Pipeline Corrosion Protection Simulation of Cathod
Pipeline Corrosion Protection Simulation of Cathod
Pipeline Corrosion Protection Simulation of Cathod
Egi S. Avianto1, Budi Prasojo2, Ega Sepfriansyah A.3, Ali Imron4, Endah
Wismawati5, Burniadi Moballa6, Faiz Hamzah7,Ayu Rossa A.N.8
1Piping Engineering Department, Shipbuilding Institute of Polytechnic Surabaya,
Surabaya, Indonesia
2Shipbuilding Construction Department, Shipbuilding Institute of Polytechnic
Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
3Marine Engineering Department, Shipbuilding Institute of Polytechnic Surabaya,
Surabaya, Indonesia
Abstract. Corrosion protection is very necessary for all steel or other types of metal, especially
in buried pipes (underground construction). Direct contact between pipe materials (Carbon
steel) can accelerate the corrosion rate. This is the case with the 20 inch pipe project working
on the pipe installation. Initially to prevent this type of corrosion was done cathodic protection,
but the result of examination was proven that there was a leakage of the potential distribution
protection to the ground. Therefore it is necessary to do a distribution protection simulation to
get how many anodes (magnesium package) to meet protection needs. The anode distance
simulation results on the distribution of potential are carried out with the following variations:
distance of every 45 meters, distance of every 30 meters, distance of every 20 meters, and
distance of anodes every 15 meters. Based on the simulation results it is found that the anode
distance cannot meet the minimum protection (-850milli volt) except at a distance of 15
meters. Installation of anodes at a distance of 15 meters with each pair of distance of 4.9 meters
proved that the simulation results have met the minimum potential for corrosion protection. So
that it can be used as a reference for installation of anode spacing for pipe corrosion
protection.
1.Introduction
Corrosion is a reduction in the quality of a material generally metal, and a mixture due to the contact
between metals and their environment [1]. Various transportation, steel bridges, civil constructions,
industrial equipment, factory machinery, and energy generation facilities and equipment
often
experience corrosion attacks. This also happens as in the piping system in the paper industry which is
very important for the production process [2] .Furthermore it often happens in the buried pipeline. The
piping system is underground because the land that is supposed to be used for piping is actually used
as a population area so it is not possible to place it on the surface [3]. Therefore various industries that
use metal equipment must use corrosion protection systems. Corrosion protection method involves the
spread of the electric potential on the surface of the pipe towards the anode. The potential value of
this pipe is the benchmark in various standards whether the pipeline has been protected from
corrosion or not. This is because the corrosion reaction is the same thing as the potential
electrochemical moving reaction which involves electrolyte, anode and cathode elements. However,
the installation of corrosion pipeline protection has been installed in the buried pipeline while the
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
International Conference Earth Science & Energy IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 519 (2020) 012044 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/519/1/012044
inspection results of potential test. point protection show inadequate values (-450 millivolt) from the
protection adequacy range (-850 millivolt to -1050 millivolt). This makes the pipeline area need to be
backfilled to reinstall the anode. Therefore, it is very important for engineering evaluation and
improvement based on the condition of the project area through numerical modeling simulations to
obtain a more accurate and better protection value.
2
International Conference Earth Science & Energy IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 519 (2020) 012044 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/519/1/012044
just do adjustments to the rectifier. This indirectly gives a lower cost effect when implementing
construction. With the use of corrosion protection type ICCP location or reference anode point
attached to the metal surface (pipes, steel structures, sea building facilities, tanks and so on) this can
be determined based on the profile of the protected metal it self.
Sacrifice anode is a very active anode material that is used to protect metal surfaces that are less active
against corrosion attacks [11]. The anode material in the SACP (Sacrifice Anodic cathodic Protection)
system which has more negative electrochemical potential properties than the protected metal is a
corroded metal anode that replaces the protected material. The corrosion protection system of the
Sacrifice Anode Cathodic Protection type uses packaged anode in which there is a material that has
more downward properties in the galvanized potential table and is connected to a connector to the
outer surface area of the pipe. So that is way the electrochemical ion will flow from more active
material (anode) to the pipe. Even actually there some kind of cathodic anode but the type of
magnesium is rottenly used in many projects.
2 Research methodology.
The following methodology is a step, time, and work process taken in conducting research starting
from data collection and work processes. The following form of research is in the form of
improvement and optimization of the need for protection stresses and the number of anodes to meet the
potential protection of the pipeline which will be protected from corrosion attacks. There are several
variations that will be done with the distance of each anode so that the area of the pipe area will be
obtained which is still not sufficiently protected. Then the results will be used as an analysis material
to improve the design of the distance for each anodize. Those process of the research is shown in
figure 2 bellow that form start problem and purposes identification, literature study and field study,
getting the potential requirement at the pipe location for protection, simulation and having the value of
potential distribution.
3
International Conference Earth Science & Energy IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 519 (2020) 012044 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/519/1/012044
4
International Conference Earth Science & Energy IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 519 (2020) 012044 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/519/1/012044
Figure 3. The simulation parameters of corrosion protection modeling on the cathodic type protection
(side view).
Figure 3 above describe how the geometry is drawn in the geometry software. The pipe is shaped with
having an internal diameter. The thickness of the pipe is 15.09 millimeter. The soil geometry’s
dimension length x width x height is 90 meters x 2 meters x 4 meters. Those dimension will ease the
people who want to simulate it again in the analysis software.
5
International Conference Earth Science & Energy IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 519 (2020) 012044 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/519/1/012044
6
International Conference Earth Science & Energy IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 519 (2020) 012044 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/519/1/012044
Figure 4. The simulation result of corrosion protection modeling on the cathodic type protection.
Those cathodic protection method is corrosion protection for a 90 m pipeline (ninety meter) land
over a 36 m (thirty six meters) main high cross way. This makes the pipeline using a pipe casing. In
research using design calculations for the protection of the following software simulation requires
that the data be carried out based on the data that has been obtained. So after setting the modeling
with the variations in modeling the spread of corrosion protection potential on the distance of the
method of setting and each combination of the ICCP-SACP. The results of the simulation of
corrosion protection modeling on the cathodic type of protection from the review software review
are shown in the Fig bellow The results of modeling are shown in Fig 3 graph of the potential value
of corrosion protection spread peranode.
Figure 5. Graph of the potential value for corrosion protection simulation installation
distance
Corrosion protection above is carried out at the anode distance every 15 meters (fifteen meters) with
each pair of distance 0.7 meters (zero point seven meters), 1.4 meters (one point four), 2.8 meters
(two point eight meters), 4.2 meters (four point two meters), 4.9 meters (four point nine meters) and
5.6 meters (five point meters) six meters). From the results of the modeling it was found that the
pipeline could be protected against corrosion. It is evident that the potential spread value experienced
by the pipeline at that distance has entered the potential protection limit (min -850 millivolt).
Acknowledgments
Thanks to God Allah SWT for giving us blessings to be able to always study the knowledge and be
able to do the following research. Special thanks to our parents who always support both morally and
materially.
7
International Conference Earth Science & Energy IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 519 (2020) 012044 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/519/1/012044
References
[1]. Arrend.FR 2005 ICCP for development of optimum configuration system on ship using Scalatic
Model. Ed 56 : 4. Germany: material and corrosion journal.
[2]. Prasojo B, Wismawati E, and Arif Y 2017 Analisa Laju Erosi dan Perhitungan Lifetime
Terhadap Material Stainless Steel 304 , 310 , dan 321 pada Aliran Reject 1st Cleaner to 2nd
Cleaner OCC Line Voith Unit SP 3-5 di PT . PAKERIN ( Pabrik Kertas Indonesia ), 2rd ed.,
vol. 2. Surabaya: CPEAA, pp. 105–110.
[3]. Endri, George, S. Daisy, dan S. Hamzah 2017 Perancangan Burried Pipe 12" Untuk
Pengiriman
[4]. Limbah Water Produce di PT Pertamina EP Tanjung Field,” vol. I. Surabaya: CPEAA, pp. 43-
47.
[5]. Syawaldi 2013 . Analisa Laju Korosi Pada sistem Perpipaan Bawah Tanah, vol. 5. Riau:
APTEK, pp. 19-24.
[6]. Gadala, I. M., M. Abdel Wahab, and A. Alfantazi 2016 Numerical simulations of soil
physicochemistry and aeration influences on the external corrosion and cathodic protection
design of buried pipeline steels, Ed 97. Matdes: Materials and Design, pp. 287-289.
[7]. Hari. B 2014 Pengaruh Zeoloit Terhadap Laju Korosi Pada Baja karbon Dalam Lingkungan
Asam,” 3. Jogja: Jurnal Sains Dasar
[8]. Kartika 2017 Studi Karakteristik Laju Korosi Pelapisan Logam dan Alumunium,” vol 6.
Jakarta: Jurnal Teknik Mesin, pp.1
[9]. Khambaita, P, F.Tieghe, F 1995 Corrosion, vol 3. United States: NACE
[10]. Arrend.FR 2015 ICCP for development of optimum configuration system on ship using
Scalatic Model, Ed 56 : 4. Germany: Materials and Corrosion journal , pp.4
[11]. Puspitasari F,Mochamad M M, Fipka B 2018 Pengaruh kebocoran arus akibat sentuh rebar
chamber pada pipa yang diproteksi katodik terhadap kebutuhan arus ICCP, vol. III. Surabaya :
CPEAA, pp. 201-206