Homework 9 Solution
Homework 9 Solution
Homework 9 Solution
1
a) r
pbqb
pb ± zα/2
n
r
(0.24)(0.76)
⇒ 0.24 ± (2.575) = 0.24 ± 0.110
100
⇒ 0.130 < p < 0.350
2
Problem 4: [1, Exercise 9.66]
Ten engineering schools in the United States were surveyed. The sample contained 250
electrical engineers, 80 being women; 175 chemical engineers, 40 being women. Com-
pute a 90% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of women in
these two fields of engineering. Is there a significant difference between the two propor-
tions?
Solution:
n1 = 250
n2 = 175
80
pb1 = = 0.32
250
40
pb2 = = 0.2286
175
qb1 = 1 − pb1 = 0.68
qb2 = 1 − pb2 = 0.7714
1 − α = 90% ⇒ α = 0.1 ⇒ zα/2 = z0.05 = 1.645
Therefore: s
pb1 qb1 pb2 qb2
p1 − pb2 ) ± zα/2
(b +
n1 n2
r
(0.32)(0.68) (0.2286)(0.7714)
⇒ (0.32 − 0.2286) ± (1.645) + = 0.0914 ± 0.0713
250 175
⇒ 0.0201 < p1 − p2 < 0.1627
There is a significantly higher proportion of women in electrical engineering than there
is in chemical engineering.
3
Therefore: s
pb1 qb1 pb2 qb2
p1 − pb2 ) ± zα/2
(b +
n1 n2
r
(0.2740)(0.7260) (0.3158)(0.6842)
⇒ (0.2740 − 0.3158) ± (1.96) + = −0.0418 ± 0.0431
1000 760
⇒ −0.0849 < p1 − p2 < 0.0013
At the confidence level of 95%, the significance can not be shown.
a)
The number that would have been woman in 1990 is:
n1 ∗ pb1 = (20)(0.337) ≈ 7
n2 ∗ pb2 = (20)(0.362) ≈ 7
b)
1 − α = 95% ⇒ α = 0.5 ⇒ zα/2 = z0.025 = 1.96
s
pb1 qb1 pb2 qb2
p1 − pb2 ) ± zα/2
(b +
n1 n2
r
(0.337)(0.663) (0.362)(0.638)
⇒ (0.337 − 0.362) ± (1.96) + = −0.025 ± 0.295
20 20
⇒ −0.320 < p1 − p2 < 0.270
There is no evidence that at the confidence level of 95%, there is a change in propor-
tions.
4
Problem 7: [1, Exercise 9.72]
A random sample of 20 students yielded a mean of x = 72 and a variance of s2 = 16 for
scores on a college placement test in mathematics. Assuming the scores to be normally
distributed, construct a 98% confidence interval for σ 2 ?
Solution:
n = 20
s2 = 16
1 − α = 98% ⇒ α = 0.02
υ = n − 1 = 20 − 1 = 19 (degrees of f reedom)
χ2α/2 = χ20.01 = 36.191
χ21−α/2 = χ20.99 = 7.633
Therefore:
(n − 1)s2 2 (n − 1)s2
<σ <
χ2α/2 χ21−α/2
(19)(16) (19)(16)
⇒ < σ2 <
36.191 7.633
2
⇒ 8.400 < σ < 39.827
5
References
[1] Walpole, R. E., Myers, R. H., Myers, S. L. and Ye, K., Probability &
Statistics for Engineers & Scientists, 9th ed., MA, USA: Prentice-Hall, 2012.
[2] DeGroot, M. H. and Schervish, M. J., Probability and Statistics, 4th ed., MA,
USA: Pearson Education, Inc., 2012.