0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views

Numerical Analysis Bisection Method: Lecture # 4

sds

Uploaded by

Sajid Shahid
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views

Numerical Analysis Bisection Method: Lecture # 4

sds

Uploaded by

Sajid Shahid
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 31

Numerical Analysis

Bisection Method

Lecture # 4
Tuesday, Sept 21, 2021

Dr. Zohaib Atiq Khan


Assistant Professor
[email protected]
Department of Chemical, Polymer & Composite Materials
Engineering (New Campus)

1
Solution of Nonlinear Equation

1. Simple Iteration Method (Fixed Point Iteration method)


2. Bisection Method
3. Newton Rapson Method
4. Secant method
5. Method of false position

UET 2
LAHORE Copyright ® Dr Zohaib Atiq Khan
Bisection Method

UET
LAHORE Copyright ® Dr Zohaib Atiq Khan
Basis of Bisection Method

Theorem An equation f(x)=0, where f(x) is a real continuous function,


has at least one root between xl and xu if f(xl) f(xu) < 0.
f(x)

x
x
xu

Figure 1 At least one root exists between the two points if the function is
real, continuous, and changes sign.
UET 4
4
LAHORE Copyright ® Dr Zohaib Atiq Khan
Basis of Bisection Method
f(x)

x x
xu

Figure 2 If function does not change sign between two points, roots of the
equation may still exist between the two points.

UET 5
5
LAHORE Copyright ® Dr Zohaib Atiq Khan
Basis of Bisection Method

f(x)
f(x)

x xu
x x
x xu

f (x )
f (x ) = 0
Figure 3 If the function does not change sign between two points, there may not be
any roots for the equation between the two points.

UET 6
6
LAHORE Copyright ® Dr Zohaib Atiq Khan
Basis of Bisection Method

f(x)

xu
x
x

Figure 4 If the function f ( x ) changes sign between two points,


more than one root for the equation f (x ) = 0 may exist between the two
points.
UET 7
7
LAHORE Copyright ® Dr Zohaib Atiq Khan
Algorithm for Bisection Method

8
Step 1

Choose x and xu as two guesses for the root such that f(x) f(xu) < 0, or
in other words, f(x) changes sign between x and xu. This was
demonstrated in Figure 1.
f(x)

x
x
xu

Figure 1

UET 9
9
LAHORE Copyright ® Dr Zohaib Atiq Khan
Step 2

Estimate the root, xm of the equation f (x) = 0 as the mid point between
x and xu as
f(x)

x + xu
xm =
2
x xm
x
xu

Figure 5 Estimate of xm
UET 10
10
LAHORE Copyright ® Dr Zohaib Atiq Khan
Step 3

Now check the following

a) If f (xl ) f (xm )  0 , then the root lies between x and xm; then x
= x ; xu = xm.

b) If f (xl ) f (xm )  0 , then the root lies between xm and xu; then x
= xm; xu = xu.

c) If f (xl ) f (xm ) = 0 ; then the root is xm. Stop the algorithm if this
is true.

UET 11
11
LAHORE Copyright ® Dr Zohaib Atiq Khan
Step 4

Find the new estimate of the root


x + xu
xm =
2
Find the absolute relative approximate error
x new − x old

a = 100
m m
new
xm

where
xmold = previous estimate of root
xmnew = current estimate of root
12
Step 5

Compare the absolute relative approximate error a with


the pre-specified error tolerance s .
Go to Step 2 using new
Yes upper and lower
Is a s ? guesses.

No Stop the algorithm

Note one should also check whether the number of


iterations is more than the maximum number of iterations
allowed. If so, one needs to terminate the algorithm and
notify the user about it.
13
Example 1

You are working for ‘TANK COMPANY’ that makes floats for ABC tanks.
The floating ball has a specific gravity of 0.6 and has a radius of 5.5
cm. You are asked to find the depth to which the ball is submerged
when floating in water.

Figure 6 Diagram of the floating ball 14


UET 14
LAHORE Copyright ® Dr Zohaib Atiq Khan
Example 1 Cont.

The equation that gives the depth x to which the ball is submerged
under water is given by
x3 − 0.165x 2 + 3.993 10−4 = 0

a) Use the bisection method of finding roots of equations to find the


depth x to which the ball is submerged under water. Conduct three
iterations to estimate the root of the above equation.
b) Find the absolute relative approximate error at the end of each
iteration, and the number of significant digits at least correct at the
end of each iteration.

UET 15
15
LAHORE Copyright ® Dr Zohaib Atiq Khan
Example 1 Cont.

From the physics of the problem, the ball would be submerged between
x = 0 and x = 2R,
where R = radius of the ball,
that is
0  x  2R
0  x  2(0.055)
0  x  0.11

Figure 6 Diagram of the floating ball


16
Example 1 Cont.

Solution

To aid in the understanding


of how this method works to
find the root of an equation,
the graph of f(x) is shown to
the right,
where
f (x ) = x 3 − 0.165 x 2 + 3.993 10- 4

Figure 7 Graph of the function f(x)


UET 17
LAHORE Copyright ® Dr Zohaib Atiq Khan
Example 1 Cont.

Let us assume
x = 0.00
xu = 0.11
Check if the function changes sign between x and xu .
f (xl ) = f (0) = (0) − 0.165(0) + 3.993 10 −4 = 3.993 10 −4
3 2

f (xu ) = f (0.11) = (0.11) − 0.165(0.11) + 3.993 10 −4 = −2.662 10 −4


3 2

Hence
( )( )
f (xl ) f (xu ) = f (0) f (0.11) = 3.993 10 −4 − 2.662 10 −4  0

So there is at least on root between x and xu, that is between 0 and 0.11
18
Example 1 Cont.

Figure 8 Graph demonstrating sign change between initial limits


19
Example 1 Cont.

Iteration 1 x + xu 0 + 0.11
The estimate of the root is xm = = = 0.055
2 2

f (xm ) = f (0.055) = (0.055) − 0.165(0.055) + 3.993 10 −4 = 6.655 10 −5


3 2

( )( )
f (xl ) f (xm ) = f (0) f (0.055) = 3.993 10 −4 6.655 10 −5  0

Hence the root is bracketed between xm and xu, that is, between 0.055
and 0.11. So, the lower and upper limits of the new bracket are
xl = 0.055, xu = 0.11
At this point, the absolute relative approximate error a cannot be
calculated as we do not have a previous approximation.

20
Example 1 Cont.

Figure 9 Estimate of the root for Iteration 1


21
Example 1 Cont.

Iteration 2 x + xu 0.055 + 0.11


The estimate of the root is xm = = = 0.0825
2 2

f (xm ) = f (0.0825) = (0.0825) − 0.165(0.0825) + 3.993  10 −4 = −1.622  10 −4


3 2

f (xl ) f (xm ) = f (0.055) f (0.0825) = (− 1.622  10 −4 )(6.655  10 −5 )  0

Hence the root is bracketed between x and xm, that is, between 0.055
and 0.0825. So, the lower and upper limits of the new bracket are
xl = 0.055, xu = 0.0825

22
Example 1 Cont.

Figure 10 Estimate of the root for Iteration 2


http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.ed 23
u
Example 1 Cont.

The absolute relative approximate error a at the end of Iteration 2 is

xmnew − xmold
a = new
 100
xm
0.0825 − 0.055
=  100
0.0825
= 33.333%

None of the significant digits are at least correct in the estimate root of
xm = 0.0825 because the absolute relative approximate error is greater
than 5%.

24
Example 1 Cont.

Iteration 3 x + xu 0.055 + 0.0825


The estimate of the root is xm = = = 0.06875
2 2
f (xm ) = f (0.06875) = (0.06875) − 0.165(0.06875) + 3.993 10 −4 = −5.563 10 −5
3 2

( )( )
f (xl ) f (xm ) = f (0.055) f (0.06875) = 6.655 10 −5 − 5.563 10 −5  0

Hence the root is bracketed between x and xm, that is, between 0.055
and 0.06875. So, the lower and upper limits of the new bracket are
xl = 0.055, xu = 0.06875

25
Example 1 Cont.

Figure 11 Estimate of the root for Iteration 3


26
Example 1 Cont.

The absolute relative approximate error a at the end of Iteration 3 is

xmnew − xmold
a = new
100
xm
0.06875 − 0.0825
=  100
0.06875
= 20%

Still none of the significant digits are at least correct in the estimated
root of the equation as the absolute relative approximate error is
greater than 5%.
Seven more iterations were conducted and these iterations are shown in
Table 1.
27
Table 1 Cont.

Table 1 Root of f(x)=0 as function of number of iterations for


bisection method.
Iteration x xu xm a % f(xm)

1 0.00000 0.11 0.055 ---------- 6.655×10−5


2 0.055 0.11 0.0825 33.33 −1.622×10−4
3 0.055 0.0825 0.06875 20.00 −5.563×10−5
4 0.055 0.06875 0.06188 11.11 4.484×10−6
5 0.06188 0.06875 0.06531 5.263 −2.593×10−5
6 0.06188 0.06531 0.06359 2.702 −1.0804×10−5
7 0.06188 0.06359 0.06273 1.370 −3.176×10−6
8 0.06188 0.06273 0.0623 0.6897 6.497×10−7
9 0.0623 0.06273 0.06252 0.3436 −1.265×10−6
10 0.0623 0.06252 0.06241 0.1721 −3.0768×10−7

UET 28
LAHORE Copyright ® Dr Zohaib Atiq Khan
Table 1 Cont.

Hence the number of significant digits at least correct is given by the


largest value or m for which
a  0.5 10 2− m
0.1721  0.5 10 2− m
0.3442  10 2− m
log(0.3442 )  2 − m
m  2 − log(0.3442 ) = 2.463
So
m=2
The number of significant digits at least correct in the estimated root
of 0.06241 at the end of the 10th iteration is 2.
UET 29
LAHORE Copyright ® Dr Zohaib Atiq Khan
Advantages

• Always convergent
• The root bracket gets halved with each iteration - guaranteed.

UET 30
LAHORE Copyright ® Dr Zohaib Atiq Khan
Drawbacks

◼ Slow convergence
◼ If one of the initial guesses is close to the
root, the convergence is slower

31

You might also like