History of Psychology
History of Psychology
History of Psychology
Learning Objectives
It is always a difficult question to ask, where to begin to tell the story of the
history of psychology. Some would start with ancient Greece; others would look to a
demarcation in the late 19th century when the science of psychology was formally
proposed and instituted. These two perspectives, and all that is in between, are
appropriate for describing a history of psychology. The interested student will have
no trouble finding an abundance of resources on all of these time frames and
perspectives (Goodwin, 2011; Leahey, 2012; Schultz & Schultz, 2007). For the
purposes of this module, we will examine the development of psychology in
America and use the mid-19th century as our starting point. For the sake of
convenience, we refer to this as a history of modern psychology.
Psychology is an exciting field and the history of psychology offers the
opportunity to make sense of how it has grown and developed. The history of
psychology also provides perspective. Rather than a dry collection of names and
dates, the history of psychology tells us about the important intersection of time and
place that defines who we are. Consider what happens when you meet someone for
the first time. The conversation usually begins with a series of questions such as,
“Where did you grow up?” “How long have you lived here?” “Where did you go to
school?” The importance of history in defining who we are cannot be overstated.
Whether you are seeing a physician, talking with a counselor, or applying for a job,
everything begins with a history. The same is true for studying the history of
psychology; getting a history of the field helps to make sense of where we are and
how we got here.
A Prehistory of Psychology
Philosophical questions about the nature of mind and knowledge were matched
in the 19th century by physiological investigations of the sensory systems of the
human observer. German physiologist Hermann von Helmholtz (1821–1894)
measured the speed of the neural impulse and explored the physiology of hearing
and vision. His work indicated that our senses can deceive us and are not a mirror
of the external world. Such work showed that even though the human senses were
fallible, the mind could be measured using the methods of science. In all, it suggested
that a science of psychology was feasible.
The response to the new science was immediate and global. Wundt attracted students
from around the world to study the new experimental psychology and work in his lab.
Students were trained to offer detailed self-reports of their reactions to various
stimuli, a procedure known as introspection. The goal was to identify the elements
of consciousness. In addition to the study of sensation and perception, research was
done on mental chronometry, more commonly known as reaction time. The work of
Wundt and his students demonstrated that the mind could be measured and the nature
of consciousness could be revealed through scientific means. It was an exciting
proposition, and one that found great interest in America. After the opening of
Wundt’s lab in 1879, it took just four years for the first psychology laboratory to open
in the United States (Benjamin, 2007).
James McKeen Cattell (1860–1944) received his Ph.D. with Wundt but quickly
turned his interests to the assessment of individual differences. Influenced by the
work of Darwin’s cousin, Frances Galton, Cattell believed that mental abilities
such as intelligence were inherited and could be measured using mental tests.
Like Galton, he believed society was better served by identifying those with
superior intelligence and supported efforts to encourage them to reproduce.
Such beliefs were associated with eugenics (the promotion of selective breeding) and
fueled early debates about the contributions of heredity and environment in defining
who we are. At Columbia University, Cattell developed a department of psychology
that became world famous also promoting psychological science through advocacy
and as a publisher of scientific journals and reference works (Fancher, 1987; Sokal,
1980).
Throughout the first half of the 20th century, psychology continued to grow and
flourish in America. It was large enough to accommodate varying points of view on
the nature of mind and behavior. Gestalt psychology is a good example. The Gestalt
movement began in Germany with the work of Max Wertheimer (1880–1943).
Opposed to the reductionist approach of Wundt’s laboratory psychology, Wertheimer
and his colleagues Kurt Koffka (1886–1941), Wolfgang Kohler (1887–1967), and
Kurt Lewin (1890–1947) believed that studying the whole of any experience was
richer than studying individual aspects of that experience. The saying “the whole
is greater than the sum of its parts” is a Gestalt perspective. Consider that a melody
is an additional element beyond the collection of notes that comprise it. The Gestalt
psychologists proposed that the mind often processes information simultaneously
rather than sequentially. For instance, when you look at a photograph, you see a
whole image, not just a collection of pixels of color. Using Gestalt principles,
Wertheimer and his colleagues also explored the nature of learning and thinking.
Most of the German Gestalt psychologists were Jewish and were forced to flee the
Nazi regime due to the threats posed on both academic and personal freedoms. In
America, they were able to introduce a new audience to the Gestalt perspective,
demonstrating how it could be applied to perception and learning (Wertheimer, 1938).
In many ways, the work of the Gestalt psychologists served as a precursor to the rise
of cognitive psychology in America (Benjamin, 2007).
Behaviorism emerged early in the 20th century and became a major force in
American psychology. Championed by psychologists such as John B. Watson (1878–
1958) and B. F. Skinner (1904–1990), behaviorism rejected any reference to mind
and viewed overt and observable behavior as the proper subject matter of
psychology. Through the scientific study of behavior, it was hoped that laws of
learning could be derived that would promote the prediction and control of
behavior. Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov (1849–1936) influenced early
behaviorism in America. His work on conditioned learning, popularly referred to as
classical conditioning, provided support for the notion that learning and behavior
were controlled by events in the environment and could be explained with no
reference to mind or consciousness (Fancher, 1987).
Psychology as a Profession
As the roles of psychologists and the needs of the public continued to change,
it was necessary for psychology to begin to define itself as a profession. Without
standards for training and practice, anyone could use the title psychologist and offer
services to the public. As early as 1917, applied psychologists organized to create
standards for education, training, and licensure. By the 1930s, these efforts led to the
creation of the American Association for Applied Psychology (AAAP). While the
American Psychological Association (APA) represented the interests of academic
psychologists, AAAP served those in education, industry, consulting, and clinical
work.
Given that psychology deals with the human condition, it is not surprising
that psychologists would involve themselves in social issues. For more than a
century, psychology and psychologists have been agents of social action and change.
Using the methods and tools of science, psychologists have challenged assumptions,
stereotypes, and stigma. Founded in 1936, the Society for the Psychological Study of
Social Issues (SPSSI) has supported research and action on a wide range of social
issues. Individually, there have been many psychologists whose efforts have
promoted social change. Helen Thompson Woolley (1874–1947) and Leta S.
Hollingworth (1886–1939) were pioneers in research on the psychology of sex
differences. Working in the early 20th century, when women’s rights were
marginalized, Thompson examined the assumption that women were
overemotional compared to men and found that emotion did not influence
women’s decisions any more than it did men’s.
Hollingworth found that menstruation did not negatively impact women’s
cognitive or motor abilities. Such work combatted harmful stereotypes and
showed that psychological research could contribute to social change (Scarborough &
Furumoto, 1987).
Timeline
1936- Founding of The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues