Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 125 views

    Vda. de Bataclan vs. Medina, 102 Phil. 181 (1957) Facts

    Uploaded by

    July Bacar
    - The proximate cause of death is the cause that produces the injury in a natural and continuous sequence without an intervening cause. - A bus overturned after a tire burst, trapping 4 passengers including Bataclan inside the overturned bus. Men then arrived with torches to help, unintentionally starting a fire that burned and killed the trapped passengers. - The court ruled that the proximate cause of death was the overturning of the bus, not the subsequent fire, because the fire was a natural result of the bus overturning and call for rescue, not a separate intervening cause.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Vda. de Bataclan vs. Medina, 102 Phil. 181 (1957) Facts

    Uploaded by

    July Bacar
    125 views2 pages
    - The proximate cause of death is the cause that produces the injury in a natural and continuous sequence without an intervening cause. - A bus overturned after a tire burst, trapping 4 passengers including Bataclan inside the overturned bus. Men then arrived with torches to help, unintentionally starting a fire that burned and killed the trapped passengers. - The court ruled that the proximate cause of death was the overturning of the bus, not the subsequent fire, because the fire was a natural result of the bus overturning and call for rescue, not a separate intervening cause.

    Original Title

    Vda. De Bataclan v Medina

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    - The proximate cause of death is the cause that produces the injury in a natural and continuous sequence without an intervening cause. - A bus overturned after a tire burst, trapping 4 passengers including Bataclan inside the overturned bus. Men then arrived with torches to help, unintentionally starting a fire that burned and killed the trapped passengers. - The court ruled that the proximate cause of death was the overturning of the bus, not the subsequent fire, because the fire was a natural result of the bus overturning and call for rescue, not a separate intervening cause.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    125 views2 pages

    Vda. de Bataclan vs. Medina, 102 Phil. 181 (1957) Facts

    Uploaded by

    July Bacar
    - The proximate cause of death is the cause that produces the injury in a natural and continuous sequence without an intervening cause. - A bus overturned after a tire burst, trapping 4 passengers including Bataclan inside the overturned bus. Men then arrived with torches to help, unintentionally starting a fire that burned and killed the trapped passengers. - The court ruled that the proximate cause of death was the overturning of the bus, not the subsequent fire, because the fire was a natural result of the bus overturning and call for rescue, not a separate intervening cause.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Vda. De Bataclan vs. Medina, 102 Phil.

    181(1957)

    Facts:

    Proximate cause is that which, in a natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any new independent
    cause, produces an event and without which the event would not have occurred

    Proximate cause is not, therefore, equivalent to "immediate cause."

    The doctrine of proximate cause has been defined as follows: "Was there an unbroken connection
    between the wrongful act and the injury, a continuous operation? Did the facts constitute a continuous
    succession of events, so linked together as to make a natural whole, or was there some new and
    independent cause intervening between the wrong and the injury?" (Milwaukee vs. Kellog, supra.) The
    question that needs to be asked is: If the event did not happen, could the injury have resulted? If the
    answer is NO, then the event is the proximate cause.

    After midnight on September 13, 1952, a bus of Medina Transportation operated by Mariano Medina,
    left the town of Amadeo, Cavite, on its way to Pasay City, driven by Conrado Saylon.

    There are about 18 passengers and Bataclan is one of the passengers of the said bus who was seated
    beside of the driver.

    At 2 o’clock that same morning, while the bus was running within the jurisdiction of Imus, Cavite, one of
    the front tires burst and the vehicle began to zigzag until it fell into the canal on the right side of the
    road and the bus turned turtle. Four passengers including Bataclan were trapped inside the bus and
    could not get out.

    After an hour, ten men came carrying lighted torch made of bamboo fueled with petroleum. These men
    approached the bus and a fierce fire started, burning and all but consuming the bus, including the four
    passengers. By reason of the death of Bataclan, his widow, Salud Villanueva, filed a suit to recover from
    Mariano Medina compensatory, moral, and exemplary damages and attorney’s fees .The RTC of Cavite
    awarded P1000 to the plaintiffs plus 600 as attorney’s fee, plus P100, value of the goods carried by
    Bataclan for sale in Pasay City. This is for the reason that the proximate cause of the death of Bataclan
    was not the overturning of the bus, but rather, the fire that burned the bus including the four
    passengers. That damages were awarded not for his death but for the physical inquiries suffered by him.
    Plaintiffs and the defendants appealed the decision to CA but the latter endorsed the appeal to SC
    because of the value involved in the claim of the complaint.

    ISSUE:

    WON the proximate cause of the death of Bataclan was not the overturning of the bus, but rather, the
    fire that burned the bus.
    RULING:

    No. Proximate cause as defined in American Jurisprudence is… ‘'that cause, which, in natural and
    continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient intervening cause, produces the injury, and without
    which the result would not have occurred.'

    And more comprehensively, 'the proximate legal cause is that acting first and producing the injury,
    either immediately or by setting other events in motion, all constituting a natural and continuous chain
    of events, each having a close causal connection with its immediate predecessor, the final event in the
    chain immediately effecting the injury as a natural and probable result of the cause which first acted,
    under such circumstances that the person responsible for the first event should, as an ordinary prudent
    and intelligent person, have reasonable ground to expect at the moment of his act or default that an
    injury to some person might probably result there from.

    In the present case under the circumstances obtaining in the same, we do not hesitate to hold that the
    proximate cause was the overturning of the bus, this for the reason that when the vehicle turned not
    only on its side but completely on its back, the leaking of the gasoline from the tank was not unnatural
    or unexpected; that the coming of the men with a lighted torch was in response to the call for help,
    made not only by the passengers, but most probably, by the driver and the conductor themselves, and
    that because it was dark (about 2:30 in the morning), the rescuers had to carry a light with them, and
    coming as they did from a rural area where lanterns and flashlights were not available; and what was
    more natural than that said rescuers should innocently approach the vehicle to extend the aid and effect
    the rescue requested from them. In other words, the coming of the men with a torch was to be
    expected and was a natural sequence of the overturning of the bus, the trapping of some of its
    passengers and the call for outside help.

    You might also like