Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC)

Volume 2, Issue 6, November 2021

ISSN: 2715-5072 DOI: 10.18196/jrc.26140 582

Simulation and Arduino Hardware

Implementation of DC Motor Control
Using Sliding Mode Controller
Alfian Ma’arif 1*, Abdullah Çakan2
1
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2
Konya Technical University, Konya, Turkey
Email: [email protected]
*Corresponding Author

Abstract—The research proposed an alternative controller and robot Manipulator [35][36][37]. Nevertheless, all
to control the Direct Current (DC) Motor using a sliding mode mentioned researches were limited to simulation purpose
controller (SMC) in Matlab Simulink simulation and Arduino only.
hardware implementation. The proposed controller, SMC, was
designed using the system model (equivalent control) and The simulation about sliding mode controller had been
Lyapunov control design (also to prove the stability). The sliding done before [38][39][40][41][42]. They resulted in a good
mode controller had a better response than PID Controller, with performance, but we need the hardware implementation to
no overshoot response in the simulation result. In the Arduino observe more. This research would do not only the simulation
hardware implementation result, the augmented system could but also the hardware implementation. For a simple
reach the reference but has an oscillation and chattering effect
in the control signal. The chattering could be reduced by
implementation, it would use the Arduino microcontroller.
modifying the switching control. Comparing with PID, SMC The advantage of using the Arduino is low-cost [43][44][45],
had a better response with no overshoot. Thus, the SMC could small [46], and has many applications [47][48][49][50].
be used as an alternative controller for the DC Motor. Thus, it will good for the education purpose [51] and the
hardware implementation.
Keywords—DC Motor, Sliding Mode Controller, Arduino,
PID Control, Matlab The paper will be structured as follows. The first section
of the paper is the introduction. Next, the second section is
I. INTRODUCTION the modeling of DC Motor. Then, the next section is the
Direct Current (DC) motors play an important role in sliding mode controller design. The following section is the
vehicles [1][2], robotics [3][4][5], aircraft [6], and industrial result and discussion that consist of numerical simulation and
[7][8][9]. The common controller used in DC motor is hardware implementation. The last section is the conclusions
Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) Controller [10]. The and the future work.
main weakness of the PID controller is inconsistent II. MODEL OF DC MOTOR
performance [11][12]. The parameter of the controller only
has good performance in one set point. In other set points, the The DC Motor diagram is shown in Figure 1. The variable
given response would be different [13]. 𝑣𝐷𝐶 is the DC power supply, 𝑣𝐸𝑚𝑓 is the back electromotive
force voltage, 𝑅 is the armature resistance, 𝐿 is the armature
The other controller is the Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) inductance, 𝑓𝑘 is the friction torque, 𝐽 is the inertia, 𝜔 is the
[14][15][16][17][18][19]. It is not easy to be designed, angular speed, 𝑇 is the motor torque, 𝑖 is the armature current.
especially if it has many inputs. It requires experience, as in
experimental data, to be able to design a suitable controller.
It also needs more memory if it has many rules. Thus, we
need an alternative controller for DC Motor. Another
controller is the state feedback controller [20][21][22].
However, the controller needs all of the state must be
measurable in hardware implementation. Thus it cannot work
only using one sensor.
The alternative controller for DC Motor is the Sliding
Mode Controller (SMC) that has the advantage of avoiding Fig. 1. DC Motor Diagram
uncertainties and disturbance [23][24]. It is similar to the
Variable Structure System (VSS) and is included in the The equations with Kirchhoff voltage law analysis is
nonlinear controller [25]. It has been applied to many obtained as
systems, such as Magnetic Levitation System [26][27], Buck
Converter [28][29], Quadcopter [30][31], Quadrotor [32],
Unmanned Surface Vehicle [33], DC/DC Converters [34]

Journal Web site: http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jrc Journal Email: [email protected]

Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC) ISSN: 2715-5072 583

𝑑𝑖 The parameter value of DC Motor is shown in Table I.

𝑅𝑖 + 𝐿 = 𝑣 − 𝐾𝑒 𝜔 (1) The parameter was used in the simulation and controller
𝑑𝑡 design.
where variable 𝐾𝑒 is the electromotive force constant. The state-space model in (12) and (13) using the
The equation with Newton second law for rotation is parameter from Table 1 was
obtained as
−5.5 37.5 0
𝑥̇ = [ ]𝑥 + [ ]𝑢 (14)
−0.01852 −0.1481 0.3704
𝐽𝜔̇ + 𝑏𝜔 = 𝐾𝑡 𝑖 (2)

where 𝐾𝑡 is the motor torque constant, and 𝑏 is the motor 𝑦 = [1 0]𝑥 (15)
friction constant.
Based on the state-space model, the transfer function
After using the mathematical processing with (1) and (2), model can be obtained as (it can use Matlab function ss2tf)
we obtained
13.89
𝑑𝑖 𝜔(𝑠) = 𝑣(𝑠) (16)
𝐿 = −𝑅𝑖 − 𝐾𝑒 𝜔 + 𝑣 (3) 𝑠2 + 5.648𝑠 + 1.509
𝑑𝑡

𝐽𝜔̇ = −𝑏𝜔 + 𝐾𝑡 𝑖 (4)

TABLE I. DC MOTOR PARAMETER VALUE [52]
Define the state space variables and the control signal Parameter Value
variable as
𝑅 0.4
𝑥1 = 𝜔 (5) 𝐿 2.7

𝐽 0.0004
𝑥2 = 𝑖 (6)
𝐾𝑏 0.0022

𝑢=𝑣 (7) 𝐾𝑡 0.015

𝐾𝑒 0.05
Then, we obtained the derivation of the state space
variable as
III. SLIDING MODE CONTROLLER DESIGN
𝑑𝜃 𝑏 𝐾𝑡
𝑥̇1 = 𝜔̇ = =− 𝜔+ 𝑖 (8) The sliding mode controller needs the model in the state
𝑑𝑡 𝐽 𝐽
space controllable form. Thus, the transfer function model in
(16) can be written time domain as
𝑑𝑖 𝐾𝑒 𝑅 1
𝑥̇ 2 = 𝑖̇̇ = =− 𝜔− 𝑖+ 𝑢 (9)
𝑑𝑡 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝜔̈ + 5.648𝜔̇ + 1.509𝜔 = 13.89𝑣 (17)

Then, we used the substitution to obtain Then, we define the state space variable as

𝑏 𝐾𝑡 𝑥1 = 𝜔 (18)
𝑥̇1 = − 𝑥1 + 𝑥2 (10)
𝐽 𝐽
𝑥2 = 𝜔̇ (19)
𝐾𝑒 𝑅 1
𝑥̇ 2 = − 𝑥1 − 𝑥2 + 𝑢 (11)
𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝑢=𝑣 (20)
The state-space model is
We obtain the state-space model in the controllable
canonical form as
𝑥̇ = 𝐴𝑥 + 𝐵𝑢 (12)
𝑥̇1 = 𝑥2 (21)
𝑦 = 𝐶𝑥 (13)
𝑥̇ 2 = −5.648𝑥2 − 1.509𝑥1 + 13.89𝑢 (22)
Where

𝑏 𝐾𝑡 The first step to designing the sliding mode controller was

𝑥1 − 0 designing the sliding mode function as
𝐽 𝐽
𝑥 = [𝑥 ] 𝐴 = 𝐵 = [ 1] 𝐶 = [1 0]
2 𝐾𝑒 𝑅 𝑠 = 𝑐𝑒 + 𝑒̇ (23)
𝐿
[− 𝐿 − ]
𝐿

Alfian Ma’arif, Simulation and Arduino Hardware Implementation of DC Motor Control Using Sliding Mode Controller
Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC) ISSN: 2715-5072 584

Where variable 𝑒 is the tracking error and variable 𝑐 must A. Numerical Simulation
satisfy the Hurwitz condition (𝑐 > 0). In the section, the simulation used the Simulink Matlab
The tracking error and the derivation are Software. The Simulink setup is shown in Figure 2. The SMC
control signal is in (33).
𝑒 = 𝜔𝑑 − 𝜔 (24)

𝑒̇ = 𝜔̇ 𝑑 − 𝜔̇ (25)

𝑒̈ = 𝜔̈ 𝑑 − 𝜔̈ (26)

where variable 𝜔𝑑 is the reference signal, and 𝜔 is the actual

angular speed.
Define the Lyapunov function as
Fig. 2. Simulation Setup in Simulink Matlab
1
𝑉 = 𝑠2 (27)
Comparing system response with PID, the result for the
2
step reference signal is shown in Figure 3. The detailed
To guarantee the stability condition, the derivation of the system response is shown in Table II. It can be seen that the
Lyapunov function in (27) must be 𝑉̇ < 0 as SMC response did not have an overshoot. Meanwhile, the
PID response had a 22.48% overshoot. Thus, the SMC
𝑠𝑠̇ < 0 (28) response was better than the PID Controller.

The derivation of the sliding mode function is TABLE II. SYSTEM RESPONSE PERFORMANCE

System Response Performance

𝑠̇ = 𝑐𝑒̇ + 𝑒̈ (29) Controller
Rise Time Settling Time Overshoot
SMC 0.6070 1.0899 0
= 𝑐𝑒̇ + 𝜔̈ 𝑑 − 𝜔̈ (30)
PID 0.1830 1.0014 22.4793

= 𝑐𝑒̇ + 𝜔̈ 𝑑 + 5.648𝜔̇ + 1.509𝜔 − 13.89𝑢 (31)

Thus the derivation of the Lyapunov function 𝑉̇ is 1.5

𝑠𝑠̇ = 𝑠(𝑐𝑒̇ + 𝜔̈ 𝑑 + 5.648𝜔̇ + 1.509𝜔 − 13.89𝑢) (32)

To satisfy the condition 𝑠𝑠̇ < 0, the sliding mode 1

controller is designed as
RPM

1
𝑢= (1.509𝜔 + 5.648𝜔̇ + 𝜔̈ 𝑑 + 𝑐𝑒̇
13.89 (33) 0.5
Reference
+ 𝐾 sgn(s)) PID
SMC
Where
0
1, 𝑠 > 0 0 2 4 6 8
sgn(s) = { 0, 𝑠 = 0 (34) time (second)
−1, 𝑠 < 0 Fig. 3. Response system

Substitute (33) to (28), then we get

𝑠𝑠̇ = −𝐾 sgn(s) < 0 (35) B. Arduino Hardware Implementation

In this section, the hardware implementation would be
conducted using Arduino, DC Motor JGA25, Driver Motor
L298, Encoder, and Current Sensor INA219. The device
IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION setup is shown in Figure 4.
The section will be divided into two. The first part is the The result is shown in Figure 5. The SMC control signal
numerical simulation using Matlab Software. Then, the is shown in Figure 6. It can be seen that the system could
second part is the hardware implementation using the reach the reference but had an oscillation. The SMC control
Arduino microcontroller. signal had a chattering effect.

Alfian Ma’arif, Simulation and Arduino Hardware Implementation of DC Motor Control Using Sliding Mode Controller
Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC) ISSN: 2715-5072 585

The sliding mode controller was modified to reduce the 100

chattering effect, as
80
1
𝑢= (1.509𝜔 + 5.648𝜔̇ + 𝜔̈ 𝑑 + 𝑐𝑒̇
13.89 (36)
s 60
+𝐾 )

PWM
|𝑠| + 𝛿
40
Where the parameter 𝛿 is the scalar tuning parameter to
reduce the chattering effect.
20
Control Signal

0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (ms)

Fig. 6. SMC Control Signal

600

500

Fig. 4. DC Motor Hardware Setup

400
Omega (RPM)

The system’s responses and control signal using modified

300
switching function in (36) is shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8.
It can be shown that the chattering effect was reduced, and
the system response was better than before. 200
Reference
The subsequent examination was a comparison between 100 Response
the SMC and PID controller. The result is shown in Figure 9.
It can be seen that SMC 1 and SMC 2 did not have any 0
overshoot. Meanwhile, the PID control had an overshoot. The 0 20 40 60 80 100
PID had a small oscillation than the SMC. Time (ms)

Fig. 7. SMC System Response

V. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK
The paper proposed DC Motor control using the sliding
mode controller in simulation and hardware implementation. 100
Based on the simulation, the SMC had a better response than
PID Controller. Meanwhile, in hardware implementation,
SMC had oscillation to follow the reference. Thus, the SMC 80
could be implemented in the hardware system but still need
improvement to reduce the oscillation. 60
PWM

600
40

500
20
400 Control Signal
Omega (RPM)

0
300 0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (ms)
200 Fig. 8. SMC Control Signal
Reference
100 Response

0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (ms)

Fig. 5. SMC System Response

Alfian Ma’arif, Simulation and Arduino Hardware Implementation of DC Motor Control Using Sliding Mode Controller
Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC) ISSN: 2715-5072 586

600 [14] N. L. Ismail, K. A. Zakaria, N. S. M. Nazar, M. Syaripuddin, A. S. N.

Mokhtar, and S. Thanakodi, “DC motor speed control using fuzzy logic
controller,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2018, vol. 1930, no. 1, p.
500 020026.
[15] Y. A. Almatheel and A. Abdelrahman, “Speed control of DC motor
400 using Fuzzy Logic Controller,” in Proceedings - 2017 International
Omega (RPM)

Conference on Communication, Control, Computing and Electronics

300 Engineering, ICCCCEE 2017, 2017.
[16] K. Sreeram, “Design of Fuzzy Logic Controller for Speed Control of
Reference Sensorless BLDC Motor Drive,” in 2018 International Conference on
200 Control, Power, Communication and Computing Technologies,
SMC 1
ICCPCCT 2018, 2018, pp. 18–24.
SMC 2
100 [17] A. Mousmi, Y. Houm, and A. Abbou, “Implementation of a fuzzy logic
PID controller for a BLDC motor,” in 3rd Renewable Energies, Power
Systems and Green Inclusive Economy, REPS and GIE 2018, 2018.
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 [18] D. Perdukova, P. Fedor, and V. Fedak, “A fuzzy approach to optimal
Time (ms) DC motor controller design,” in International Conference on Electical
Drives and Power Electronics, 2019, vol. 2019-Septe, pp. 48–53.
Fig. 9. Comparing SMC with PID [19] B. Ananthababu, C. Ganesh, and C. V. Pavithra, “Fuzzy based speed
control of BLDC motor with bidirectional DC-DC converter,” in
REFERENCES Proceedings of 2016 Online International Conference on Green
Engineering and Technologies, IC-GET 2016, 2017.
[1] M. A. Hassanin, F. E. Abdel-Kader, S. I. Amer, and A. E. Abu-
Moubarka, “Operation of Brushless DC Motor to Drive the Electric [20] G. Liu and X. Zhang, “State Feedback Control and Applied to PV
Vehicle,” in 2018 20th International Middle East Power Systems Systems Under Improved MPPT Control,” in 2018 IEEE 4th
Conference, MEPCON 2018 - Proceedings, 2019, pp. 500–503. International Conference on Control Science and Systems
Engineering, ICCSSE 2018, 2018, pp. 145–149.
[2] P. Vishnu Sidharthan and Y. Kashyap, “Brushless DC hub motor drive
control for electric vehicle applications,” in 2020 1st International [21] M. Ahmad, A. Khan, M. A. Raza, and S. Ullah, “A study of state
Conference on Power, Control and Computing Technologies, ICPC2T feedback controllers for pole placement,” in 5th International Multi-
2020, 2020, pp. 448–453. Topic ICT Conference: Technologies For Future Generations, IMTIC
2018 - Proceedings, 2018.
[3] J. Meng, A. Liu, Y. Yang, Z. Wu, and Q. Xu, “Two-Wheeled Robot
Platform Based on PID Control,” in Proceedings - 2018 5th [22] D. M. Soares, H. A. M. Calil, and R. M. Stephan, “Cascade Control vs
International Conference on Information Science and Control Full-State Feedback,” in 2019 IEEE 15th Brazilian Power Electronics
Engineering, ICISCE 2018, 2019, pp. 1011–1014. Conference and 5th IEEE Southern Power Electronics Conference,
COBEP/SPEC 2019, 2019.
[4] K. Sharma and D. K. Palwalia, “A modified PID control with adaptive
fuzzy controller applied to DC motor,” in IEEE International [23] J. Yang, S. Li, and X. Yu, “Sliding-mode control for systems with
Conference on Information, Communication, Instrumentation and mismatched uncertainties via a disturbance observer,” IEEE
Control, ICICIC 2017, 2018, vol. 2018-Janua, pp. 1–6. Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 160–169,
2013.
[5] R. R. Carmona, H. G. Sung, Y. S. Kim, and H. A. Vazquez, “Stable
PID Control for Mobile Robots,” in 2018 15th International [24] M. Zhou, D. Mao, M. Zhang, L. Guo, and M. Gong, “A Hybrid Control
Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision, ICARCV with PID–Improved Sliding Mode for Flat-Top of Missile
2018, 2018, pp. 1891–1896. Electromechanical Actuator Systems,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 12, p.
4449, Dec. 2018.
[6] M. Ahmed, N. M. Tahir, A. Y. Zimit, M. Idi, K. A. Abubakar, and S.
A. Jalo, “Improved PID Controller for DC Motor Control,” IOP [25] E. S. Sinekli and R. Coban, “Dynamic integral sliding mode control of
Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 1052, no. an electromechanical system,” in 2017 International Conference on
1, p. 012058, Jan. 2021. Mechanical, System and Control Engineering, ICMSC 2017, 2017, pp.
160–164.
[7] V. Yadav and V. K. Tayal, “Optimal Controller Design for a DC Motor
using PID Tuner,” in 2018 International Conference on Power Energy, [26] R. Uswarman, S. Istiqphara, and D. H. Tri Nugroho, “Sliding Mode
Environment and Intelligent Control, PEEIC 2018, 2019, pp. 442–445. Control with Gain Scheduled for Magnetic Levitation System,” Jurnal
Ilmiah Teknik Elektro Komputer dan Informatika, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 36–
[8] S. A. Bhatti, S. A. Malik, and A. Daraz, “Comparison of P-I and I-P 43, 2019.
controller by using Ziegler-Nichols tuning method for speed control of
DC motor,” in 2016 International Conference on Intelligent Systems [27] H. M. M. Adil, S. Ahmed, and I. Ahmad, “Control of MagLev System
Engineering, ICISE 2016, 2016, pp. 330–334. Using Supertwisting and Integral Backstepping Sliding Mode
Algorithm,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 51352–51362, 2020.
[9] I. Khanam and G. Parmar, “Application of SFS algorithm in control of
DC motor and comparative analysis,” in 2017 4th IEEE Uttar Pradesh [28] K. G. Shankar, D. Jena, and R. Reddivari, “Comparative Overview of
Section International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Internal Model Control Based PID, State Feedback Integral, and
Electronics, UPCON 2017, 2017, vol. 2018-Janua, pp. 256–261. Sliding Mode Controllers for Buck Converter,” in 2019 IEEE
International Conference on Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical
[10] N. M. A. Mohamed, A. A. A. Abdalaziz, A. A. Ahmed, and A. A. A. Circuits and Robotics, DISCOVER 2019 - Proceedings, 2019.
Ahmed, “Implementation of a PID control system on microcontroller
(DC motor case study),” in Proceedings - 2017 International [29] L. Du, P. Huang, and W. Tong, “Research on full-order sliding mode
Conference on Communication, Control, Computing and Electronics control method for buck converter,” in 2019 IEEE 3rd International
Engineering, ICCCCEE 2017, 2017. Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer
Engineering, EITCE 2019, 2019, pp. 1171–1175.
[11] R. V. Jain, M. V. Aware, and A. S. Junghare, “Tuning of Fractional
Order PID controller using particle swarm optimization technique for [30] R. Uswarman, S. Istiqphara, R. A. Yunmar, and A. Z. Rakhman,
DC motor speed control,” in 1st IEEE International Conference on “Robust Control of a Quadcopter Flying Via Sliding Mode,” Journal
Power Electronics, Intelligent Control and Energy Systems, ICPEICES of Science and Application Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 135–143, Jun.
2016, 2017. 2019.
[12] I. S. Okoro and C. O. Enwerem, “Robust control of a DC motor,” [31] R. Uswarman and S. Istiqphara, “Perancangan Sistem Kendali
Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 12, Dec. 2020. Quadcopter Menggunakan Modified Sliding Mode Control,” Jurnal
Nasional Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi (JNTETI), vol. 8, no.
[13] K. Boudaraia, H. Mahmoudi, M. Abbou, and M. Hilal, “DC motor 3, p. 273, Aug. 2019.
position control of a solar tracking system using second order sliding
mode,” in International Conference on Multimedia Computing and [32] D. J. Almakhles, “Robust Backstepping Sliding Mode Control for a
Systems -Proceedings, 2017, vol. 0, pp. 594–598. Quadrotor Trajectory Tracking Application,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp.
5515–5525, 2020.

Alfian Ma’arif, Simulation and Arduino Hardware Implementation of DC Motor Control Using Sliding Mode Controller
Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC) ISSN: 2715-5072 587

[33] C. Xiu and P. Guo, “Global Terminal Sliding Mode Control with the [44] A. A. C. Carcamo, M. G. M. Reyes, and S. M. S. Urbina, “Low cost
Quick Reaching Law and Its Application,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. Pulse Oximeter using Arduino,” in IEEE CHILEAN Conference on
49793–49800, Sep. 2018. Electrical, Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication
[34] S. Lee, Y. C. Jeung, and D. C. Lee, “Voltage balancing control of IPOS Technologies, CHILECON 2019, 2019.
modular dual active bridge DC/DC converters based on hierarchical [45] M. S. Kumar, T. R. Chandra, D. P. Kumar, and M. S. Manikandan,
sliding mode control,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 9989–9997, 2019. “Monitoring moisture of soil using low cost homemade Soil moisture
[35] W. Boukadida, R. Bkekri, A. Benamor, and H. Messaoud, “Trajectory sensor and Arduino UNO,” in ICACCS 2016 - 3rd International
tracking of robotic manipulators using optimal sliding mode control,” Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems:
in 2017 International Conference on Control, Automation and Bringing to the Table, Futuristic Technologies from Arround the
Diagnosis, ICCAD 2017, 2017, pp. 545–550. Globe, 2016.
[36] S. Ilgen, A. Durdu, E. Gulbahce, and A. Cakan, “Sliding mode control [46] G. Gasparesc, “PID control of a DC motor using Labview Interface for
of a two-link robot manipulator using adams matlab software,” in 2018 Embedded Platforms,” in 2016 12th International Symposium on
6th International Conference on Control Engineering and Information Electronics and Telecommunications, ISETC 2016 - Conference
Technology, CEIT 2018, 2018. Proceedings, 2016, pp. 145–148.
[37] T. N. Truong, A. T. Vo, and H. J. Kang, “A Backstepping Global Fast [47] S. Gunputh, A. P. Murdan, and V. Oree, “Design and implementation
Terminal Sliding Mode Control for Trajectory Tracking Control of of a low-cost Arduino-based smart home system,” in 2017 9th IEEE
Industrial Robotic Manipulators,” IEEE Access, 2021. International Conference on Communication Software and Networks,
ICCSN 2017, 2017, vol. 2017-Janua, pp. 1491–1495.
[38] H. Maghfiroh, A. Sujono, C. Hermanu, and B. Apribowo, “Basic
Tutorial on Sliding Mode Control in Speed Control of DC-motor,” Apr. [48] J. Sheng, “Real Time DC Water Tank Level Control using Arduino
2020. Mega 2560,” in IEEE International Symposium on Industrial
[39] B. A. Reddy and D. Sowjanya, “Control of D.C Motor Using Sliding Electronics, 2019, vol. 2019-June, pp. 635–640.
Mode Control under Disturbance Conditions,” in Proceedings of the [49] S. Dhingra, R. B. Madda, A. H. Gandomi, R. Patan, and M.
3rd International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control, ICISC Daneshmand, “Internet of things mobile-air pollution monitoring
2019, 2019, pp. 32–36. system (IoT-Mobair),” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 6, no. 3,
pp. 5577–5584, Jun. 2019.
[40] R. Coban, “Backstepping integral sliding mode control of an
electromechanical system,” Automatika, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 266–272, [50] M. Lobur, D. Korpyljov, N. Jaworski, M. Iwaniec, and U. Marikutsa,
2017. “Arduino Based Ambient Air Pollution Sensing System,” in 2020
[41] S. A. Al-Samarraie and M. Hussein Mishary Me, “A Chattering Free IEEE 16th International Conference on the Perspective Technologies
Sliding Mode Observer with Application to DC Motor Speed Control,” and Methods in MEMS Design, MEMSTECH 2020 - Proceedings,
2020, pp. 32–35.
in 2018 3rd Scientific Conference of Electrical Engineering, SCEE
2018, 2018, pp. 259–264. [51] J. H. Li, “Control system laboratory with arduino,” in Proceedings -
2018 International Symposium on Computer, Consumer and Control,
[42] S. Rakhonde and V. Kulkarni, “Sliding mode controller (SMC)
governed speed control of DC motor,” in 2018 3rd IEEE International IS3C 2018, 2019, pp. 181–184.
Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information and [52] B. Hekimoglu, “Optimal Tuning of Fractional Order PID Controller for
Communication Technology, RTEICT 2018 - Proceedings, 2018, pp. DC Motor Speed Control via Chaotic Atom Search Optimization
1657–1662. Algorithm,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 38100–38114, 2019.
[43] Z. Tir, O. Malik, M. A. Hamida, H. Cherif, Y. Bekakra, and A. Kadrine,
“Implementation of a fuzzy logic speed controller for a permanent
magnet dc motor using a low-cost Arduino platform,” in 2017 5th
International Conference on Electrical Engineering - Boumerdes,
ICEE-B 2017, 2017, vol. 2017-Janua, pp. 1–4.

Alfian Ma’arif, Simulation and Arduino Hardware Implementation of DC Motor Control Using Sliding Mode Controller