Inverse Q
Inverse Q
Summary
The effect of dispersion and attenuation on land seismic data can be removed by applying inverse Q filtering thus
improving the seismic resolution. In this case study, the Q filter structure was designed by deterministic processing sequences
on real data where there is a need to improve signal to compensate for attenuation losses. This method is useful in areas
where there well data is available.
The earth filter, considered as a minimum phase Q values are traditionally estimated by measuring
process, could be represented by a Q model where Q denotes spectral ratios between two receivers straddling a constant
the quality factor of the medium. A forward Q filtering is Q through the direct downgoing wavefield of VSP data
used to test attenuation and dispersion effects generally on (Leaney, 1999). This method determines spectral ratios
synthetic data, and an inverse Q filtering is used to remove between all possible receiver pairs in the VSP resulting in a
them from seismic data .The application of this inverse plot of many Q values versus depth. These estimated values
filtering can not recover lost information, but can effectively of Q can be used in designing the inverse Q filter for
restore the natural balance of the remaining information. application to the seismic data to effectively compensate
attenuation losses.
The degree of frequency loss and phase distortion
Harris et al. (1997) found that Q was independent
are inversely related to the Q values of the medium. Large
of frequency over the seismic bandwidth for a North Sea
Q values imply low absorption, where as small Q values
VSP. In this presented study, we estimated Q structure by
imply large absorption. The Q factor depends on the velocity,
calculating the spectral ratio of a reference signal’s
the density and the bulk modulus of the medium. It can
amplitude spectrum with that of a data window in
vary from lithology to lithology.
overlapping time windows moving down the trace. To obtain
a good compromise between stability and resolution, we
Theoretical background used the multi-taper method (Thomson, 1982).
Seismic attenuation impacts the amplitude and Inverse Q filters aiming to compensate for both
wave shape of recorded seismic data. It is a fundamental amplitude and phase losses are not stable as they entail a
(713)
large amplification of high frequencies. To improve the
stability of inverse Q filters, constant gain limited operators
and high cut filters are used. By limiting the maximum gains
of the inverse filters, these operators are active only on the
spectrum in which signal dominates the noise.
Application of inverse Q filtering on real data pass filtered with (5-10-80-95) bandwidth. Flattened spectrum
indicates compensation of loss of high frequencies, which
The 3D land data pertaining to Cauvery Basin was in turn results in wavelet compression and the phase
taken for this study where there were no spectral readings stability.
available from VSP data. Conditioning of raw data was done
by removal of high amplitude noise, application of statics Figures (2-a) and (2-b) show the time-variant am-
and surface consistent amplitude correction. plitude strength for different frequency components both
before and after inverse Q filtering indicating that ampli-
Random noise attenuation was done both before tudes have been sufficiently recovered after inverse Q filter
and after the application of inverse Q filtering followed by application.
gapped deconvolution. The prior made volume stack was
used to arrive at the Q structure for application of inverse Figure (3-a) shows the stack section before inverse
Q filter on pre-stack gathers. Q filtering and Figure (3-b) the same section after the
filtering. The inverse Q filtered section shows higher
Figures (1-a) and (1-b) testify that inverse Q dominant frequency than the other. The lateral coherence
filtering has flattened the amplitude spectrum within the of the events also is better in the filtered section.
signal band. The amplitude spectra were subsequently band-
(714)
6th International Conference & Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics “Kolkata 2006”
Acknowledgements
References
(715)