Barriers To The Introduction of Ict
Barriers To The Introduction of Ict
Barriers To The Introduction of Ict
2
e-ISSN: 1308-1470 www.e-iji.net p-ISSN: 1694-609X
Within a very few years, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has
turned out to be an effective educational technology which promotes some
dramatic changes in teaching and learning processes. Technologies allow students
to work more productively than in the past, but the teacher’s role in technology-
rich classrooms is more demanding than ever (Keengwe, Onchwari et al. 2008).
ICT has the potential to transform the nature of education (improving teachers’
design work, enhancing the roles of students and teachers in the learning process
and helping to create a collaborative learning environment, etc). Although ICT has
the potential to improve the educational system to a great extent, developing
countries are far from reaping these benefits because of certain barriers. The aim
of this paper is to present a comprehensive review of international articles
relating to barriers encountered when introducing ICT into classrooms.
This review will help identify the factors that influence teachers’ decisions
whether or not to implement ICT in teaching-learning situations.
Connections will be made with existing literature to explore possible
barriers for introducing ICT into education in Bangladesh. Further, this
paper also offers a number of recommendations to reduce these barriers and
maximize the beneficial use of ICT on education.
Key Words: educational technology, teachers' design works, student learning, ICT
implementation
62 Barriers to the Introduction of ICT into Education …
INTRODUCTION
The growth of information and communication technologies (ICT) has
dramatically reshaped teaching and learning processes in higher education
(Pulkkinen, 2007; Wood, 1995). ICT for education is more critical today than
ever before since its growing power and capabilities are triggering a change in
the learning environments available for education (Pajo & Wallace, 2001). The
use of ICT offers powerful learning environments and can transform the
learning and teaching process so that students can deal with knowledge in an
active, self directed and constructive way (Volman & Van Eck, 2001; de Corte
et al., 2003). At present ICT is considered as an important means to promote
new methods of instruction (teaching and learning). It should be used to
develop students' skills for cooperation, communication, problem solving and
lifelong learning (Plomp et al., 1996; Voogt, 2003). Although computers and
technology are prevalent throughout our society (Cuban, 2001), developing
countries are far from reaping their benefits because of certain barriers.
The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive review of international
articles relating to barriers encountered when introducing ICT into classrooms.
This review will help identify the factors that influence teachers’ decisions
whether or not to implement ICT in teaching-learning situations. Connections
will be made with existing literature to explore possible barriers for introducing
ICT into education in Bangladesh. Understanding the pedagogical,
psychological and cognitive barriers to the successful use of information
technology may be a vital precondition for improving the utilization of
computers and other technological aids in the educational process (Benzie,
1995). It is hoped that this paper will be useful for the educators, policymakers
and other decision makers who are directly involved in introducing ICT into
education in Bangladesh
During the last two decades, the implementation of ICT in education has
become an important topic in research on educational reform (Drent and
Meelissen 2008). Research findings over the past two decades provide some
evidence as to the positive effects of the use of information and
communications technology (ICT) on pupils’ learning (Mumtaz, 2000; Hattie,
2009). Sanyal (2001) states that there are four ways ICT can support basic
education: (i) supporting education in schools, (ii) providing non-formal
education for out-of-school children and adults, (iii) supporting pre-service
distance education of teachers and their in-service professional development,
and (iv) enhancing the management of schools. Sanyal (2001) makes a
cautionary observation by quoting IIEP (1995), ‘‘Putting computers in
classrooms and wiring up schools does not of itself create exciting new learning
situations that are about changing the ethos of classrooms and the culture of
institutions’’.
By adopting ICT, we can offer high quality education. Ehrmann (1994)
identified four distinct faces of quality education, which can be supported by
ICT: learning by doing, real time conversation, delayed time conversation and
directed instruction. Hawkridge et al (1990) suggested that the use of ICT could
improve performance, teaching, and administration, have a positive impact on
education as a whole, and develop relevant skills in the disadvantaged
communities - helping in liberation and transformation. The Dakar Framework
for Action (World Education Forum, Dakar, Senegal, April 2000) also stressed
the use of ICT for achieving ‘Education For All’ (EFA) goals and
recommended, “ICT must be harnessed to support EFA goals at an affordable
cost. These technologies have great potential for knowledge dissemination,
effective learning and the development of more efficient education services.”
Technology should be used as a tool to support educational objectives such as
skills for searching and assessing information, cooperation, communication and
problem solving - which are important for the preparation of children for the
knowledge society (Drent and Meelissen 2008). Cox et al (1999) carried out a
study examining the factors relating to the uptake of ICT in teaching. The
results showed that the teachers who are already regular users of ICT have
confidence in using ICT, perceive it to be useful for their personal work and for
their teaching and plan to extend their use further in the future. The factors that
were found to be the most important to these teachers in their teaching were:
making the lessons more interesting, easier, more fun for them and their pupils,
more diverse, more motivating for the pupils and more enjoyable. Additional,
more personal, factors were: improving presentation of materials, allowing
greater access to computers for personal use, giving more power to the teacher
in the school, giving the teacher more prestige, making the teachers’
administration more efficient and providing professional support through the
Internet
ICT enhances higher education in a number of ways:
• It enables the effective storing/sorting of information, and can offer new
fast ways of communication;
• It enables the reduction of information quantity towards a higher quality
and better structure;
• It can be integrated into teaching and learning strategies – and used to
support relative learning theories; and
• ICT (computers, Inter and Intranet) can be used to create new types of
interactive learning media for improved quality, equity, and access in
higher education (Rosswall, 1999).
Researchers have also found that computers enhance teaching and learning by
providing opportunities to practice and to analyze, offering better access to
relevant articles and teaching and learning materials. Every classroom teacher
should use learning technologies to enhance their students' learning in every
subject - because ICT can engage the thinking, decision making, problem
solving and reasoning behaviors of students (Grabe & Grabe, 2001). In fact,
innovative use of ICT can facilitate student-centered learning (Drent, 2005),
engage students in constructivist classrooms and enhance their social interaction
(Dodge, Colker, & Heroman, 2003). It has been shown to improve their
cognitive development (Nir-Gal & Klein, 2004), increase creativity (O’Hara,
2008), and improve their problem solving skills (Sarama & Clements, 2001).
The International Society for Technology in Educational (ISTE) emphasizes
that teachers of today should prepare to provide technology-based learning
opportunities for their students (Hamidi, Meshkat et al. 2011). ICT use has
increased dramatically over the last few years. In the developed regions, the
percentage remains much higher than in the developing world (MDG Report
2010) (see Fig. 1). On the other hand, adoption and usage of ICT are not
restricted to the developed countries, and several developing countries have
adopted technology in their educational systems (Ihmeideh, 2009). For instance,
in 2007, the Minister of Higher Education in Lebanon announced the
distribution of 400 computers for public schools, connected to the Web through
broadband1(Nasser, 2008). In Kenya, Wims and Lawler (2008) examined the
impact of ICT projects in educational institutions, and found tangible benefits to
students from exposure to ICT.
1
Broadband is high-speed Internet access (can be up to 50 times faster than dial-up
access) so as downloading a web page are noticeably quicker. Fixed Broadband is the
fastest Internet access in which has a high rate of data transmission. Two common ways
to obtain fixed broadband Internet access are with a cable modem provided by a cable
company, or a digital subscriber line (DSL) provided by a telephone company Savage,
S. J. and D. Waldman (2005). "Broadband Internet access, awareness, and use:
Analysis of United States household data." Telecommunications Policy 29(8): 615-
633.. Mobile broadband is a form of wireless Internet access in which data is
transferring through the cellular carriers to cell phones and laptops. Mobile broadband
works through a variety of devices, including portable modems and mobile phones
Here Internet speeds (mean data transmission rate) are in general less than fixed
broadband services, such as cable, DSL.
Figure 1: Comparison between developed and developing regions over the last
decade
computer tools in the classroom (Candiotti and Clark 1998) nor providing state-
of-art technology by itself will make any desirable learning changes in
education (Kent and McNergney 1999). This barrier mainly falls into two broad
categories: (i) Government vision and plan and (ii) School Vision and plan.
Government vision and plan
The Government of Bangladesh has emphasized the implemention of ICT in
education with “Vision 2021” - in order to improve the quality of the
educational system and also to create an improved teaching and learning
environment to empower and develop the proficiency of teachers and students
in Bangladesh. Effective implementation of ICT in education is not merely a
vision. Rather, it needs a proper plan, policies, execution and monitoring: which
is really a major constraint for a country like Bangladesh.
School Vision and plan
Ertmer (1999) wrote, “A vision gives us a place to start, a goal to reach for, as
well as a guidepost along the way” (p. 54). Many researchers have pointed out
that a school’s ICT vision is essential to effective ICT integration (Anderson &
Dexter, 2000). In Bangladesh most of the educational institutions are far away
from implementing ICT into teaching and learning situations. Also, there are
few higher educational institutions in big cities that have ICT facilities but
cannot integrate it effectively due to lack of a proper vision and plan. So ICT
integration is clearly related to actions taken at the school level, such as the
development of an ICT plan, ICT support, and ICT training (Tondeur, van Keer
et al. 2008) which is absent at most of the educational institutions in
Bangladesh.
Political Factors
Sharma (2003) states that the most notable of the barriers to the use of ICT in
education in developing countries seems to be the political will of the people in
the corridors of power. The allocation of sufficient funds for the educational
sector and ICT does not seem to be very attractive to the leaders. It can be seen
from the budgetary allocations in third world countries that greater allocations
may be for the defense forces rather than education. If the political leaders
favour the technology, it will bloom. Here the case of India and Bangladesh are
worth citing. After the death of Mrs Indira Gandhi in 1984, Mr. Rajiv Gandhi
became Prime Minister of India. Since he was very fond of computers and
telecommunications (he himself had a Pilot's License), India witnessed a
tremendous growth of computerization and tele-networking in his time. As a
result, nowadays most of the schools (in the urban areas) have computers and
are well connected to the Web. The new Government of Bangladesh came with
Corruption
The situation in Bangladesh represents a distinct case where corruption has
found a remarkably safe space in which to proliferate, despite the vigilance of
control mechanisms. Corruption is so pervasive that it has evoked widespread
condemnation, both inside and outside the country (Zafarullah & Siddique,
2001). Consequently, Bangladesh has been consistently ranked by
Transparency International as one of the most venal among the researched
countries (Bhuiyan 2011). As a result, corruption can be identified as one of the
strong barriers to the implementation of ICT in education. The misuse of
government funds which could have been used to develop other sectors like the
integration of ICT in education is channeled in other directions i.e. few people
benefit from those funds by pocketing all the money (Kessy et al, 2006).
Mamun & Tapan (2009) state that the budget for the newer technology was
misused and reduced due to corruption in the administration. Huge budgets are
passed to buy modern teaching and learning materials for the improvement of
the teaching and learning process, but in the end only minor improvements are
found in the over all technical and vocational education sector.
Teachers' Attitudes and Beliefs about ICT
Teachers’ attitudes have been found to be major predictors of the use of new
technologies in instructional settings (Almusalam, 2001). Mumtaz (2000) states
that teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning with ICT are central to
integration. To be successful in computer use and integration, teachers need ‘‘to
engage in conceptual change regarding their beliefs about the nature of learning,
the role of the student, and their role as teacher’’ (Niederhauser et al. 1999, p.
157). Hence the successful use of ICT into classroom largely depends on
teachers’ attitudes and belief relating to these. In fact, it has been suggested that
attitudes towards computers affect teachers’ use of computers in the classroom
and the likelihood of their benefiting from training (Kluever, et al, 1994). It is
found that less technologically capable teachers who possess positive attitudes
towards ICT, require less effort and encouragement to learn the skills necessary
for the implementation of ICT in their design activities into the classroom.
Therefore, teachers who have positive attitudes towards ICT itself will be
positively disposed towards using it in the classroom (Moseley & Higgins,
1999). Moreover, Harrison and Rainer (1992) found that participants with
negative computer attitudes were less skilled in computer use and were
therefore less likely to accept and adapt to technology than those with positive
attitudes. They concluded that changing individuals’ negative attitudes is
essential for increasing their computer skills. Therefore, if teachers want to
successfully use technology in their classes, they need to possess positive
attitudes to the use of technology. Such attitudes are developed when teachers
are sufficiently comfortable with technology and are knowledgeable about its
use (Afshari et al, 2009).
Lack of Knowledge and Skill
According to Pelgrum (2001), the success of educational innovations depends
largely on the skills and knowledge of teachers. Teachers’ lack of knowledge
and skills is one of the main hindrances to the use of ICT in education both for
the developed and underdeveloped countries (Mamun, & Tapan, 2009;
Pelgrum, 2001; Ihmeideh, 2009; Williams 1995). Integrating technology in the
curriculum requires knowledge of the subject area, an understanding of how
students learn and a level of technical expertise (Morgan 1996). Moreover,
Berner (2003) found that the faculty’s belief in their computer competence was
the greatest predictor of their use of computers in the classroom. Therefore, lack
of knowledge regarding the use of ICT and lack of skill on ICT tools and
software have also limited the use of ICT tools in teaching learning situation in
Bangladesh.
Lack of Time
Bangladesh, a developing country, has a shortage of teachers, and they are
already burdened with heavy workload. Some of the institutions have already
introduced two shifts, without increasing the number of teaches. So teachers'
teaching load has been increased due to conducting classes in both the shifts.
Moreover, most of the teachers are also responsible for administrative tasks. In
these circumstances teachers don’t have time to design, develop and incorporate
technology into the teaching learning situation (Afshari et al, 2009; Beggs,
2000; Newhouse, 1999; Ihmeideh, 2009). These studies reported lack of time as
one of the biggest constraints to the integration of ICT into the teaching-
learning situation. Teachers need time to learn how to use the hardware and
software, time to plan, and time to collaborate with other teachers. Teachers
also need time to develop and incorporate technology into their curriculum.
Some teachers are unable to make appropriate use of technology in their own
classrooms, while others are unwilling to try because of anxiety, lack of
interest, or lack of motivation (Duhaney 2001).
In addition to the factors mentioned above, there are other factors that directly
and indirectly influence the effective implementation of ICT in education in
Bangladesh. They are: poor administrative support (Keengwe et al. 2008); lack
of appropriate staff training and quality training for teachers and school
principles (Copley and Ziviani, 2004; Mamun, M. A. & Tapan, S.M., 2009;
Afshari et al, 2009); lack of qualified ICT coordinators who will assist teachers
to integrate ICT in classroom and lab and favorable school culture (Afshari et
al, 2009; Lim, C. P., 2002; Tearle, P., 2003).
Acknowledgement
We would like to show my sincere gratitude to Professor Peter Goodyear, Co-director,
and Dr. Lina Markauskaite, Senior Lecturer, CoCo Research Centre, Faculty of
Education and Social Work, The University of Sydney for their encouragement,
guidance and support.
REFERENCES
Afshari, M., Bakar, K. A., Su Luan, W., Samah, B. A., & Fooi, F.S. (2009). Factors
affecting teachers’ use of information and communication technology.
International Journal of Instruction. 2(1), 77-104.
Almusalam, S. N. (2001). Factors related to the use of computer technologies for
professional tasks by business and administration teachers at Saudi technical
colleges. (Doctoral Dissertation, the Ohio State University, 2001). ProQuest Digital
Dissertations (UMI No. AAT 3011019).
Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S.L. (2000). School Technology Leadership: Incidence
and Impact (Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey Report#6).
Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations,
University of California, Irvine.
Beggs, T. A. (2000). Influences and barriers to the adoption of instructional
technology. In Proceedings of the mid-south instructional technology conference.
Retrieved April 28, 2011, from http://www.mtsu.edu/%7Eitconf/proceed00/beggs/beggs.htm.
Berner, J. E. (2003). A Study of Factors That May Influence Faculty in Selected
Schools of Education in the Commonwealth of Virginia to Adopt Computers in the
Classroom.(Abstract Doctoral Dissertation, George Mason University, 2003).
ProQuest Digital Dissertations (UMI No. AAT 3090718).
Benzie, D. (1995). IFIP Working Group 3.5: Using Computers to Support Young
Learners. In J.D.Tinsley & T.J. van Weert (Eds.), World Conference on Computers
in Education VI: WCCE’ 95 Liberating the Learner (pp. 35-42). London: Chapman
& Hall.
Bhuiyan, S. H. (2011). Modernizing Bangladesh public administration through e-
governance: Benefits and challenges. Government Information Quarterly 28(1), 54-
65.
Bush, M., & Mott, J. (2009). The transformation of learning with technology.
Educational Technology, 49(1), 3–20.
Candiotti A, Clark N (1998) Combining universal access with faculty development
and academic facilities. Commun ACM 41(1), 36-41. doi:10.1145/268092.268106
Contractor, N S; Fulk, J; Monge, P R and Singhal, A. (1986). Cultural
Assumptions that influence the implementation of Communication Technologies,
the paper presented at the conference organized by the International Association
for Mass Communication Research, New Delhi: August 25 -29.
Copley, J., & Ziviani, J. (2004). Barriers to the use of assistive technology for
children with multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 11(4),
229–243.
Cox, M., Preston, C. & Cox, K. (1999). What Factors Support or Prevent Teachers
from Using ICT in their Classrooms? Paper presented at the British Educational
Research Association Annual Conference, University of Sussex, Brighton,
November.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N., & van Merrienboer, J. (Eds.). (2003).
Powerful learning environments: unravelling basic components and dimensions.
Oxford: Pergamon/Elsevier.
DFID, 2000. Guide to supporting media in conflict and other emergencies. Conflict
and Humanitarian Affairs Department & Social Development Department, DFID,
UK.
Dodge, D., Colker, L., & Heroman, C. (2003). The creative curriculum for pre-
school. Washington, DC: Teaching Strategies.
Drent, M. and M. Meelissen (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher
educators to use ICT innovatively?" Computers & Education 51(1), 187-199.
Drent, M. (2005). In Transitie: Op Weg Naar Innovatief ICT-gebruik op de PABO
[In transition:On the road to innovative use of ICT in teacher education] (doctoral
dissertation). Enschede: University of Twente.
Duhaney, D. C. (2001). Teacher education: Preparing teachers to integrate
technology. International Journal of Instructional Media, 28(1), 23–30.
Dupagne, M. & Krendl, K. A. (1992). Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Computers: a
review of the literature, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3),
420-429.
Ehrmann, Stephen C. (1994). Responding to the Triple Challenge Facing Post
Secondary Education: Access, Quality, Costs, Report prepared for the OECD,
International conference, December 14-16, Paris.
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing First- and Second-Order Barriers to Change:
Strategies for Technology Integration. Educational Technology Research and
Development, 47(4), 47-61.
Fullan, M. (1992). Successful School Improvement: The Implementation
Perspective and Beyond. Open University Press, Philadelphia, USA.
Gulbahar, Y. (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology
integration in schools. Computers & Education 49(4): 943-956.
Grabe, M., & Grabe, C. (2001). Integrating Technology for Meaningful Learning.
Houghton Muffin Company. USA.
Hadley, M. & Sheingold, K. (1993). Commonalities and Distinctive Patterns in
Teachers’ Integration of Computers, American Journal of Education, 101(3), 261-
315.
Hamidi, F., M. & Meshkat, et al. (2011) Information technology in education,
Procedia Computer Science 3: 369-373.
Harrison, A. W. & Rainer, R. K. (1992) The Influence of Individual Differences on
Skill in End-User Computing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1),
93-111.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hawkridge, D., Jawoski, J., & McMohan, H. (1990). Computers in the Third World
Schools: Examples, Experiences and Issues, London.
Ian Mcdonald, H. (2001). Reshaping the New Educational Landscape, Convocation
address at the Tenth Convocation of the Dr B R Ambedkar Open University,
Hyderabad, India (November 25,2001).
Ihmeideh, F. M. (2009). Barriers to the Use of Technology in Jordanian Pre-School
Settings. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(3), 325-341.
ITU (International Telecommunication Union) (2009). Measuring the information
society: The ICT development index. Geneva, Switzerland: International
Telecommunication Union.
Kent TW, McNergney RF (1999). Will technology really change education?
Thousand oaks. Corwin Press, CA.
Islam, T. & Md Selim, A. S (2006). Current Status and Prospects for E-learning in
the Promotion of Distance Education in Bangladesh. Turkish Online Journal of
Distance Education. 7 (1), 114-123. Retrieved April 26, 2011 from
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.112.4888&rep=rep1&ty
pe=pdf#page=114.
Keengwe, J., G. Onchwari, et al. (2008). Computer Technology Integration and
Student Learning: Barriers and Promise. Journal of Science Education and
Technology 17(6), 560-565.
Kessy, D., Kaemba, M., & Gachoka, M. (2006). The reasons for under use of ICT
in education: In the context of Kenya, Tanzania and Zambia. Paper presented at the
4th IEEE International Workshop on Technology for Education in Developing
Countries, Iringa, Tanzania.
Kluever, R. C., Lam T. C., Hoffman, E. R., Green, K. E., & Swearinges, D. L.
(1994). The Computer Attitude Scale: Assessing Changes in Teachers’ Attitudes
Toward Computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11 (3), 251-261.
O’Hara, M. (2008). Young children, learning and ICT: A case study in the UK
maintained sector. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(1), 29–40.
Pajo, K., & Wallace, C. (2001). Barriers to the uptake of web-based technology by
university teachers. Journal of Distance Education, 16, 70–84.
Pelgrum, W.J. (2001). Obstacles to the Integration of ICT in Education: Results
from a Worldwide Educational Assessment. Computers & Education 37, 163- 178.
Plomp, Tj., ten Brummelhis, A.C.A., & Rapmund, R. (1996). Teaching and
Learning for the Future. Report of the Committee on MultiMedia in Teacher
Training (COMMITT). Den Haag: SDU.
Pulkkinen, J. (2007). Cultural globalization and integration of ICT in education. In
K. Kumpulainen (Ed.), Educational technology: Opportunities and challenges (pp.
13–23). Oulu, Finland: University of Oulu.
Reigeluth, C. M., Watson, W. R., Watson, S. L., Dutta, P., Chen, Z., & Powell, N.
(2008). Roles for technology in the information-age paradigm of education:
Learning management systems. Educational Technology, 48(6), 32–39.
Rosswall, Thomas (1999). The role of ICT in higher education at the beginning of
this new millennium. Thomas was the Rector of the Swedish University of
Agricultural Sciences during the time of writing this piece. URL
http://online.kennis.org/eva/eva06/ictslu.htm
Rosen, L. D. & Weil, M. M. (1995). Computer Availability, Computer Experience,
and Technophobia Among Public School Teachers, Computers in Human
Behavior, 11(1), 9-31.
Rosenthal, I. G. (1999). New Teachers and Technology: Are They Prepared?
Technology and Learning, 19 (8), 22-24, 29-28.
Sanyal, B. C. (2001). New functions of higher education and ICT to achieve
education for all, Paper prepared for the Expert Roundtable on University and
Technology-for-Literacy/Basic Education Partnership in Developing Countries to
be held in Paris from 10 to 12 September 2001.
Sarama, J., & Clements, D. (2001). Computers in early childhood mathematics.
Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Panel
Discussion, Seattle, WA.
Savage, S. J. and D. Waldman (2005). Broadband Internet access, awareness, and
use: Analysis of United States household data, Telecommunications Policy 29(8):
615-633.
Sharma, R. C. (2003). Barriers in using technology for education in developing
countries. Information Technology: Research and Education, 2003. Proceedings.
ITRE2003. International Conference on.
Snoeyink R, Ertmer P (2001). Thrust into technology: how veteran teachers
respond. Journal of educational technology systems (0047-2395), 30 (1), p. 85.