − a are both larger than e, and a − e = 9 − e ≠ e ; we have b − d − 1 = e . (5
points)
Then 9 + d − b = 8 − e , and 10 + e − a = e + 1 . Hence the order of the five digits of
N is 9 − e , e, e+1 and 8 − e . (5 points)
According to the magnitude of the value of a, b, c, d and e, we have d = e + 1 and
b = 9 − e . And from b − d − 1 = e , we have b = 2e + 2 , and so 9 − e = 2e + 2 . And
And obviously such value of e doe not exist. Therefore, no such five-digit “Magic
Number” exists. (5 points)
Answer: No such number exists
The Rubric for the marking (points given)
0 point: Conclusion given, but without any explanation.
5 point: Using proof by contradiction, using the letters a, b, c, d, e (or other
letters expression) and list them according to the order of magnitude,
and express N based on the magnitude of the numbers.
5 point: Express each number digit of N in terms of a, b, c, d and e.
5 point: Obtain the relationship among the numbers a, b, c, d and e; using
one of them to express the number digit in N.
5 point: Using each of the number digits in N to prove the conclusion.
15. 【Proof 1】
We estimate an upper limit for the number of stamps
being cut. It is easy to cut out 10 pieces of stamp (two X X X
stamps in the middle of every line). Cutting 11 pieces of X X
stamp is also possible (as shown on the right figure). X X
(10 points) X X
We will then prove that 11 is the maximum number of
X X
stamp that could be cut.
Suppose 12 pieces of stamp could be cut. Let the length
of each stamp be one unit. If 12 pieces of stamp were cut, by conditions 1 and 2,
the “perimeter” of the sheet of remaining stamps is 28+4×12=76. On the other
hand, we can tackle the question as if we are going to stick the stamps back on a
square frame of stamps. The perimeter of a square frame of stamps is (7+5)×4=48,
and we are required to stick back 52 − 12 = 13 pieces of stamp. Each time a stamp
is stick to the frame, the total perimeter will increase by 2. Hence the maximum
perimeter of the stamps put back is 48 + 2 × 13 = 74 < 76 . This is a contradiction.
Therefore, Leon could not cut more than 12 pieces of stamp under such conditions.
(10 points)
Answer: 11 pieces
The Rubric for the marking (points given)
10 point: Only the answer and the diagram are given.
10 point: Proof of the conclusion is given.
【Proof 2】
According to condition (1), at most 25 stamps could be cut. And according to
condition (2), at most 13 stamps could be cut (as shown in figure (a)) (5 points).
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X
X X X X
X X X X X
In the original large sheet fo stamps, at most 3 stamps could be cut in each row. If
3 stamps is cut in one row, then at most 2 stamps could be cut on its adjunct row,
with proper location of cutting (as shown in figure (b)) . Assume that 12 stamps
could be cut, then at least 2 of the rows having 3 stamps being cut. If 3 stamps
was cut from the third row (or fourth, fifth row) , then condition (3) is not
satisfied (as shown in figure (b)). Hence the cases for cutting 2 rows of 3 stamps
each could only be for the 2nd and the 6th row. It is easy to see that such cases do
not satisfy conditions (3). (5 points)
Hence at most 11 stamps could be cut, as shown in figure (c) (10 points).
The Rubric for the marking (points given)
5 point: Provide the answer of at most 13 stamps were cut, according to
conditions (1) and (2).
10 point: Provide the answer of at most 13 stamps were cut, according to
conditions (1) and (2), and prove that at most 11 stamps were cut.
【Proof 3】
At most 11 stamps were cut, as shown in figure (a) (10 pints).
Next show that no more stamps could be cut.
According to condition (1), at most 25 stamps could be cut. And according to
condition (2), at most 13 stamps could be cut. There is only one way, as shown in
figure (b). (5 points).
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X