MMW Module2 Mathematical Language and Symbols The Importance of Mathematics Language
MMW Module2 Mathematical Language and Symbols The Importance of Mathematics Language
According to Schiro (1997), one very important element in a student’s mathematical success is his
being able to communicate effectively in mathematics.
Students should be given opportunities to correctly read, write, speak about and understand
the math language in the classroom
Discover the purpose for communicating mathematically with numerals or symbols
The language of math would make it easy for the students to communicate their ideas among
themselves:
Precise – well defined and clearly stated, lacks ambiguity unlike ordinary language
Concise – briefly stated
Powerful – complex ideas are well expressed
Nontemporal – No tenses (present, past or future)
Expressions – combination of numbers or symbols or both (the noun given to a math object/does
not make sense)
Just like any ordinary language sentences of mathematics also have complicated structures which
can be easily understood if one knows some of the basic terminologies of grammar in math.
Some parts of speech in math language are very similar to those in natural language and some are
quite different.
FOUR BASIC CONCEPTS Mathematical sentences can be written using the following:
Sets
Functions
Relations
Binary Operations
Binary operations act like a conjunction that sits between two objects (nouns)
EX “two plus four”
Some familiar examples of binary operations are “plus”, “minus”, “times”, “divided by” and “raised
to the”
SYMBOLIC LOGIC
Symbolic logic studies relationships of natural language by using symbols.
Main ingredients are statements and connectives
SENTENCES
A statement is an assertion of something that can be either true or false.
The following sentences:
It is sunny today;
Ms. W. will have a broader audience next month;
I did not join the club;
Not sentences:
How’s the weather? (questions)
Cool! (interjections)
SIMPLE STATEMENTS
Simple statements do not contain other statements as their parts. We typically represent simple
statements using letters P, Q, R, ...; for example (small letters are also used)
S:Your bicycle is slick;
C: I like its color.
COMPOUND STATEMENTS
These are combined statements with the use of connectives
***will be discussed thoroughly in Elementary logic
p p is true(Assertion)
¬p p is false(Negation)
Connectives and compound statements.
p∧q p and q (Conjunction) (note: connective “but” uses the same symbol)
p∨q either p or q, or both(Disjunction)
p→q if p then q (Conditional)
p ↔q p if and only if q (Biconditional)
CONNECTIVES
Connectives join simple statements into more complex statements, called compound statements.
The most common connectives and their symbols are:
and/but ∧; or ∨;
if ...,then →.
Example. Your bicycle is slick and I like its color
S ∧ C.
The “operation” not ¬ turns a single statement into its negation and it is not a connective.
The symbols representing statements, connectives, and the negation operation form our dictionary.
Parentheses are used for punctuation.
Note:
The connective or, in logic, has an inclusive meaning.
For example, Bob will play tennis or go to the movies is interpreted as follows:
Bob will either play tennis, or go to the movies, or do both.
The connective but has an identical role as the connective and, thus the same symbol ∧ is used for
both.
For example, Your bicycle is slick, but I don’t like its color is written symbolically as b ∧ ¬ c.
Parenthesis
If I do a web search for pages containing the terms “termites” or “cattle”, then I will search for pages
containing “global warming”.
t: I search for pages containing “termites;”
c: I search for pages containing “cattle;”
g: I search for pages containing “global warming.”
The symbolic form of the compound statement is then (t ∨ c)→g.
Truth table
For example, p can only either be true (T) or false (F), so its truth table (the simplest of all) is:
p T F
The next simplest truth table is the truth table for the negation, whose truth values are always the
opposite as those of the original statement:
p T F
¬p F T
EXAMPLE:
The statements “If the price is right, I will buy this” and “The price is not right or I will buy this”
have the same logical content.
De morgan’s laws
(A) ¬(p∧q) is logically equivalent to (¬p)∨¬q. (B) ¬(p∨q) is logically equivalent to (¬p)∧¬q.
EXAMPLE: It is not true that today is Wednesday and it is raining is equivalent to asserting that
Today is not Wednesday or it is not raining.
Conditional Statement
For statements p and q, with p as antecedent/premise/hypothesis and q as the
consequent/conclusion, the statements are as follows: if p then q; p implies q; p only if q; not p or
q; every p is q; q, if p; q provided that p; q is a necessary condition for p; q is a sufficient condition
for p; p yields q; q follows from p
Bi-conditional
ThBi-conditional
Bi-implication P ←→ Q is well-named as such since it is actually the same as
(P →Q )∧(Q → P).
In prose we can write “P is necessary and sufficient for Q,” for P ←→ Q, which is then the same as “Q
is necessary and sufficient for P,” i.e., Q ←→ P.
TAUTOLOGY
The statement is a tautology if the output in truth table contains entirely of T.
CONTRADICTION
The statement is a contradiction if the output in truth table contains entirely of F.
NEGATION
The negation ¬(p→q) is logically equivalent to the conjunction p∧¬q.
EXAMPLE: My Lord, I reject your proposition that “If we lose the war, then our heads will fall”!
the negation of the statement:
“We lost the war, but our heads did not fall.”
The inverse statement is obtained by negating the antecedent and the consequent.
In symbols, the inverse is (¬p)→¬q.
Its English form is “If you do not stay, then I do not leave.”
The contrapositive statement is one of the most important related conditionals (it will return in the
study of validity of logical arguments).
It is obtained by both negating the antecedent and the consequent and by interchanging them.
In symbols, the contrapositive is (¬q)→¬p.
Its English form is “If I do not leave, then you do not stay.”
QUANTIFIERS
The three quantifiers used by nearly every professional mathematician are as follow:
universal quantifier: ∀ read, “for all,” or “for every;” existential quantifier: ∃ read, “there exists;”
uniqueness quantifier: ∃! read, “unique.”
Here S is a set and P(x) is some statement about x. The meanings of these quickly become
straightforward. For instance, consider
ELEMENTARY LOGIC
Propositions
Verbal or written assertions or statements, declarative sentences that are either true OR false BUT
NOT both:
a) 2 + 5 = 9 (false) b) 5 is a prime number (true)
c) 3 is a prime number but 6 is not (true) d) a + b is divisible by 2 (neither T or F)
e) Every natural number can be written as the sum of the squares of three natural numbers.
(true, Number Theory)
f) Every even number (an integer that is a multiple of 2) greater than 4 can be written as the
sum of two prime numbers (true, law on numbers)
Notes: In a), the subject is “2 + 5” and the verb is “=” (“equals” or “is equal to”); b) the subject is 5
and the verb is “is”; c) compound sentence has 2 subject-verb pairs; d) has free variables, no truth
value until specific values are substituted ( so that divisibility makes sense)
Other Propositions:
4 + 3 = 7 (true, mathematical sentence)
The number 3 is positive and the number 2 is negative ( false, 2 is not negative)
25890134 + 1 is a prime number (either true or false but not both)
If a tree has n vertices, then it has n-1 edges (T or F)
2n + n is a prime number for infinitely many n
Every seven integer greater than 4 is the sum of two prime numbers ( T or F, Goldbach’s conjecture)
a + b = b + a for all a, b ԑ R (Proposition with word “for all”
2n = n 2 for some n ԑ N (Proposition with word “for some”
If the world is flat, then 3 + 3 = 6 ( paradoxical)
Propositional Calculus is the study of logical relationships between statements or propositions which
are usually interpretable as meaningful assertions in real life contexts.
Sentence MAY BE a statement but truth value cannot be ascertained because of ambiguity or lack
of qualification.
Yesterday it was sunny. (meaning of sunny or its reference is unclear)
He thinks Manila is a wonderful city. (“thinks” denotes an opinion)
There is a number x such that x2 = 3. (may be true or false depending on value of x)
Mrs. Reyes is a brunette. (being a brunette is not qualified, lack of antecedence)
There will be moon tonight. (“will” denotes uncertainty, truth is determined in due time)
Paradox: truth value cannot be assigned. Example: “ I am lying to you”. Suppose the statement is
true, I am lying, If I am lying, then the sentence is false. Suppose the sentence is false, then I am not
lying and the statement is true.
Ambiguous Propositions:
Teachers are overpaid.
Farmers are poor.
It is hot in May in the Philippines.
Math is difficult.
Matrices are more interesting than graphs.
X2 = 0 implies x = 0 for all x. (set of all x not specified; would be true for all x ԑ R)
COMPOUND STATEMENTS
NOT ₋ or ⌐ or ̴ negation
OR ˅ disjunction
Arguments expressed in ordinary English can be written in the notation of mathematical logic and
then studied. Consider the propositions and the argument:
Therefore, If it is not a good weather in the afternoon, I should take my umbrella with me.
conclusion: p → r
The conditional statement or implication p → q (if p … then q) can also be read as “p implies q”. p is
the antecedent or hypothesis and q is the consequent or conclusion. As an exercise, give the other
compound statements: converse, inverse and contrapositive. In such a case of p → q, p would be
the premise and q would be the conclusion. (If it is not good weather in the afternoon, then it is
going to rain in the evening)
Note that p → q being true does not imply that q → p is also true. Each statement or compound
statement has its own truth value and these combinations, set as criteria, could be summarized in a
truth table which would ultimately help determine the acceptability of the statements based on
criteria that would help in decision making.
The Truth Table: A table giving the truth values of the compound statements in terms of their
component parts.
Converting to Symbolic Logic Notation:
1. You win a prize of a new car or cash. p: You win a new car q: You win cash.
Answer: p ᴠ q
2. If my mother does not come to get the dishes, my father will.
p: My mother will get the dishes q: My father will get the dishes.
Answer: p ᴠ q My mother or my father will get the dishes
: ⌐p → q If my mother does not come to get the dishes, then my father will.
3. If I go and eat at the restaurant, I’m going to eat fish, but if I go to another restaurant, I’ll have
steak.
p: I am going to eat at the restaurant.
q: I’m going to eat fish.
r: I’ll have steak.
Answer: (p ʌ q) ᴠ [(⌐p) ʌ r]
The truth values of a proposition built up from other propositions by using required
connectives which are respectively determined by the truth values of the original propositions
and way the proposition is built up from them.
The decision of accepting or rejecting a statement depends on the truth values of a proposition.
An acceptable statement is given a decision value or truth value of TRUE, T or 1; an
unacceptable statement is given a decision value of FALSE, F or 0.
The number of decision values (no. of rows in the table) would depend on the number of
propositions n and notation 2n. All criteria (propositions/compound statements) will each have
the same number of decision values.
The truth table summarizes all decision values for propositions and compound propositions.
Whether a tautology or contradiction, the truth table aids in decision making. Truth values are
determined as follows and a sample table is presented.
Assertion and Negation: proposition p and (⌐p) should not be true exactly when (⌐p) and p
are true respectively, and vise-versa. p [or (⌐p)] may either be T or F.
Given:
p and q statements; n = 2; 2n = 22 = 4; 4 decision values
p Q ⌐p ⌐q pʌq pᴠq p→q p↔q
T T F F T T T T
T F F T F T F F
F T T F F T T F
F F T T F F T T
T T T T F F F T T T
T T F F T T F F F F
T F T T F F T T T T
T F F F T T T T T T
F T T T F F F T T T
F T F T T F F F T T
F F T T F F T T T T
F F F T T F T T T T
Tautology : when possible combinations of propositions that form the compound proposition
are all true
Contingent : when possible combinations of propositions that form the compound proposition
are neither all true nor all false (combination of T and F)
Self-Test:
Show that the following compound propositions are Tautology, Contradiction or Contingent:
a) p→p; b) ⌐p ᴠ p; c) [p ʌ (p → q)] → q; d) (p → q) ↔ (q ᴠ ⌐p) are all tautology
e) p ʌ ⌐ p; f) ⌐ (⌐p ᴠ p); g) ⌐ { [ p ʌ (p → q) ] → q } are all contradiction
h) p → [ ⌐p ↔ (p → q) ] is contingent