Insurance) : Background To Takaful
Insurance) : Background To Takaful
Insurance) : Background To Takaful
BACKGROUND TO TAKAFUL
Takaful is the Islamic counterpart of conventional insurance, and exists in both life (or “family”)
and general forms. It is based on concepts of mutual solidarity, and a typical Takaful
undertaking will consist of a two-tier structure that is a hybrid of a mutual and a commercial form
of company. This in itself poses significant issues for regulation and supervision. In addition, all
the functions of a Takaful undertaking should conform fully to Islamic law (Shari’a), and this has
implications in other areas of regulation and supervision. This section sets out the background.
There are several forms of contract that govern the relationship between the participants
(policyholders) and the Takaful operator. The most widely used contracts are the mudaraba
(profit-sharing) contract and wakala (agency) contract.
• Pure Mudaraba Model: In a mudaraba model, the Takaful operator acts as a mudarib
(entrepreneur) and the participants as rab ul mal (capital provider). The contract
specifies how the investment profit and/or surplus from the Takaful operation
IFSB & IAIS – Issues in Regulation and Supervision of Takaful (Islamic Insurance) Page
5 of 16
are to be shared between the Takaful operator and participants. Losses are borne solely by the
participants as the providers of capital on the condition that the operator is free from any
misconduct and negligence actions, and in that case the mudarib is not entitled to
receive any compensation for his efforts.
• Pure Wakala Model: under this model, the principal-agent relationship is used for both
underwriting and investment activities. In underwriting, the Takaful operator acts as an
agent on behalf of the participants to run the Takaful fund. All risks are borne by the fund
and any operating surplus belongs exclusively to the participants. The Takaful operator
does not share directly in either the risk borne by the fund or any surplus/deficit of the
fund. Instead, the operator receives a set fee called a wakala fee for managing the
operation on the participants’ behalf, which is usually a percentage of contributions paid.
However, the operator’s remuneration may include a performance fee, charged against
any surplus, as an incentive to manage the Takaful fund effectively. The investment of
the Takaful fund is also based on a wakala contract whereby the operator charges the
participants a fee in exchange for services rendered.
• Combination of wakala and mudaraba contracts: In this model, the wakala contract is
adopted for underwriting activities, while the mudaraba contract is employed for the
investment activities of the Takaful fund. This approach appears to be favoured by some
international organisations and is widely adopted by Takaful undertakings in practice.
In all models the Takaful operator will usually provide an interest-free loan to cover any
deficiency in the Takaful fund. The loan has to be repaid from any future surpluses of the
Takaful fund.
ReTakaful Worldwide
Issue in retakaful
The main problem worldwide is the lack of retakaful companies that are capitalised to the levels
required by insurers and more particularly the lack of ‘A’ rated retakaful companies. This has
resulted in takaful companies having to reinsure on a conventional basis, contrary to the
preferred option of seeking cover on Islamic principles. The Shari’ah scholars have allowed
dispensation to takaful companies to reinsure on conventional basis so long as there are no
retakaful alternatives available. Takaful companies therefore actively promote co-insurance. A
number of large conventional reinsurance companies from Muslim countries take on
retrocession. Therefore a large proportion of risk is placed with international reinsurance
companies that operate on conventional basis. The retrocession from takaful companies ranges
from some 10% in the Far East where Takaful companies have relatively smaller commercial
risks (so far), to the Middle East where up to 80% of risk is reinsured on conventional basis.
Retakaful companies need to ensure that they are capitalised sufficiently to enable them to:
protect the financial stability of takaful companies from adverse underwriting
results
stabilise claims ratios from one year to the next
minimise claims accumulation from losses within and between different
classes
geographically spread risk
increase capacity
increase the profitability of insurers through permitting greater flexibility in the
size and type of risks accepted
secure technical support and help
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services continues to view the long-term growth and development of the takaful sector
positively.
2009 was broadly a profitable year for companies we rate in the sector on a technical basis, excluding the results of
start-up companies.
2009 showed continuing strong premium growth, generally ahead of the conventional insurance sector, although
rates remained soft.
Compared to three years ago, investment portfolios have lower exposure to equities, mainly due to falling
valuations in our view rather than active de-risking.
Saudi Arabia continues to be the main growth area for takaful. Around the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)
region, medical business is pushing growth.
Profitability in Malaysia's takaful sector improved in 2009, after a lackluster performance in both life and non-life
sectors during 2008.
Family business continues to show potential, but 2009 development has only been gradual.
We expect greater operational efficiencies to develop, which could lower expenses and allow true economies of
scale. Takaful fund surpluses could also develop more consistently for distribution to participants.
We anticipate the development of surpluses on takaful funds, which will then be distributable back to participants.
In the GCC region, an increasing obligation to employ local staff may be difficult to fulfil in the medium term in
our opinion given the limited supply of suitably qualified candidates.
After another positive year in 2009, Standard & Poor's believes the takaful and retakaful (Islamic insurance and
reinsurance) sector is likely to continue to grow in 2010. We believe that the long-term viability of these sectors
remains supported by high expected levels of growth, broadly positive technical results, and an increase in
profitability, particularly in the GCC region and Malaysia.
Nevertheless, while these positive factors should support the growth of the sector, we believe that the highly
competitive and, in some cases, developing, nature of the local marketplace, as well as the impact of global
investment markets on returns, continue to place an ongoing strain on sustainable development.
At the same time, we believe competitive pressures from within the sector, and from conventional insurers, means
that success in this market requires careful navigation.
Since our first takaful rating in 1997, we have monitored the rapid development of an industry that we believe has
benefited from the ongoing economic development in its core regions. Having grown from a niche product servicing
limited demand, we believe that takaful has reached a critical mass in the past five years and is now firmly
established within the global risk management markets. We consider the potential for sustained growth in this
market is significant, buoyed by the still-low insurance penetration and the growing recognition and acceptance of
Saudi Arabia
• Al-Tawfeek Co. Saudi Arabia
• Family Takaful Saudi Arabia
• SACIR Saudi Arabia
• Takafol Islamic Insurance Co. Saudi Arabia
• International Islamic Insurance Co. Saudi Arabia
• Al-Aman cooperative insurance (Al-Rajhi) Saudi Arabia
• Arab Eastern Insurance Co. Ltd, E.C. (registered in Bahrain), Jeddah Saudi
Arabia
• Arabian Malaysian Takaful Saudi Arabia
• Islamic Security Saudi Arabia
• Global Islamic Insurance Co. Saudi Arabia
• Islamic Arab Saudi Arabia
• Islamic Corporation for insurance of investment and export credit, Saudi
Arabia
• Islamic Insurance Co., Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
• Islamic International Company for Insurance Saudi Arabia
• Islamic International Insurance Co. (Salamat) Saudi Arabia
• Islamic Takaful & Re-takaful Co. Saudi Arabia/ Bahamas
• Islamic Universal Insurance Saudi Arabia
• Bank Al Jazira Takaful Ta’awuni Saudi Arabia
South Africa
• Al-Noor Risk Solutions, South Africa****
United Arab Emirates
• Abu Dhabi National Takaful Co., UAE.
• Oman Insurance Co.,UAE.
• The Islamic Arab Insurance Co., UAE.
• Dubai Islamic Insurance & reinsurance Co. UAE.
ReTakaful companies
• Islamic Takaful & Retakaful Co. (IRTCo.), Bahamas
• Asean Re-Takaful International Malaysia
• Islamic Insurance & Reinsurance Co. (IIRCo.) Saudi Arabia
• Islamic Takaful and Re-Takaful Co. (ITRCo.) Saudi Arabia
• Tokio Marine Nichido Retakaful Pte Ltd Singapore National Re-insurance Co.
(NRICo.) Sudan.
• BEIT Iaadat Ettamine Tounsi & Saoudi
• Re-insurance (B.E.S.T. Re) Tunisia ARIG, Dubai
• SCOR Asia Pacific (Singapore-French based reinsurance group)**
• Hannover Re, Germany (Retakaful Unit)
• Swiss Reinsurance (Retakaful Unit)
United Kingdom
· Lloyds Syndicate*
· Principle Insurance (previously known as British Islamic Insurance
Holdings)**
Source: icmif.org/takaful, * Resource derived from the author’s knowledge and research,
** Business Insurance, 2007,
*** Post Magazine, 2008,
**** Business Day (South Africa), 2007, The International Herald Tribune, 2006.