RAM Connection Verification Manual
RAM Connection Verification Manual
Verification Manual
Last Updated: April 22, 2015
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: AISC Verification Examples ........................................................................................ 3
1.1 Base Plate Bearing on Concrete ................................................................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Welded/Bolted Wide Tee Connection to an HSS Column ................................................................................................ 5
1.3 Double Angle Connection to an HSS Column ......................................................................................................................... 6
1.4 Unstiffened Seated Connection to an HSS Column .............................................................................................................. 8
1.5 Four Bolt Unstiffened Extended End Plate FR Moment Connection (Beam to Column Flange) ...................10
1.6 Four Bolt Unstiffened Extended End Plate FR Moment Connection (Beam to Column Flange) ...................12
1.7 All Bolted Double Angle Connection in a Coped Beam ................................................................................................... 14
1.8 Bolted Flange-Plated FR Moment Connection (Beam to Column Flange) ..............................................................16
1.9 Moment Frame Beam-to-Column Connection .................................................................................................................... 18
1.10 OMF Beam-Column Connection ................................................................................................................................................ 19
1.11 SMF Beam-Column Connection .................................................................................................................................................22
1.12 SCBF Brace-to-Brace Connection ............................................................................................................................................. 24
1.13 SMF Beam-Column Connection .................................................................................................................................................28
Chapter 2: Eurocode Verification Examples ..............................................................................31
2.1 Fin Plates - Beam to Beam ........................................................................................................................................................... 31
2.2 Double Cleats Aangle – Beam to Column Web – Tying Resistance ............................................................................ 32
2.3 Partial Depth End Plate – Beam to Hollow Section Column ......................................................................................... 33
2.4 Column Splice – End Plate with Rectangular Column ..................................................................................................... 34
2.5 Column Splice – End Plate with Circular Column ..............................................................................................................35
2.6 Column splice – Web Angle Cleats, Bearing Splice (No Net Tension) .......................................................................36
2.7 Beam Splice – Web Cover Plate ................................................................................................................................................. 36
2.8 Column Splice – Flange Cover Plate, Nonbearing Splice ................................................................................................ 37
2.9 Bolted End Plate Connection (Unstiffened) ......................................................................................................................... 39
2.10 Bolted End Plate Haunched ........................................................................................................................................................ 40
2.11 Unstiffened Column Base Plate ................................................................................................................................................. 42
2.12 Base Plate ............................................................................................................................................................................................44
2.13 Bracing Connection ........................................................................................................................................................................ 45
Problem
From the reference:
PD = 115 kips
PL = 345 kips
Calculations
Pu = 1.2(115 kips) + 1.6(345 kips) = 690 kips
Comparison
Table 1: Comparison with AISC Design Example J-7
Notes:
1. RAM Connection reports the Pp separately, and multiplying by ϕ = 0.65 gives a value of 875.16 kips.
Input Data
The following data is input into the New Joint dialog:
Joint Data tab
• Joint = CB
• Column/Section = W 12x96
• Column/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50 (from AISC database and according to the reference)
Loads tab
• Axial = -690 kips
The following data is input into the Connection Pad:
Base Plate group
• Longitudinal dimension = 22 in.
• Transverse dimension = 22 in.
• Thickness = 2 in.
Support group
• Longitudinal dimension = 24 in.
• Transverse dimension = 24 in.
• Material = C 3-40
Anchor group
• Longitudinal edge distance on the plate = 2 in.
• Transverse edge distance on the plate = 2 in.
Note: Any anchor bolt diameter and material may be used for this comparison, as these values
do not affect the compared results with the reference.
Problem
From the reference:
PD = 6.20 kips
PL = 18.5 kips
Comparison
Table 2: Comparison with AISC Design Example K-1
Input Data
The following data is input into the New Joint dialog:
Joint Data tab:
Joint = BCF
Beam/Section = W 16x50
Beam/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Column/Section = HSS_SQR 8x8x1_4
Column/Material = H500 GrB Rectangular
Loads tab:
V2 (beam) = 37 kips
Problem
From the reference:
PD = 37.5 kips
PL = 113 kips
Calculations
Vu = 1.2(37.5) + 1.6(113) = 226 kips
Comparison
Table 3: Comparison with AISC Design Example K-3
Input Data
The following data is input into the New Joint dialog:
Joint = BCF
Beam/Section = W 36x231
Beam/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Column/Section = HSS_SQR 14x14x1_2
Column/Material = H500 GrB Rectangular
Loads tab:
Note: These values are both used for demonstrative purposes, as the example does not provide
cope dimensions.
Angle group:
Tee group:
Problem
From the reference:
PD = 9.00 kips
PL = 27.0 kips
Calculations
Vu = 1.2(9.00) + 1.6(27.0) = 54 kips
Comparison
Table 4: Comparison with AISC Design Example K-4
Input Data
The following data is input into the New Joint dialog:
Joint Data tab:
Joint = BCF
Beam/Section = W 21x62
Beam/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Beam/Beam setback, sb = 0.75 in.
Column/Section = HSS_SQR 12x12x1_2
Column/Material = A500 GrB Rectangular
Loads tab:
V2 (beam) = 54 kips
Problem
From the reference:
Calculations
Vu = 1.2(7) + 1.6(21) = 42 kips
Mu = 1.2(42) + 1.6(126) = 252 kip·ft
Comparison
Table 5: Comparison with AISC Design Example II.B-4
Input Data
The following data is input into the New Joint dialog:
Joint Data tab:
Joint = BCF
Beam/Section = W 18x50
Beam/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Column/Section = W14x99
Column/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Loads tab:
V2 (beam) = 42 kips
M33 (beam) = 252 kip·ft
Select the Smart Connections/Smart MEP Extended both ways (DG4/Seismic) connection type.
The following data is input into the Connection Pad:
Moment End Plate group:
Problem
From the reference:
Calculations
Vu = 1.2(7) + 1.6(21) = 42 kips
Mu = 1.2(42) + 1.6(126) = 252 kip·ft
Comparison
Table 6: Comparison with AISC Design Example II.B-4
Input Data
The following data is input into the New Joint dialog:
Joint Data tab:
Joint = BCF
Beam/Section = W 18x50
Beam/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Column/Section = W14x99
Column/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Loads tab:
V2 (beam) = 42 kips
M33 (beam) = 252 kip·ft
Select the Smart Connections/Smart MEP Extended both ways (DG4/Seismic) connection type.
The following data is input into the Connection Pad:
Moment End Plate group:
Problem
From the reference:
RD = 10 kips
RL = 30 kips
The beam top flange is coped 2 in. deep by 4 in. long, Lev = 1¼ in., Leh =
1¾ in. Use ¾-in.-diameter ASTM 325-N or F1852-N bolts in standard
holes and ASTM A36 angles
Calculations
Vu = 1.2(10) + 1.6(30) = 60 kips
Comparison
Table 7: Comparison with AISC Design Example II.A-4
Input Data
The following data is input into the New Joint dialog:
Joint Data tab:
Joint = BG
Beam/Section = W 18x50
Beam/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Column/Section = W21x62
Column/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Loads tab:
V2 (beam) = 60 kips
Problem
From the reference:
Calculations
Vu = 1.2(7) + 1.6(21) = 42 kips
Mu = 1.2(42) + 1.6(126) = 252 kip·ft
Comparison
Table 8: Comparison with AISC Design Example II.B-1
Input Data
The following data is input into the New Joint dialog:
Joint Data tab:
Joint = BCF
Beam/Section = W 18x50
Beam/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Column/Section = W14x99
Column/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Loads tab:
V2 (beam) = 42 kips
M33 (beam) = 252 kip·ft
Problem
Refer to Joint JT-1 in Figure 3-2 of the reference. Design a bolted flange-plated fully restrained moment
connection between Beam BM-1 and Column CL-1. The beam and column are ASTM A992 W-shpaes and ASTM
A36 is used for the connecting material. Use ASTM A325-N bolts and 70-ksi electrodes.
From the reference:
LRFD
Vu = 33.9 kips
Mu = 316 kip·ft
Comparison
Table 9: Comparison with AISC Seismic Design Example 3.4.4
Input Data
The following data is input into the New Joint dialog:
Joint Data tab:
Joint = BCF
Beam/Section = W 18x55
Beam/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Column/Section = W 12x87
Column/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Loads tab:
Problem
Refer to Joint JT-1 in Figure 4-2 of the reference. Design a fully restrained (FR) moment connection for the
configuration shown in Figure 4-3 of the reference. The beam and column are ASTM A992 W-shapes and the
plate material is ASTM A36. Use 70-ksi electrodes and ASTM A325 bolts.
To avoid the field welding requirements associated with the prescriptive connection described in AISC Seismic
Provisions Section E1.6b(c), an eight-bolt stiffened end-plate connection is used.
The required shear strengths for the column based on a second-order analysis are given in Example 4.2.2. The
other shear forces acting at the beam end simultaneously with Emh are:
VD = 4.86 kips
VS = 6.49 kips
Calculations
VEV = 0.2SDSD = 0.2×(0.528)×(4.86 kips) = 0.513 kips
Comparison
Table 10: Comparison with AISC Seismic Design Example 4.2.4
Beam web weld strength 170.1 14.2 kip/in (170.4 kip/ft) < 1%
to reach yield stress
(kip/ft)
Input Data
The following data is input into the New Joint dialog:
Joint Data tab:
Joint = BCF
Beam/Section = W 18x40
Beam/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Column/Section = W 12x35
Column/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Seismic load resisting system = OMF (set
Loads tab:
Set the Seismic Parameters option in the Connection Design Configuration dialog.
Select the Smart Connections/Smart MEP Extended both ways (DG4/Seismic) connection type.
The following data is input into the Connection Pad:
Members group:
Connector group:
Position = both
Full depth = Check (set the option)
Transverse stiffeners width, bs = 3 in.
Transverse stiffener thickness, ts = 0.50 in.
Material = A36
Welding electrode to support = E70XX
Weld size to support (1/16s in), D = 4
Problem
The SMF beam-column connection design presented in this example has been chosen to demonstrate the
application of the design provisions for prequalified RBS connections in accordance with ANSI/AISC 358. This
example demonstrates that the RBS geometry developed below is satisfactory. Some of the results from this
example are used in Example 4.3.3. The geometry of an RBS connection is not unique and alternative
configurations of the RBS geometry are possible.
Refer to Joint JT-1 in Figure 4-8 of the reference. Design the connection between Beam BM-1 and Column CL-1
using the reduced beam section (RBS) shown in Figure 4-9 of the reference. All beams and columns are ASTM
A992 W-shapes. Plate material is ASTM A572 Grade 50. The gravity loads on the beam are:
wD = 0.84 kip/ft
wL = 0.60 kip/ft
Calculations
VD = 30 ft × 0.94 kip/ft = 25.2 kips
VL = 30 ft × 0.60 kip/ft = 18 kips
Comparison
Table 11: Comparison with AISC Seismic Design Example 4.3.4
Input Data
The following data is input into the New Joint dialog:
Joint Data tab:
Joint = BCF
Beam/Section = W 24x76
Beam/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Column/Section = W 114x176
Column/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Seismic load resisting system = OMF (set
The following data can be added after the Seismic Parameters option is set in the Connection
Design Configuration dialog:
Loads tab:
Note: Two load case types: DL and LL are added using the Load Conditions dialog.
Design criteria / Frame stability considered in analysis = checked (set the option)
Position = both
Full depth = checked (set the option)
Transverse stiffeners width, bs = 5.5 in.
Corner clip length, cc = 1 in.
Corner clip width, cc = 1 in.
Transverse stiffener thickness, ts = 0.75 in.
Material = A572 Gr 50
Welding electrode to support = E70XX
Weld size to support (1/16s in), D = 8
Note: RAM Connection cannot use different dimensions for transverse stiffeners on both sides.
Problem
An alternative design for Example 5.3.8 at Joint JT/1 of Figure 5-11 in the reference is presented here in this
example. Example 5.3.8 used separate gusset plates for each brace, while this example uses continuous “chevron
type” gusset plates for the top and bottom braces as shown in Figure 5-29 in the reference. This is a common
arrangement for this situation, and the example provides and admissible internal force distribution that differs
from the distribution used for the four separate gusset plates. All braces are ASTM A500 Grade B round HSS and
the beam is an ASTM A992 W27x114. For the connection, ASTM A36 plate material and 70-ksi electrodes are
used.
Refer to the figure in the reference for additional details.
Comparison
Table 12: Comparison with AISC Seismic Design Example 5.3.9
Notes:
1. Refer to Figure 5-30a in the reference.
2. Refer to Figure 5-30b in the reference.
Input Data
The following data is input into the New Joint dialog:
Joint Data tab:
Joint = CVR
Actual members / Upper gusset = yes
Actual members / Lower gusset = yes
Beam/Section = W 27x114
Beam/Material = ASTM A992 Gr50
Upper right brace / Section = HSS_SQR 6x6x5_16
Upper right brace / Material = A500 GrB Rectangular
Upper left brace / Section = HSS_SQR 6x6x5_16
Upper left brace / Material = A500 GrB Rectangular
Lower right brace / Section = HSS_RND 6.875x0.500
Lower right brace / Material = A500 GrB Rounded
Lower left brace / Section = HSS_RND 6.875x0.500
Lower left brace / Material = A500 GrB Rounded
The following data can be added after the Seismic Parameters option is set in the Connection
Design Configuration dialog:
Loads tab:
Members group:
Upper right brace / Additional geometric data / Minimum distance to other members, Le = 8 in.
Upper right brace / Additional geometric data / Left distance, Le1 = 1 in.
Upper right brace / Additional geometric data / Right distance, Le2 = 1 in.
Upper right brace / Additional geometric data / Length on beam, LH = 23 in.
Upper left brace / Additional geometric data / Minimum distance to other members, Le = 8 in.
Upper left brace / Additional geometric data / Left distance, Le1 = 1 in.
Upper left brace / Additional geometric data / Right distance, Le2 = 1 in.
Upper left brace / Additional geometric data / Length on beam, LH = 23 in.
Lower right brace / Additional geometric data / Minimum distance to other members, Le = 10 in.
Lower right brace / Additional geometric data / Left distance, Le1 = 1 in.
Lower right brace / Additional geometric data / Right distance, Le2 = 1 in.
Lower right brace / Additional geometric data / Length on beam, LH = 25.5 in.
Lower left brace / Additional geometric data / Minimum distance to other members, Le = 10 in.
Lower left brace / Additional geometric data / Left distance, Le1 = 1 in.
Lower left brace / Additional geometric data / Right distance, Le2 = 1 in.
Lower left brace / Additional geometric data / Length on beam, LH = 25.5 in.
Interfaces group:
Problem
The RBS connection is a pre-qualified connection type per AISC 358. This design example follows the procedure
outlined in AISC 358 with reference to AISC 341 and AISC 360.
The basis for the prequalification of the RBS connection is widely attributed to initial RBS connection tests
conducted at the University of Texas Ferguson Laboratory (Engelhardt etal., 1996). Extensive additional testing
of RBS joint combinations performed as part of projects confirmed the viability of the connection using myriad
beam and column sizes. Further information on the research supporting the validity of pre/qualification
parameters may be found in FEMA-355D State of the Art Report on Connection Performance and AISC 358.
The following calculations comprise a design methodology that is inherently iterative and requires some
experience to gain proficiency. After considering code drift limits and evaluating several combinations for strong
column-weak beam and panel zone strength criteria, the combination of a W27x84 beam and W14x176 column
was selected for use in the factored load combinations (Part 5), and this combination of beam and column sizes
in the computer analysis results in overall frame drifts within the code limits (Part 4). The W14x176 column was
chosen to elucidate details associated with doubler plates and possibly reduce the cost of the frame. When given
the option, steel fabricators have elected W14x176 columns are to be full-height, one length. Full=height
columns without splices were found to be the least-cost option. Column splices in SMFs must comply with AISC
341. The reduced beam section (RBS) connection developed in this example is shown in Figure 3-8 and 3-13
Comparison
Parameter RAM Connection Reference Difference
Input Data
The following data is input into the New Joint dialog:
Joint Data tab:
Joint = BCF
Beam / Section = W27x84
Beam / Material = ASTM A992 Gr 50
Column / Section = W14x176
Column / Material = ASTM A992 Gr 50
The following data can be added after the Seismic Parameters option is set in the Connection
Design Configuration dialog:
Loads tab:
DL / V2 = 16.4 kips
DL / M33 = 86.83 kip·ft
LL / V2 = 13.3 kips
LL / M33 = 77 kip·ft
EQ / V2 = 19 kips
EQ M 33 = 256.9 kip·ft
Note: Three load case types: DL, LL, and EQ are added using the Load Conditions dialog. The
Generate Load Combinations dialog is then used to create a load combination per AISC 341-05
LRFD amplified seismic factored combos.
Design criteria / Frame stability considered in analysis = checked (set the option)
Problem
From the reference:
Check the following beam to beam connection for the design forces
shown. Yellow pages are used for the initial selection of the connection
detail. A fin plate with a single vertical line of bolts would be adequate for
both connections in this example, but a double vertical line was used for
the 533 x 229 x 92 UKB in order to demonstrate the design checks
required for this configuration.
Comparison
Table 13: Comparison with SCI P358 Fin Plate Example 1
Fin plate bolt group shear: VRd 584.07 577 None (The difference is due to
(kN) rounding)
Fin plate bolt group bearing : VRd 572.48 574 None (The difference is due to
(kN) rounding)
Fin plate block tearing: VVd (kN) 494.38 494 None (The difference is due to
rounding)
Beam web in shear gross area: VRd 793.64 794 None (The difference is due to
(kN) rounding)
Beam web shear net section: VRd 836.6 837 None (The difference is due to
(kN) rounding)
Beam block tearing: VRd (kN) 480.51 481 None (The difference is due to
rounding)
Problem
From the reference:
Check the following beam to column connection for the tying force
shown.
Note: Fin plate example, but we use to test “Double cleats angle” similar capacities.
Comparison
Table 14: Comparison with SCI P358 Fin Plate Example 2
Angle - beam side block tearing due 1,321 661 None (In reference the capacity is
to tension: FRd (kN) for one fin plate)
Angle – beam side bolt shear: FRd 855.27 428 None (In reference the capacity is
(kN) for one fin plate)
Angle – beam side bolt bearing due 1,129.48 560 None (In reference the capacity is
to tension: FRd (kN) for one fin plate)
Beam side block tearing due to 597.37 597 None (The difference is due to
tension: FRd (kN) rounding)
Beam side bolt bearing due to 429.20 432 None (The difference is due to
tension: FRd (kN) rounding)
Problem
From the reference:
Check the following beam to hollow section column connection for the
design forces shown using property class 8.8 bolts in Flowdrill threaded
holes in the column.
Note:
The connections should be checked independently for (i) shear forces and
(ii) tying forces and not for both forces acting at the same time.
Comparison
Table 15: Comparison with SCI P358 End Plates Example 3
Shear resistance of beam web at the 620.59 621 None (The difference is due to
connection: Vpl,Rd (kN) rounding)
End plate bolt group shear: VVd 903.17 902 None (The difference is due to
(kN) rounding)
End plate shear at gross section: 1,290.17 1,290 None (The difference is due to
VVd (kN) rounding)
End plate shear at net section: VVd 1,539.07 1,539 None (The difference is due to
(kN) rounding)
End plate block tearing: VVd (kN) 1,194.99 1,195 None (The difference is due to
rounding)
Web or wall local net shear with 1,196.43 1,233 None (Reference error; using d0 as
one beam: VVd (kN) bolt diameter and not hole
diameter)
Structural integrity (Plate side) 449.55 451 None (The difference is due to
Tension: FFd (kN) rounding)
Structural integrity (Beam side) 1,618.75 1,619 None (The difference is due to
Web in tension: FFd (kN) rounding)
Structural integrity (support side) 860.45 862 None (The difference is due to
Wall tying capacity: FFd (kN) rounding)
Problem
From the reference:
Comparison
Table 16: Comparison with SCI P358 Column Splices Example 4
Plate and bolt tension: FFd (kN) 842.89 867 None (The difference is due to
rounding)
Bolt tension: FFd (kN) 1,219.97 1,218 None (The difference is due to
rounding)
Problem
From the reference:
Comparison
Table 17: Comparison with SCI P358 Column Splices Example 5
Plate tension: FEd (kN) 1,031.14 1,030 None (The difference is due to
rounding)
Plate and bolt tension: FEd (kN) 1,063.34 1,061 None (The difference is due to
rounding)
Bolt tension: FEd (kN) 1,626.62 1,624 None (The difference is due to
rounding)
2.6 Column splice – Web Angle Cleats, Bearing Splice (No Net Tension)
Reference
Steel Construction Institute. 2011. Joints in Steel Construction – Simple Joints to Eurocode 3 (Publication P358).
Ascot:The Steel Construction Institute. pp 198-201. Co-published by The British Constructional Steelwork
Association Limited.
Problem
From the reference:
Note: Example does not need checks on shear, because can be resisted by friction across the bearing surfaces.
Comparison
Table 18: Comparison with SCI P358 Column Splices Example 1
Problem
From the reference:
Design a bolted cover plate beam splice that connects two 457 x 191 x 67
UKB S275 sections. The splice carries a vertical shear, an axial force and
bending moment and is to be non-slip at serviceability (Category B
connection). The splice is located near to a restraint therefore it will not
carry moments due to strut action.
Comparison
Table 19: Comparison with SCI P398 Example D.1 Beam Splice
Beam shear at net section: (kN) 760.19 764 None (Reference error; using “r”
wrong value)
Problem
From the reference:
Comparison
Table 20: Comparison with SCI P358
Plate bolt group shear: FFd (kN) 828.85 840 None (The difference is due to
rounding)
Bolt resistance to bending (kN·m) 270.62 274 None (The difference is due to
rounding)
Bolt resistance to bending: FFd 103.61 105 None (The difference is due to
(kN) rounding)
Plate shear: VVd (kN) 857.37 779 None (Reference error, using wrong
γM0 factor)
Bolt shear: FFd (kN) 103.61 105 None (The difference is due to
rounding)
Problem
From the reference:
Determine the resistances for the extended end plate connection shown
below. It may be assumed that the design moments in the two beams are
equal and opposite.
Comparison
Table 21: Comparison with SCI P398 Example C.1
Row 1, alone, column web in 712.69 790 Example reference using wrong beff
transverse tension: FFd (kN)
Row 3, alone, column web in 712.69 790 Example reference using wrong beff
transverse tension: FFd (kN)
Problem
From the reference:
Comparison
Table 22: Comparison with Example: Portal frame - eaves moment connection
Without Row 1, alone, column flange 324.71 298 Example uses calculations for leff
suppleme bending: FFd (kN) and beff that are not reference in the
ntary web standard
plates
Row 1, alone, column web in 481.12 355 Example uses calculations for leff
transverse tension: FFd (kN) and beff that are not reference in the
standard
Row 1, alone, end plate bending: 325 298 Example uses calculations for leff
FFd (kN) and beff that are not reference in the
standard
Row 2, alone, column flange 351.62 294 Example uses calculations for leff
bending: FFd (kN) and beff that are not reference in the
standard
Row 2, alone, column web in 600.14 337 Example uses calculations for leff
transverse tension: FFd (kN) and beff that are not reference in the
standard
Row 3, alone, column flange 351.62 291 Example uses calculations for leff
bending: FFd (kN) and beff that are not reference in the
standard
Row 3, alone, column web in 600.14 323 Example uses calculations for leff
transverse tension: FFd (kN) and beff that are not reference in the
standard
Row 4, alone, column flange 351.62 291 Example uses calculations for leff
bending: FFd (kN) and beff that are not reference in the
standard
Row 4, alone, column web in 600.14 323 Example uses calculations for leff
transverse tension: FFd (kN) and beff that are not reference in the
standard
Row 5, alone, column web in 600.14 465 Example uses calculations for leff
transverse tension: FFd (kN) and beff that are not reference in the
standard
Compression zone, Column web in 1,799.91 1,966 Example uses calculations for leff
transverse compression: FFd (kN) and beff that are not reference in the
standard
With Compression zone, column web 1,914.80 1,726 Example uses calculations for leff
suppleme panel in shear: VVd (kN) and beff that are not reference in the
ntary web standard
plates
Moment resistance of joint: MMd 922.18 912 None
(kN·m)
Problem
From the reference:
Verify the resistance of the unstiffened column base plate shown below.
Comparison
Table 23: Comparison with SCI P398 Example E.1
Column – Weld shear: FFd (kN) 490.48 1,216 Wrong effective weld length used in
reference
Problem
From the reference:
Check the RHS column base for the design forces shown.
Comparison
Table 24: Comparison with SCI P358 Column Bases Example 3
Problem
From the reference:
Design summary:
a. The wind loading at each floor is transferred to two vertically braced
end bays on grid lines ‘A’ and ‘J’ by the floors acting as diaphragms.
b. The bracing system must carry the equivalent horizontal forces (EHF)
in addition to the wind loads.
c. Locally, the bracing must carry additional loads due to imperfections
at splices (cl 5.3.3(4)) and restraint forces (cl 5.3.2(5)). These
imperfections are considered in turn in conjunction with external
lateral loads but not at the same time as the EHF.
d. The braced bays, acting as vertical pin-jointed frames, transfer the
horizontal wind load to the ground.
e. The beams and columns that make up the bracing system have
already been designed for gravity loads1). Therefore, only the diagonal
members have to be designed and only the forces in these members
have to be calculated.
f. All the diagonal members are of the same section, thus, only the most
heavily loaded member has to be designed.
Comparison
Table 25: Comparison with SCI P387 Example No. 09 - Bracing and bracing connections
H S
HSS seismic detailing 18–26