Developing A Progressive Core Stability Program
Developing A Progressive Core Stability Program
net/publication/245765029
CITATIONS READS
58 5,622
1 author:
Ian Jeffreys
University of South Wales
100 PUBLICATIONS 1,500 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ian Jeffreys on 10 October 2017.
Developing a Progressive
Core Stability Program
Ian Jeffreys, MSc, CSCS
Coleg Powys, Penlan, Brecon, Powys LD3 9SR, U.K.
COLEG POWYS IS AN EDUCA- This involves traditional resis- “softening” of the lower abdominal
tional establishment in the United tance training sessions, where the area (or both). I consider a quarter
Kingdom catering to student ath- focus is on the principal mobiliz- out poor, half average, three-quar-
letes predominantly between the ing muscles for sports perfor- ters good, and full out excellent.
ages of 16 and 19 (essentially the mance and in addition, sessions In our experience the vast majori-
last 2 years of U.S. high school). where attention is focused on de- ty of our athletes only achieve poor
The majority of student athletes veloping the core muscles of the to average scores emphasizing the
are with us for 2–3 years, and op- trunk, especially the underlying need for this work. This lack of
timally developing these athletes stabilizing muscles. To develop core strength and stability can
within the small time scale avail- what I term the core stabilizing manifest itself in inefficient sports
able clearly presents a challenge. muscles (transverse abdominus, techniques and also predisposes
This is further hampered by the internal obliques, pelvic floor, and the athlete to injury.
lack of strength and conditioning multifidus), I have set up a core With the increasing number of
training in U.K. high schools and stability program that consists of core stability exercises being in-
thus the lack of preparation un- 2 dedicated half-hour sessions troduced, one of the challenges is
dergone by athletes before joining every week for all athletes. to apply the appropriate exercise
us. Our screening process has Our initial screening for core to the athlete depending upon his
shown that a vast majority of our stability and control involves a or her own ability and experience.
athletes are deficient in basic simple double leg-lowering test. To facilitate this, our program is
strength and conditioning on ar- Athletes lying on their back are re- based on 5 levels, each one built
rival. Indeed, within the U.K. we quired to raise both legs off the upon the previous stage; this pro-
are one of the few establishments floor with knees to chest, they vides us with a model on which all
committed to a strength and con- then have to contract the trans- program development and appli-
ditioning program. verse abdominus and slowly lower cation can be based. Because of
In our screening process over and slide both legs out to a this sequential nature of the pro-
the last few years what is evident straight position, with feet re- gram, athletes are not allowed to
is the lack of core strength and maining off the floor at all times. I move to the next level until they
stability in our athletes. Therefore, gauge the point at which the ath- have mastered the previous level.
our strength program takes an in- lete loses control of the transverse This 5-level approach allows us to
side out approach, with the pri- contraction, which normally man- classify exercises and to structure
mary focus being on developing ifests itself as an increase in mus- progressive programs for our ath-
the muscles of the trunk area. cle activity in the lower back or a letes built on the firm basis of a