EdCK 4 Module With Activities 05
EdCK 4 Module With Activities 05
Module 5
Phases and Process of Curriculum Development (Part 1)
Curriculum Planning
Introduction
The need for exactness and particularity in making decisions about ends and means
demands scientific curriculum planning. In the Philippines, a growing awareness of a need
for rational curriculum planning is manifested in concerted efforts towards generating
specific and precise educational ends.
Developing a curriculum rationally involves two factors: 1) identifying relevant
substantive decisions at increasing levels of specificity and precision and 2) checking for
consistency between and among the ends-and-means decisions by a two-way process of
derivation and evaluation at each stage and by referring to data sources for basic information.
Discussion
Curriculum Planning
Curriculum planning is the process whereby the advance arrangement of learning
opportunities for a particular population of learners is created. The trend in approaches to
curriculum planning is to give as wide as possible a participation in planning by all persons
professional and lay who are affected. Decisions in the curriculum are made on several
different levels. Some decisions about what content to include in the curriculum are made by
state legislations, such as requirements to teach the New Constitution. Still others emanate
from the Department of Education. Others are made by the school regions, or districts. Many
decisions which shape the functioning curriculum are made by local schools and by teachers,
either in groups or individually.
1|Page
Basically, there are two major issues as to who plans the curriculum which should be
considered at this point as we are examining the nature of the curriculum planning process.
They are as follows: 1) national or state and local curriculum control; and 2) the relationship
of laymen, academic scholars, and elementary school secondary school and collegiate
educators in curriculum planning.
3|Page
philosophy or point of view to support how to provide for multi-cultural groups, what
methods or strategies, and what type of evaluation to use.
7. Curriculum development is an on-going process. Continuous monitoring, examination,
evaluation and improvement of curricula are to be considered in the design of the
curriculum. As the needs of learners change, as society changes, and as new knowledge
and technology, appear, the curriculum must change.
8. Curriculum development is more effective if it is a comprehensive process rather
than a “place meal”. A curriculum design should be based on a careful plan, should
clearly establish intended outcomes, support resources and needed time available and
should equip teaching staff pedagogically.
9. Curriculum development is more effective when it follows a systematic process. A
curriculum design is composed of desired outcomes, subject matter content
complemented with references, set of procedures, needed materials and resources and
evaluation procedure which can be placed in a matrix.
10. Curriculum development starts from where the curriculum is. Curriculum planners
and designers should begin with existing curriculum. An existing design is a good starting
point for any teacher who plans to enhance and enrich a curriculum.
Building upon the ideas of Oliva, let us continue learning how to design a curriculum
by identifying its components. For most curricula, the major components or elements are
answers to the following questions:
1. What learning outcomes need to be achieved? (Intended Learning Outcomes)
2. What content should be included to achieve the learning outcomes? (Subject Matter)
3. What learning experiences and resources should be employed? (Teaching-Learning
Methods)
4. How will the achieved learning outcomes be measured? (Assessment of Achieved
Learning Outcomes)
4|Page
skills, refer to the taxonomy made by Krathwohl and for the psychomotor domain by
Simpson.
The statement should be SMART: Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Result-Oriented
and Time-bound. For a beginner, it would help if you provide the Condition, Performance
and Extent or Level of Performance in the statement of the intended earning outcomes.
For example, if a lesson intends the students to identify the parts of a simple flower as
stated in the desired learning outcomes, then the student should have identified the parts of a
simple flower, at the end of the lesson.
Sometimes the phrase intended learning outcomes is used to refer to the anticipated
results after completing the planned activity or lesson. In framing learning outcomes, it is
good practice to:
Express each outcome in terms of what successful students will be able to do. For
example, rather than stating. Students will be able to explain the reason why… it
should be: ‘Students must have explained the reason why…’ This helps students
to focus on what they have to achieve as learning. It will also help curricularists
devise appropriate assessment tasks.
Include different kinds of outcomes. The most common are cognitive objectives
(learning facts, theories, formulae, principles, etc.) and performance outcomes
(learning how to carry out procedures, calculations and processes, which typically
include gathering information and communicating results). In some contexts,
affective outcomes are important too (for developing attitudes or values, e.g. those
required as a person and for a particular profession).
III. References
The reference follows the content. It tells where the content or subject matter has been
taken. The reference may be a book, a module, or any publication. It must bear the author of
the material and if possible, the publications. Some examples are given below.
1. Project Wild (1992) K to 12 Activity Guide, An Interdisciplinary Supplementary
Conservation and Environmental Education Program. Council of Environmental
Education, Bethesda MD
2. Shipman James and Jerry Wilson, et al (2009). An Introduction to Physical Science,
Houghton Mifflin Co. Boston MA
5|Page
3. Romo, Salvador B. (2013). Horticulture an Exploratory Course.Lorimar Publishing
Inc. Quezon City
4. Bilbao, Purita P. and Corpuz, Brenda B. et al (2012). The Teaching Profession 2nd Ed.
Lorimar Publishing Inc. Quezon City
There are some examples of very simple teaching-learning methods with detailed
steps that you can start using as begin teaching.
1. Direct Instruction: Barak Rosenshine Model (in Ornstein & Hunkins, 2018)
Detailed Steps:
1. State Learning Objectives/ Outcomes: Begin lesson with a short statement of
objective or desired lesson learning outcomes.
2. Review: Introduce short review of previous or prerequisite learning
3. Present new materials: Present materials in small, sequenced manner.
4. Explain: Give clear and detailed instructions and explanations
5. Practice: Provide active practice for all students.
6. Guide. Guide students during the initial practice or provide seatwork activities.
7. Check for understanding. Ask several questions, assess student comprehension
8. Provide Feedback. Provide systematic feedback and corrections.
9. Assess Performance: Obtain student success rate of 80 percent or more during
practice session.
10. Review and test. Provide for spaced review and testing.
2. Guided Instruction: Madeline Hunter Model (in Ornstein & Hunkins, 2018)
6|Page
1. Review. Focus on previous lesson, ask students to summarize main points.
2. Anticipatory set. Focus student’s attention on new lesson. Stimulate interest in the
new materials.
3. Objective. State explicitly what is to be learned; state rationale or how it will be
useful.
4. Input. Identify needed knowledge and skills for learning new lesson; present
materials in sequenced steps.
5. Modeling. Provide several samples or demonstrations throughout the lesson.
6. Check for understanding. Monitor students’ work before they become involved in
lesson activities, check to see they understand directions or tasks.
7. Guided practice. Periodically ask students questions and check their answers.
Again monitor understanding.
8. Independence practice. Assign independent work or practice when it is reasonably
sure that students can work on their own with understanding and minimal
frustration.
3. Mastery Learning: JH Block and Lorin Anderson Model (in Ornstein &
Hunkins, 2018)
1. Clarify. Explain to students what they are expected to learn.
2. Inform. Teach the lesson, relying on the whole group instruction.
3. Pretest. Give a formative quiz on a no fault-basis, students can check their own
paper.
4. Group. Based on results, divide the class into mastery and non-mastery groups
(80% is considered mastery).
5. Enrich and correct. Give enrichment instruction to mastery group. Give
corrective (practice/ drill) to non-mastery group.
6. Monitor. Monitor student progress; vary amount of teacher time and support for
each group based on group size and performance.
7. Posttest. Give a summary test for non-mastery group.
8. Assess performance. At least 75% of the students should achieve mastery by the
summative test.
9. Reteach. If not, repeat procedures; starting with corrective instructions (small
study groups, individual tutoring, alternative instructional materials, extra
homework, reading materials practice and drill).
4. Systematic Instruction: Thomas Good and Jere Brophy (in Ornstein &
Hunkins, 2018)
7|Page
1. Review. Review concepts and skills related to homework, provide review
exercises.
2. Development. Promote students understanding, provide controlled practice,
3. Assess comprehension. Ask questions, provide controlled practice.
4. Seatwork. Provide uninterrupted seatwork; get everyone involved sustain
momentum.
5. Accountability. Check the student work.
6. Homework. Assign homework regularly; provide review problems.
7. Special reviews. Provide weekly reviews to check and further maintain and
enhance learning.
Self-assessment, through which students learn to monitor and evaluate their own
learning. This should be a significant element in the curriculum because we aim to
produce graduates who are appropriately reflective and self-critical.
Peer assessment, in which students provide feedback on each other’s learning. This
can be viewed as an extension of self-assessment and presupposes trust and mutual
respect. Research suggests that students can learn to judge each other’s work as
reliably as staff.
Teacher assessment, in which the teacher prepares and administers tests and gives
feedback on the student’s performance.
Assessment may be formative (providing feedback to help the student learn more) or
summative (expressing a judgment on the student’s achievement by reference to stated
8|Page
criteria). Many assessment tasks involve an element of both, e.g. an assignment that is
marked and returned to the student with detailed comments.
Summative assessment usually involves the allocation of marks or grades. This helps
the teacher make decisions about the progress or performance of the students.
Students usually learn more by understanding the strengths and weaknesses of their
work than by knowing the mark or grade given to it. For this reason, summative assessment
tasks (including unseen examinations) should include an element of formative feedback, if
possible.
A. Subject-Centered Design – This is a curriculum design that focuses on the content of the
curriculum. The subject –centered design corresponds mostly to the textbook because
textbooks are usually written based the specific subject or course.
9|Page
The primary drawback of subject-centered curriculum design is that it is not student-
centered. In particular, this form of curriculum design is constructed without taking into
account the specific learning styles of the students. This can cause problems with student
engagement and motivation and may even cause students to fall behind in class.
1. Subject design– Subject design curriculum is the oldest and so far the most familiar
design for teachers, parents and other laymen. According to the advocates, subject
design has an advantage because it is easy to deliver. Textbooks are written and
support instructional materials are commercially available. Teachers are familiar with
the format because they were educated using also the design.
2. Discipline design – This curriculum design model is related to the subject design.
However, whole subject design centers only on the cluster of content, discipline
design focuses on academic disciplines. Discipline refers to specific knowledge
learned though a method which the scholars use to study a specific content of their
fields.
3. Correlation design – Coming from a core, correlated curriculum design links
separate subject designs in order to reduce fragmentation. Subjects are related ot one
another and still maintain their identity. For example, English literature and social
studies correlate well in the elementary level,. In the two subjects, while history is
being studied, different literary pieces during the historical period are also being
studied.
4. Broad field design/ interdisciplinary – Broad field or interdisciplinary is a variation
of the subject centered design. This design was made to cure the
compartmentalization of the separate subjects and integrate the contents that are
related to one another.
These are some examples of curriculum designs. There are many more which are
emerging and those that have evolved in the past. The example given may be limited
however, for our purposes; they can very well represent curriculum designs.
Underlying Spokesperson/
Design Emphasis Source/ Focus
Philosophy Champion
Subject –Centered
Essentialism Science,
Subject Design Separate subject Harris, Hutchins
Perennialism Knowledge
Interdisciplinary
Essentialism Science,
Broad-Fields design subjects, scholarly Broudy, Dewey
Progressivism Knowledge
discipline
11 | P a g e
Separate subject,
Progressivism
Correlation design disciplines linked but Knowledge Alberty, Alberty
Essentialism
identities maintained
Learner-centered design
Child’s needs and Dewey, Kilpatrick,
Child-centered design Progressivism Child
interests Parker
Experience-centered Child’s experiences Dewey, Rugg,
Progressivism Child
design and needs Shumaker
Experiences, interest, Combs, Abraham,
Reconstructionism Psychology,
Humanistic design needs of a person Maslow, Carl
Existentialism Child, Society
and group Rogers
Problem-centered design
Life (social)
Life-situation design Reconstructionism Society Spencer
problem
Child focus on
Transformatory (or society and the Open System
Society Slattery
becoming) change world, all reals of Post Modernism
culture
Reconstructionist Child, the teacher,
Open System Post Modernism Roth
design the world
Curriculum Mapping
Curriculum mapping is a model for designing, refining, upgrading and
reviewing the curriculum resulting in a framework that provides form, focus and
function (Hale and Dunlap, 2010). It is a reflective process that helps teachers
understand what has been taught in class, how it has been taught and how learning
outcomes are assessed. This approach is an ongoing process or “work-in-progress”. It
is not a one time initiative but a continuing action, which involves the teacher and
other stakeholders, who have common concerns. Curriculum mapping can be done by
teachers alone, a group of teachers teaching the same subject, the department, the
whole school or district or the whole system.
Some curricularists would describe curriculum mapping as making a map to
success. There are common questions that are asked by different stakeholders, like
teachers, colleagues, parents, school officials and the community as well. These
questions may include:
12 | P a g e
Curriculum mapping may be able to answer these questions above.
Furthermore, mapping will produce a curriculum map, which is a very functional tool
in the curriculum development.
Example A.
1. Make a matrix or a spread sheet.
2. Place a timeline that you need to cover (one quarter, one semester, one year).
This should be dependent on time frame of a particular curriculum that was
written.
3. Enter the intended learning outcomes, skills needed to be taught or achieved at
the end of the teaching.
4. Enter in the same matrix the content areas/ subject areas to be covered.
5. Align and name each resource available such as textbooks, workbooks, module
next to subject areas.
6. Enter the teaching-learning methods to be used to achieve the outcomes.
7. Align and enter the assessment procedure and tools to the intended learning
outcomes, content areas and resources.
8. Circulate the map among all involved personnel for their inputs.
9. Revise and refine map based on suggestions and distribute to all concerned.
You will find Example A as a component of an OBE-Inspired syllabus for the higher
education. However, this can be modified for basic education to serve the specific
purpose as you will see in some maps.
Suggested ReferenceVideo:
1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdM-i1ZY3cA
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXz0cVRRBUk
14 | P a g e
Exercise
15 | P a g e