0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views

Final

The document profiles 20 police respondents in terms of sex, age, years of experience and education. It then examines their satisfaction levels and whether these differ based on their sex, age, experience or education, finding no significant differences.

Uploaded by

PATRICK CALAMBA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views

Final

The document profiles 20 police respondents in terms of sex, age, years of experience and education. It then examines their satisfaction levels and whether these differ based on their sex, age, experience or education, finding no significant differences.

Uploaded by

PATRICK CALAMBA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Patrick A.

Calamba

1. What is the profile of the respondents in terms of:

1.1 Sex
1.2 Age
1.3 Total years of police experience
1.4 Level of education

Table 1

Distribution Table Showing the Number of Respondents in Terms of Sex

Sex Frequency Percentage


Male 16 16/20=0.8 or 80%
Female 4 4/20=0.2 or 20%
Total 20 100%

Table 2

Distribution Table Showing the Number of Respondents in Terms of Age

Age Frequency Percentage


21-25 years old 4 4/20=0.2 or 20%
26-35 years old 11 11/20=0.55 or 55%
36 and above 5 5/20=0.25 or 25%
Total 20 100%

Table 3

Distribution Table Showing the Number of Respondents in Terms of Total years of


Experience

Total years of experience Frequency Percentage


Less than 2 years 3 3/20=0.15 or 15%
2-5 years 8 8/20=0.40 or 40%
6-10 years 9 9/20=0.45 or 45%
Total 20 100%
Table 4

Distribution Table Showing the Number of Respondents in Terms of Level of Education

Level of Education Frequency Percentage


College graduate 6 6/20=0.30 or 30%
With units in graduate studies 14 14/20=0.70 or 70%
Total 20 100%

2. What is the satisfaction level of the respondents along their work and station/office
atmosphere?

Table 5

Distribution Table Showing the Number of Respondents in Terms of their Satisfaction


Level

Satisfaction Level Frequency Percentage


Strongly Satisfied 81 40.5%
Satisfied 65 32.5%
Somewhat Satisfied 54 27%
Somewhat Dissatisfied 0 0
Strongly Dissatisfied 0 0
Total 200 100%

3. Is there a significant difference in terms of their level of work satisfaction when grouped
according to:

3.1 Sex
3.2 Age
3.3 Total years of police experience
3.4 Level of education

Table 6
Sex Male Female T value
mean Desc sd mean Desc sd
Job 5.21 Not 1.15 5.05 Not 0.01 1.1
Satisfaction significant significant
at p< .05. at p< .05.

Table 7

Age 21 to 35 years od 30 to 45 years old 46 and above F


valu
e
mea Desc sd mea Desc sd mea Desc sd
n n n
Job 5.24 Not 0.2 5.16 Not 0.2 5.12 Not 0.2 0.28
Satisfactio significa 0 significa 6 significa 8
n nt at p< . nt at p< . nt at p< .
05. 05. 05.

Table 8

Experienc Less than 2 years 2-5 years 6 and above F


e valu
e
mea Desc sd mea Desc sd mea Desc sd
n n n
Experienc 5.16 Not 0.1 5.25 Not 0.3 5.1 Not 0.2 0.77
e significa 6 significa 2 significa 0
Satisfactio nt at p< . nt at p< . nt at p< .
n 05. 05. 05.

Table 9

Education College graduate Unit earner T value


mean Desc sd mean Desc sd
Job 5.18 Not 0.6 5.17 Not 0.07 0.09
Satisfaction significant significant
at p< .05. at p< .05.

You might also like