Analysing Rwanda Foreign Policy - Final
Analysing Rwanda Foreign Policy - Final
Analysing Rwanda Foreign Policy - Final
SSC4604
M00719397
RWANDA’S FOREIGN POLICY 2
Introduction
In 1990, a guerrilla force made up of exiled Tutsis from Rwanda invaded Rwanda from its
southern Uganda borders. The force called itself the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF). The
invasion intended to overthrow the Hutu-dominated regime in Rwanda's capital, Kigali (Curtis,
2005). After defeating the Hutu regime, that is responsible for the genocide that claimed at least
800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutu within three months, the new Tutsi regime felt the need to
ensure their security and guarantee sustainable peace. Two years after the end of the genocide,
Rwanda military intervened twice in the DRC. The operations initially served limited objectives
The invasion of the DRC by Rwanda in 1998 led to a serious destructive enterprise that
attracted a continental war that drew over seven foreign armies and other rebel groups and
militias. The fighting led to the death of about 3.3 million people from starvation and diseases
that were brought primarily by the war between 1998 and 2002 (MacQueen, 2002). The Pretoria
Agreement signed by Rwandan President Paul Kagame and DRC's Joseph Kabila ended the
major hostilities and led to the withdrawal of all foreign forces from the DRC. Besides the
agreement, the tension between the two neighbours remains high. The recommencement of
hostilities remains a real possibility despite the existence of peace in an insignificant sense
(Ofcansky, 2002). A broad understanding of Rwanda's long-term security interests and foreign
policy concerning DRC can guarantee the forecasts of absolute peace. The paper examines
Rwanda's foreign policy concerning the DRC and highlights the goals, strategies, measures,
methods, guidelines, directives, and agreements surrounding the policy. What were Rwanda’s
foreign interests and government concerns that necessitated the foreign policy in the DRC?
RWANDA’S FOREIGN POLICY 3
Any understanding of the post-genocide foreign policy in DRC ought, to begin with, clarity on
the effects of the Rwandan Civil War. The aftereffects of the genocide are critical in interpreting
the foreign policy of Rwanda in the DRC. Among the critical effects of the genocide was the
influx of Hutu refugees into the DRC. Among these refugees were political and military officials
of the former government that executed the genocide. They mainly settled in the UN-established
refugee camps. The mass exit was facilitated by the French direct military intervention
(MacQueen, 2002). The French were a key supporter of the Hutu regime and launched an
operation that saw the establishment of a humanitarian zone in southern Rwanda. The
humanitarian zone was launched in the closing days of the civil war under 'Operation Turquoise.'
Hutu extremists that initiated and fuelled the genocide used the zone to flee the country
(MacQueen, 2002).
Since the change of guard in Rwanda, there have been tremendous steps that have been
undertaken to ensure the conflict between the DRC’s Hutu refugees and the Rwandan forces
reduces. Diplomatic outreach has been critical, as the foreign policy in DRC has helped to
disarm the militia that constantly attacked the Congolese Tutsi, leading to retaliation by the
Congolese forces. With Rwanda taking up a huge role in the decision making of DRC, several
regimes in DRC have not been cooperative. However, with the intervention by international
bodies and international trade activities, the conflict between the two nations have experienced
peace in the recent past and continue to engage in diplomatic discussions on how to strengthen
their economic and cultural ties. Although DRC experienced a long dictatorial regime,
democracy has helped in making the interaction of the two nations possible. The UK and EU
have recently participated in the democracy of DRC to avert any possibilities of conflict among
RWANDA’S FOREIGN POLICY 4
themselves. Regional cooperation and geopolitics have shaped the state of Rwanda’s foreign
policy.
Following the influx of Rwandan Hutu in the North and South Kivu provinces of the DRC did
not go well with the region's ethnic-communal balance. It provided a humanitarian pretext for
Rwanda's intervention. The numbers swelled, leading to the Congolese Hutu aligning themselves
with the exiled militants from Rwanda. They mobilized attacks against the Congolese Tutsi. The
ethnic cleansing that took place saw the displacement of thousands of Congolese Tutsi. Most of
the refugees fled to Rwanda. The fighting and war that followed saw the fall of Kinshasa, a great
win for Rwanda. The fall of Kinshasa saw the dismantling of large Hutu refugee camps and the
participant in the internal affairs of DRC. When Kabila rose to power, Rwanda and DRC formed
an alliance that seemed delicate as Rwanda dominated the affairs of the DRC. The alliance lasted
Rwanda’s acceptance to sign the Pretoria Agreement formed the basis of its foreign
policy as it withdrew all its troops in the DRC a few months later. However, President Kabila
was not ready to disarm his FDLR soldiers. This was a violation of the Pretoria Agreement. After
the Pretoria Agreement, Rwanda has been a critical supporter of the UN mission in the DRC
through disarmament. The period of Rwanda's good relations with DRC saw the lifting of
millions of people out of poverty through employment. Even though the DRC's war that led to
the loss of millions of people was alleged to have been initiated and perpetrated by Rwanda, the
Rwanda has since strived to meet the UN Millennium Development Goals. The streets
are safe there is a functioning internet connection that has facilitated communication. Schools
and other amenities have been constructed through foreign aid. It has ranked high on the list if
effective investors of foreign aid (Blair & Buffet, 2013). The international community has
continued to with Rwanda while strengthening its support to the DRC about governance. A
second agreement was arrived at the International Conference for the Great Lakes Region that
saw peace negotiations in which both the DRC and Rwanda admitted to the failure of the earlier
Pretoria Agreement. The West has continued to support the two nations to restore total peace and
build sustainable solutions to the conflicts (Blair & Buffet, 2013). These diplomatic approaches
have seen the resumption of peace in the regions and building of bridges between the neighbours
Literature Review
Rwanda’s response to the Hutu influx in DRC and the regrouping of the Congolese Hutu
was facilitated by the proximity of the threat to the country. The geopolitical aspects of the
the two countries. Geopolitics can be defined as the study of the earth's geography on politics
and international relations (Overland, 2015). The Rwandan army understood the geography of
the DRC and thus made it easy for them to invade and destroy the threatening Hutu fighters that
had regrouped in DRC. Geography has been a decisive factor in the development of various
civilisations. Politicians, public officials, leaders, and countries change over time. The geography
of a place is the constant factor that is never subjected to any change. Therefore, geography
remains the fundamental factor in foreign policy because of its permanence (Pejić, 2018).
Geography separates one country’s territory from another and defines the culture of the nation,
RWANDA’S FOREIGN POLICY 6
leading to the definition of cultures that shape the choices of a nation. Some scholars such as
Sanctions by the international community had been issues to Rwanda in the past.
Recently, in 2012, the UN group of experts reported that Rwanda supported rebels in DRC soil.
These allegations led to the cutting of aid from the US, Germany, Holland, and Sweden.
Whereas foreign aid to Rwanda accounts for only 3% of the state budget, the economy was not
affected. After these sanctions, reports indicated that military attacks were stopped temporarily.
The diplomatic message from the international community was strong since it included Rwanda's
key Western ally, the USA. Cross border support of illegal militia ceased after the diplomatic
call.
(Evans & Newnham, 1998). However, the idea of sending troops to another state is old and was
common in many cultures. For example, King Lobengula of the Ndebele nation (Zimbabwe) sent
ambassadors to Queen Victoria to protest the encroachment on his territories by British settlers
(Chan, 2017). Therefore, the Rwandan invasion of DRC is not an isolated case in Africa. In a bid
to create and promote sustainable peace, Rwanda needed to neutralize the forces that were likely
to cause havoc in the post-genocide regime. To explain the decisions that necessitate foreign
policy, this paper shall base arguments on the International Relations Theory with great attention
international institutions play a critical role in the cooperation among states (Shiraev, 2014).
Liberalism is the exact opposite of realism and it is perceived to be a more concrete school of
thought than realism. The Foreign policy in the DRC was a response to the presence of Hutu
RWANDA’S FOREIGN POLICY 7
militants on the Congolese territory and are believed to have perpetrated the Rwandan genocide.
It means that Rwanda was protecting their interests of peace in the invasion of DRC (Goodin,
2010). According to Smith (2018), the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the cold war
led to the rise of the liberal theory of international relations. Within the liberal international
relations theory, other theories support the propositions therein. The theories include the
democratic peace theory, the commercial peace theory, and the institutional peace theory
(Placek, 2012). There is rich scholarly exposure to the liberal theory of international relations.
Liberalism revolves around three major principles including the rejection of power
politics, the accentuation of mutual benefits and international corporations and the
Within these principles, the liberal theory emphasizes three major factors that encourage less
conflict and more cooperation. They include international organizations such as the United
Nations, the international trade that interconnects countries' economies, and the spread of
democracy that reduces interstate war. In the case of Rwanda and DRC, their relationship
remains frosty, but Rwanda is looking west for trade; meaning it is looking towards the DRC.
DRC sells minerals and food to Rwanda while Rwanda sells livestock and food crops to DRC.
These bilateral trade relations are likely to calm the tensions between the two countries to the
mutual benefits from each other. According to the National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda,
cross border trade in 2017 generated $100 million. Up to ninety thousand people cross the
The liberal theory revolves around international organizations, trade and democracy.
Recently, the UN Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) estimated an increase of intra-
African exports by over US $1 billion if the African Continental Free Trade Area is
RWANDA’S FOREIGN POLICY 8
implemented. For Rwanda, it will mean there will more trade with DRC. With international
organizations such as the United Nations becoming more involved in the operations of the
countries, the likelihood of conflict is relatively minimal. This makes the liberal theory more
applicable in Rwanda's foreign policy situation as the major factors and principles at play are
identical to the propositions made by the theory. According to Shiraev (2014), liberals believe
that international organizations are critical in cooperation among states. With correct
international organizations such as the United Nations and increasing interdependence among
states lead to reduced conflict. When the economies of Rwanda and DRC depend on each other
and have cultural exchange among them, the frosty relationship will be forgotten. With mature
and functional democracies, the two nations are slowly creeping out of conflict and are working
towards a united region. Diplomacy is a great tool in making the two nations get to negotiate and
interact with each other to support a non-violent solution to problems (Shiraev, 2014). In this
regard, the liberal international relations theory has broad areas of study such as the democratic
peace theory, the commercial peace theory and the institutional peace theory among others. A
more advanced version of liberalism is neoliberalism which believes that democracies cannot
Rwanda and DRC have made diplomatic progress with Rwanda hosting the DRC
president in 2019 at a business forum that aimed at boosting private investments and regional
integration. According to a report published in RFI, a French news and current affairs media
outlet, the president of Rwanda intends to establish a single regional market that will see all
political divisions set aside. The sign of recognition for the president of DRC played a critical
role in showing signs of better days to come (Okello, 2019). The diplomatic approaches that the
two countries are undertaking are likely to lead to the success of the foreign policy of Rwanda
RWANDA’S FOREIGN POLICY 9
and end all traces of violence that are likely to emanate from the extremist Hutu group of DRC
and other ethnic formations. The grand strategies in the two countries have made them
interdependent.
According to Schneider (2012), the electoral woes that affected DRC in the past were key
contributions to the lack of democratic and institutional development from 2006. Weak
international and continental engagement is the cause of the lack of democracy in the country
(Schneider, 2012). With the dictatorial regime of President Kabila, the Congolese citizens that
voted him felt that he was a deception and any policy brought forward by him was not embraced
by the masses. With the intervention of the United Nations in the elections that have followed the
country is now experiencing stability and citizens are better informed on policy matters
regarding their country and their neighbours (USAID, 2019). The intervention of the UN
explains why liberalism is relevant in the formulation and execution of public policy.
Methodology
the actual contents of the policy and the intentions. The main source of data for this paper were
the foreign policy documents that are available in the government databases and the various
analytical positions in peer-reviewed journal articles. The study took a purely descriptive
approach, as it relied on descriptive secondary data. Rwanda's foreign policy in DRC, as well as
the Pretoria Agreement, were critical documents in analysing the foreign policy. The data from
the secondary sources were analysed to find common ground on the reasons that led to the
In the analysis of the foreign policy, reports on the electoral processes of the two
countries were critical in weighing the level of democracy of the two nations to establish if the
RWANDA’S FOREIGN POLICY 10
foreign policy could survive. Furthermore, all international conferences that included the DRC
and Rwanda were critical in understanding the steps that they have undertaken in reducing the
reoccurrence of violence. The Pretoria agreement gives the initial suggestions and sets the
ground for Rwanda's foreign policy. Journal articles, diplomatic engagements and media reports
also informed the research and gave useful insights on the foreign policy journey that Rwanda
has undertaken and the Congolese relations that have now set the ground for useful trade
Library research is critical as it reveals rich secondary data that is concrete and insightful
scholars have dissected the Rwanda-DRC relations and have reported extensively on the same. It
is one of the most researched African state relations. The Rwandan genocide is another critical
piece in history that contributed greatly to the compilation of this report as it provides the basis
on which an understanding of the Congolese Hutu and Tutsi rivalry conflict. The history also
details how the Hutu fled Rwanda after the change of governance.
Conclusion
Geopolitical factors are critical in foreign policy analysis. In the Rwanda and DRC
situation, territorial grievances and the issue of security jeopardized the claim of national identity
by the Hutu militia in DRC. The invasion was aimed at ensuring Rwanda did not experience
anything close to the genocide that claimed the lives of close to a million people. The fear of
violence and war in Rwanda makes it prepare and neutralize any imminent danger within, and
outside its borders. The liberal international relations theory describes what foreign policy should
have and the things that are considered before its implementation. The proposed study will use
RWANDA’S FOREIGN POLICY 11
secondary data and analyse the foreign policy of Rwanda in DRC. The specifics of the analysis
will be based on geopolitical identities, grand strategy and diplomatic statecraft of Rwanda.
The liberal theory of international relations is critical in understanding the actions taken
by two nations. Despite having a frosty relationship, Rwanda and DRC have benefitted greatly
from the international organization organizations, trade and democracy. The maturity of the
democracies has led to a cease-fire as illegal militia have been disarmed successfully. For
example, the cross-border trade between DRC and Rwanda has seen close to 100,000 people
crossing the border each day for genuine trade. The blossoming relationship between the nations
and international organizations has seen the conflict reduce significantly. Democracy in DRC
played a critical role in ensuring the insurgent group was disarmed successfully. Bilateral
diplomatic talks between the two nations have seen them cooperate in trade and other intra-
References
Blair, T. & Buffet, H., 2013. Stand with Rwanda. Foreign Policy, 21 February.
Chan, S., 2017. Theories of Foreign Policy and International Relations. [Online]
international-relations/
Curtis, M., 2005. Raison d’État Unleashed: Understanding Rwanda’s Foreign Policy in the
Dunne, T. & Schmidt, B., 2007. The Globalisation of World Politics, 4th ed, p. 4 ed. s.l.: Baylis,
Evans, G. & Newnham, J., 1998. The Penguin Dictionary of International relations. London,
Goodin, R. E., 2010. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
MacQueen, N., 2002. United Nations Peacekeeping in Africa since 1960. London: Pearson
Education.
Mugisha, I., 2019. Rwanda turns to DRC as trade with Uganda dips. The East African, 19 May.
Ofcansky, T., 2002. "Rwanda: Recent History,” in Africa South of the Sahara 2002. 31 ed.
Okello, C., 2019. Diplomatic progress as Rwanda hosts DRC president at business forum. RFI,
26 March.
Overland, I., 2015. Future Petroleum Geopolitics: Consequences of Climate Policy and
Pejić, I. M., 2018. Geopolitics of Containment in the Post Cold War World. TEME, 12(4), pp.
1389-1404.
Schneider, M., 2012. Examining the Role of Rwanda in the DRC Insurgency. International
Shiraev, E. B., 2014. International Relations. Oxford University Presses ed. New York: s.n.
USAID, 2019. Democracy, Human Rights and Governance. USAID News, 28 August.