CF Chapter 2 Notes
CF Chapter 2 Notes
Capital budgeting describes the process which companies use to make decisions on capital projects
i.e. projects with a lifespan of one year or more. It is a cost-benefit exercise which seeks to produce
end results and benefits which are greater than the costs of the capital budgeting efforts.
There are several steps involved in the capital budgeting process. The specificity of the procedures
adopted by a manager is, however, dependent on factors such as the manager’s level in the company,
the size and complexity of the particular project being evaluated, and the size of the company.
Step 1: Generate ideas – Generating good ideas is the most important step.
Step 2: Analyze individual proposals – Information is gathered which helps to forecast cash flows
for each project and then evaluate the project’s profitability.
Step 3: Plan the capital budget – This step involves looking at project timing, scheduling,
prioritizing, and coordinating.
Step 4: Monitor and post-audit – How the project is performing is assessed and actual results
(revenues, expenses, cash flows etc.) are compared with planned or projected results.
Since capital budgeting describes the process by which all companies make decisions on their capital
projects, it is not unusual for some fairly sophisticated techniques to be employed. Regardless of this,
capital budgeting relies heavily on just a few basic principles.
Decisions are based on cash flows and not on accounting concepts such as net income
The timing of cash flows is critical
Cash flows are based on opportunity costs. A comparison is made between the incremental
cash flows that occur with an investment and without the investment.
Cash flows are analyzed on an after-tax basis. Taxes have to be fully reflected in capital
budgeting decisions.
The financing costs are ignored. Financing costs are already reflected in the required rate of
return and therefore including them again in the cash flows and in the discount rate would lead to
double counting.
The capital budgeting cash flows are not the same as accounting net income.
Sunk costs – These are costs which have already been incurred.
Opportunity cost – This refers to what a resource is worth if it is put to its next-best use.
Incremental cash flow – This is the cash flow which is realized because of a decision.
Externality – This refers to the effect of an investment on other things besides the investment
itself. If possible, these should be part of the investment decision. Cannibalization is one example of
an externality. This occurs when an investment results in customers and sales moving away from
another part of a company.(Impact of investment in sales of any other product or part of the business)
Conventional cash flows versus nonconventional cash flows – A conventional cash flow
pattern is one which has an initial cash outflow followed by a series of cash inflows. Conversely, a
nonconventional cash flow pattern is one in which the initial cash outflow is not followed by cash
inflows only, but the cash flows can flip from positive to negative again (or even change signs
several times).
Project Sequencing
The purpose of project sequencing is to arrange projects in a logical order for completion. It enables
a project manager to determine the order of project completion which best manages the time and
resources that are available.
Through project sequencing, investing in one project may create the option to invest in future
projects. For example, a manager may invest in one project today and then invest in another project
in a year’s time if the financial results of the first project or new economic conditions are favorable.
Capital Rationing
Capital rationing is the act of placing restrictions on the amount of new investments or projects
that a company can undertake. It may occur either through the imposition of a higher cost
of capital for investment consideration or by the establishment of a ceiling on specific portions of a
budget.
Capital rationing is more frequent whenever a company has a fixed amount of funds available
to invest. If however the company has more profitable projects than it has funds available for,
then it will be forced to allocate these scarce funds in a manner which achieves maximum
shareholder value subject to the funding constraints.
The opposite of capital rationing occurs whenever unlimited funds are available to a company. In this
situation, a company can raise the required funds for all profitable projects simply by paying the
required rate of return.
Measures of profitability
Several important decision criteria are used to evaluate capital investments. The two most
comprehensive and well-understood measures of whether or not a project is profitable are the net
present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) measures. Other measures include the payback
period, discounted payback period, average accounting rate of return (AAR), and the profitability
index (PI)
Many projects have cash flow patterns in which outflows occur not only at the start of the project (at
time = 0) but also at future dates. In these instances, a better formula to use is:
The decision rule for the NPV is: Invest in the project if NPV > 0; do not invest in the project if NPV
< 0; and stay indifferent if NPV = 0.
In other words, positive NPV investments are wealth increasing, while negative NPV investments are
wealth decreasing.
NPV Example
Example 1
Suppose Company A is considering an investment of $100 million in a capital expansion project that
will return after-tax cash flows of $20 million per year for the first 3 years and another $33 million in
year 4, the final year of the project. If the required rate of return for the project is 8%, what would the
NPV be and should company undertake this project?
Gerhardt Corporation is considering an investment of $50 million in a capital project that will
return after-tax cash flows of $16 million per year for the next four years plus another $20
million in year five. The required rate of return is 10 percent.
Solution
EXAMPLE-Z Ltd. has two projects under consideration A & B; each costing$ 6 million .The
projects are mutually exclusive. Life for project A is 4 years & project B is 3 years. Tax Rate
33.99%. Cost of Capital is 15%.Calculate NPV
EBITD ( 00000)
1 60 100 0.870
3 120 50 0.685
4 50 — 0.572
Solution :
Computation of Net Present V alue of the Projects.
Project A
(PAT+Deprn)
Project B
(Initial Investment)
As Project “A” has a higher Net Present Value, it has to be taken up.
It looks very much like the NPV equation except that the discount rate is the IRR instead of r, the
required rate of return. Discounted at the IRR, the NPV is equal to zero.
The decision rule for the IRR is to invest in the project if the IRR exceeds the required rate of return
for the project i.e. invest if IRR > r; do not invest if IRR < r.
In instances where the outlays for a project occur at times other than time 0, a more general form of
the IRR equation is:
IRR Example
Following on from the above NPV example, if company A is considering an investment of $100
million in a capital expansion project that will return after-tax cash flows of $20 million per year for
the first 3 years and another $33 million in year 4, the final year of the project, what is the IRR for
this project and should it be undertaken given that the required rate of return for the project is 8%?
The solution can be found by trial and error. However, a much simpler approach is to use a financial
calculator or spreadsheet software.
The IRR is computed to be -2.626%. Since -2.626% < 8%, the project should not be undertaken.
Example.
Year 1 2 3 4
Payback Period
The payback period refers to the number of years required to recover the original investment in a
project. It is very simple to compute and explain. It, however, ignores the time value of money and
the risk of a project by not discounting cash flows at the project’s required rate of return. It also
ignores cash flows that occur after the payback period is reached. It may be used as an indicator of a
project’s liquidity but not of its profitability.
After the first year, 1,500 of the initial investment of 5,000 is recovered, with 3,500 still unrecovered.
In year 2, the project earns 3,500, which means that the initial investment is now fully recovered. The
payback period is therefore 2 years. Payback period ignores the cash flows which occur in years 3
and 4.
Example-. A project cost$1, 00,000 and yields annual cash inflow of$20,000 for 8 years,
calculate payback period
It is ascertained by cumulating cash inflows till the time when the cumulative cash
inflows become equal to initial investment.
Year Cash inflow Cumulative cash inflow
1 2000 2000
2 4000 6000
3 3000 9000
4 2000 11000
The initial investment is recovered between the 3rd and the 4th year.
C 2000 2
Example
A project costing $2 million yields annually a profit of 300000 after depreciation @10% (straight line method) but
before tax 50%.
Solution
cash inflow = Profit after tax + Depreciation = 3,00,000 – Tax 1,50,000 + Depre. 2,00,000 = 350000 p.a.
2000000/350000=5.7
Year 0 1 2 3 4
Cash flow (CF) -5,000 1,500.00 3,500.00 4,000.00 4,000.00
Cumulative CF -5,000 -3,500.00 0 4,000.00 4,000.00
Discounted CF -5,000 1,363.64 2,892.56 3,005.26 2,732.05
Cumulative -5,000 -3,636.36 -743.80 2,261.46 4,993.51
discounted CF
The discounted payback period is between 2 and 3 years. More precisely, it is two years plus (the
cumulative discounted CF after 2 years divided by the discounted cash flow in year 3) i.e. 2 +
743.80/3,005.26 = 2.25 years.
Whenever the NPV > 0, the PI will be greater than 1.0; conversely, whenever the NPV is negative,
the PI will be less than 1.0.
The decision rule for the PI is; Invest in the project if PI>1.0; do not invest in the project if PI<1.0.
PI Example
If company A has a project with an initial outlay of $100 million and an NPV of -$24.201 million,
the profitability index is computed as:
Since the PI < 1.0, undertaking the project would not be a profitable investment.
This method measures the rate in profit expected to result from investment.
Example.
A project costing $1,000000. EBITD (Earnings before Depreciation, Interest and Taxes) during
the first five years is expected to be$2,50,000;$3,00,000,$3,50 ,000;$4,00,000 and 5,00,000.
Assume 33.99% tax and 30% depreciation on WDV Method.
YEARS 1 2 3 4 5
TOTAL
ARR=127805/500000 X100=25.56%
Example