Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Final

    Uploaded by

    PATRICK CALAMBA
    The document profiles 20 police respondents in terms of sex, age, years of experience and education. It then examines their satisfaction levels and whether these differ based on their sex, age, experience or education, finding no significant differences.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Final

    Uploaded by

    PATRICK CALAMBA
    11 views3 pages
    The document profiles 20 police respondents in terms of sex, age, years of experience and education. It then examines their satisfaction levels and whether these differ based on their sex, age, experience or education, finding no significant differences.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document profiles 20 police respondents in terms of sex, age, years of experience and education. It then examines their satisfaction levels and whether these differ based on their sex, age, experience or education, finding no significant differences.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    11 views3 pages

    Final

    Uploaded by

    PATRICK CALAMBA
    The document profiles 20 police respondents in terms of sex, age, years of experience and education. It then examines their satisfaction levels and whether these differ based on their sex, age, experience or education, finding no significant differences.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Patrick A.

    Calamba

    1. What is the profile of the respondents in terms of:

    1.1 Sex
    1.2 Age
    1.3 Total years of police experience
    1.4 Level of education

    Table 1

    Distribution Table Showing the Number of Respondents in Terms of Sex

    Sex Frequency Percentage


    Male 16 16/20=0.8 or 80%
    Female 4 4/20=0.2 or 20%
    Total 20 100%

    Table 2

    Distribution Table Showing the Number of Respondents in Terms of Age

    Age Frequency Percentage


    21-25 years old 4 4/20=0.2 or 20%
    26-35 years old 11 11/20=0.55 or 55%
    36 and above 5 5/20=0.25 or 25%
    Total 20 100%

    Table 3

    Distribution Table Showing the Number of Respondents in Terms of Total years of


    Experience

    Total years of experience Frequency Percentage


    Less than 2 years 3 3/20=0.15 or 15%
    2-5 years 8 8/20=0.40 or 40%
    6-10 years 9 9/20=0.45 or 45%
    Total 20 100%
    Table 4

    Distribution Table Showing the Number of Respondents in Terms of Level of Education

    Level of Education Frequency Percentage


    College graduate 6 6/20=0.30 or 30%
    With units in graduate studies 14 14/20=0.70 or 70%
    Total 20 100%

    2. What is the satisfaction level of the respondents along their work and station/office
    atmosphere?

    Table 5

    Distribution Table Showing the Number of Respondents in Terms of their Satisfaction


    Level

    Satisfaction Level Frequency Percentage


    Strongly Satisfied 81 40.5%
    Satisfied 65 32.5%
    Somewhat Satisfied 54 27%
    Somewhat Dissatisfied 0 0
    Strongly Dissatisfied 0 0
    Total 200 100%

    3. Is there a significant difference in terms of their level of work satisfaction when grouped
    according to:

    3.1 Sex
    3.2 Age
    3.3 Total years of police experience
    3.4 Level of education

    Table 6
    Sex Male Female T value
    mean Desc sd mean Desc sd
    Job 5.21 Not 1.15 5.05 Not 0.01 1.1
    Satisfaction significant significant
    at p< .05. at p< .05.

    Table 7

    Age 21 to 35 years od 30 to 45 years old 46 and above F


    valu
    e
    mea Desc sd mea Desc sd mea Desc sd
    n n n
    Job 5.24 Not 0.2 5.16 Not 0.2 5.12 Not 0.2 0.28
    Satisfactio significa 0 significa 6 significa 8
    n nt at p< . nt at p< . nt at p< .
    05. 05. 05.

    Table 8

    Experienc Less than 2 years 2-5 years 6 and above F


    e valu
    e
    mea Desc sd mea Desc sd mea Desc sd
    n n n
    Experienc 5.16 Not 0.1 5.25 Not 0.3 5.1 Not 0.2 0.77
    e significa 6 significa 2 significa 0
    Satisfactio nt at p< . nt at p< . nt at p< .
    n 05. 05. 05.

    Table 9

    Education College graduate Unit earner T value


    mean Desc sd mean Desc sd
    Job 5.18 Not 0.6 5.17 Not 0.07 0.09
    Satisfaction significant significant
    at p< .05. at p< .05.

    You might also like